Integration of traditional and digital educational technologies: points of contact and differences in teaching a foreign language

Issue 55, 2024

Nargiza Babaniyazova

Received 27.11.2023, Revised 14.02.2024, Accepted 11.03.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.216kb1

Abstract

Relevance. The use of digital educational technologies can lead to more effective and interactive learning, offering new opportunities for teachers and students. In light of the introduction of digital technologies in education, the Government of the Republic of Uzbekistan is actively developing new initiatives, issuing decrees and resolutions, which emphasizes the importance of carefully studying the integration of traditional and digital teaching methods in the country's educational system.

Purpose. Thus, the purpose of the current article is to identify common ground and differences between traditional and digital educational technologies in teaching a foreign language in order to create the most effective educational model.

Methodology. The methodology of scientific work is based on analysis and synthesis, as well as comparison.

Results. The results of the work showed that, in the modern world, knowledge of a foreign language is necessary, and understanding how best to use existing educational resources in the process of teaching languages is crucial for both self-study and for private teachers and educational institutions. While digital technologies offer several benefits, including increased access to education, instant feedback, and personalization of learning paths, traditional methods still retain their value in creating and implementing the educational process. The study shows that the most optimal educational model is a balanced approach that combines the strengths of both traditional and digital technologies. Understanding the common ground and differences between the analysed technologies makes it possible to create a more effective and attractive learning environment, which ultimately increases the educational level, improves the quality of foreign language proficiency.

Conclusions. The study acts as an additional tool for studying the current issue, for developing curricula and teaching methods for foreign languages, which optimize the learning of languages in the digital age, thus determining the significance of the results obtained.

Keywords: pedagogical activity; comparative analysis; Internet; professional development; efficiency; innovations

Suggested citation

Babaniyazova N. Integration of traditional and digital educational technologies: points of contact and differences in teaching a foreign language. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):2161-2173. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.216kb1

Download article

References

  1. Sayaf AM, Alamri MM, Alqahtani MA, Alrahmi WM. Factors influencing university students’ adoption of digital learning technology in teaching and learning. Sustainability. 2022;14(1):493. DOI: 10.3390/su14010493.
  2. Zawacki-Richter O, Jung I, editors. Handbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education. Singapore: Springer; 2023. Marín VI, Castaneda L. Developing digital literacy for teaching and learning; p. 1089-1108. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_64-1.
  3. Kalolo JF. Digital revolution and its impact on education systems in developing countries. Educ Inf Technol. 2019;24:345–58. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-018-9778-3.
  4. Guppy N, Verpoorten D, Boud D, Lin L, Tai J, Bartolic S. The post‐COVID‐19 future of digital learning in higher education: Views from educators, students, and other professionals in six countries. Brit J Educ Technol. 2022;53(6):1750–65. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.13212.
  5. Cheung A. Language teaching during a pandemic: A case study of zoom use by a secondary ESL teacher in Hong Kong. RELC J. 2021;54(1):55–70. DOI: 10.1177/0033688220981784.
  6. Velieva SR. Foreign experience in digital educational technologies. Eur J Innov Nonform Educ. 2021;1(2):152–4.
  7. President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Decree “On the development strategy of the new Uzbekistan for 2022-2026” [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024 Jan 21]. Decree No. UP-60. 2022 January 28. Available from: https://lex.uz/docs/5841063.
  8. President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Decree “On measures to develop the system of higher education” [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2024 Jan 21]. Decree No. PP-2909. 2017 April 20. Available from: https://lex.uz/docs/3171590.
  9. Zhukovskaya IE. The main trends in improving the activities of a higher educational institution in the context of digital transformation. Open Educ. 2021;25(3):15–25. DOI: 10.21686/1818-4243-2021-3-15-25.
  10. Rifai M, Anwar K, Isma A. Modern and simple society education in dealing with socio-cultural changes, modernization and development. Int J Educ Vocat Soc Sci. 2023;2(1):99–109. DOI: 10.99075/ijevss.v2i01.142.
  11. Abdurakhmonova ZYu. The role of modern pedagogical technologies in improving the quality of the educational process. Econ Soc. 2022;3(94):12–6.
  12. Hidayat DN, Lee JY, Mason J, Khaerudin T. Digital technology supporting English learning among Indonesian university students. Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn. 2022;17(1):23. DOI: 10.1186/s41039-022-00198-8.
  13. Rong Lim P, Noor NM. Digital storytelling as a creative teaching method in promoting secondary school students’ writing skills. Int J Interact Mobil Technol. 2019;13(7):117–28. DOI: 10.3991/ijim.v13i07.10798.
  14. Jobirovich YM. Effectiveness of using digital technologies in educational system. Eur J Mod Med Pract. 2022;2(4):124–8.
  15. Styrkina YuS. Modern and traditional teaching of a foreign language: advantages and disadvantages. Aesthet Eth Pedagog Action. 2019;20:161–70.
  16. Meirovitz T, Russak S, Zur A. English as a foreign language teachers’ perceptions regarding their pedagogical-technological knowledge and its implementation in distance learning during COVID-19. Heliyon. 2022;8(4):e09175.
  17. Tashkent State Law University [Internet]. TSUL; 2023 [cited 2024 Jan 21]. Available from: https://tsul.uz/en.
  18. Tashkent State Pedagogical University named after Nizami [Internet]. TSUL; 2023 [cited 2024 Jan 21]. Available from: https://new.tdpu.uz/catlist/2.
  19. Samarkand State University named after Sharof Rashidov [Internet]. Samarkand State University; 2023 [cited 2024 Jan 21]. Available from: https://www.samdu.uz/.
  20. Kharatova SK. Use of innovative technologies in the educational process. Sci Educ. 2022;3(3):713–8.
  21. Almaiah MA, Ayouni S, Hajjej F, Lutfi A, Almomani O, Awad AB. Smart mobile learning success model for higher educational institutions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Electron. 2022;11(8):1278. DOI: 10.3390/electronics11081278.
  22. Rueda L, Benitez J, Braojos J. From traditional education technologies to student satisfaction in Management education: A theory of the role of social media applications. Inform Manag. 2017;54(8):1059–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2017.06.002.
  23. Falk S. Mobile-Assisted Language Learning: An empirical study on the use of digital mobile devices in the context of foreign language teaching. Tubingen: Narr Francke Attempto Verlag; 2019.
  24. Lombardi G. The use of augmented reality in teaching Italian L2. Ital LinguaDue. 2016;8(1):103–23. DOI: 10.13130/2037-3597/7566.
  25. Sun PP, Mei B. Modeling preservice Chinese-as-a-second/foreign-language teachers’ adoption of educational technology: a technology acceptance perspective. Comput Assist Lang Learn. 2022;35(4):816–39. DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2020.1750430.
  26. Allayeva GZh. Development of digital technologies as a factor of sustainable development of the economy of the Republic of Uzbekistan. In: 1st ECLSS International Online Conference on Economics and Social Sciences; 2020 May 20-21; Samarkand. Samarkand: Samarkand Branch of Tashkent University of Economics; 2020. P. 463-469.
  27. Sadykov ShS. The main directions for improving higher education in the Republic of Uzbekistan in the context of digital transformation of the economy. Open Educ. 2021;25(1):40–7. DOI: 10.21686/1818-4243-2021-1-40-47.
  28. Chen L, Chen P, Lin Z. Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access. 2020;8:75264–78.
  29. Ratheeswari K. Information communication technology in education. J Appl Adv Res. 2018;3(1):45–7. DOI: 10.21839/jaar.2018.v3iS1.169.
  30. Salah J. Some remarks and propositions on riemann hypothesis. Mathem Statist. 2021;9(2):159-165.
  31. Nasimovna NA. New pedagogical technologies in teaching english language to students with no specialized foreign language. Am J Pedagog Educ Res. 2022;6:76–9.
  32. Kerimkhulle S, Kerimkulov Z, Aitkozha Z, Saliyeva A, Taberkhan R, Adalbek A. The Classification of Vegetations Based on Share Reflectance at Spectral Bands. Lect Not Networks Syst. 2023;724:95-100.
  33. National digital educational architecture HEMIS [Internet]. HEMIS; 2023 [cited 2024 Jan 21]. Available from: https://hemis.uz/.
  34. Asadchykh OV, Filonova VO, Fedotova YS, Dybska TS, Bukriienko AO. Cognitive features of hieroglyphic writing in the context of perception of culture and language. Asia Life Sci Supp. 2020;22(2):427-440.
  35. Trus I, Gomelya N, Halysh V, Radovenchyk I, Stepova O, Levytska O. Technology of the comprehensive desalination of wastewater from mines. East-Eur J Enter Tech. 2020;3(6-105):21-27.
  36. Loxha A. Do remittances reduce poverty in kosovo? - A counterfactual analysis. South East Eur J Econ Bus. 2019;14(2):117-132.
  37. Ginters E, Dimitrovs E. Latent Impacts on Digital Technologies Sustainability Assessment and Development. Adv Intell Syst Comput. 2021;1365:3-13.
  38. al-Matrudi AR, al-Rubayan A. Problems of distance education faced by students with learning difficulties from the point of view of teachers. J Arts Psychol Educ Stud. 2022;1(14):77–139.
  39. Ginters E, Mezitis M, Aizstrauta D. Sustainability simulation and assessment of bicycle network design and maintenance environment. In: 2018 International Conference on Intelligent and Innovative Computing Applications, ICONIC 2018 (8601225). Plaine Magnien: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2018.
  40. Pirahandeh M, Kim D-H. High performance GPU-based parity computing scheduler in storage applications. Concurr Comput: Pract Exper. 2017;29(4):e3889.
  41. Faure E, Shcherba A, Lavdanskyi A, Makhynko M, Khizirova M. Three-Pass Protocol on Permutations: Implementation Example and Security. CEUR Workshop Proceed. 2024;3654:110-125.
  42. Vallejo A, González A. Teacher training experience in the creation of digital resources in H5P: toolbox for interactivity. Virtuality Educ Sci. 2022;13(25):120–34.
  43. Nugroho A, Atmojo AEP. Digital learning of English beyond classroom: EFL learners’ perception and teaching activities. J Engl Educ Linguist Stud. 2020;7(2):219–43. DOI: 10.30762/jeels.v7i2.1993.
  44. Asadchykh OV, Smovzhenko LH, Kindras IV, Romanov II, Pereloma TS. Academic language as an object of teaching foreign languages to philology students. Astra Salv. 2022;2022(1):671-689.
  45. Naumovets AG, Paliy MV, Vedula YuS, Loburets AT, Senenko NB. Diffusion of lithium and strontium on Mo(112). Prog Surf Sci. 1995;48(1-4):59-70.
  46. Kerimkhulle S, Obrosova N, Shananin A, Tokhmetov A. Young Duality for Variational Inequalities and Nonparametric Method of Demand Analysis in Input–Output Models with Inputs Substitution: Application for Kazakhstan Economy. Mathem. 2023;11(19):4216.
  47. Abdymanapov SA, Muratbekov M, Altynbek S, Barlybayev A. Fuzzy Expert System of Information Security Risk Assessment on the Example of Analysis Learning Management Systems. IEEE Acc. 2021;9:156556-156565.
  48. Salah J, Al Hashmi M, Rehman HU, Al Mashrafi K. Modified Mathematical Models in Biology by the Means of Caputo Derivative of a Function with Respect to Another Exponential Function. Mathem Statist. 2022;10(6):1194-1205.
  49. Arifi F. Stature and its estimation utilizing arm span measurements of both gender adolescents from southeast region in Kosovo. Sport Sci. 2017;10(1):92-95.
  50. Aizstrauta D, Ginters E. Using Market Data of Technologies to Build a Dynamic Integrated Acceptance and Sustainability Assessment Model. Proced Comp Sci. 2016;104:501-508.
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua