Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

ISSN 2415-8038 e-ISSN 2786-6688
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Modern practise of financing higher education: an analysis of the experience of OECD countries and the Republic of Kazakhstan

Issue 56, 2024

Assel Aryn, Parida Issakhova

Received 08.02.2024, Revised 10.06.2024, Accepted 05.07.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.247hd4

Abstract

Relevance. The study examines higher education financing systems in OECD countries and Kazakhstan, analyzing the contributions of different funding sources. This is relevant as education funding impacts access, quality, and economic development.

Purpose. The main goal of the study is to determine the share of participation of the state, the private sector and other entities in financing the higher education system in the OECD countries in comparison with the Republic of Kazakhstan.

Methodology. The research used economic and statistical methods, comparative analysis, and expert evaluation. Data was gathered from OECD, World Bank, UNESCO, and Kazakhstan government reports and statistics.

Results. The study found four main models of higher education financing among OECD countries, varying in tuition costs and student support. Most OECD countries spend over 1.5% of GDP on higher education, with the public sector as the main funder in European countries. Kazakhstan spends only 0.3% of GDP on higher education, with 70% of students self-funding their education.

Conclusions. Kazakhstan's higher education financing system provides limited government support and low tuition fees, resembling the fourth OECD model. To improve competitiveness, Kazakhstan needs to increase investment in higher education and human capital development, expanding funding sources and mechanisms based on OECD country experiences. The current grant allocation system is not equitable for low-income students and needs reform.

Keywords: higher education; state funding; private sector; state budget expenditures

Suggested citation

Aryn A, Issakhova P. Modern practise of financing higher education: an analysis of the experience of OECD countries and the Republic of Kazakhstan. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(56):2474-2483. DOI: 10.54919/physics/56.2024.247hd4

Download article

References

  1. O’Carroll C, Harmon C, Farrell L. The economic and social impact of higher education. Dublin: Irish Universities Association; 2006.
  2. Valero A, Van Reenen J. The Economic Impact of Universities: Evidence from Across the Globe. London: Centre for Economic Performance of London School of Economics and Political Science; 2016.
  3. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. The Economic Benefits of Higher Education Qualifications. A report by PricewaterhouseCoopers for the Royal Society of Chemistry and the Institute of Physics. (2005).  https://www.rsc.org/images/EconomicBenefitsHigherEducationQualifications_tcm18-12647.pdf
  4. Harmon C, Oosterbeek H, Walker, I. The Returns to Education: Microeconomics. J Econ Surv Black Publ. 2003;17(2):115-156.
  5. Heckman JJ, Lochner LJ, Todd PE. Fifty Years of Mincer Earnings Regressions. NBER Working Paper No. 9732. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc; 2003.
  6. Soyler I, Karatas S. Establishment and financing of private higher education institutions in Turkey. In: Proceedings of the International Higher Education and Congress: New Trends and Issue (pp. 57-71). Istanbul: Turkish Council of Higher Education; 2011.
  7. World Bank. Constructing Knowledge Societies: New Challenges for Tertiary Education. Washington: The World Bank; 2002.
  8. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Financing education – Investments and returns: Analysis of the World Education Indicators. Paris: OECD; 2003.
  9. UIS (UNESCO Institute for Statistics). Global education digest 2012: opportunities lost: the impact of grade repetition and early school leaving. Montreal: UIS; 2012.
  10. Holland D, Liadze I, Rienzo C, Wilkinson D. BIS research paper No. 110. The relationship between graduates and economic growth across countries. London: National Institute of Economic and Social Research; 2013.
  11. Statistics Committee of the Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Information and analytical system “Taldau”; 2020. http://old.stat.gov.kz/faces/publicationsPage/TaldauURL2.
  12. Varghese NV. Governance reforms in higher education: a study of selected countries in Africa. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP); 2016.
  13. OECD. Education at Glance. France: OECD; 2013.  
  14. OECD. Education at Glance. France: OECD; 2015.
  15. OECD. Education at Glance. France: OECD; 2017.
  16. OECD. Education at Glance. France: OECD; 2018.
  17. The impact of universities on the UK economy; 2014. https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/policy-and-analysis/reports/Documents/2014/the-impact-of-universities-on-the-uk-economy.pdf.
  18. Nurlanov E, Amankazy M, Nogaybaeva G, Akhmetzhanova A, Karbaeva G, Dauliev M, Korotkikh E, Abdrasheva D, Shakenova M, Duisengali A, Kasymbekova N. National report on the state and development of the education system of the Republic of Kazakhstan (at the end of 2017). Astana: JSC “IAC”; 2018.
  19. National report on the state and development of the education system of the Republic of Kazakhstan; 2015. http://iac.kz/ru/analytics/nacionalnyy-doklad-o-sostoyanii-i-razvitii-sistemy-obrazovaniya-respubliki-kazahstan-po.
  20. Statistical Bulletin of the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2015-2019; 2020. https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/minfin?lang=en
  21. OECD. National Education Policy Review: Higher Education in Kazakhstan. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017. 
Make a Submission

Indexing

  • Scopus logo
  • WorldCat logo
  • OpenAIRE logo
  • Crossref logo
  • VNLU logo
  • Professional publications of Ukraine logo
  • BASE logo
  • Google Scholar logo

info@physics.uz.ua