Mathematic modeling of risks as a way for determining corruption in the acquisition system

Issue 56, 2024

Aissulu Kazbekova, Vitaliy Khan, Aliya Mussayeva, Assem Tapenova, Bagdat Auyeshova

Received 21.01.2024, Revised 08.05.2024, Accepted 19.06.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.76ohf8

Abstract

Relevance. The research is relevant due to the potential of mathematical risk modeling in diagnosing corruption within the acquisition system. This approach is highly effective in identifying the causes and conditions of corruption, offering significant prospects for improving anti-corruption measures.

Purpose. The study aims to comprehensively analyse both the normative and theoretical foundations of mathematical risk modeling in the acquisition system. The goal is to develop doctrinal proposals to enhance the current state of mathematical modeling in this context.

Methodology. The authors used analysis, synthesis, formal-logical methods, system-structural methods, and mathematical modeling to examine Kazakhstan's anti-corruption regulations and establish legal grounds for diagnosing corruption risks.

Results. The research presented an evidence-based proposal for the gradual implementation of mathematical modeling provisions in diagnosing corruption risks within the acquisition system, structured in two stages. It offered a critical analysis of theoretical developments on the subject, explored the functions of mathematical modeling in jurisprudence, and discussed their concepts and types. The study also developed a mathematical formula for calculating corruption risks and described its components.

Conclusions. The study's findings include recommendations for developing mathematical formulas to diagnose corruption risks in the procurement system, highlighting the practical significance of the work. These recommendations provide valuable insights for improving anti-corruption measures through the application of mathematical risk modeling.

Keywords: strategy; Kazakhstan Republic Law; cause and conditions of the crime; scientific program

Suggested citation

Kazbekova A, Khan V, Mussayeva A, Tapenova A, Auyeshova B. Mathematic modeling of risks as a way for determining corruption in the acquisition system. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(56):768-776. DOI: 10.54919/physics/56.2024.76ohf8

Download article

References

  1. Igissinova EK, Davletbayeva Zh. Developing an Anti-Corruption Culture by Promoting еhe Ideology of Integrity. Bul Inst Leg Legal Infor Rep Kaz. 2022;1(68):76-83.
  2. Katayev NA, Moldabaev SS, Begaliyev BA, Aubakirova AA, Begaliyev YeN. The Essence and Principles of Combating Corruption in the Field of Public Procurement. J Adva Res Law Econ. 2019;9(8):2631-2637.
  3. Miliienko OA, Sabitova AA, Sabitova SA, Khussainov OB, Begaliyev YN. Protection of human rights in administrative proceedings from the standpoint of international law. J Nat Acad Leg Sci Ukr. 2020;27(4):43-52.
  4. Sharma SK, Sengupta A, Panja SCh. Mapping Corruption Risks in Public Procurement: Uncovering Improvement Opportunities and Strengthening Controls. Pub Perf Manag Rev. 2019;42(4):947-975.
  5. Velasco RB, Carpanese I, Interian R, Neto OCGP, Ribeiro CC. A decision support system for fraud detection in public procurement. Inter Trans Oper Res. 2020;28(1):27-47.
  6. Wachs J, Fazekas M, Kertesz J. Corruption risk in contracting markets: a network science perspective. Inter J Dat Sci Anal. 2021;12:45-60.
  7. Niyazbekova S, Zverkova A, Sokolinskaya N, Kerimkhulle S. Features of the «Green» strategies for the development of banks. E3S Web Conf. 2023;402:08029.
  8. Makedon V, Krasnikova N, Krupskyi OP, Stasiuk Y. Arrangement of digital leadership strategy by corporate structures: a review. Ikon Izsled. 2022;31(8):19-40.
  9. Golyshev LV, Mysak IS, Dovgoteles GA, Sidenko AP, Kravets' TYu. The effect of coal quality on the limitation of the nominal capacity of a power unit. Therm Eng. 2001;48(7):538-541.
  10. Decree of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 802 “On approval of the Concept of anti-corruption policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2022-2026 and amendments to some decrees of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan;” 2022. Available from: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/U2200000802.
  11. Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 410-V “On Anti-Corruption;” 2015. Available from: https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=33478302.
  12. Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 434-V “On Public Procurement;” 2015. Available from: https://online.zakon.kz/document/?doc_id=34050877#sub_id=0.
  13. Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 72-VII ZRK “On the Introduction of Amendments and Additions to Certain Legislative Acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Public Procurement, Procurement of Subsoil Users and Subjects of Natural Monopolies, Communications, Road Transport, Defense and Financing of Science;” 2021. Available from: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/Z2100000072.
  14. Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 407-IV “On Science;” 2011. Available from: https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=30938581.
  15. Makedon V, Zaikina H, Slusareva L, Shumkova O, Zhmaylova O. Use of rebranding in marketing sphere of international entrepreneurship. Int J Entrep. 2020;24(1):1-8.
  16. Fialko NM, Prokopov VG, Meranova NO, Borisov YuS, Korzhik VN, Sherenkovskaya GP. Thermal physics of gasothermal coatings formation processes. State of investigations. Fiz Khim Obrabot Mater. 1993;(4):83-93.
  17. Prokopov VG, Fialko NM, Sherenkovskij YuV, Sherenkovskaya GP, Borisov YuS, Korzhik VN, Murashov AP. Analysis of temperature conditions in the system ″coating-sublayer-basis″ under gas-thermal spray-coating of composite powders. Elekt Obrabot Mater. 1992;(2):12-15.
  18. Anisimov AG, Mysak IS, Klub MV, Sargsyan KB, Eritsyan SKh, Petrosyan GS, Avtandilyan AV, Gevorgyan AR. Development and Implementation of Automatic Conversion of Steam-Gas Power Unit from Compound Cycle Mode to Steam-Power Mode Without Shutdown of the Unit. Pow Tech Eng. 2018;51(5):568-573.
  19. Niss M, Blum W, Galbraith P. Introduction. In: W. Blum, P.L. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and Applications in Mathematics Education. New York: Springer; 2007. p. 3-32.
  20. Haines C, Crouch R. Mathematical Modelling and Applications: Ability and Competence Frameworks. In: W. Blum, P.L. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and Applications in Mathematics Education. New York: Springer; 2007. p. 417-424.
  21. Verschaffel L, Greer B, de Corte E. Everyday Knowledge and Mathematical Modeling of School Word Problems. In: K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. Oers, L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, Modeling and Tool Use in Mathematics Education. Dordrecht: Springer; 2002. p. 257-276.
  22. Kmetyk-Podubinska K. Legal modeling as a method of modern constitutional and legal research. Entr, Econ Law. 2020;7:211-215.
  23. Lopatiev AO. Modeling as a methodology of cognition. Theo Meth Phys Educ. 2007;8:4-10.
  24. Borgovini R, Pemberton S, Rossi M. Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis. Rome: Reliability Analysis Center; 1993.
  25. Misra KB. Reliability analysis and prediction. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers; 1992.
  26. Kinyanjui LW. Effect of corruption on social welfare issues in the Kenyan economy. Nairobi: Strathmore University; 2021.
  27. Fantaye AK, Birhanu ZK. Mathematical Model and Analysis of Corruption Dynamics with Optimal Control. J App Math. 2022;2022:8073877.
  28. Alemneh HT. Mathematical Modeling, Analysis, and Optimal Control of Corruption Dynamics. J App Math. 2020;4:1-13.
  29. Habibi F, Barzinpour F, Sadjadi SJ. A mathematical model for project scheduling and material ordering problem with sustainability considerations: A case study in Iran. Comp Ind Eng. 2019;128:690-710.
  30. Poza E, Jódar L, Merello P. Modeling Political Corruption in Spain. Mathematics. 2021;9:952.
  31. Clark, R.E. Linear and non-linear modeling techniques in transnational corruption risk assessment. London: Routledge; 2021.
  32. Cozma AC, Cotoc CN, Vaidean VL, Achim MV. Corruption, Shadow Economy and Deforestation: Friends or Strangers? Risks. 2021;9(9):153.
  33. Kotola BS, Teklu ShW. A Mathematical Modeling Analysis of Racism and Corruption Codynamics with Numerical Simulation as Infectious Diseases. Comp Math Meth Med. 2022;11:9977727.
  34. Heydari M, Keung Lai K, Xiaohu Zh. Corruption, Infrastructure Management and Public-Private Partnership. London: Routledge; 2021.
  35. Patra A, Matipira L, Saruchera F, Sastry Musti KS. Revisiting Corruption Mathematical Models in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Advanced Perspectives on Global Industry Transitions and Business Opportunities. Pennsylvania: IGI Global; 2021.
  36. Gholizadeh H, Fazlollahtabar H, Khalilzadeh M. A robust fuzzy stochastic programming for sustainable procurement and logistics under hybrid uncertainty using big data. J Clean Prod. 2020;258:120640.
  37. Kerimkhulle S, Dildebayeva Z, Tokhmetov A, Amirova A, Tussupov J, Makhazhanova U, Adalbek A, Taberkhan R, Zakirova A, Salykbayeva A. Fuzzy Logic and Its Application in the Assessment of Information Security Risk of Industrial Internet of Things. Symm. 2023;15(10):1958.
  38. Prokopov VG, Fialko NM, Sherenkovskaya GP, Yurchuk VL, Borisov YuS, Murashov AP, Korzhik VN. Effect of the coating porosity on the processes of heat transfer under, gas-thermal atomization. Poroshk Metall. 1993;(2):22-26.
  39. Kunitskii YuA, Korzhik VN, Nemirovskii AV. Transformations in the plasma-sprayed Fe67Ti7B24C2 alloy in heating. Sov Mater Sci. 1990;26(1):87-90.
  40. Kohler JC, Dimancesco D. The risk of corruption in public pharmaceutical procurement: how anti-corruption, transparency and accountability measures may reduce this risk. Glob Heal Act. 2019;13:1694745.
  41. Vian T. Anti-corruption, transparency and accountability in health: concepts, frameworks, and approaches. Glob Heal Act. 2020;13(1):1694744.
  42. Mackey TK, Cuomo RE. An interdisciplinary review of digital technologies to facilitate anti-corruption, transparency and accountability in medicines procurement. Glob Heal Act. 2020;13:1695241.
  43. Kirya MT. Promoting anti-corruption, transparency and accountability in the recruitment and promotion of health workers to safeguard health outcomes. Glob Heal Act. 2020;13:1701326.
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua