Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

ISSN 2415-8038 e-ISSN 2786-6688
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Three models, MSSM, 2HDM, NMSSM, for supersymmetry searches at the LHC

Issue 56, 2024

Tetiana Obikhod, Evgen Petrenko

Received 03.08.2024, Revised 14.09.2024, Accepted 24.10.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.279tg2

Abstract

Relevance. Supersymmetry is a theory that provides an elegant solution to Standard Model problems related to the interaction hierarchy, dark matter candidates, and corrections to the Higgs boson mass. Searching for supersymmetric particles is a key focus of the LHC, exploring various decay modes and potential links to recent ATLAS and CMS observations.

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to use modern software to select the optimal theory for the predictions of the manifestations of supersymmetry in the LHC experiment.

Methodology. A complex methodology was used for the analysis and synthesis of relevant experimental and theoretical material, computer modeling and a comparative-analytical research method.

Results. The research results are summarized in three tables, each corresponding to MSSM, 2HDM, and NMSSM models, with relevant scenarios. For supersymmetry searches, two parameter spaces were defined: scenario 1 without experimental constraints and scenario 2 based on experimental data. Analysis of the Higgs boson production cross-sections through gluon-gluon and bottom-quark interactions showed that the NMSSM model is optimal, yielding the highest cross-section for the lightest CP-even Higgs in gluon fusion. The MSSM model had the largest cross-section for CP-odd Higgs production. No significant changes were observed in CP-odd Higgs production for 2HDM across scenarios 1 and 2. The cross-sections in gluon fusion, especially for the NMSSM model, align with experimental data presented the greatest value for the production of the lightest and CP-even Higgs bosons, MSSM model yields the best results for the lightest and CP-odd Higgs bosons in the second scenario.

Conclusions. For the search for superparticles, both theoretical models, in this case, this is the NMSSM model, and the parameter space of the considered models are of significant importance. At the same time, it is necessary to note the growth of the cross section for all models with increasing energy at the collider LHC.

Keywords: supersymmetry; gluon-gluon fusion; parameters of model; production cross sections; Higgs boson

Suggested citation

Obikhod T, Petrenko E. Three models, MSSM, 2HDM, NMSSM, for supersymmetry searches at the LHC. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(56):2792-2797. DOI: 10.54919/physics/56.2024.279tg2

Download article

References

  1. ATLAS Collaboration. Standard Model Summary Plots October 2023. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2023-039. Geneva; 2023.
  2. Englert C. Learning New Tricks with more than one Higgs. URL: https://indico.cern.ch/event/1334507/contributions/5972827/attachments/2880056/5045516/2024_CERN.pdf
  3. Trimble V. Existence and nature of dark matter in the universe. Annu Rev Astron Astrophys. 1987;25:425–472.
  4. Hinshaw G, Weiland JL, Hil RS, Odegard N, Larson D, Bennett CL, Dunkley J, Gold B, Greason MR, Jarosik N, Komatsu E, Nolta MR, Page L, Spergel DN, Wollack E, Halpern M, Kogut A, Limon M, Meyer SS, Tucker GS, Wright EL. Five-year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: Data processing, sky maps, and basic results. Astrophys J Suppl. 2009;180(2):225–245.
  5. Aharonov Y, Komar A, Susskind L. Superluminal Behavior, Causality, and Instability. Phys Rev. 1969;182(5):1400–1403.
  6. Golfand Y, Likhtman E. Extension of the Algebra of Poincare Group Generators and Violation of P Invariance. JETP Lett. 1971;13:323-326.
  7. Freund P. Introduction to Supersymmetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988.
  8. Volkov DV, Akulov VP. Possible universal neutrino interaction. In: J. Wess, V.P. Akulov (Eds.), Supersymmetry and Quantum Field Theory. Lecture Notes in Physics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1998.
  9. Ramond P. Dual Theory for Free Fermions. Phys Rev D. 1971;3(10):2415–2418.
  10. Neveu A, Schwarz JH. Factorizable dual model of pions. Nucl Phys B. 1971;31(1):86–112.
  11. Wess J, Zumino B. Supergauge transformations in four dimensions. Nucl Phys B. 1974;70(1):39–50.
  12. Heinemeyer S, Stal O, Weiglein G. Interpreting the LHC Higgs search results in the MSSM. Phys Lett B. 2012;710(1):201–206.
  13. Jungman G, Kamionkowski M, Griest K. Supersymmetric dark matter. Phys Rep. 1996;267(5–6):195–373.
  14. Garrett K, Dūda G. Dark matter: A primer. Advan Astron. 2011;968283:1–22.
  15. Dimopoulos S, Raby S, Wilczek F. Supersymmetry and the Scale of Unification. Phys Rev D. 1981;24(6):1681–1683.
  16. ATLAS Collaboration. Search for supersymmetry in events with four or more charged leptons in 139fb−1 of s√=13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector. JHEP. 2021;7:167.
  17. Binetruy P. Supersymmetry: Theory, Experiment, and Cosmology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
  18. Cecotti S. Supersymmetric Field Theories: Geometric Structures and Dualities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
  19. Martin SP. A supersymmetry primer. In: G.L. Kane (Ed.), Perspectives on Supersymmetry (pp. 1-98). 1998.
  20. Branco GC, Ferreira PM, Lavoura L, Rebelo MN, Sher M, Silva JP. Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models. Phys Reports. 2012;516(1-2):1-102.
  21. Ellwanger U, Hugonie C, Teixeira AM. The Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model. Phys Rep. 2010;496:1-77.
  22. ATLAS Collaboration. Studies on the improvement of the matching uncertainty definition in top-quark processes simulated with Powheg+Pythia 8. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2023-029, CERN. Geneva; 2023.
  23. The CMS Collaboration. A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery. Nature. 2022;607:60–68.
  24. Harlander RV, Liebler S, Mantler H. SusHi: A program for the calculation of Higgs production in gluon fusion and bottom-quark annihilation in the Standard Model and the MSSM. Comput Phys Commun. 2013;184:1605-1617.
Make a Submission

Indexing

  • Scopus logo
  • WorldCat logo
  • OpenAIRE logo
  • Crossref logo
  • VNLU logo
  • Professional publications of Ukraine logo
  • BASE logo
  • Google Scholar logo

info@physics.uz.ua