Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

ISSN 2415-8038 e-ISSN 2786-6688
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Organizational and pedagogical conditions of profile training of students with special educational needs in the printing industry

Issue 56, 2024

Yelena Kalinichenko, Akmaral Satova, Zhazira Stambekova

Received 16.01.2024, Revised 09.05.2024, Accepted 27.06.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.126wg1

Abstract

Relevance. One of the main responsibilities of modern society is to educate students with special educational needs and integrate individuals with disabilities into the community.

Purpose. The aim of this research is to study the peculiarities of organizational and pedagogical conditions of profile training of persons with special educational needs.

Methodology. The study was conducted by means of a sociological survey. 265 respondents took part in the survey, including 198 teachers, 43 representatives of administration and 24 heads of educational institutions and their departments. During the survey, the respondents assessed their skills and abilities of teaching capabilities.

Results. The results showed the need to improve teachers’ ability to manage the teaching process, and to apply inclusive education strategies, the need to improve management skills and the use of equipment. Administrators and supervisors need to improve their skills in communicating with students in an inclusive classroom, understanding how to communicate their vision to teachers.

Conclusions. The study of the possibilities of improving the conditions for teaching students with special educational needs, shows the need to form a space taking into account the needs of students, the creation of infrastructure, the selection, and use of appropriate technologies for teaching, quality training and continuous professional development of teaching staff. The practical significance of the study lies in the study of the level of readiness of teachers, administrators, and supervisors to implement studies for students with special educational needs in the polygraphic field in institutions of profile training.

Keywords: inclusion; curricula; infrastructure; adaptability; teaching capabilities

Suggested citation

Kalinichenko Ye, Satova A, Stambekova Zh. Organizational and pedagogical conditions of profile training of students with special educational needs in the printing industry. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(56):1261-1272. DOI: 10.54919/physics/56.2024.126wg1

Download article

References

  1. Shalbayeva DKh, Zhetpisbayeva BA, Akbayeva GN, Assanova DN. Organizational and pedagogical conditions for the educational process implementation within the inclusive education in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Eur J Contem Educ. 2021;10(3):711-725.
  2. Makoelle TM, Burmistrova V. Teacher education and inclusive education in Kazakhstan. Int J Incl Educ. 2021:1-17.
  3. Berikkhanova G, Ospanova B, Yermenova B, Zharmukhametova R, Sultanova N, Urazbaeva A. The effectiveness of the training model of the future teacher in conditions of inclusive education. Int J Educ Prac. 2021;9(4):670-686.
  4. Demirok MS, Gunduz N, Yergazina AA, Maydangalieva ZA, Ryazanova EL. Determining the opinions of special education teachers regarding the use of assistive technologies for overcoming reading difficulties. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2019;14(22):141-153.
  5. Abdullayeva GS. Development of methodological competence of university teachers in the context of inclusive education. Int J Soc Sci Res Rev. 2022;5(5):34-39.
  6. Bolborici A-M, Bódi D-C. Issues of special education in Romanian schools. Eur J Educ. 2018;5(2):135-145.
  7. Pehoiu C, Andra P, Savu C, Cristea D. Study on the importance of physical exercise in the recovery and social integration of pupils with special needs. Int J Res. 2021;9(4):542-556.
  8. Telna O, Klopota Y, Klopota O, Okolovych O. Inclusive education in Ukraine: Parents of children with disabilities perspective. New Educ Rev. 2021;64(2):225-235.
  9. Karkut D. Therapeutic possibilities of literature for children and adolescents in work with a student with special educational needs. Annales Univer M Curie-Sklod Sect N Educ Nova. 2021;6:329-342.
  10. Jauhari MN, Irvan M, Sunarya PB. Vocational education services in schools for children with special needs. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information Technology and Education (ICITE 2020) (pp. 665-668). Dordrecht: Atlantis Press; 2020.
  11. Myronova S, Dokuchyna T, Rudzevych I, Smotrova O, Platash L. Current Problems of teachers’ readiness of higher educational institutions for implementing inclusive education. Revi Roman pent Educ Multidim. 2021;13(3):151-165.
  12. Olán-Sánchez MD, López-Valdivieso L, Martínez-Vichel G, Priego-Gómez MC. Strategies to promote the Inclusion of People with Visual Disabilities in the Technological Institute of Villahermosa. ECORFAN J Rep Parag. 2020;6(10):21-27.
  13. Adewumi TM, Mosito C. Experiences of teachers in implementing inclusion of learners with special education needs in selected Fort Beaufort district primary schools, South Africa. Cog Educ. 2019;6(1):1703446.
  14. Martínez-Agut MP, Monzó-Martínez A. Training of education professionals within the framework of the sustainable development goals (SDG). In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and New Developments (pp. 255-257). Lisbon: inScience Press; 2022.
  15. da Silva Fernandes PR, Jardim J, de Sousa Lopes MC. The soft skills of special education teachers: Evidence from the literature. Educ Sci. 2021;11(3):125.
  16. Al-Khatib Z, Obaid Allah H. A training program for people with hearing disabilities to develop their home furnishings production skills using Velvet Residue in developing micro-projects. Int Desig J. 2020;10(3):223-234.
  17. Stark K, Bettini E, Cumming M, O’Brien KM, Brunsting N, Huggins-Manley C, Binkert G, Shaheen T. Measuring special educators’ working conditions: A systematic review. Remed Spec Educ. 2023;44(2):137-153.
  18. Riga A, Ioannidi V, Papayiannis N. Students with special educational needs in Greek higher education: ICTS as a vital tool for inclusion. Eur J Spec Educ Res. 2020;6(2):51-66.
  19. Larraceleta A, Castejón L, Iglesias-García M-T, Núñez JC. Assessment of public special education teachers training needs on evidence-based practice for students with autism spectrum disorders in Spain. Children. 2022;9(1):83.
  20. Kang DY, Martin SN. Improving learning opportunities for special education needs (SEN) students by engaging pre-service science teachers in an informal experiential learning course. Asia Pac J Educ. 2018;38(3):319-347.
  21. Ogba FN, Ugodulunwa CA, Igu NCN. Assessment of training needs of teachers and administrators for effective inclusive education delivery in secondary schools in South East Nigeria. Int J Educ Lead Prep. 2020;15(1):72-91.
  22. Trentin VB, Raitz TR. Education and work: Professional training for young people with intellectual in special school. Revi Educ Espec. 2018;31(62):713-726.
  23. Emoto A, Soeda K. The initial development and practice of training materials using 3D printer to employment support for inclusive society. In: Proceedings of the 2022 20th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET) (pp. 1-5). Antalya: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2022.
  24. Osuyi SO, Obanewa AO. Acquisition of vocational skills by persons living with disabilities in Edo State: Challenges and prospects. Int J Educ Res. 2019;6(2):90-98.
  25. Gula I, Zhuravlova N. Synthesis of development of book graphics and design in Ukraine. Cult Contemp. 2023;1:70-75.
  26. Tripak M, Vasyliuk T, Pysarevska O, Razmolodchykova I, Melnyk R. Development of the concept of training students with special educational needs in institutions of higher education. Eduweb. 2022;16(3):134-145.
  27. Calle-Jimenez T, Sanchez-Gordon S, Arias-Flores H. Profiling of e-learning users with accessibility needs. In: Proceedings of the AHFE 2021 Virtual Conferences on Usability and User Experience, Human Factors and Wearable Technologies, Human Factors in Virtual Environments and Game Design, and Human Factors and Assistive Technology “Advances in Usability, User Experience, Wearable and Assistive Technology” (pp. 477-485). Cham: Springer; 2021.
  28. Danchenko IO. Organizational and pedagogical conditions for ensuring inclusion of persons with special educational needs in the educational process of higher education institutions. Scient J MP Dragom Nat Ped Univer. Ser 5 Ped Sci Realit Persp. 2020;73(1):86-90.
  29. Feng Z, Hou H, Lan H. Understanding university students’ perceptions of classroom environment: A synergistic approach integrating grounded theory (GT) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP). J Build Eng. 2024;83:108446.
  30. Efendi M, Pradipta RF, Dewantoro DA, Ummah US, Ediyanto E, Yasin MHM. Inclusive education for student with special needs at Indonesian public schools. Int J Instruc. 2022;15(2):967-980.
  31. Khurana A. Converting physical spaces into learning spaces: Integrating universal design and universal design for learning. Front Educ. 2022;7:965818.
  32. Holmqvist M, Anderson L, Hellström L. Teacher educators’ self-reported preparedness to teach students with special educational needs in higher education. Probl Educ 21st Cent. 2019;77(5):584-597.
  33. Moriña A, Perera VH, Carballo R. Training needs of academics on inclusive education and disability. SAGE Open. 2020;10(3):1-10.
  34. Kairbekova BD, Tashimova A, Kabbasova A, Mukhamedzhanova A. Readiness of teachers to work in conditions of psychological and pedagogical support of children with special educational needs. Bull Innov Univer Euras. 2021;4:19-25.
  35. Morin KL, Ganz JB, Vannest KJ, Haas AN, Nagro SA, Peltier CJ, Fuller MC, Ura SK. A systematic review of single-case research on video analysis as professional development for special educators. J Spec Educ. 2019;53(1):3-14.
  36. Biggs EE, Gilson CB, Carter EW. “Developing that balance”: Preparing and supporting special education teachers to work with paraprofessionals. Teach Educ Spec Educ. 2019;42(2):117-131.
  37. Prihunov O, Yavorska Y. Innovative approaches and information technologies in organizational support of educational activities. Libr Sci Rec Stud Informol. 2023;4:146-155.
  38. Candeias AA, Grácio ML, Saragoça MJ, Pires H. Training needs of Portuguese practitioners working with children and young people with complex and intense support needs. J Intel Disab. 2019;23(4):512-525.
  39. Billingsley B, Bettini E, Mathews HM, McLeskey J. Improving working conditions to support special educators’ effectiveness: A call for leadership. Teach Educ Spec Educ. 2020;43(1):7-27.
  40. Marcheva-Yoshovska P. Mentorship in the context of the inclusive education in Bulgaria. Knowl Int J. 2018;28(3):809-814.
  41. Kornіat V, Ostrovska K, Ostrovskii I, Slobodyan S. Professional education of persons with special educational needs: Problems and prospects for change. Contin Profes Educ Theor Prac. 2019;1:30-35.
  42. Simonson SR, Earl B, Frary M. Establishing a framework for assessing teaching effectiveness. Coll Teach. 2021;70(2):164-180.
  43. Johnson E, Semmelroth CL. Special education teacher evaluation: Why it matters, what makes it challenging, and how to address these challenges. Asses Effect Interv. 2014;39(2):71-82.
  44. Johnson ES, Crawford A, Moylan LA, Zheng Y. Validity of a special education teacher observation system. Educ Asses. 2020;25(1):31-46.
  45. Kratz HE, Locke J, Piotrowski Z, Ouellette RR, Xie M, Stahmer AC, Mandell DS. All together now: Measuring staff cohesion in special education classrooms. J Psychoeduc Asses. 2015;33(4):329-338.
  46. Lopatina H, Tsybuliak N, Popova A, Hurenko O, Suchikova Y. Inclusive education in higher education institution: Are Ukrainian faculty members’ ready for it? Res Educ. 2023;118(1):49-72.
  47. Bibigul D, Marina K, Alpysbayeva M, Nietbaeva GB. Training a special teacher: Opinions and experience of teachers in the conditions of inclusive education. Cypr J Educ Sci. 2022;17(3):920-929.
Make a Submission

Indexing

  • Scopus logo
  • WorldCat logo
  • OpenAIRE logo
  • Crossref logo
  • VNLU logo
  • Professional publications of Ukraine logo
  • BASE logo
  • Google Scholar logo

info@physics.uz.ua