Sargsyan, G., Silveistr, A., Lysyi, M., Mokliuk, M., & Sargsyan, H.
(2023).
The appearance of standing wave structures in the reaction medium during the diffusion development of the chain reaction process.
Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics",
(54),
36-46.
https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/54.2023.36
The appearance of standing wave structures in the reaction medium during the diffusion development of the chain reaction process
https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/54.2023.36
Abstract
Relevance. Understanding the dynamic behavior of radicals in reactors undergoing gas-phase oxidation of organic substances is crucial for optimizing reactor design and safety across industries.
Purpose. This study aims to elucidate the emergence of standing wave structures influenced by feedback mechanisms in reactors with cylindrical and spherical symmetry, using mathematical principles governing the propagation of oscillations and shock waves in diffusion-driven chain reactions.
Methodology. Materials and methods for the research included a computer simulation using MATHCAD 2001i, and comparative analysis of experimental data obtained from reactor experiments. The computational modeling revealed vivid formations of standing wave structures in reactors influenced by feedback mechanisms.
Results. The impact of reverse connections in reactors with cylindrical and spherical symmetry significantly contributed to the formation of various standing wave structures of radical concentrations within the reaction zone. It was found that these structures were largely imperceptible visually and could only be observed when the reaction was accompanied by intense light emission. These visual representations served as compelling evidence of the intricate interplay between reaction kinetics and feedback effects. The study emphasized the importance of understanding and predicting the root causes of instabilities, ultimately enhancing the reliability and safety of reactors across various industries. The results demonstrated a correlation between specific feedback mechanisms and the spatial distribution of standing wave structures.
Conclusions. The derived computational patterns, as presented in this paper, provide compelling evidence supporting the feasibility of standing wave structure formation within reactors when influenced by feedback mechanisms. The study unveiled the potential for fine-tuning reactor parameters to influence the formation and stability of these structures. The findings represented a significant stride towards a more comprehensive understanding of dynamic regimes in reactors, with implications for reactor design, operation, and safety protocols. The insights garnered from uncovering standing wave structures influenced by feedback mechanisms offered valuable opportunities to optimize reactor design and operational safety, leading to more efficient and sustainable processes
Keywords: oxidation, back bonding, modeling of dynamic modes, radicals, oscillatory phenomena, stationary process
Suggested citation
References
[1] Lin C, Jiang J, Ruan H, Ma X. Investigation of non-uniform oxidation based on a mechanochemical phase field model with nonlinear reaction kinetics and large inelastic deformation. npj Mater Degrad. 2023;7:57. DOI: 10.1038/s41529-023-00376-z.
[2] Sargsyan G, Evinyan M, Gukasyan P, Sargsyan H. Modeling of hydrocarbons and hydrogen oxidation in the presence of surface-active centers water-negative halogen ion in terms of the formation of weak shock waves. J Contemp Phys. 2022;57:297-302. DOI: 10.1134/S1068337222030148.
[3] Abrahamyan T, Haroyan H, Hambaryan D, Parsamyan H, Babajanyan A, Lee K, et al. Surface-standing-wave formation via resonance interaction of a finite-length conductive rod with microwaves. J Phys D Appl Phys. 2022;55:445001. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/ac8e14.
[4] Kretschmer S, Heermann T, Tassinari A, Glock P, Schwille P. Increasing MinD’s membrane affinity yields standing wave oscillations and functional gradients on flat membranes. ACS Synth Biol. 2021;10(5):939–949. DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.0c00604.
[5] Villar-Sepúlveda E, Champneys AR. General conditions for Turing and wave instabilities in reaction-diffusion systems. J Math Biol. 2023;86:39. DOI: 10.1007/s00285-023-01870-3.
[6] Gaskins D, Soohoo J, Dolnik M, Epstein I. Birth and death of invading standing waves in the BZ-AOT reaction-diffusion system. Israel Journal of Chemistry. 2018;58(6–7):776–780. DOI: 10.1002/ijch.201700142.
[7] Sargsyan GN, Yessayan RS, Vardanyan IA. Analysis of heterogeneous homogeneous model, describing oscillations in system CH3CHO+O2. Appl Catal A. 2000;203(2):285–291. DOI: 10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00488-9.
[8] Berenstein I, Beta C. Spatiotemporal chaos arising from standing waves in a reaction-diffusion system with cross-diffusion. J Chem Phys. 2012;136(3):034903. DOI: 10.1063/1.3676577.
[9] Lim S. Mechanisms underlying sharpening of visual response dynamics with familiarity. Neurosci. 2019;8:e44098. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.44098.001.
[10] Hu H, Li X, Fang Zh, Fu X, Ji L, Li Q. Inducing and modulating spiral waves by delayed feedback in a uniform oscillatory reaction-diffusion system. Chem Phys. 2010;371:60–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2010.04.004.
[11] Lansdell B, Ford K, Kutz JN. A reaction-diffusion model of cholinergic retinal waves. PLOS Comput Biol. 2014;10(12):e1003953. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003953.
[12] Hamik CT, Steinbock O. Excitation waves in reaction-diffusion media with non-monotonic dispersion relations. New J Phys. 2003;5:58.1–58.12.
[13] Hata S, Nakao H, Mikhailov AS. Sufficient conditions for wave instability in three-component reaction–diffusion systems. Prog Theor Exp Phys. 2014;1:013A01. DOI: 10.1093/ptep/ptt102.
[14] Regenauer-Lieb K, Hu M, Schrank C, Chen X, Clavijo SP, Kelka U, et al. Cross-diffusion waves resulting from multiscale, multi-physics instabilities: Theory. Solid Earth. 2021;12:869–883. DOI: 10.5194/se-12-869-2021.
[15] Cuiñas D, Berenstein I, Carballido-Landeira J, Muñuzuri A. Transition from traveling to standing waves as a function of frequency in a reaction-diffusion system. J Chem Phys. 2008;128:244907. DOI: 10.1063/1.2946697.
[16] Hamster C, van Heijster P. Waves in a stochastic cell motility model. Bull Math Biol. 2023;85(8):70. DOI: 10.1007/s11538-023-01164-1.
[17] Bianchi F, Kurtén Th, Riva M, Mohr C, Rissanen MP, Roldin, P, et al. Highly oxygenated organic molecules (HOM) from gas-phase autoxidation involving peroxy radicals: A key contributor to atmospheric aerosol. Chem Rev. 2019;119(6):3472–3509. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00395.
[18] Li, BW, He Y, Li LD, Yang L, Wang X. Spiral wave chimeras in reaction-diffusion systems: Phenomenon, mechanism and transitions. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2021;99:105830. DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2021.105830.
[19]Xu Z, Ren Y, Deng X, Xu M, Chai W, Qian X, et al. Recent developments on gas-phase volatile organic compounds abatement based on photocatalysis. Adv Energy Sustainability Res. 2022;3(11):2200105. DOI: 10.1002/aesr.202200105.
[20] Salo V, Valiev R, Lehtola S, Kurtén Th. Gas-phase peroxyl radical recombination reactions: A computational study of formation and decomposition of tetroxides. J Phys Chem. 2022;126(25):4046–4056. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.2c01321.
[21] Cardona, AL, Gibilisco, RG, Rivela, CB, Blanco MB, Patroescu-Klotz I, Illmann N, et al. Kinetics, product distribution and atmospheric implications of the gas-phase oxidation of allyl sulfides by OH radicals. Chemosphere. 2022;288(2):132546. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132546.
[22] Subramanian S, Murray SM. Pattern selection in reaction diffusion systems. Phys Rev E. 2021;103(1–1):012215. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.103.012215.
[23] Sargsyan G, Gukasyan P, Sargsyan H, Poveda R. Diffusion flames and a semi-empirical method for estimating the distribution of hydrogen molecules in propane flames. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2023;53:42–52. DOI: 10.54919/physics/53.2023.42.
[24] Bobyr SV. Development and application of a simple model for calculating the quantum diffusion parameters of rubidium, hydrogen, and deuterium atoms. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2021;49:19–25.
