The legal status of a judge in the Republic of Kazakhstan

Issue 56, 2024

Almas Salpekov, Saida Akimbekova, Gulmira Talapova

Received 19.02.2024, Revised 08.05.2024, Accepted 29.06.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.70wog1

Abstract

Relevance. The relevance of the study is based on the fact that the judiciary is an institutional element of the legal system that ensures the democratic development of the state towards economic, political and social renewal.

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to expose the mechanism of the judicial system and highlight the special features of the legal status of the judge and the major challenges that hinder the improvement of the legal position.

Methodology. Among the methodological approaches used in this investigation are formal legal, theoretical, legal hermeneutics, dogmatic, deduction, synthesis and others.

Results. The study examined the mechanism for the judicial system and its specific features, highlighting the role of this element of the legal system in the formation of public life; the concept of the legal status of judges and their rights and obligations were also analysed. Special attention has been given to the content of the employment contract with judges and their requirements, and the specifics of entering into an employment contract. The analysis reveals the special features and challenges in modifying and terminating a judge's mandate. The principle of judicial independence has been studied in detail, establishing its importance in ensuring a fair trial and creating the conditions for citizens to regain the trust of the authorities.

Conclusions. The practical relevance of the findings is in recommendations on how to address the challenges in improving the legal status of the judge, as this is an integral part of building a democratic state.

Keywords: judicial power; justice; legal status; powers; judicial reform

Suggested citation

Salpekov A, Akimbekova S, Talapova G. The legal status of a judge in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(56):701-708. DOI: 10.54919/physics/56.2024.70wog1

Download article

References

  1. Mones E, Sapieżyński P, Thordal S, Olsen HP, Lehmann S. Emergence of network effects and predictability in the judicial system. Sci Rep. 2021;11:article number 2740.
  2. Epps D, Sitaraman G. How to Save the Supreme Court? Yale Law J. 2019;129:148-206.
  3. Sadykbekova AN. Formation of the judicial system in the Republic of Kazakhstan. In: Legal Sciences, Legal State and Modern Legislation: II International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 280-283). Penza: Nauka i Prosveshcheniye; 2018.
  4. Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan; 1993. https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=1010212.
  5. Decree of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 1569 “On the state program of legal reform in the Republic of Kazakhstan”; 1994. https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=1002787.
  6. Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan; 1995. https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=1005029.
  7. Decree of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan having the force of a constitutional law No. 2694 “On courts and the status of judges in the Republic of Kazakhstan”; 1995. https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=1004028.
  8. Decree of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 858 “On the Concept of the Legal Policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan for the period from 2010 to 2020”; 2009. https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=30463139.
  9. Toktombaeva AZh, Shamshieva M. Independence, immunity and irremovability as components of the legal status of judges. Law State Theory Pract. 2019;12:224-226.
  10. Constitutional Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 132-II “On the judicial system and the status of judges of the Republic of Kazakhstan”; 2000. https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=1021164.
  11. Piana D. Judicial Power. In: The SAGE Handbook of Political Science (pp. 799-813). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2020.
  12. Guarnieri C, Pederzoli P. The judicial system: the administration and politics of justice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2020.
  13. Alfonsín RR. The Function of Judicial Power During the Transition. In: I.P. Stotzky (Ed.), Transition to Democracy in Latin America: The Role of the Judiciary (pp. 41-52). London: Routledge; 2020.
  14. Popelier P, Glavina M, Baldan F, van Zimmeren E. A research agenda for trust and distrust in a multilevel judicial system. Maastricht J Eur Compar Law. 2022;29(3):351-374.
  15. Opeskin B. Future-Proofing the Judiciary. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2021.
  16. Fuentes-Rohwer L. Taking Judicial Legitimacy Seriously. Chic-Kent Coll Law. 2018;93(2):505-524.
  17. Suleimenova SZh, Zhanilsinova SS. Legal status of judges of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Bull KazNU Ser Leg. 2018;2:84-88.
  18. Matmurotovich DU. Problems of Increasing the Transparency of the Judicial System. Eur Scholar J. 2022;3(1):47-48.
  19. Garwan I. Ideal Execution of Civil, Cases Based on Principles of Justice to create a Simple and Low-cost Judiciary. J Human Soc Sci Stud. 2020;6:70-77.
  20. Korzhik VN. Theoretical analysis of amorphization conditions for metallic alloys under gas-thermal spraying. III. Transformations in the amorphized alloy under building-up of coatings. Poroshk Metall. 1992;(11):47-52.
  21. Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany; 1949. https://www.1000dokumente.de/?c=dokument_de&dokument=0014_gru&l=ru&object=translation.
  22. German Judicial Act; 1950. https://cutt.ly/YCJ0WKS.
  23. French Magistracy Law; 1958. https://worldconstitutions.ru/?p=877.
  24. French Law on the Superior Council of Magistracy; 1958. https://worldconstitutions.ru/?p=895.
  25. Constitution of the United States; 1787. https://www.hist.msu.ru/ER/Etext/cnstUS.htm.
  26. Doroshkevich AS, Zakharova AS, Oksengendler BL, Lyubchyk AI, Lyubchyk SI, Lyubchyk SB, Tatarinova AA, Kirillov AK, Vasilenko TA, Gorban OO, Bodnarchuk VI, Nikiforova NN. The Rectifying Contact of Hydrated Different Size YSZ Nanoparticles for Advanced Electronics. Nanomater. 2022;12(24):4493.
  27. Fialko NM, Prokopov VG, Meranova NO, Borisov YuS, Korzhik VN, Sherenkovskaya GP. Temperature conditions of particle-substrate systems in a gas-thermal deposition process. Fiz Khim Obrabot Mater. 1994;(2):59-67.
  28. Indiana Legal Research: Judiciary; 2022. https://law.indiana.libguides.com/c.php?g=19851&p=112580.
  29. Supreme Court Law; 1981. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1981/54/contents/enacted.
  30. Constitution of Japan; 1947. https://wipolex.wipo.int/ru/legislation/details/2637.
  31. Ramadhan DA. Judicial Preview Model in the Budget Function of the Legislative Body. Dih: J Ilmu Hukum. 2021;17(2):128-140.
  32. Makarova TL, Zakharchuk I, Geydt P, Lahderanta E, Komlev AA, Zyrianova AA, Lyubchyk A, Kanygin MA, Sedelnikova OV, Kurenya AG, Bulusheva LG, Okotrub AV. Assessing carbon nanotube arrangement in polystyrene matrix by magnetic susceptibility measurements. Carb. 2016;96:1077-1083.
  33. Seidaliyeva U, Ilipbayeva L, Taissariyeva K, Smailov N, Matson ET. Advances and Challenges in Drone Detection and Classification Techniques: A State-of-the-Art Review. Sens. 2024;24(1):125.
  34. Message of the Constitutional Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 01-4/1 “On the state of constitutional legality in the Republic of Kazakhstan”; 2007. https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=30106571.
  35. Tuan PL, Kulik M, Stef M, Phuc TV, My NTB, Zelenyak TY, Buse G, Racu A, Doroshkevich A, Khiem LH, Cong VD, Lyubchyk AI, Lyubchyk SI, Lyubchyk SB, Anh NN. An examination on the porosity of ErF3 doped CaF2 crystal using the Rutherford back-scattering method. Nucl Inst Meth Phys Res Sect B Beam Interact Mater Atom. 2024;547:165178.
  36. Mikhailov P, Ualiyev Z, Kabdoldina A, Smailov N, Khikmetov A, Malikova F. Multifunctional Fiberoptic Sensors For Space Infrastructure. East-Eur J Enter Tech. 2021;5(5-113):80-89.
  37. Al Salami SAKR. The role of the constitutional judiciary in regulating political life. Islam Coll Univ J. 2022;2(65):525-552.
  38. Dorohova YaV, Tsaturyan TV. Theoretical study of the legal status of a judge: the history of the formation of the legal status of a judge. Matrix Sci Knowl. 2019;10:84-92.
  39. Shylo A, Doroshkevich A, Lyubchyk A, Bacherikov Y, Balasoiu M, Konstantinova T. Electrophysical properties of hydrated porous dispersed system based on zirconia nanopowders. Appl Nanosci (Switz). 2020;10(12):4395-4402.
  40. Sydorets V, Korzhyk V, Khaskin V, Babych O, Bondarenko O. Electrical characteristics of the equipment for the hybrid plasma-MIG welding. In: 58th Annual International Scientific Confererence on Power and Electrical Engineering of Riga Technical University, RTUCON 2017 (pp. 1-6); 2017.
  41. Hadjigeorgiou N. Conflict resolution in post-violence societies: some guidance for the judiciary. Int J Hum Rights. 2021;4:695-717.
  42. Khardazi S, Zaitouni H, Neqali A, Lyubchyk S, Mezzane D, Amjoud M, Choukri E, Kutnjak Z. Enhanced thermal stability of dielectric and energy storage properties in 0.4BCZT-0.6BTSn lead-free ceramics elaborated by sol-gel method. J Phys Chem Sol. 2023;177:111302
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua