Wang Ch, Karabalaeva G, Zhao R, Ding Q, Zhou X. Modern trends in the development of design education in universities in China and Kyrgyzstan. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(56):1040-1049. DOI: 10.54919/physics/56.2024.104wo0
Modern trends in the development of design education in universities in China and Kyrgyzstan
Changning Wang, Gulmira Karabalaeva, Ruixin Zhao, Qiang Ding, Xianfeng Zhou
https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.104wo0
Abstract
Relevance. China and Kyrgyzstan represent different approaches to the provision of design education, driven by socio-cultural and economic contexts. This is what determines the relevance of studying modern trends in the development of design education in these countries, in order to better understand their differences and similarities, as well as to find potential areas of cooperation.
Purpose. The purpose of this article is to study current trends in the development of design education in universities in China and Kyrgyzstan, as well as to identify potential ways to improve the quality of education provided.
Methodology. The methodology of the work is presented by theoretical research methods, including analysis, comparison, and generalization.
Results. The results of the study showed that in China and Kyrgyzstan there is a trend towards the development of design education. In addition, it was determined that an important factor contributing to development is the use of modern digital technologies and computer programs in the learning process. It was revealed that in both countries, special attention is paid to practical training and the development of students' professional skills. In this process, cooperation with industry and enterprises plays an important role, which contributes to the practical orientation of education and provides students with the opportunity to realize their projects in a real environment.
Conclusions. The results obtained are of great importance for understanding the current trends in the development of design education. They can be used to improve the programs and methods of teaching universities, develop partnerships with the industry, as well as to exchange experience between the two countries in the field of design education.
Keywords: digitalization; innovations; exchange of experience; creativity; teaching methods; design education; universities
Suggested citation
References
- Boylston S. Designing with society: A capabilities approach to design, systems thinking and social innovation. New York: Routledge; 2019.
- Meyer MW, Norman D. Changing design education for the 21st century. She Ji: J Desig Econ Innov. 2020;6(1):13-49.
- Fry T, Dilnot C, Stewart S. Design and the question of history. London: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2015.
- Abdullaeva GM. Pedagogical conditions for model formation professional competencies of design students at the university. Modern High Techn. 2022;5:122-126.
- Jin J. Research on innovation of art design education mode in colleges and universities based on computer aided technology. J Phys Conf Ser IOP Publ. 2021;1744:032116.
- Zhang J. Comparison of Chinese and foreign design education and research on the interdisciplinary model of innovative design education in the new era. Educ Theor Appl. 2020;2(1):63-69.
- Benliang H. A review of China’s design education research in the past 20 years – Citespace-based bibliometric analysis. Creat Design. 2021;1:72-79.
- Miaohui W, Yan L, Hiuling W, Zeyu J. The current situation and countermeasures of design education in my country – A method based on data analysis. Educ Teach For. 2020;17:1-4.
- Sodikov NM, Kaldybaev SK. Reforms of higher education in Kyrgyzstan at post-soviet period. Sci New Techn Innov Kyrg. 2016;1:168-171.
- Kasymalieva GM. Problems of preservation of national identity in training specialists in culture and art. Sci New Techn. 2014;2:239-242.
- Voûte E, Stappers PJ, Giaccardi E, Mooij S, van Boeijen A. Innovating a large design education program at a University of Technology. She Ji: J Desig Econ Innov. 2020;6(1):50-66.
- Muñoz JLR, Ojeda FM, Jurado DLA, Pena PF, Carranza CP, Berrios HQ, Molina SU, Farfan ARM, Arias-Gozales JL, Vasquez-Pauca MJ. Systematic review of adaptive learning technology for learning in higher education. Eur J Educ Res. 2022;98(98):221-233.
- Haleem A, Javaid M, Qadri MA, Suman R. Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustain Oper Comp. 2022;3:275-285.
- Hamilton D, McKechnie J, Edgerton E, Wilson C. Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: a systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design. J Comp Educ. 2021;8:1-32.
- Newman G, George B, Li D, Tao Zh, Yu S, Lee RJ. Online learning in landscape architecture: Assessing issues, preferences, and student needs in design-related online education. Landsc J. 2020;37(2):41-63.
- Kye B, Han N, Kim E, Park Ye, Jo S. Educational applications of metaverse: possibilities and limitations. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:1149230.
- Fu Zh. A study of factors hindering graduation creativity of students of art and design universities in Chinese universities. In: DPU International Conference on Business Innovation and Social Sciences 2022 (pp. 832-843). Paris: DPU; 2022.
- Glazunova AV, Kojokulova AN. The features of distance education for architects and designers. Herald KSUCTA. 2022;75(1):122-127.
- Liu W. The present situation, problems and countermeasures of domestic textile design in China. Highligh Art Design. 2023;3(1):45-49.
- Yi Y. Research on thinking mode of design education in American universities. Beaut Tim Creat. 2019;9:7-9.
- Yuan L, Tiejun Z. Empirical research on the creative design talents cultivation of sino-foreign cooperative education project in local engineering universities. In: International Conference on E-Learning, E-Education, and Online Training (pp. 3-15). Cham: Springer; 2020.
