Shakarim Kudaiberdiev's library as a reflection of spiritual and scientific quests: On the development of the poet's aesthetic and philosophical principles

Issue 56, 2024

Kuralay Tursynkhanova, Arap Espenbetov, Akmaral Smagulova, Zhanar Aitova, Gulnur Mursalim

Received 14.01.2024, Revised 08.04.2024, Accepted 02.05.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.35sof2

Abstract

Relevance. The relevance of the study of the specific features of the development of a person's philosophy and worldview is based on the fact that it is not always possible to establish them precisely. It mostly depends on their outlook and life experience. Thus, the issue of identifying the origins of the development of the worldview, philosophy and scientific views of the Kazakh poet, philosopher, and volost Shakarim Kudaiberdiev is relevant because it has not been sufficiently explored in Kazakh literary studies.

Purpose. This study is intended to identify the specific features of the philosophical views and worldview of the Kazakh poet and philosopher Shakarim Kudaiberdiev. The purpose of this study is to discover the origins of the poet's worldview.

Methodology. The main method used in the study is the desk research method: working with academic researchers on the subject. The method of bibliographic research, involving an analysis of Shakarim's biography and work, has also been applied, allowing identifying the factors that influenced the development of the thinker's and poet's philosophical views.

Results. The study provides analysis not only of the poet's life and scientific and literary activities but also of the specific historical realities and cultural preferences of the artist. The study identifies factors that have affected the development of Shakarim's worldview: readership, education, environment, and the tragic events of the 20th century. The material in this study is of practical value for further bibliographic research.

Conclusions. This study elucidates the unique philosophical views and worldview of Shakarim Kudaiberdiev by exploring the influences that shaped his intellectual and aesthetic development. The analysis reveals that Shakarim's philosophical and literary principles were significantly molded by his extensive readership, educational background, environmental factors, and the historical events of his time.

Keywords: bibliographic research method; readership; philosophy of conscience; world view

Suggested citation

Tursynkhanova K, Espenbetov A, Smagulova A, Aitova Zh, Mursalim G. Shakarim Kudaiberdiev's library as a reflection of spiritual and scientific quests: On the development of the poet's aesthetic and philosophical principles. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(56):352-360. DOI: 10.54919/physics/56.2024.35sof2

Download article

References

  1. Berlev OD. Social relations in Egypt during the Middle Kingdom: The social layer of "royal hmww". Moscow: Nauka; 1978.
  2. Ris A, Ris B. The heritage of the Celts: An ancient tradition in Ireland and Wales. Moscow: Enigma; 1999.
  3. Weatherford J. Genghis Khan and the making of the modern world. Moscow: ACT; Vladimir: VKT; 2008.
  4. Kiselev NP. About Moscow typography of the 17th century. Moscow: Nauka; 2019.
  5. Sydykov YeB. Shakarim. Moscow: AO "Molodaya gvardiya"; 2012.
  6. Auezov MO, Aymautov Zh. Poets of the post-Abaevo era. Abay. 1918;5:20-32.
  7. Aubakir ZhM, Gaynullina FA. Creativity of Shakarim Kudaiberdiev and the spiritual life of the people. Bull Kemerovo State Univ Cult Arts. 2008;6:17-21.
  8. Mukanov S. A bright star. Almaty: Sanat; 1995.
  9. Abashin S. Nationalism in Central Asia: in search of identity. St. Petersburg: Aleteyya; 2020.
  10. Yanushkevich A. Diaries and letters from a journey across the Kazakh steppes. Pavlodar: TOO NPF, "EKO"; 2006.
  11. Samartseva YuA. History of Kazakhstan: teaching in schools and universities. Hist Kazakhstan: Teach Sch Univ. 2014;12:17-22.
  12. Shokbatarova K. Spiritual heritage of the great. Ves Semey. 2015;145(6):42-59.
  13. David AR. Ancient Egypt. Moscow: Veche; 2000.
  14. Auezov MO. Poetic environment of Abai. Lit Arena. 1934;7(4):5-28.
  15. Amanzhol A. Some features of L. Tolstoy’s translation by Shakarim. Abay. 2005;1:60-64.
  16. Lyubchyk SI, Lyubchyk SB, Lyubchyk AI. Characterization of adsorption properties inherent to zirconia dioxide for different positions of yttrium in the ZrO2–Y2O3 lattice. Semicond Phys Quant Elect Optoelect. 2022;25(4):362-371.
  17. Kudiyarova A. Shakarim: poet, thinker, person. Niva. 2001;9:88-96.
  18. Smailov N, Koshkinbayev S, Tashtay Y, Kuttybayeva A, Abdykadyrkyzy R, Arseniev D, Kiesewetter D, Krivosheev S, Magazinov S, Malyugin V, Sun C. Numerical Simulation and Measurement of Deformation Wave Parameters by Sensors of Various Types. Sens. 2023;23(22):9215.
  19. Schapovalova O, Gorlova A, de Munter J, Sheveleva E, Eropkin M, Gorbunov N, Sicker M, Umriukhin A, Lyubchyk S, Lesch KP, Strekalova T, Schroeter CA. Immunomodulatory effects of new phytotherapy on human macrophages and TLR4- and TLR7/8-mediated viral-like inflammation in mice. Front Med. 2022;9:952977.
  20. Uzbekuly S, Tumanova A. Ideal of Shakarim Kudaiberdiev. Themis. 2002;1:18-53.
  21. Iskakova G. Political and legal views of Shakarim and the present. In: Collection of Scientific Papers "Issues of Shakarim Studies". Almaty: SA Print Service; 2007.
  22. Korzhik VN. Theoretical analysis of amorphization conditions for metallic alloys under gas-thermal spraying. III. Transformations in the amorphized alloy under building-up of coatings. Poroshk Metall. 1992;(11):47-52.
  23. Kudayberdiyev Sh. Three truths. Almaty: Kazakhstan; 1991.
  24. Yesim G. Kazakh philosophy: Pyramid in the steppe, or the philosophy of love. Almaty: Kazak Universitet; 2005.
  25. Shakarim Kudaiberdiev (1858-1931) ‒ "Three Truths", "Canons of Islam". 2017. https://infopedia.su/17x123dc.html.
  26. Petrov EG, Shevchenko YV, Gorbach VV, Lyubchik S, Lyubchik A. Features of gate-tunable and photon-field-controlled optoelectronic processes in a molecular junction: Application to a ZnPc-based transistor. AIP Adv. 2022;12(10):105020.
  27. Shybyntayeva M. Three truths ‒ modesty, justice, kindness. Our Busin. 1998;9:46-56.
  28. Amirbayev A. Worldview of Shakarim Kudaiberdy uly in a cultural and historical context. Almaty: Nauka; 1994.
  29. Askar A, Sunggat M, Maxat M, Nunzhigit S, Kanat Z, Ainur K, Arnay A, Asset O. Investigation of the Efficiency of the Ozonator in the Process of Water Purification Based on the Corona Discharge. J Eco Eng. 2023;24(2):140-151.
  30. Gaynullina F. Philosophical heritage of Shakarim and aesthetic searches of the XXI century. Shakarim. 2009;1:45-47.
  31. Nysanbayev EN, Barlybayeva GF. The Philosophy of Shakarim. Shakarim Elemi. 2006;1:13-24.
  32. Sydorets V, Korzhyk V, Khaskin V, Babych O, Bondarenko O. Electrical characteristics of the equipment for the hybrid plasma-MIG welding. In: 58th Annual International Scientific Confererence on Power and Electrical Engineering of Riga Technical University, RTUCON 2017 (pp. 1-6); 2017.
  33. Korzhik VN, Kunitskii YuA, Borisov YuS, Spivak AYu, Nemirovskii AV, Kriklya AI. Structural transformations in Fe-B-C-Si alloys vitrified by the gasothermal coating process. Russian metallurgy. Metall. 1989;(2):165-168.
  34. Shylo A, Doroshkevich A, Lyubchyk A, Bacherikov Y, Balasoiu M, Konstantinova T. Electrophysical properties of hydrated porous dispersed system based on zirconia nanopowders. Appl Nanosci (Switz). 2020;10(12):4395-4402.
  35. Nurbosynova L. The meaning of life as a socio-philosophical problem in Kazakh philosophy of the early twentieth century. Thought. 2003;8:41-45.
  36. Doroshkevich AS, Zakharova AS, Oksengendler BL, Lyubchyk AI, Lyubchyk SI, Lyubchyk SB, Tatarinova AA, Kirillov AK, Vasilenko TA, Gorban OO, Bodnarchuk VI, Nikiforova NN. The Rectifying Contact of Hydrated Different Size YSZ Nanoparticles for Advanced Electronics. Nanomater. 2022;12(24):4493.
  37. Dal VI. Explanatory Dictionary. Moscow: ROOSSA; 2020.
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua