Abdykalykova M, Orazayeva G, Mazhinov B, Shokhambekova A, Saltanat O. The model of joint integrative and organisational activity of the pedagogical department and a university resource and methodological centre. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(56):2176-2183. DOI: 10.54919/physics/56.2024.217qk6
The model of joint integrative and organisational activity of the pedagogical department and a university resource and methodological centre
Madina Abdykalykova, Gulzhan Orazayeva, Bagdat Mazhinov, Anar Shokhambekova, Omirbek Saltanat
https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.217qk6
Abstract
Relevance. The relevance of the study is conditioned by the fact that the general logic of building a university management model in accordance with the long-term practice of various institutions is based on the conditions of a market economy, civil society, and democratic and political systems. It defines an integrative way of thinking about the cultural and social functions of universities.
Purpose. The purpose of the study is to consider a model of joint integrative and organisational activity of the pedagogical department and the resource and methodological centre of the university.
Methodology. The study utilized institutional, process, and scenario approaches to examine the joint activities of the pedagogical department and university resource-methodological center.
Results. The model of joint integrative and organizational activity of the pedagogical department and the university resource-methodological center aims to improve teaching quality, support scientific development, and disseminate pedagogical knowledge. This model emphasizes strategic management, interdisciplinary research, and cooperation with both academic and socio-economic partners. It promotes the integration of faculty staff, provides opportunities for student development, and enhances the competitiveness of graduates in the labor market.
Conclusions. The joint model of the pedagogical department and university resource center fosters a competitive, adaptable institution responsive to societal and scientific changes. This approach underscores education's role in social development and advocates for increased collaboration to improve academic quality and community integration.
Keywords: universities; higher education; strategies; concepts, integration
Suggested citation
References
- Brewster C. Different Paradigms in Strategic HRM: Questions Raised by Comparative Research. In: P. Wright, L. Dyer, J. Boudreau, and G. Milkovich (Eds.), Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, Supplement 4: Strategic Human Resources Management in the Twenty-First Century. Stamford: JAI Press; 1999.
- Dunn MB, Jones C. Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967–2005. Admin Sci Quart. 2010;55:114–149.
- Eisenhardt KM, Westcott B. Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management. Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company; 2018.
- Friedland R, Alford RR. Bringing Society Back. In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions. In: W. W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio, (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: Chicago University Press; 1991.
- Haveman HA, Cohen LE. The ecological dynamics of careers: The impact of organizational founding, dissolution, and merger on job mobility. Amer J Sociol. 1994;100:104–152.
- Jackall R. Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers. New York: Oxford University Press; 1988.
- Jarzabkowski P, Matthiesen J, Van De Ven AH. Doing which work? A practice approach to institutional pluralism. In: Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations (pp. 284-316). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
- Kim T, Shin D, Oh H, Jeong Y. Inside the Iron Cage: Organizational Political Dynamics and Institutional Changes in Presidential Selection Systems in Korean Universities, 1985-2002. Admin Sci Quart. 2007;52(2):286-323.
- Lounsbury M. Institutional transformation and status mobility: the professionalization of the field of finance. Acad Manag J. 2002;45:255–266.
- Pache A, Santos F. When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Acad Manag Rev. 2010;35(3):455-476.
- Tripsas M, Gavetti G. Capabilities, cognition and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strat Manag J. 2000;21(10‐11):1147-1161.
- Weaver GR, Trevino LK, Cochran PL. Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Acad Manag J. 1999;42(5):539-552.
- Andriopoulos C, Lewis MW. Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organis Sci. 2009;20:696-717.
- Cameron K, Quinn R. Organizational paradox and transformation. In: R. Quinn, K. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management (pp. 1-18). Cambridge: Ballinger.; 1988.
- Carlile PR. Transferring, translating, and transform: Integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ Sci. 2004;15(5):555–568.
- Colyvas JA. From divergent meanings to common practices: The early institutionalization of technology transfer in the life sciences at Stanford university. Res Pol. 2007;36(4):456-476.
- Ely RJ, Thomas DA. Cultural diversity at work: effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Admin Sci Quart. 2001;46(2):229-273.
- Fiss PC, Zajac EJ. The symbolic management of strategic change: Sense giving via framing and decoupling. Acad Manag J. 2006;49:1173-1193.
- Clemons EK, Row MC. Information technology and industrial cooperation: The changing economics of coordination and ownership. J Manag Inform Syst. 1992;9(2):9-28.
- Benham A, Lee Benham L. Measuring the Costs of Exchange. In: C. Ménard (Ed.), Institutions, Contracts and Organizations: Perspectives from New Institutional Economics (pp. 367-375). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2000.
- Ribbens B. Organizational learning styles: Categorizing strategic predispositions from learning. Int J Organ Anal. 2019;5(1):220-227.
