Methodological foundations of the continuity of teaching the physics course in the "school-university" system

Issue 55, 2024

Dana Kuatbayeva, Sholpan Shuinshina, Danakul Kazakhbayeva, Zhazira Bitibayeva

Received 04.10.2023, Revised 12.12.2023, Accepted 25.02.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.79dj8

Abstract

Relevance. The relevance of this study lies in the fact that ensuring the continuity of education plays an important role in the modernisation of the education system in the Republic of Kazakhstan and requires a detailed study of the updated content of physics lessons in the "school-university" structure.

Purpose. The primary aim is to analyze the methodological foundations for ensuring continuity in physics education within the "school-university" system in Kazakhstan. This involves examining the educational standards and practices at both school and university levels to identify and implement effective methods for seamless educational progression.

Methodology. The methodological basis of this study was formed by psychological, philosophical and pedagogical concepts of cognition of the educational process, and methodological foundations of physics and definitions of didactics, achievements and directions of theory and teaching methods of the modern physics course.

Results. The study reveals a need for methodological adjustments in teaching physics to ensure a coherent educational trajectory from school to university. Key findings include the significance of developing educational programs that foster scientific thinking, adapt to students' physiological development, and incorporate modern technological advancements. The analysis also underscores the importance of interdisciplinary integration and the cultivation of critical thinking and problem-solving skills among students.

Conclusions. The materials of this article can be used by teachers of universities of the Republic of Kazakhstan to prepare materials for teaching physics. The presented material may also be of interest to students in the direction of "Natural science disciplines" during preparation for seminars and practical classes that are preparing to teach physics as a science in the future.

Keywords: educational process; basic level; physics teacher; preparatory courses; cooperation; self-determination

Suggested citation

Kuatbayeva D, Shuinshina S, Kazakhbayeva D, Bitibayeva Z. Methodological foundations of the continuity of teaching the physics course in the "school-university" system. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):798-807. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.79dj8

Download article

References

  1. Afanasyeva TP, Tyunnikov YuS, Kazakov IS, Yurchenko YuA. Teacher's readiness to increase the degree of continuity of education: Concepts and means of evaluation. Espacios. 2018;39(38):1-15.
  2. Gamble J, Sidebotham M, Gilkison A, Davis D, Sweet L. Acknowledging the primacy of continuity of care experiences in midwifery education. Women Birth. 2020;33(2):111–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.09.002
  3. Vedishenkova MV, Efimova EV, Ryabova EV. Student’s research work as the condition of continuity of general and professional education. Int J Environ Sci Educ. 2016;10(4):533–42. DOI: 10.12973/ijese.2015.267a
  4. Nagovitsyn RS, Danilov OE, Tutolmin AV. Continuity in the continuous training of teachers for pre-school and primary general education. Perspekt Nauki Obrazov. 2019;40(4):194–203. DOI: 10.32744/pse.2019.4.16
  5. Liu D, Guo X. Study of continuity trust on adoption and design of e-education and student development. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2017;11(12):64–7. DOI: 10.3991/ijet.v11i12.5921
  6. Babic N. Continuity and discontinuity in education: example of transition from preschool to school. Early Child Dev Care. 2018;187(10):1596–609. DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2017.1301935
  7. Abylkasymova AE, Ryzhakov MV, Shishov SE. Modern trends in the development of continuous pedagogical education. Monogr Atamura. 2017;1:124–72.
  8. Sharipov SS. The Continuity of the Process of Developing Creative Individuals in the System of Uninterrupted Education. Int J Spec Educ. 2022;37(2):398–401.
  9. Regehr C, Nelson S, Hildyard A. Academic continuity planning in higher education. J Bus Continuity Emerg Plan. 2017;11(1):73-84.
  10. Dankin DG. Methods of teaching physics in the conditions of online interaction. J Phys Conf Ser. 2021;2056(1):012060. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2056/1/012060
  11. Bezemer J, Kress G. Continuity and change: Semiotic relations across multimodal texts in surgical education. Text Talk. 2017;37(4):509–30. DOI: 10.1515/text-2017-0014
  12. Tumasheva OV. Social and professional partnership in preparation of pedagogical personnel: Regional practices. Vyssh Obraz. 2021;30(7):81–90.
  13. Villani A, Barolli E, Nascimento WE. Revisiting teaching trajectories: A synergy between contexts and provisions. Investig Ens Cienc. 2021;25(3):270–99. DOI: 10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2020v25n3D270
  14. Luciano A, Giacomassi Luciano AP, Garcia Fernandes PR, Takai H, Altoe Fusinato P. Remote access experiment as a facilitator for teaching modern and contemporary physics in secondary schools. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019;1286(1):012035. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1286/1/012035
  15. Araujo R, Dias VS. International Physics Masterclasses and Workshop on Particle Physics: Professional Development Tools for High School Teachers in São Paulo. In: 38th International Conference on High Energy Physics; 2016 Aug 3-10; Chicago. Chicago; 2016. 128556. DOI: 10.22323/1.282.0341
  16. Vörös AIV. Panel debate on energy production in high school physics teaching. Can J Phys. 2020;98(6):579–87.
  17. Ruggiero ML, Mattiello S, Leone M. Physics for the masses: Teaching Einsteinian gravity in primary school. Phys Educ. 2021;56(6):065011. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6552/ac1ca3
  18. Zhai X, Zhang M, Li M. One-to-one mobile technology in high school physics classrooms: Understanding its use and outcome. Br J Educ Technol. 2018;49(3):516–32. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12539
  19. Son J, Lee B, Jho H, Choi J, Shim KC. Analysis of the organization of the physics curriculum in science core schools. New Phys Sae Mulli. 2018;68(12):1347–55.
  20. Siorenta A, Jimoyiannis A. Physics instruction in secondary schools: An investigation of teachers’ beliefs towards physics laboratory. Res Sci Technol Educ. 2018;26(2):185–202.
  21. Babak VP, Shchepetov VV. Wear Resistance of Amorphous-Crystalline Coatings with Lubricants. J Frict Wear. 2018;39(1):38–43.
  22. Babak V, Dekusha O, Vorobiov L, Dekusha L, Kobzar S., Ivanov S. The Heat Exchange Simulation in the Device for Measuring the Emissivity of Coatings and Material Surfaces. 2019 IEEE 39th Int Conf Electr Nanotechnol ELNANO 2019 – Proceed. 2019;1:301–304.
  23. Koval YM, Kutsova VZ, Kovzel MA. Regularities of formation of structure, phase composition and properties of chromium–manganese alloys in the initial cast state during the process of friction wear. Metallofiz Noveish Tekhnol. 2021;43(3):407–423. DOI: 10.15407/mfint.43.03.0407
  24. Koval YM, Kutsova VZ, Kovzel MA, Shvets PY. Features of structure formation, kinetics of phase transformations, mechanical and tribological properties of the Fe-based Cr–Mn–Ni alloys. Progr Phys Met. 2020;21(2):180–248. DOI: 10.15407/ufm.21.02.180
  25. Fialko N, Dinzhos R, Sherenkovskii J, Meranova N, Prokopov V, Babak V, Korzhyk V, Izvorska D, Lazarenko M, Makhrovskyi V. Influence on the thermophysical properties of nanocomposites of the duration of mixing of components in the polymer melt. East-Eur J Enterp Technol. 2022;2(5-116):25–30. DOI: 10.15587/1729-4061.2022.255830
  26. Fialko N, Dinzhos R, Sherenkovskii J, Meranova N, Aloshko S, Izvorska D, Korzhyk V, Lazarenko M, Mankus I, Nedbaievska L. Establishment of regularities of influence on the specific heat capacity and thermal diffusivity of polymer nanocomposites of a complex of defining parameters. East-Eur J Enterp Technol. 2021;6(12(114)):6–12. DOI: 10.15587/1729-4061.2021.245274
  27. Mustafayeva E, Karimova N, Rahimova K, Novruzova U, İsmayilzade M, Alirzayeva L. Mathematical modeling of damage of a cylindrically isotropic thick pipe under a complex stress state. Glob Stochast Anal. 2022;9(1):47–55.
  28. Babak V, Zaporozhets A, Kuts Y, Scherbak L, Eremenko V. Application of material measure in measurements: Theoretical aspects. Stud Syst, Decis Contr. 2021;346:261–269.
  29. Veliev F, Mustafayeva E, Mamontov A, Shevtsov V, Zinchenko S, Rud A. Development of a procedure for determination of damage to seeds and cotton fibers in cotton cleaning machines. EUREKA, Phys Engin. 2021;2021(4):125–133. DOI: 10.21303/2461-4262.2021.001944
  30. Karimov HK, Mustafayeva E, Jafarov E, Safarova T, Veliev F. Theoretical Study of the Grate-Sawtype Large-Litter Cleaner of the Mounted Type. East-Eur J Enterp Technol. 2021;2:74–84. DOI: 10.15587/1729-4061.2021.229032
  31. Kovzel M, Kutzova V. Regularities of the formation of structure, phase composition and tribological properties of heat-resistant chromium-nickel alloys Nikorin. In: Structural materials: Manufacture, properties, conditions of use: Collective monograph (pp. 68–120). Kharkiv: Technology Center; 2023. DOI: 10.15587/9786177319978.CH3
  32. Babak V, Dekusha O, Kovtun S, Ivanov S. Information-measuring system for monitoring thermal resistance. CEUR Workshop Proceed. 2019;2387:102–110.
  33. Babak VP, Shchepetov VV, Harchenko SD. Antifriction Nanocomposite Coatings that Contain Magnesium Carbide. J Frict Wear. 2019;40(6):593–598.
  34. Privalko VP, Dinzhos RV, Privalko EG. Enthalpy relaxation in the cooling/heating cycles of polyamide 6/ organoclay nanocomposites. II. Melting behavior. J Macromol Sci – Phys. 2005;44 B(4):431–443. DOI: 10.1081/MB-200061614
  35. Privalko VP, Dinzhos RV, Rekhteta NA, Calleja FJB. Structure-diamagnetic susceptibility correlations in regular alternating terpolymers of ethene and propene with carbon monoxide. J Macromol Sci – Phys. 2003;42 B(5):929–938. DOI: 10.1081/MB-120023548
  36. Fialko N, Dinzhos R, Sherenkovskii J, Meranova N, Navrodska R, Izvorska D, Korzhyk V, Lazarenko M, Koseva N. Establishing Patterns In The Effect Of Temperature Regime When Manufacturing Nanocomposites On Their Heat-Conducting Properties. East-Eur J Enterp Technol. 2021;4(5-112):21–26. DOI: 10.15587/1729-4061.2021.236915
  37. Babak VP, Babak SV, Eremenko VS, Kuts YV, Myslovych MV, Scherbak LM, Zaporozhets AO. Models of Measuring Signals and Fields. Stud Syst, Decis Contr. 2021;360:33–59.
  38. Kutsova VZ, Zhivotovich AV, Kovzel MA, Kravchenko AV. Structure, phase composition and phase x-ray spectroscopic analysis of high-temperature chromium-nickel alloy. Metallofiz Noveish Tekhnol. 2008;30(SPEC. ISS.):235–243.
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua