Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

ISSN 2415-8038 e-ISSN 2786-6688
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Manifestation of neo-mythology and postmodernism in the national prose of Kazakhstan

Issue 56, 2024

Yerkezhan Seitkazy, Almasbek Maulenov, Zhayna Satkenova, Saule Yerzhanova, Yerkingul Soltanayeva

Received 13.01.2024, Revised 04.05.2024, Accepted 28.06.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.271lf1

Abstract

Relevance. The study's significance lies in exploring how modern literary movements contribute to national cultural identity through a comparative analysis of postmodern philosophical and aesthetic paradigms. It investigates the effective transmission of both national traits and individual authorial style within a single artistic context. This research is crucial for understanding the interplay between cultural specificity and contemporary literary expression.

Purpose. The purpose of this study is a detailed investigation of neo-mythological and postmodern manifestations in Kazakh national prose, the examination of key features in the perception of images, plots, and motivic structure in postmodern discourse.

Methodology. The methodological framework included the theoretical analytical-synthetic method, comparative, selective literary, structural analysis, which allowed figuring out the main trends of the Kazakh literary process.

Results. This paper contains a study of the key works of Kazakh national prose in the context of postmodernism and neo-mythologism. The features of the reception of ancient, biblical, folklore images and plots were considered and the problems concerning the perception of postmodern text were actualised. The study focused on genre and style diversity, structural and compositional techniques, and neo-mythological nature of literary works.

Conclusions. The study formed an idea of the Kazakh literary tradition and aesthetic and artistic paradigm, indicating the importance of intertextuality and verbal play in terms of expanding the base of artistic techniques in the postmodern text. The results of this paper were compared with the results of research by modern English, Chinese, Kazakh, and Ukrainian literary critics.

Keywords: literary work; playing with the canon; real and unreal; genre and style specifics; author’s position

Suggested citation

Seitkazy Ye, Maulenov A, Satkenova Zh, Yerzhanova S, Soltanayeva Ye. Manifestation of neo-mythology and postmodernism in the national prose of Kazakhstan. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(56):2711-2719. DOI: 10.54919/physics/56.2024.271lf1

Download article

References

  1. Buranova JA, Kaxxorova G. Interpretation of the Term Neomythologism in Modern Literature. Pind J Cult Liter ELT. 2021;2021:5-10.
  2. Poliakova O. The Special Situation of the Postmodern: Transmutation of Cultural Consciousness into the Modern Age. Sci J Virt. 2020;41:29-31.
  3. Zhanysbekova ET. Myth in the structure of the narrative text (on the material of modern Kazakh prose). In: Materials of the international scientific and educational-methodical conference “Philology, linguodidactics and translation studies: topical issues and development trends” (pp. 66-72). Almaty: Kazakh University; 2020.
  4. Hayat MK. Topic of Assignment: Feature of postmodern literature; 2020. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346652019_Topic_of_Assignment_Feature_of_postmodern_literature.
  5. Kovbasenko Y. The literature of postmodernism: on the other side of different sides. Foreig Liter Ukr School. 2002;5:2-12.
  6. Magauin M. Kypchak beauty. Almaty: Samga; 2007.
  7. Nurmaganbetov T. The old man, the camel and the wind. Astana: Er-Daulet; 2007.
  8. Aitmatov Sh. When mountains fall. Almaty: Dauir-kitap; 2017.
  9. Altai A. Altai novellas. Almaty: Olke; 2001.
  10. Kemelbaeva A. Munara. Almaty: Soros-Kazakhstan; 2003.
  11. Altybayeva S. Neomythologism of modern Kazakh prose: multicultural discourse and the search for an artistic perspective. Respect Philol. 2011;20:27-40.
  12. Altybayeva S. Kazakh prose of the independence period: tradition, innovation, perspectives. Almaty: Gylym; 2018.
  13. Kaldybaeva R, Shakir Zh, Omarkulova B. The character of postmodernism in Kazakh stories. In: International conference on modern researches in science and technology (pp. 59-62). Nizhny Novgorod: NOO Professional Science; 2020.
  14. Frisch M. Don’t call me Gantenbein. Kharkiv: Folio; 2010.
  15. Kafka F. Castle. Kharkiv: Folio; 2006.
  16. Mann T. Dr. Faustus. Kharkiv: Folio; 2011.
  17. Nurpeisov AK. Last debt. Almaty: Book club; 2021.
  18. Joyce J. Ulysses. Kyiv: Publishing House Zhupanskyi; 2015.
  19. Homer. Odyssey. Kyiv: Dnipro; 1963.
  20. Asemkulov T. Taltus. Almaty: SaGa; 2020.
  21. Yoko U. The Name of the Rose. Kharkiv: Folio; 2018.
  22. Mukanova R. Bright world. Almaty: Zalyn; 1994.
  23. Adibaev Kh. Constellations of twins (secret and mysterious): novel-revelation. Almaty: Atamura; 2004.
  24. Hesse G. The Glass Bead Game. Kharkiv: Folio; 2020.
  25. Maulenov AA, Matbek NK. Neomythology in works of art. Ker Gyl J. 2022;1(74):160-169.
  26. Loffe D. East-European Critical Thought: Myth, Religion, and Magic versus Literature, Sign and Narrative. Relig. 2021;12(9):717.
  27. Hong Y. Return of Myth, Myth Resources, and the Contemporaneity of Mythology in Korea and China Today. Int J Korean Hist. 2022;27(1):325-354.
  28. Chengbing W. Reclaiming Postmodern Confucianism through Narrative and Edification. Educ Philos Theor. 2020;55(4):398–405.
  29. Holtz P. Does Postmodernism Really Entail a Disregard for the Truth? Similarities and Differences in Postmodern and Critical Rationalist Conceptualisations of Truth, Progress, and Empirical Research Methods. Front Psych 2020;11:545959.
  30. Ali-Khan C. Postmodern metaphor. Cult Stud Sci Educ. 2020;15:951-954.
  31. Simkova E. The Meeting of the Postmodern and Metamodern in the Characters of Ali Smith´s Autumn. Contemp Res Foreig Philol. 2020;18:262-271.
  32. Onega S, Ganteau J-M. Transcending the Postmodern: The Singular Response of Literature to the Transmodern Paradigm. London: Routledge; 2020.
  33. Baidya TS. Postmodernism: a Rupture or Continuity of Modernism? 2020. https://cutt.ly/yNhgTrQ.
  34. Benesch K. Is Truth to Post-Truth what Modernism Is to Postmodernism? Heidegger, the Humanities, and the Demise of Common-Sense. Eur J Amer Stud. 2020;15(1):1-13.
  35. Mares M. High Postmodernism and Its Self-Understanding. Seminal Postmodernist Work of Art, Literature and Visual Culture. Munich: Grin Verlag; 2020.
  36. Drozdovskyi DI. Postmodernism VS Post-Postmodernism: Philosophical Distinctions (on the Material of the Contemporary British Novel). Phil Treat. 2020;11(3-4):32-40.
Make a Submission

Indexing

  • Scopus logo
  • WorldCat logo
  • OpenAIRE logo
  • Crossref logo
  • VNLU logo
  • Professional publications of Ukraine logo
  • BASE logo
  • Google Scholar logo

info@physics.uz.ua