Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

ISSN 2415-8038 e-ISSN 2786-6688
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Blended learning in professional training of teachers

Issue 56, 2024

Aliya Imanova, Zhadyra Yermekova, Alma Murzalinova, Leila Almagambetova, Amangeldy Imanov

Received 23.10.2023, Revised 20.02.2024, Accepted 02.05.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.51voh9

Abstract

Relevance. The issue of blended learning in professional training of teachers is extremely relevant. This increased interest is due to the spread of the acute infectious disease COVID-19, as all public spheres of activity of citizens have been transferred to a blended format.

Purpose. The aim of the work is to analyze the main features of the blended format of training, as well as to establish the necessary level of knowledge and training of teachers for its effective implementation.

Methodology. The article used a number of scientific and methodological tools that helped to reveal important elements of the studied question. Accordingly, an important place in the work is occupied by functional and system approaches, in addition, such logical methods as the method of analysis and synthesis, comparison, generalization, deduction.

Results. The main results of the study are the theoretical and practical bases of the question under consideration. In the theoretical part the basic concepts, their properties and attributes, undoubtedly related to the sphere of professional competence of the teacher were revealed. On the practical side, it compares the main approaches used so far to train future teachers in the delivery of learning services, namely in a blended format. In addition, the article considered the experience of other countries, which helped to study in depth the features of the studied issue and to establish promising directions that can be applied in Kazakhstan.

Conclusions. In future scientific works on this topic it is necessary to analyze the main differences between distance and blended learning in order to distinguish the directions of teacher training.

Keywords: teaching and learning process; teacher; advanced training; competence; distance learning

Suggested citation

Imanova A, Yermekova Zh, Murzalinova A, Almagambetova L, Imanov A. Blended learning in professional training of teachers. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(56):519-526. DOI: 10.54919/physics/56.2024.51voh9

Download article

References

  1. Decree of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 827 “On approval of the State Program “Digital Kazakhstan””; 2017. https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P1700000827.
  2. Huy C, Luong N, Vu N. Blended learning in badminton training for professionals: students’ perceptions and performance impacts. Eur J Phys Educ Sport Sci. 2020;6(6):28-36.
  3. Portillo J, Lopez de la Serna A. An international perspective for “Improving teacher professional development for online and blended learning: a systematic meta-aggregative review”. Educ Tech Res Devel. 2021;69:25-28.
  4. Martínez S, Guíñez F, Zamora R. On the instructional model of a blended learning program for developing mathematical knowledge for teaching. ZDM Math Educ. 2020;52:877-891.
  5. Yeigh T, Lynch D, Turner D. Using blended learning to support whole-of-school improvement: The need for contextualisation. Educ Inform Tech. 2020;25:3329-3355.
  6. An Y. A response to an article entitled “Improving teacher professional development for online and blended learning: a systematic meta-aggregative review”. Educ Tech Res Devel. 2021;69:39-42.
  7. Ihnatova O, Poseletska K, Matiiuk D, Hapchuk Y, Borovska O. The application of digital technologies in teaching a foreign language in a blended learning environment. Ling Cult Rev. 2021;5(S4):114-127.
  8. Jacques G, Antonietta M. International Teachers Professional Developing: Blended Learning between Europe and Asia. Educ Issues. 2020;2:114-127.
  9. Al-Ayed S, Al-Tit A. Factors affecting the adoption of blended learning strategy. Int J Data Netw Sci. 2021;5(3):267-274.
  10. Putri D. Sutrisno and Adha, Muhammad Mona and pitoewas, berchah. The Problems of Implementing Blended Learning Class in Civic Education Students, University of Lampung. Univ J Educ Res. 2020;8:106-114.
  11. Salas-Rueda R. Impact of the WampServer application in Blended learning considering data science, machine learning, and neural networks. E-Learn Dig Media. 2020;17(3):199-217.
  12. Taghizadeh M, Hajhosseini F. Investigating a Blended Learning Environment: Contribution of Attitude, Interaction, and Quality of Teaching to Satisfaction of Graduate Students of TEFL. Asia-Pacif Educ Res. 2021;30:459-469.
  13. Kundu A, Bej T, Rice M. Time to engage: Implementing math and literacy blended learning routines in an Indian elementary classroom. Educ Inform Techn. 2021;26:1201-1220.
  14. Şentürk C. Effects of the blended learning model on preservice teachers’ academic achievements and twenty-first century skills. Educ Inform Techn. 2021;26:35-48.
  15. Viljoen CA, Millar RS, Manning K. Effectiveness of blended learning versus lectures alone on ECG analysis and interpretation by medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20:488.
  16. Stahl G. Redesigning Mathematical Curriculum for Blended Learning. Educ Sci. 2021;11(4):165.
  17. Antwi-Boampong A. Towards a faculty blended learning adoption model for higher education. Educ Inform Techn. 2020;25:1639-1662.
  18. Macaruso P, Wilkes S, Prescott JE. An investigation of blended learning to support reading instruction in elementary schools. Educ Tech Res Devel. 2020;68:2839-2852.
  19. Raza A, Malik S, Jumani N. Developing Instructional Design in Teacher Education for Blended Learning Environment: A Needs Analysis. Res J Soc Sci Econ Rev. 2020;1(4):273-281.
  20. Izquierdo ÁV. Guidelines for Instructional Design for Teaching in a Blended Learning Course. Lect Notes Netw Syst. 2020;126:23-34.
  21. Herayantı L, Widodo W, Susantini E, Gunawan G. The effectiveness of blended learning model based on inquiry collaborative tutorial toward students’ problem-solving skills in physics. J Educ Gift Young Sci. 2020;8(3):959-972.
  22. Hurko O, Koroliova V, Popova I, Holikova N, Maiboroda N. Ethnolinguistic specificity of the manifestation of the category of affirmation in the Ukrainian and English languages. Dragom. 2024;14(16):269-287.
  23. Fedoniuk TP, Pyvovar PV, Skydan OV, Melnychuk TV, Topolnytskyi PP. Spatial structure of natural landscapes within the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone. J Water Land Develop. 2024;60:79-90.
  24. Belov SG, Tamm TI, Mamontov IN, Nepomnyashchiy VV. Perforation of peptic ulcer: Nonstandard situations and nonstandard decisions. Klinich Khirurh. 2016;3:69-72.
  25. Shuka L, Çullaj A, Shumka S, Miho A, Duka S, Bachofen R. The Spatial and Temporal Variability of Limnological Properties of Bovilla Reservoir (Albania). Water Resourc Manag. 2011;25(12):3027-3039.
  26. Smailov N, Koshkinbayev S, Tashtay Y, Kuttybayeva A, Abdykadyrkyzy R, Arseniev D, Kiesewetter D, Krivosheev S, Magazinov S, Malyugin V, Sun C. Numerical Simulation and Measurement of Deformation Wave Parameters by Sensors of Various Types. Sens. 2023;23(22):9215.
  27. Ushenko YA, Dubolazov AV, Angelsky AP, Sidor MI, Bodnar GB, Koval G, Zabolotna NI, Smolarz A, Junisbekov MS. Laser polarization fluorescence of the networks of optically anisotropic biological crystals. Proceed SPIE - Int Soc Optic Engin. 2013;8698:869809.
  28. Meulenbroek P, Hammerschmied U, Schmutz S, Weiss S, Schabuss M, Zornig H, Shumka S, Schiemer F. Conservation requirements of european eel (Anquilla anquilla) in a balkan catchment. Sustain (Switzerland). 2020;12(20):1-14.
  29. Sousa R, Zając T, Halabowski D, Aksenova OV, Bespalaya YV, Carvalho F, Castro P, Douda K, da Silva JP, Ferreira-Rodríguez N. ... Zieritz A, Aldridge DC. A roadmap for the conservation of freshwater mussels in Europe. Conserv Biol. 2023;37(2):e13994.
  30. Seidaliyeva U, Ilipbayeva L, Taissariyeva K, Smailov N, Matson ET. Advances and Challenges in Drone Detection and Classification Techniques: A State-of-the-Art Review. Sens. 2024;24(1):125.
  31. Kiesewetter D, Krivosheev S, Magazinov S, Malyugin V, Varzhel S, Loseva E, Koshkinbayev S, Smailov N. Application of Fiber Bragg Gratings as a Sensor of Pulsed Mechanical Action. Sens. 2022;22(19):7289.
  32. Issin DK, Zholdubayeva ZD, Neshina YG, Alkina AD, Khuangan N, Rahimova GM. Advanced composite alloys for constructional parts of robots. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Engin. 2018;363(1):012032.
  33. Azarov OD, Dudnyk OV, Kaduk OV, Smolarz A, Burlibay A. Method of correcting of the tracking ADC with weight redundancy conversion characteristic. Proceed SPIE - Int Soc Optic Engin. 2015;9816:98161V.
  34. Azarov OD, Murashchenko OG, Chernyak OI, Smolarz A, Kashaganova G. Method of glitch reduction in DAC with weight redundancy. Proceed SPIE - Int Soc Optic Engin. 2015;9816:98161T.
  35. Khmelovskyi V, Rogach S, Tonkha O, Rosamaha Y. Quality evaluation of mixing fodder by mobile combined units. Engin Rur Develop. 2019;18:299-304.
  36. Tonkha OL, Sychevskyi SO, Pikovskaya OV, Kovalenko VP. Modern approach in farming based on estimation of soil properties variability. In: 12th International Scientific Conference "Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment". Kyiv: European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers; 2018.
  37. Skarbøvik E, Shumka S, Mukaetov D, Nagothu US. Harmonised monitoring of Lake Macro Prespa as a basis for integrated water resources management. Irrig Drain Syst. 2010;24(3-4):223-238.
  38. Shumka S, Apostolou A. Current knowledge on the status of the most common non-indigenous fish species in the transboundary greater Prespa Lake (Albanian side). Acta Zool Bulgar. 2018;70(2):203-209.
  39. Osadchuk AV, Osadchuk VS. Radiomeasuring microelectronic transducers of physical quantities. In: 2015 International Siberian Conference on Control and Communications, SIBCON 2015 - Proceedings (article number 7147167). Omsk: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2015.
  40. Momynkulov Z, Dosbayev Z, Suliman A, Abduraimova B, Smailov N, Zhekambayeva M, Zhamangarin D. Fast Detection and Classification of Dangerous Urban Sounds Using Deep Learning. Comp, Mater Contin. 2023;75(1):2191-2208.
Make a Submission

Indexing

  • Scopus logo
  • WorldCat logo
  • OpenAIRE logo
  • Crossref logo
  • VNLU logo
  • Professional publications of Ukraine logo
  • BASE logo
  • Google Scholar logo

info@physics.uz.ua