Intangible cultural heritage as a resource for consolidating modern Ukrainian society

Issue 55, 2024

Hanna Chmil, Inna Kuznietsova, Maryna Mishchenko, Oleksandra Oliynyk, Violeta Demeshchenko

Received 07.11.2023, Revised 23.01.2024, Accepted 04.03.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.164dm8

Abstract

Relevance. The relevance of this study lied in actualising the issue of increasing the level of social consolidation of Ukrainian society under the conditions of a number of political, economic, social, and cultural transformations. Intangible cultural heritage serves as the main resource for the establishment and development of national consciousness, which, in turn, strengthens integration processes within society.

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to prove the value of intangible cultural heritage in the modern life of Ukrainians and substantiate the need to preserve cultural values in the course of historical development as a powerful ethno-unifying factor.

Methodology. In the course of the study, general scientific methods, namely analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, systematic, and comparative were used for logical and consistent presentation of the material. A critical approach to information allowed comprehensively and thoroughly examining the issue of cultural heritage as a unifying factor.

Results. As a result of the study, it was discovered that due to complex socio-political and globalisation processes, there is still a need to preserve the traditional heritage, which is an indicator of cultural independence, proving the uniqueness and originality of each nation. Therefore, in the course of the technologisation of society, shifting from the conventional provisions, Ukrainians continue to preserve long-established values, transmit elements of intangible cultural heritage from generation to generation, emphasising the heredity of Ukrainian culture. In the context of this subject, there are currently a small number of publications that only briefly mention the consolidating function of intangible cultural heritage for a particular culture, and, to a greater extent, cover the issues of preserving this type of cultural heritage.

Conclusions. The scientific value of the study lies in emphasising the relevance of preserving and further transmitting cultural traditions and languages to protect national identity and raise the level of civic consciousness.

Keywords: traditions; language; spiritual culture; consciousness; self-identification

Suggested citation

Chmil H, Kuznietsova I, Mishchenko M, Oliynyk O, Demeshchenko V. Intangible cultural heritage as a resource for consolidating modern Ukrainian society. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):1648-1656. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.164dm8

Download article

References

  1. Butsenko O. Culture and cultural heritage issues projected on SDGs. Art Hist Ukraine. 2020;20:8–13. DOI: 10.31500/2309-8155.20.2020.220912.
  2. Demian V. Conceptual framework of the ich in the modern scientific discourse. Art Hist Ukraine. 2020;20:14–9. DOI: 10.31500/2309-8155.20.2020.220915.
  3. Bokuchava G. Factors of Ukrainian society’s consolidation. Rahvusvaheline Kaitseuuringute Keskus Anternational Centre for Defence and Securiry [Internet]. The International Centre for Defence and Security; 2017 [updated 2017 Jun. 28; cited 2024 Jan. 26]. Available from: https://icds.ee/en/factors-of-ukrainian-societys-consolidation/
  4. Grabovska IM. Civil Society as one of the decisive factors of the Ukrainians’ consolidation in the Postcolonial period. Sci Theor Almanac Grani. 2017;20(2):87–91. DOI: 10.15421/171730.
  5. Malysh N, Shevchenko V, Tkachuk-Miroshnychenko O. State policy in the sphere of protection of cultural heritage in Ukraine. J Cult Herit Manag Sustain Dev. 2021;11(3):262–79. DOI: 10.1108/JCHMSD-03-2020-0047.
  6. Arizpe L. The genealogy of intangible cultural heritage. Cult Divers Herit Maj Stud. 2020;12:100–17. DOI: 10.4000/books.editionsmsh.16411.
  7. Afonin E, Martynov A. Tradition as a factor of integration and consolidation of ukrainian society in the conditions of postmodern: Archetypic Approach. Public Governance. 2020;1(21):27–41.
  8. Mergos G, Patsavos N. Cultural heritage as economic value. Athens: InHeriT; 2016.
  9. Kitsikidis A, Dimitropoulos K, Tsalakanidou F, Alivizatou-Barakou M, editors. Mixed Reality and Gamification for Cultural Heritage. Cham: Springer; 2017. Kitsikidis A, Chantas G, Dimitropoulos K, Nikolopoulos S. Intangible cultural heritage and new technologies: Challenges and opportunities for cultural preservation and development. mixed reality and gamification for cultural heritage; p. 129-158.
  10. Jokilehto J. Considerations on authenticity and integrity in world heritage context. City Time. 2006;2(1):1–16.
  11. Lenzerini F. Intangible cultural heritage: The living culture of peoples. Eur J Int Law. 2011;22(1):101–20. DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chr006.
  12. Paton BE, Chernets AV, Marinsky GS, Korzhik VN, Petrov VS. Prospects of using plasma technologies for disposal and recycling of medical and other hazardous waste. Part 2. Probl Spetsial Electrometall. 2005;(4):46-54.
  13. Esfehani MH. Intangible cultural heritage and tourism in protected areas: thesis of candidate of doctor of philosophy. Dunedin: University of Otago; 2016.
  14. Borisov Y, Korzhyk V. Internal stresses in plasma coatings with an amorphous structure. Proceed Int Therm Spr Conf. 1998;1:693-697.
  15. Szmelter I. New values of cultural heritage and the need for a new paradigm regarding its care. CeROArt. 2013. DOI: 10.4000/ceroart.3647.
  16. Giglitto D, Ciolfi L, Bosswick W. Building a bridge: opportunities and challenges for intangible cultural heritage at the intersection of institutions, civic society, and migrant communities. Int J Heritage Stud. 2021;1:1–18. DOI: 10.1080/13527258.2021.1922934.
  17. Fialko NM, Prokopov VG, Meranova NO, Borisov YuS, Korzhik VN, Sherenkovskaya GP. Temperature conditions of particle-substrate systems in a gas-thermal deposition process. Fiz Khim Obrabot Mater. 1994;(2):59-67.
  18. Yan WJ, Chiou SC. The safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage from the perspective of civic participation: The informal education of chinese embroidery handicrafts. Sustainability. 2021;13:1–21. DOI: 10.3390/su13094958.
  19. Kovzel M, Kutzova V. Regularities of the formation of structure, phase composition and tribological properties of heat-resistant chromium-nickel alloys Nikorin. In: Structural materials: Manufacture, properties, conditions of use: Collective monograph, (pp. 68-120). Kharkiv: Technology Center; 2023. DOI: 10.15587/9786177319978.CH3
  20. Terzyan A. Towards democratic consolidation? Ukraine after the revolution of dignity. Open Political Science. 2020;3:183–91. DOI: 10.1515/openps-2020-0015.
  21. Burlaka V, Lavrova E, Podnebennaya S, Zakharova I. Development of single-phase high-power factor inverter welding sources. East-Eur J Enter Tech. 2017;4(1):18-24.
  22. Shapovalova N, editor. Civil society in post Euromaidan Ukraine: From revolution to consolidation. Stuttgart: ibidem Verlag; 2018. Shapovalova N, Burlyuk O. Civil society and change in Ukraine post-Euromaidan: An introduction; p. 11-40.
  23. Royanov V, Zakharova I, Lavrova E. Development of properties of spray flow and nature of pressure distribution in electric arc metalization. East-Eur J Enter Tech. 2017;6(5-90):41-49.
  24. Kombayev K, Kim A, Yelemanov D, Sypainova G. Strengthening of Low-Carbon Alloy Steel by Electrolytic-Plasma Hardening. Int Rev Mech Eng. 2022;16(2);84-91.
  25. Lypak H, Kunanets N, Pasichnyk V, Veretennikova N. Digitized historical and cultural heritage consolidation technologies: From a territorial resource to a national portal. Int Conf Adv Comput Inf Technol. 2020;2020:20008182. DOI: 10.1109/ACIT49673.2020.9208819
  26. Fialko NM, Prokopov VG, Meranova NO, Borisov YuS, Korzhik VN, Sherenkovskaya GP. Thermal physics of gasothermal coatings formation processes. State of investigations. Fiz Khim Obrabot Mater. 1993;(4):83-93.
  27. Kombayev K, Muzdybayev M, Muzdybayeva A, Myrzabekova D, Wieleba W, Leśniewski T. Functional Surface Layer Strengthening and Wear Resistance Increasing of a Low Carbon Steel by Electrolytic-Plasma Processing. Stroj Vest/J Mech Eng. 2022;68(9):542-551.
  28. Lozynska TM. Archetypes and imagination in the formation of rural neo-societies: Conclusions for the state policy of rural development. Ukr Soc. 2021;1(76):69–76. DOI: 10.15407/socium2021.01.069.
  29. Petronela Т. The importance of the intangible cultural heritage in the economy. Proc Econ Finance. 2016;39:731–6. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30271-4.
  30. Kutsova VZ, Kovzel MA, Grebeneva AV, Ratnikova IV, Velichko OA. The influence of alloying elements on structure formation, phase composition and properties of chromium-manganese iron in the cast state. Metall Min Indust. 2015;7(9):1090-1095.
  31. Intangible cultural heritage [Internet]. Ukrainian Center for Cultural Research: Ministry of Culture and Information Policy of Ukraine; 2021 [cited 2024 Jan. 26]. Available from: http://uccs.org.ua/nemateryalna-kulturna-spadshchyna
  32. Virtual Museum of Intangible Cultural Heritage [Internet]. Ukrainian Center for Cultural Research: Ministry of Culture and Information Policy of Ukraine; 2021 [cited 2024 Jan. 26]. Available from: http://virtmuseum.uccs.org.ua/ua
  33. Xtaxkgakget Makgkaxtlawana: the Centre for Indigenous Arts and its contribution to safeguarding the intangible cultural heritage of the Totonac people of Veracruz, Mexico [Internet]. UNESCO: Intangible Cultural Heritage; 2021 [cited 2024 Jan. 26]. Available from: https://ich.unesco.org/en/BSP/xtaxkgakget-makgkaxtlawana-the-centre-for-indigenous-arts-and-its-contribution-to-safeguarding-the-intangible-cultural-heritage-of-the-totonac-people-of-veracruz-mexico-00666
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua