Implementation of content and language integrated learning in biology education programs

Issue 56, 2024

Aigerim Tuktassinova, Kulzhakhan Bakirova, Almash Kitapbayeva, Anargul Sharipkhanova, Zhamal Igissinova

Received 30.11.2023, Revised 20.02.2024, Accepted 11.05.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.80edj7

Abstract

Relevance. Modern higher education emphasizes not only professional training but also the integration of students into the global professional community through foreign language proficiency, which enhances skills and professional competence.

Purpose. This research aims to assess the effectiveness of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) methodology in biological education programmes at higher education institutions in Kazakhstan.

Methodology. A semi-formalized questionnaire survey was conducted across six educational institutions in Kazakhstan, comprising "closed" questions including open-ended list questions, single-choice questions using the Likert scale, and multiple-choice questions, totalling 16 questions.

Results. The survey conducted across six educational institutions in Kazakhstan revealed that 85.5% of students perceive Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) positively contributes to their English language acquisition within biological education programmes. This underscores CLIL's effectiveness in enhancing language skills alongside disciplinary knowledge. Despite varying English proficiency levels among participants, the study indicated strong student engagement with CLIL, demonstrating significant interest and active participation in the learning process.

Conclusions. The study confirms CLIL's efficacy in enhancing English acquisition within Kazakhstan's biological education. With 85.5% of students noting its positive impact, CLIL shows promise as a key method for integrating language and disciplinary knowledge. Despite varying English levels, high student engagement underscores CLIL's effectiveness. Future steps should focus on formalizing CLIL across Kazakhstan, providing support for educators, and refining methodologies through ongoing research. Implementing CLIL prepares students for global contexts, enhancing educational outcomes and international competitiveness.

Keywords: English; pedagogy; teaching methodology; linguistics

Suggested citation

Tuktassinova A, Bakirova K, Kitapbayeva A, Sharipkhanova A, Igissinova Zh. Implementation of content and language integrated learning in biology education programs. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(56):807-816. DOI: 10.54919/physics/56.2024.80edj7

Download article

References

  1. Hemmi C, Banegas DL. CLIL: An overview. In: International Perspectives on CLIL. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2021. p. 1-20.
  2. De Smet A, Mettewie L, Hiligsmann P, Galand B, Van Mensel L. Does CLIL shape language attitudes and motivation? Interactions with target languages and instruction levels. Inter J Bilin Educ Bilin. 2019;22(8):534-553.
  3. Fitrawati F, Syarif H, Zaim M, Perrodin DD. The perceptions of tertiary students and lecturers regarding CLIL-based critical reading material employing interactive multimedia. Ind J App Ling. 2022;12(3):598-611.
  4. Loranc-Paszylk B. Integrating reading and writing into the context of CLIL classroom: Some practical solutions. Inter CLIL Res J. 2009;1(2):47-53.
  5. Roth T, Conradty C, Bogner FX. The relevance of school self-concept and creativity for CLIL outreach learning. Stud Educ Eval. 2022;73:101153.
  6. Jiang P, Akhter S, Azizi Z, Gheisari A, Kumar T. Exploring the role of content and language integrated learning approach in developing transversal skills in university students with respect to the mediating role of emotional intelligence. Front Psych. 2022;13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.988494
  7. Feddermann M, Möller J, Baumert J. Effects of CLIL on second language learning: Disentangling selection, preparation, and CLIL-effects. Learn Instr. 2021;74:101459.
  8. Nawrot-Lis B. The effectiveness of CLIL: Overview of the field. In: The Challenges of Content Acquisition in a CLIL Course. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler; 2019. p. 21-39.
  9. Artino Jr AR, La Rochelle JS, Dezee KJ, Gehlbach H. Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87. Med Teach. 2014;36(6):463-474.
  10. Silva L. A. Gamification and CLIL: Development communication skills in L2 with the aid of digital tools in the bilingual context. In: Anais Estendidos do XXI Simpósio Brasileiro de Jogos e Entretenimento Digital. Porto Alegre: SBC; 2022. p. 1076-1080.
  11. Yokono N. The effects of L1 use in CLIL on the syntactic complexity in L2 academic paragraph writing. J Jap CLIL Ped Assoc. 2022;4:144-156.
  12. Bukabayeva B, Kemelbekova ZA, Erzhanova GA. Forming and developing CLIL-teacher’s competences. Bul KazNPU. Ser Ped Sci. 2021;3(71):38-45.
  13. Olkova I, Sytnikova N. Graphic organizers in CLIL lessons as a way to activate cognitive processes. Bul Kaz Nat WomTeach Train Univ. 2021;1:124-135.
  14. Nilsson D, Lundqvist S. Identifying weaknesses of CLIL in the military higher education classroom. J Teach Eng Spec Acad Purp. 2022;10(2):217-243.
  15. Hussain SS. Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) in ELT as a link between language learning and content development. Arab Wor Eng J (AWEJ). 2022;13(2):386-400.
  16. Jafarigohar M, Divsar H, Etemad P. The effect of CLIL context on the primary education EFL receptive and productive lexical growth. Lang Teach Res; 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221078997
  17. Lo YY, Lui WM, Wong M. Scaffolding for cognitive and linguistic challenges in CLIL science assessments. J Immer Cont-Bas Lang Educ. 2019;7(2):289-314.
  18. Seguí LP. Qualitative meta-analysis on the training needs reported by in-service CLIL teachers. Span J App Ling. 2019;32(1):277-303.
  19. Ivanova I, Serdyuk M, Malkina V, Tonkha O, Tsyz O, Mazur B, Shkinder-Barmina A, Herasko T, Havryliuk O. Cultivar features of polyphenolic compounds and ascorbic acid accumulation in the cherry fruits (Prunus cerasus L.) in the Southern Steppe of Ukraine. Agro Res. 2022;20(3):588-602.
  20. Deryaev AR. Features of forecasting abnormally high reservoir pressures when drilling wells in the areas of Southwestern Turkmenistan. SOCAR Proceed. 2023;2023:7-12.
  21. Sydorets V, Korzhyk V, Khaskin V, Babych O, Bondarenko O. Electrical characteristics of the equipment for the hybrid plasma-MIG welding. In: 58th Annual International Scientific Confererence on Power and Electrical Engineering of Riga Technical University, RTUCON 2017 (pp. 1-6); 2017.
  22. Floqi T, Shumka S, Malollari I, Vezi D, Shabani L. Environment and sustainable development of the Prespa park. J Environ Protect Eco. 2009;10(1):163-175.
  23. Khalbekova HU. Amino acid composition of species of the genus Atriplex L. growing in the Aral Sea (Uzbekistan). E3S Web Conf. 2023;411:02063.
  24. Kvasnytskyi V, Korzhyk V, Kvasnytskyi V, Mialnitsa H, Dong C, Pryadko T, Kurdyumov GV, Matviienko M, Buturlia Y. Designing brazing filler metal for heat-resistant alloys based on ni3al intermetallide. East-Eur J Enter Tech. 2020;6(12):6-19.
  25. Banegas DL, Will GG. "Challenging, but not impossible": Student-teachers’ views of CLIL. Argen J App Ling. 2022;10(2):51-60.
  26. Kirkimbayeva Z, Lozowicka B, Biyashev K, Sarsembaeva N, Kuzembekova G, Paritova A. Leptospirosis in cattle from markets of Almaty province, Kazakhstan. Bull Vet Inst Pul. 2015;59(1):29-35.
  27. Deryaev AR. Forecast of the future prospects of drilling ultra-deep wells in difficult mining and geological conditions of Western Turkmenistan. SOCAR Proceed. 2023;2023:13-21.
  28. Tashmatova G. Challenges of implementing CLIL (content and language integrated learning). Web Scien: Inter Scien Res J. 2022;3(3):567-574.
  29. Omarbekova G. Implementation of content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at the university level. Ling For. 2020;2(1):10-18.
  30. Kuznetsov BN, Chesnokov NV, Mikova NM, Zaikovskii VI, Drozdov VA, Savos'kin MV, Yaroshenko AM, Lyubchik SB. Texture and catalytic properties of palladium supported on thermally expanded natural graphite. React Kinet Catal Lett. 2003;80(2):345-350.
  31. Shuka L, Çullaj A, Shumka S, Miho A, Duka S, Bachofen R. The Spatial and Temporal Variability of Limnological Properties of Bovilla Reservoir (Albania). Wat Res Manag. 2011;25(12):3027-3039.
  32. Paton BE, Chernets AV, Marinsky GS, Korzhik VN, Petrov VS. Prospects of using plasma technologies for disposal and recycling of medical and other hazardous waste. Part 2. Probl Spetsial Electrometall. 2005;(4):46-54.
  33. del Mar Gálvez Gómez M. The effects of CLIL on FL learning: A longitudinal study. In: Content and Language Integrated Learning in Monolingual Settings. Cham: Springer Cham; 2021. p. 141-165.
  34. Tikhonova LP, Goba VE, Kovtun MF, Tarasenko YuA, Khavryuchenko VD, Lyubchik SB, Boiko AN. Sorption of metal ions from multicomponent aqueous solutions by activated carbons produced from waste. Russ J Appl Chem. 2008;81(8):1348-1355.
  35. Namsaeng P. The potential of CLIL for promoting critical thinking skills in Thailand. Hum Soc Sci. 2022;39(1):182-206.
  36. Fernández-Sanjurjo J, Fernández-Costales A, Miguel Arias Blanco J. Analysing students’ content-learning in science in CLIL vs. non-CLIL programmes: Empirical evidence from Spain. Inter J Bilin Educ Bilin. 2019;22(6):661-674.
  37. Ichshanova A, Taubaev U, Absatirov G, Kirkimbaeva Z, Radojicic B. Carrier state of pasteurellosis in saiga antelopes in the western Kazakhstan region. Ind Vet J. 2018;95(8):17-18.
  38. Bayram D, Öztürk RÖ, Atay D. Reading comprehension and vocabulary size of CLIL and non-CLIL students: A comparative study. Lang Teach Educ Res. 2019;2(2):101-113.
  39. Cimermanova I. Meta-analysis of studies on the acquisition of receptive skills and vocabulary in CLIL. J Lang Cult Educ. 2020;8(1):30-52.
  40. Ostovar-Namaghi SA, Nakhaee S. The effect of CLIL on language skills and components: A meta-analysis. Iran J App Ling. 2019;22(1):109-144.
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua