Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

ISSN 2415-8038 e-ISSN 2786-6688
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Theoretical foundations of professionally oriented study of physics at school

Issue 56, 2024

Usen Baizak, Bakhyt Baizakova

Received 06.08.2023, Revised 25.11.2023, Accepted 14.02.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.38ryg0

Abstract

Relevance. The modern study of physics is focused on changes in conceptual approaches to its functioning, goals, content, methods, and results. This study examines the effectiveness of a model for training future physics teachers to design lessons in the context of variable education approaches.

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to evaluate changes in the design and modelling competence of future physics teachers after implementing an experimental training model.

Methodology. A pedagogical experiment was conducted with control and experimental groups of future physics teachers. Their design and modelling competence were assessed before and after the experimental training using surveys, tests, quasi-professional tasks, and analysis of teaching practice reports. Results were analysed statistically using Pearson's chi-squared test and Student's t-test.

Results. Three components were evaluated: motivational-axiological, cognitive-operational, and productive-creative. The experimental group showed significant increases in all components of design and modelling competence compared to the control group. Statistical analysis confirmed the differences were significant. The model improved the motivation, knowledge, skills and creative abilities related to lesson design and implementation.

Conclusions. The experimental training model was effective in developing future physics teachers' competence in designing lessons for variable educational contexts.

Keywords: teaching methods; pedagogical modelling; development of constructive skills; lesson model

Suggested citation

Baizak U, Baizakova B. Theoretical foundations of professionally oriented study of physics at school. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(56):380-390. DOI: 10.54919/physics/56.2024.38ryg0

 

Download article

References

  1. Akramova AS, Aripova ShG, Muhiddinova GH. Modern educational technologies and innovative activity of teacher in higher education system. J Crit Rev. 2020;7(7):1077-1079.
  2. Prokhorova MP, Lebedeva TE, Vaganova OI, Egorov EE, Shkunova AA. Conditions for the university innovative activity development from the teachers’ standpoint. Espacios. 2019;40(19).
  3. Bykova EA. Formation of motivation for innovative activity among students – future teachers. Persp Nauki Obraz. 2019;40(4):102-115.
  4. Volkova JS, Peteraitis SK, Smirnova ZV, Vaganova OI, Kutepov MM, Kutepova LI, Markova SM. The development of innovative activities in high edsucation. Int J Innov Technol Expl Eng. 2019;8(9):2393-2399.
  5. Belova AN, Shkilev SV. Features of adaptation to innovative activity of teachers of psychological and pedagogical disciplines with the lateralnostis various individual profiles. World Appl Sci J. 2013;27(1);61-65.
  6. Wang Z, Utemov VV, Krivonozhkina EG, Liu G, Galushkin AA. Pedagogical readiness of mathematics teachers to implement innovative forms of educational activities. Euras J Math Sci Technol Educ. 2018;14(1):543-552.
  7. Roshchupkina VV, Shatskaya EY, Alekhina EI, Lukyanova AV, Pivnenko PP. Innovative and entrepreneurial activity stimulation among teachers through personalized monitoring technology. Opcion. 2020;36(26):1576-1595.
  8. Musabekova GT, Rysbekova AK, Meldebekova UI, Beysenbayeva CB, Orazbayev ED, Usenov AS. Formation of readiness of the future teachers to innovative acti{dotless}vi{dotless}ty. Life Sci J. 2013;10(4):3535-3543.
  9. Saydakhmedova B, Makhkamova M, Rakhimova S. Content of innovation and innovative activity of the teacher. Int J Advan Sci Technol. 2020;29(7):665-669.
  10. Shepilova NA, Pustovoitova OV, Podgorskaya AV. Expert evaluation of the model of management of the process of development of professional readiness for the innovative activity of teachers of a preschool educational organization. Persp Nauki Obraz. 2019;37(1):455-465.
  11. Abramova IV, Vechtomov EM, Shilova ZV. Innovative aspects of the organization of design and research activity of teachers at the university. Persp Nauki Obraz.  2020;45(3):488-507.
  12. Tatarinova LV, Rerke VI, Bubnova IS. Innovative activity of teachers: Study and directions of development. Espacios. 2019;40(33):6-12.
  13. Shatunova OV. Ways of development of innovative activity of school teachers in modern Russia. Mid East J Scient Res. 2013;17(4):414-418.
  14. Seery N, Canty D, Dunbar R. Maximising the impact of creative and innovative activities within the constraints of defined education structures. In: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings; 2010.
  15. Borodina TF. Psychological support of formation in the future teachers of readiness for the creative-innovative activity within the context of the competency-based approach. Soc Sci (Pakistan). 2016;11(15):3648-3654.
  16. [Bykova YA, Istomina SV. Perceptions of the innovative potential of students by teachers of general, secondary vocational and higher education institutions. J Pharm Sci Res. 2018;10(8):2030-2033.
  17. Akilovna EM, Sobirovich IS, Aminovna TF, Nadjatbekovna KD, Xamidovna AS. Psychological basis of innovative activity and creativity of teachers of higher education institutions. Int J Psychosoc Rehabil. 2020;24(8):6352-6358.
  18. Savina NN. Major factors of teachers’ resistance to innovations. Ensaio. 2019;27(104):589-609.
  19. Mussabekova G, Chakanova S, Boranbayeva A, Utebayeva A, Kazybaeva K, Alshynbaev K. Structural conceptual model of forming readiness for innovative activity of future teachers in general education school. Opcion. 2018;34(85):217-240.
  20. Baizak UA, Katbaeva M, Baizakova B. The meaning and necessity of professionally oriented teaching at school. Sci Life Kazakh. 2018;7:105-108
  21. Baizak U, Baizakova B, Shyrynbekova B. About one approach of professionally oriented physics study. Act Sci Int J. 2019;3:109-111.
  22. Baizak U, Baizakova B. New technologies for assessing student knowledge in Bloom's taxonomy or a new technology for compiling test items. Materials of the IV-International. scientific and practical conference “Actual problems of vocational education in a new formation”. Turkestan: International Kazakh-Turkish University named after Akhmet Yasavi. 2016;1:98-103.
Make a Submission

Indexing

  • Scopus logo
  • WorldCat logo
  • OpenAIRE logo
  • Crossref logo
  • VNLU logo
  • Professional publications of Ukraine logo
  • BASE logo
  • Google Scholar logo

info@physics.uz.ua