Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

ISSN 2415-8038 e-ISSN 2786-6688
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Methods of teaching secondary school students to solve algebraic equations and inequalities and their systems

Issue 56, 2024

Arailym Sansyzbayeva, Serik Daiyrbekov, Dauletbay Berdaliyev, Gulmira Daiyrbekova, Altynbek Sansyzbayev

Received 17.01.2024, Revised 28.04.2024, Accepted 11.06.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.146vf4

Abstract

Relevance. The relevance of this study is conditioned by the integral role of algebraic equations and inequalities in mathematics education, as well as the need for effective methods and approaches to their teaching at the secondary school level.

Purpose. The study aims to develop and appropriate methods for teaching secondary school students to solve algebraic equations and inequalities, including their systems, taking into account modern educational requirements and pedagogical approaches.

Methodology. In the course of the study, methods such as experimental research, questionnaire surveys, and statistical analysis of data were used.

Results. Because of the study, it was revealed that the innovative methodology for teaching the solution of algebraic equations and inequalities in secondary school had a positive impact on students' mastery of the material. The participants demonstrated a deeper understanding of algebraic concepts, increased independence in problem-solving, and developed critical thinking skills. They became more confident in analysing and interpreting problem conditions, identifying relationships between variables, and proposing adequate solutions. The new approach also improved students’ motivation to study algebra and their academic performance, with increased interest and passion for the subject due to the interactive methods and practical tasks provided.

Conclusions. The study confirms the effectiveness of the innovative methodology in the contemporary educational context of mainstream schools. The practical significance of the study lies in providing mainstream schoolteachers with tools to successfully teach students algebraic equations and inequalities, contributing to the development of analytical thinking and mathematical competence.

Keywords: interactive lessons; visualization of mathematical concepts; individual progress; skill development

Suggested citation

Sansyzbayeva A, Daiyrbekov S, Berdaliyev D, Daiyrbekova G, Sansyzbayev A. Methods of teaching secondary school students to solve algebraic equations and inequalities and their systems. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(56):1464-1473. DOI: 10.54919/physics/56.2024.146vf4

Download article

References

  1. Groth RE. Teaching mathematics in grades 6-12: Developing research-based instructional practices. London: SAGE Publications; 2012.
  2. Zulpukarova D, Kultaeva D, Jakypbekova A. The role of mathematics in the formation of pupils’ creative activity. Bul Sci Prac. 2021;7(9):548-556.
  3. Stigler J, Hiebert J. The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press; 1999.
  4. Kaskatayeva B, Kamalova G, Duisebaeva A, Shiyapov K, Kainbaeva L. Training pre-service math teachers for developing students’ mathematical culture at school. J Pos Scho Psych. 2022;6(8):661-689.
  5. Hrynevych L, Khoruzha L, Proshkin V. Improving the quality of mathematical education of pupils: Diagnostics and analytics. Journal of Physics: Conf Ser. 2022;2288:012022.
  6. Mukina T, Chun H. Algebra I teachers’ beliefs and knowledge of algebra for teaching. J Educ, Teach Soc Stud. 2022;4(1):1-17.
  7. Drigas A, Pappas MA. On line and other game-based learning for mathematics. Inter J Onl Eng. 2015;11:62-67.
  8. Mursalin M. The critical thinking abilities in learning using elementary algebra e-books: A case study at public universities in Indonesia. Mal J Math Lear. 2019;2(1):29-33.
  9. Sukstrienwong A. Animo math: The role-playing game in mathematical learning for children. TEM J. 2018;7(1):147-154.
  10. Angraini L, Fitri Y. The effect of interactive multimedia-based learning on students’ mathematical problem-solving ability. Inter J Cont Stud Educ. 2023;2(2):85-90.
  11. Aholongan A, Suripah S. Student ability in using Algebrator software: Case study during online learning. Khaw: J Pen Pemb Mat. 2021;5(1):24-34.
  12. Desyarti S, Tatang H. An analysis of pre-service mathematics teachers’ Desmos activities for linear programming lesson. Inter J Ped Dev Lif Lear. 2020;1(1):ep2002.
  13. Darragh L, Franke N. Online mathematics programs and the figured world of primary school mathematics in the digital era. Math Educ Res J. 2023;35:33-53.
  14. Shahi M, Banjara MR, Kayastha J, Chaulagain A, Pradhan S. Effectiveness of teaching methods: Comparative outcomes. J AyurCamp. 2020;1(1):16-25.
  15. Alijonov SH, Khabibullaev SK, Tokhtaev ZA, Usmonov IM. Use of interactive methods in mathematics lessons. Amer J Ped Educ Res. 2023;12:240-241.
  16. Rakhmankulova N, Mirzanazarova S. Interactive method of teaching mathematics. Europ Multid J Mod Sci. 2022;6:249-253.
  17. Banerjee R, Subramaniam K. Evolution of a teaching approach for beginning algebra. Educ Stud Math. 2012;80(3):351-367.
  18. Kaplar M, Radović S, Veljković K, Simić-Muller K, Marić M. The influence of interactive learning materials on solving tasks that require different types of mathematical reasoning. Inter J Sci Math Educ. 2021;20(3):411-433.
  19. Walkington C, Bernacki ML. Personalizing algebra to students’ individual interests in an intelligent tutoring system: Moderators of impact. Inter J Artif Intel Educ. 2019;29:58-88.
  20. Algani AY. Innovative ways to teach mathematics: Are they employed in schools? J Comp Educ Res. 2019;7(14):496-514.
Make a Submission

Indexing

  • Scopus logo
  • WorldCat logo
  • OpenAIRE logo
  • Crossref logo
  • VNLU logo
  • Professional publications of Ukraine logo
  • BASE logo
  • Google Scholar logo

info@physics.uz.ua