Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

ISSN 2415-8038 e-ISSN 2786-6688
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Linguistic and cultural analysis of the written monuments of the Old Kipchak language of the Mamluk-Golden Horde period

Issue 56, 2024

Bagdat Dyussenov

Received 24.09.2023, Revised 12.01.2024, Accepted 27.03.2024

https://doi.org/ 10.54919/physics/56.2024.171ap8

Abstract

Relevance. The study of the linguocultural foundations of the Kipchak language lays the foundation for the formation of historical, cultural, phonetic and lexico-grammatical components, which create a mechanism for the development of Turkic studies as a whole. The process of loss of clarity and sharpness of cultural contrasts and their dissipation must be adapted to save the potential of subtle differences in Kipchak speech present in the social reality of the Turks.

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to analyse the features of the functioning of Turkic linguistic and cultural trends, taking into account the peculiarities of the use of Kipchak language units.

Methodology. To achieve the research goals, the following methods were used: structural, content analysis, comparative.

Results. The results of the work determined that the Kipchak words form the basis for the study of linguocultural and lexical components that form the cultural, phonetic and grammatical structures of the development of Turkic studies in general. Content analysis made it possible to identify various language units that describe the picture of the world of the Turks and are unique dialects of the cultural context. It was determined that the study of the phonetic and lexical and grammatical properties of the Kipchak language contributes to the active promotion of linguocultural elements that permeate the traditions, customs, and culture of the Turks.

Conclusions. Consideration of the relevant phrases, expressions, and language units made it possible to see a wide linguocultural spectrum of the functioning of the Kipchak language within the framework of historical events, life, and professions of that time. The practical significance lies in the use of the results of the study by scientists, as well as specialists in the field of cultural studies, linguoculturology, linguistics and Turkology.

Keywords: Kipchak language; culture; identity; dialects; linguistic picture of the world

Suggested citation

Dyussenov B. Linguistic and cultural analysis of the written monuments of the Old Kipchak language of the Mamluk-Golden Horde period. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(56):1718-1726. DOI: 10.54919/physics/56.2024.171ap8

Download article

References

  1. Ermers R. Turkey morphology seen by the Arabic grammarians. The passive. Hist Epistemol Lang. 2020;42(1):73-92.
  2. Dosimov Z, Alimova Sh. The vocabulary layer of the Khorezm Kipchak dialect. Psychol Educ. 2021;58(1):4989-4997.
  3. Meirambekova L, Sagidolda G, Yeskeyeva M, Abdygalieva T, Sarekenova K. On the history of vocabulary study of Kipchak languages group. Americ J Appl Sci. 2016;13(11):1184-1192.
  4. Buranov A. Brief analysis of Kipchak dialect of Uzbeki and Altai language lexemas. Int J Incl Sust Educ. 2023;2(2):62-67.
  5. Urazboyev P. Neighborhood relationships between relative languages. Innov Tecnolog. 2022;3(4):81-85.
  6. Shamshetova YM, Elmuratova SA. Phonological structure of borrowed words in the Karakalpak. Psychol Educ. 2021;58(2):1198-1204.
  7. Mauder C. Being Persian in late Mamluk Egypt: The construction and significance of Persian ethnic identity in the salons of sultan Qāniṣawh al-Ghawrī (r. 906–922/1501–1516). Al-Usur Al-Wusta. 2020;28:376-408.
  8. Khodjaeva RU. The role of the Central Asians in the socio-political and cultural life of Mamluk Egypt. Americ J Soc Sci Educ Innov. 2020;5:227-236.
  9. Baskin S. Why should bilingualized dictionary of Turkish be used in teaching Turkish as a foreign language? Eur J Educ Res. 2018;7(2):319-327.
  10. Jafarov B, Dadaboev O. “Codex Cumanicus” – Ancient Turkic manuscript. J Hunan Univ (Natur Sci). 2022;49(8):1075-1090.
  11. Johanson L. Registers of orature and literature. In: Turkic (pp. 157-171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2021.
  12. Qahramanova Y. Structural-typological comparison of Sumerian and Turkic case systems. Univ Socied. 2020;12(5):415-420.
  13. Aubakirova K, Jubatova B, Mustafayeva A, Mukhitdinov R, Zhiyekbayeva A. Written manuscripts in ancient Kipchak Language of 13-15th centuries and their research problems in Kazakhstan. Medit J Soc Sci. 2015;6(5):575-581.
  14. Aripova Z. Influence of Central Asian traditions on Egyptian life in XIII-XV centuries. Turk Onl J Qualit Inqu. 2021;12(6):6910-6915.
  15. Batyrshauly B. Relations of the Mamluk state of Egypt with Deshti-Kipchak, XIII-XV centuries. Almaty: Nur-Mubarak; 2021.
  16. Firdaus YE, Elfia E, Meirison M. Rise and fall of Mamluk sultanate: The struggle against Mongols and crusaders in Holy War. Al-Adyan J Relig Stud. 2020;1(1):14-28.
  17. Eckmann J. The Mamluk-Kipchak literature. Cent Asiat J. 1963;8(4):304-319.
  18. Muhammed R. Turkic borrowings in the Arabic language of the Mamluk-Kipchak written monuments. Turk Stud J. 2021;3(4):52-60.
  19. Savelyev A, Robbeets M. Bayesian phylolinguistics infers the internal structure and the time-depth of the Turkic language family. J Lang Evolut. 2020;5(1):39-53.
  20. Auanasova A, Nurpeisov E, Auanassova K, Kushenova G, Mukhlissov N. The history of the alash party in the context of the Impact on the processes of constitutional acts. Ancient Asia. 2021;12:14.
  21. Dikhanbayeva AYe, Shaimerdinova NG. Kipchak riddles of The Codex Comanicus monument as the common heritage of all Turkic-speaking peoples. J Posit School Psychol. 2022;6(10):150-161.
  22. Samadova K. Teaching elements of Kipchak language in north Azerbaijani groups (with emphasis on educational materials in the mother tongue). Revis on line Polit Gest Educac. 2022;26:e022017.
  23. Németh M. A historical morphology of Western Karaim: The -a jez- ~ -a ez- approximative. Acta Orient Acad Scient Hung. 2021;74(2):325-344
Make a Submission

Indexing

  • Scopus logo
  • WorldCat logo
  • OpenAIRE logo
  • Crossref logo
  • VNLU logo
  • Professional publications of Ukraine logo
  • BASE logo
  • Google Scholar logo

info@physics.uz.ua