Baimukhanova A, Abdykhalykova Zh, Sagitova Zh. Preparing future educational psychologists to prevent school bullying. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(56):2453-2459. DOI: 10.54919/physics/56.2024.245ki3
Preparing future educational psychologists to prevent school bullying
Aizhan Baimukhanova, Zhazira Abdykhalykova, Zhanna Sagitova
https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.245ki3
Abstract
Relevance. School bullying is a widespread problem that requires effective prevention strategies. However, many teachers and educational psychologists lack sufficient knowledge and skills to address bullying. There is a need to better prepare future educational psychologists to prevent and intervene in bullying situations.
Purpose. The purpose of the research article is to develop and test an elective course for training future educational psychologists in bullying prevention in Kazakhstan schools.
Methodology. An elective course titled “Prevention of school bullying: from theory to practice” was developed and implemented with third-year bachelor's students in Pedagogy and Psychology at L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. The course included theoretical and practical components. Students' knowledge and skills were assessed before and after the course using tests and case studies.
Results. Prior to the course, most students demonstrated low levels of knowledge and skills related to bullying prevention. After completing the course, students in the experimental group showed significant improvements, with 64% reaching a high level of competency compared to 0% in the control group. The course helped students acquire both theoretical knowledge and practical skills for addressing bullying.
Conclusions. The elective course was effective in developing future educational psychologists' professional competencies for bullying prevention. Recommendations are provided for improving bullying prevention efforts in Kazakhstan schools, including raising awareness, providing training for teachers and psychologists, and maintaining communication with parents. The study demonstrates the importance of practice-oriented training in preparing educational psychologists to address school bullying.
Keywords: bullying; bullying prevention; school violence; educational psychologist; educational environment; anti-bullying course
Suggested citation
References
- Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan. On approval of the state program for the development of education and science of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2020-2025. № 998; 2019. https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P1900000988
- Gladden RM, Vivolo-Kantor AM, Hamburger ME, Lumpkin CD. Bullying surveillance among youths: uniform definitions for public health and recommended data elements, version 1.0. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014.
- Eyuboglu M, Eyuboglu D, Pala SC, Oktar D, Demirtas Z, Arslantas D, Unsal A. Traditional school bullying and cyberbullying: Prevalence, the effect on mental health problems and self-harm behavior. Psych Res. 2021;297:113730.
- UNESCO. Behind the numbers: ending school violence and bullying. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; 2019.
- Turegeldiyeva M. Bullying among adolescents in Astana, Kazakhstan: prevalence and associated factors. Astana: Nazarbayev University School of Medicine; 2018.
- Jumageldinov A, Nuradinov A, Brunnet AE, Derivois D. Cultural risk factors of suicidal behavior among adolescents in Kazakhstan. L'Enceph. 2020;46(6):500-502.
- Gaffney H, Farrington DP, Ttofi MM. Examining the effectiveness of school-bullying intervention programs globally: a meta-analysis. Int J Bull Prev. 2019;1(1):14-31.
- Gubenko AYu, Khan NN. The problem of bullying in the educational process. Bull “Ped Sci.” 2020;65(1):227-231.
- National Public Health Center. National report factors shaping the health and well-being of children and adolescents in Kazakhstan; 2018. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AdWjQy8a3Em98-S1kneq7kawIQCFc2iC/view
- Chai L, Xue J, Han Z. School bullying victimization and self-rated health and life satisfaction: the gendered buffering effect of educational expectations. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020;116:105252.
- Li L, Chen X, Li H. Bullying victimization, school belonging, academic engagement and achievement in adolescents in rural China: a serial mediation model. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020;113:104946.
- Mazzone A, Nocentini A, Menesini E. Bullying in residential care for children: qualitative findings from five European countries. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2019;100:451-460.
- Liu Y, Hu F. Being bullied at school as a child, worse health as an adult? Evidence from China. Int J Educ Dev. 2021;82:102374.
- Huk O. School psychologist’s decisions regarding bullying as related to research and professional development. Curr Res Behav Sci. 2021;2:100025.
- Sheryazdanova HT, Baizdrakhmanova AK. Socio-psychological aspects of the work of a psychologist with bullying in a Kazakhstani school. High Educ Tod. 2015;12:51-55.
- Verseveld MDA, Fukkink RG, Fekkes M, Oostdam RJ. Effects of antibullying programs on teacher’s interventions in bullying situations. A meta‐analysis. Psych School. 2019;56:1522-1539.
- Chung JY, Sun MS, Kim HJ. What makes bullies and victims in Korean elementary schools? Child Youth Serv Rev. 2018;94:132-139.
- Fraguas D, Diaz-Caneja CM, Ayora M, Duran-Cutilla M, Abregu-Crespo R, Ezquiaga-Bravo I, Arango C. Assessment of school anti-bullying interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA Ped. 2021;175(1):44-55.
- Gaffney H, Ttofi MM, Farrington DP. What works in anti-bullying programs? Analysis of effective intervention components. J School Psych. 2021;85:37-56.
- Gaffney H, Ttofi MM, Farrington DP. Evaluating the effectiveness of school-bullying prevention programs: an updated meta-analytical review. Aggr Viol Behav. 2019;45:111-133.
- Olweus D, Limber SP. Bullying in school: evaluation and dissemination of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program. Amer J Orthopsych. 2010;80(1):124-134.
- Chen LM. School-based anti-bullying strategies in Taiwan and their effects. Stud Educ Eval. 2018;59:218-223.
