Methodology for specialized teaching of the subject “Algebra and Beginnings of Analysis” for high school students

Issue 55, 2024

Zhanar Alimova, Alma Abylkassymova, Larissa Zhadrayeva

Received 01.11.2023, Revised 30.01.2024, Accepted 12.03.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.245ko4

Abstract

Relevance. The educational system of the Republic of Kazakhstan is gradually being updated based on international requirements. Changes have also affected the methodology of profile teaching of the subject “Algebra and Beginnings of Analysis” as an important element of training of high school students.

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to reveal the features of profile teaching of the subject “Algebra and Beginnings of Analysis” in the conditions of updating the content of education.

Methodology. To achieve the goal, the methods of analysis and synthesis, comparison, generalization, as well as the author’s questionnaires were used.

Results. The study revealed the features of the new educational paradigm of the Republic of Kazakhstan, described the essence of updating the content of education and identified changes in the methodology of teaching mathematical disciplines. The role of profile teaching of the subject “Algebra and Beginnings of Analysis” for high school students was determined. To determine the actual problems in the methodology of teaching the subject “Algebra and Beginnings of Analysis”, a study was conducted among 129 students of profile senior classes of secondary general education schools of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The results of the study demonstrated that students receive the necessary knowledge in the process of studying the subject “Algebra and Beginnings of Analysis” according to the updated methodology, but there is a lack of innovative technologies in the learning process and feedback from teachers. The methods of improving the methodology of profile education in the subject “Algebra and Beginnings of Analysis” were suggested, including additional work with teachers and improvement of their innovative competences, gamification of the educational process and providing students with opportunities to apply their knowledge in practice.

Conclusions. The results of this study can be used by the management of secondary general education schools of the Republic of Kazakhstan, as well as by teachers of mathematical disciplines to improve the educational process and better training of students of profile high schools.

Keywords: exact sciences; specialized teaching; content updating; mathematical literacy; secondary education; educational program

Suggested citation

Alimova Z, Abylkassymova A, Zhadrayeva L. Methodology for specialized teaching of the subject “Algebra and Beginnings of Analysis” for high school students. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):2454-2466. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.245ko4

Download article

References

  1. Decree of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 726 “On approval of the national project ‘Quality education Educated Nation’”. 2021. https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P2100000726
  2. Yessikyzy A, Smagulov E, Temerbekova A, Tanabayeva A. Basic provisions of logical thinking formation in teaching mathematics. Bull Zhetysu Uni. 2020;2(94):27-32.
  3. Kagazbaeva AK, Rakhimova GN. State of geometric education in secondary schools Kazakhstan. In: Materials of the Republican Scientific and Methodological Conference “Introduction of Innovative Technologies into the Educational Process – The Basis Quality Education” (pp. 318-323). Taldykorgan: Zhetysu University; 2020.
  4. Stanogina NV. On the development of mathematical literacy in schoolchildren. In: Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference “Sultangazin Readings-2023” (pp. 16-18). Kostanay: A. Baitursynov Kostanay Regional University; 2023.
  5. Zhadrayeva L, Iskakova M. Didactic and methodological approaches to creating a textbook and educational materials in mathematics in the context of updating the content of education. News Kyrgyz Academ Educ. 2020;2(51):220-225.
  6. Satbaev SK. Teachers’ approaches to teaching mathematics through the context of real-life situations in primary school. Proceed Int Young Schol Worksh. 2020;9:464-476.
  7. Abdikerova GO, Sadyrova MS. Transformation of professional preferences of high school children in Kazakhstan: Sociological analysis. Bull Abai Kazakh Nation Ped Uni. 2022;4(80):5-12.
  8. Raditya A, Saputra N. Question analysis in Indonesians’ new curriculum secondary mathematics textbook. Desim: J Matem. 2022;5(3):353-362.
  9. Decree of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 941 “On approval of the Concept for the development of education of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2022-2026”. 2022. https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/archive/docs/P2200000941/24.11.2022
  10. Order of the Minister of Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 399 “On approval of standard curricula in general education subjects and courses at the choice of levels of primary, basic secondary and general secondary education”. 2022. https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V2200029767
  11. Avotina M, Zilite A. Changes in the mathematics curriculum for grades 10-12 in Latvia. In: Proceedings of ATEE Annual Conference “To Be or Not to Be a Great Educator” (pp. 666-683). Riga: University of Latvia Press; 2023.
  12. Zhang Z. Designing cognitively diagnostic assessment for algebraic content knowledge and thinking skills. Int Educ Stud. 2018;11(2):106-117.
  13. Rind AA, Mughal SH. An analysis of Pakistan’s national curriculum of mathematics at secondary level. Electron J Educ, Social Econ Tech. 2020;1(1):39-42.
  14. Utomo D, Sulfiah S, Inganah S. Algebraic literacy among pesantren-based senior high school students. J Teor Apliki Matem. 2022;6(2):247-260.
  15. Instructional and methodological letter “On the features of the educational process in secondary education organizations Republic of Kazakhstan in the 2023-2024 academic year”. 2023. https://uba.edu.kz/storage/app/media/2023%20%D3%98%D0%9D%D0%A5/%20%20%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B7%2028%2008%202023.pdf
  16. Hakiki L, Murtiyasa B, Djumadi D. Mathematics learning planning in the independence curriculum. J Pendidik Amarth. 2023;2(1):52-54.
  17. Fan L, Li L, Chen Q, Li N. How is educational gamification represented in school curriculum? An investigation of Chinese secondary mathematics textbooks. Sustain. 2023;15(4):3830.
  18. Abylkasymova AE, Nurmukhamedova ZM, Nurbaeva DM, Zhumalieva LD. “The Turkish Vector” influence on teaching the exact disciplines in modern educational system of Kazakhstan: On the example of teaching algebra and mathematics. Glob J Pure Appl Math. 2016;12(4):3481-3491.
  19. Sarıgöz O. Examination of secondary school mathematics curriculum in terms of 21st century skills. e-Int J Educ Res. 2023;14(2):1-16.
  20. Eshanova SA, Muratbekova MA. Methods of development of research and research activities of students on the subject “Algebra and the beginning of analysis”. Bull Series Phys Math Sci. 2021;4(76):7-14.
  21. Vasylenko O. Functional literacy in the system of adult education. Horyz Wychow. 2023;22(63):121-129.
  22. Storozhenko L, Butsky V, Taranovsky O. Stability of compressed steel concrete composite tubular columns with centrifuged cores. J Construct Steel Res. 1998;46(1-3):484. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(98)80098-9
  23. Pavlikov A, Kochkarev D, Harkava O. Calculation of reinforced concrete members strength by new concept. In: Proceedings of the fib Symposium 2019: Concrete - Innovations in Materials, Design and Structures (pp. 820-827). Krakow: International Federation for Structural Concrete; 2019.
  24. Salah J, Ur Rehman H, Al-Buwaiqi I. The Non-Trivial Zeros of The Riemann Zeta Function through Taylor Series Expansion and Incomplete Gamma Function. Mathem Statist. 2022;10(2):410-418. https://doi.org/10.13189/ms.2022.100216
  25. Jawabreh O, Qader AA, Salah J, Al Mashrafi K, AL Fahmawee EAD, Ali BJA. Fractional Calculus Analysis of Tourism Mathematical Model. Progr Fract Different Applic. 2023;9:1-11. https://doi.org/10.18576/pfda/09s101
  26. Nebesna Y, Ivasiv V, Nebesnyi R. The study of technological and kinetic regularities of simultaneous methacrylates obtaining over zirconium-containing catalysts. East-Eur J Enterp Technol. 2015;5(6):49-52. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.51348
  27. Kisała J, Ferraria AM, Mitina N, Cieniek B, Krzemiński P, Pogocki D, Nebesnyi R, Zaichenko O, Bobitski Y. Photocatalytic activity of layered MoS2 in the reductive degradation of bromophenol blue. RSC Adv. 2022;12(35):22465-22475. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ra03362c
  28. Istihapsari V, Junaedi I, Mulyono M. Comparing school mathematics curriculum between Switzerland and Indonesia. Bull Appl Math Math Educ. 2021;1(2):105-112.
  29. Siregar E, Sutiarso S, Yusuf Z. Analysis of students’ mathematical literacy ability in algebraic concepts based on trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS) problems. Tech Social Sci J. 2021;21(1):381-392.
  30. Salah J, Al Hashmi M, Rehman HU, Al Mashrafi K. Modified Mathematical Models in Biology by the Means of Caputo Derivative of a Function with Respect to Another Exponential Function. Mathem Statist. 2022;10(6):1194-1205. https://doi.org/10.13189/ms.2022.100605
  31. The system-methodological complex. 2017. https://smk.edu.kz/Upload/Page/270c7795-5530-42d7-bef6-fa8ba616580f.pdf
  32. Yakovkin IN, Katrich GA, Loburets AT, Vedula YS, Naumovets AG. Alkaline-earth overlayers on furrowed transition metal surfaces: An example of tailoring the surface properties. Progr Surface Sci. 1998;59(1-4):355-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6816(98)00061-6
  33. Yakovlev SV, Valuiskaya OA. Optimization of linear functions at the vertices of a permutation polyhedron with additional linear constraints. Ukrain Mathem J. 2001;53(9):1535-1545. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014374926840
  34. Abylkassymova AE, Zhumagulova ZA. On some aspects of mathematical education content at school and pedagogical institutions of higher education. Sci Sch. 2016;1:157-161.
  35. Nurbaeva DM. Methodological features of teaching an algebra course at school and pedagogical university. Almaty: Abay Kazakh National Pedagogical University; 2018.
  36. Aikenhead G. A rationale for the junior-senior secondary Mathematics curriculum 2.0. educ. 2021;27(1). https://doi.org/10.37119/ojs2021.v27i1.494
  37. Angriani V, Herman T, Nurlaelah E. Algebraic literacy skills of secondary school students. J Phys Conf Series. 2020;1657:012034.
  38. Cherniha R, Pliukhin O. New conditional symmetries and exact solutions of reaction-diffusion-convection equations with exponential nonlinearities. J Mathem Anal Applic. 2013;403(1):23-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2013.02.010
  39. Cherniha R, Serov M. Symmetries, ansätze and exact solutions of nonlinear second-order evolution equations with convection terms, II. Eur J Appl Mathem. 2006;17(5):597-605. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956792506006681
  40. Asmarawati E. Implementation of the independent curriculum in mathematics learning for class X vocational school in the administrative city of East Jakarta. Int J Educ Res Social Sci. 2022;3(5):1915-1919.
  41. Rehman HU, Darus M, Salah J. Graphing examples of starlike and convex functions of order β. Appl Mathem Inform Sci. 2018;12(3):509-515. https://doi.org/10.18576/amis/120305
  42. Salah JY. Properties of the modified caputo's derivative operator for certain analytic functions. Int J Pure Appl Mathem. 2016;109(3):665-671. https://doi.org/10.12732/ijpam.v109i3.14
  43. Imasuen K, Stanley OE. Proficiency in algebraic equations as a predictor of secondary school students’ academic achievement in mathematics. African J Math Stat Stud. 2022;5(3):33-42.
  44. Ali I, Das S. Factors Affecting algebraic problem-solving skills of secondary school students. Int J Educ Sci. 2021;35(1-3):22-28.
  45. Kinanti M, Sujadi I, Indriati D, Kuncoro K. Examining students’ cognitive processes in solving algebraic numeracy problems: A phenomenology study. J Elem. 2023;9(2):494-508.
  46. Stiphout IV, Drijvers P, Gravemeijer K. The development of students’ algebraic proficiency. Int Electron J Math Educ. 2013;8(2-3):62-80.
  47. Chan L, Sharifah O, Dian K, Edi S, Jeya A, Chuzairy H. Difficulties that students face when learning algebraic problem-solving. Uni J Educ Res. 2020;8(11):5405-5413.
  48. Das S, Ali I. An investigation on the effects of attitude towards algebraic problem-solving achievement. Int J Evaluat Res Educ. 2023;12(2):1016-1022.
  49. Richards T, Samuels S. Exploring the efficacy of guided discovery learning in improving algebraic thinking skills. Int J Sci Res. 2023;11(7):1784-1792.
  50. Maheswari GA, Saraswati E, Pratini HS. Analysis of student activeness in mathematics learning with Merdeka Curriculum. Union: J Ilmiah Pendidik Matem. 2023;11(2):217-225.
  51. Nebesnyi R, Ivasiv V, Dmytuk Y, Lapychak N. Acrylic Acid Obtaining By Acetic Acid Catalytic Condensation With Formaldehyde. East-Eur J Enterp Technol. 2013;6(6(66)):40-42. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2013.19130
  52. Nebesnyi R, Ivasiv V, Pikh Z, Zhyznevskyi V, Dmytruk Y. The kinetics of the gas phase aldol condensation reaction of propionic acid with formaldehyde on B2O3-P2O5-WO3/SiO2 catalyst. Chem Chem Technol. 2014;8(1):29-34. https://doi.org/10.23939/chcht08.01.029
  53. Dmytruk Y, Ivasiv V, Nebesnyi R, Maykova S. Optimum conditions determination of methyl methacrylate obtaining over tungsten-containing catalyst. East-Eur J Enterp Technol. 2015;4(6):4-7. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.47955
  54. Rupasinghe D, Vitharana P, Amarasinghe A. Professional development of mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in teaching basic algebra. Int J Res Innov Social Sci. 2023;7:469-479.
  55. Changwe R. Mathematics teacher education curriculum in Zambia: Lecturers’, students’ and in-service teachers’ perspective. Int J Res Innov Social Sci. 2022;6(12):592-602.
  56. Iilonga H, Ogbonnaya U. Grade 10 Namibian learners’ problem-solving skills in algebraic word problems. Infin J. 2023;12:275-290.
  57. Nautwima J, Asa A, Nendongo V. Integrating gamification into middle school mathematics curriculum: Game-based learning approach in Namibia. Int J Operat Manag. 2022;2(4):7-19.
  58. Poveda-Vásquez R, Zumbado-Castro M. Implementation of an institutional mathematics curriculum: From expectation to reality. Rev Electrón Educ. 2022;27(1). https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.27-1.14531
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua