Legal contracts and legal customs in the history of law of the Kazakh society

Issue 56, 2024

Zhanna Sadykanova, Nataliia Korchak, Olga Klepikova, Sergiy Maksymov, Oleksandr Lytvynov

Received 28.09.2023, Revised 16.01.2024, Accepted 07.03.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.101le1

Abstract

Relevance. The relevance of the study lies in considering the branch function of natural law and analysing the provisions that can form its basis in society.

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to examine the role of legal customs and contracts in the historical development of the legal system in Kazakh society, focusing on their foundational role before and during the early stages of state formation.

Methodology. The study utilizes an interdisciplinary approach, incorporating insights from the "new biology" fields such as animal ethology, behavioral genetics, primatology, evolutionary psychology, anthropology to analyze the origins of moral provisions and legal norms.

Results. The research identifies legal customs as a primary source of legal provisions before the formation of the state and highlights the role of legal contracts at the earliest stages of state development. The study demonstrates the continuity of legal systems throughout the existence of the Kazakh ethnic group. Additionally, it emphasizes the limitations of cultural influence in explaining the root causes of social norms, pointing to the need for a deeper understanding of the natural law origins. The study provides insights into the historical aspects of the legal system development in Kazakhstan, influenced by various biological and social sciences.

Conclusions. The study concludes that legal customs and contracts are fundamental to the development of legal systems, especially in the context of Kazakh society. It underscores the necessity of considering the natural law origins of legal norms to better understand the mechanisms of their development. The research highlights the importance of philosophical inquiry into the roots of legal customs, which is crucial for understanding universal and regional legal norms. Furthermore, the study suggests that recognizing the continuity in the legal development of Kazakhstan can provide valuable perspectives on the formation and evolution of legal systems in other societies.

Keywords: legal science; philosophy; origin of moral norms; human nature; society

Suggested citation

Sadykanova Zh, Korchak N, Klepikova O, Maksymov S, Lytvynov O. Legal contracts and legal customs in the history of law of the Kazakh society. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(56):1011-1020. DOI: 10.54919/physics/56.2024.101le1

Download article

References

  1. Timmer I. Contract automation: Experiences from Dutch legal practice. In: Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation. Basingstoke: Springer Nature; 2019.
  2. Huang F. Contract enforcement: A political economy model of legal development. J Law Econ Org. 2013;29(4):835-870.
  3. Prisacariu C, Schneider G. Abstract specification of legal contracts. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2009.
  4. Rohrmann CA, Campos MDAM. A comparative analysis of legal aspects of electronic contracts in Brazil. Int J Priv Law. 2011;4(2):237-251.
  5. Curtotti M, McCreath E, Sridharan S. Software tools for the visualization of definition networks in legal contracts. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2013.
  6. Olander M, Norrman A. Legal analysis of a contract for advanced logistics services. Int J Phys Dist Log Man. 2012;42(7):673-696.
  7. Ayotte K, Hansmann H. A nexus of contracts theory of legal entities. Int Rev Law Econ. 2015;42:1-12.
  8. Amigud A, Dawson P. The law and the outlaw: is legal prohibition a viable solution to the contract cheating problem? Assess Ev High Ed. 2020;45(1):98-108.
  9. Glaser I, Waltl B, Matthes F. Named entity recognition, extraction, and linking in German legal contracts. Juslet IT. 2018;4(1):57-69.
  10. Tauginiene L, Jurkevicius V. Ethical and legal observations on contract cheating services as an agreement. Int J Ed Int. 2017;13(1):9.
  11. Stitilis D, Petrauskas R, Rotomskis I. The implementation of public e-services for immovable property contracts in Lithuania: Legal aspects. J Int Comm Law Tech. 2006;1(2):80-83.
  12. Gillroy JM. Toward an environmental law of essential goods: A philosophical and legal justification for “ecological contract”. Int J Technoeth. 2018;9(2):42-50.
  13. Coloma G. Damages for breach of contract, impossibility of performance and legal enforceability. Rev Law Econ. 2008;4(1).
  14. Dung PM, Thang PM. Modular argumentation for modelling legal doctrines in common law of contract. Artif Intell Law. 2009;17(3):167-182.
  15. Rumore MM. The course syllabus: Legal contract or operator’s manual? Amer J Pharm Ed. 2016;80(10):177.
  16. Kirpichev AE, Shagieva RV, Nikolyukin SV, Borisova NE, Ralko VV. Non-classical paradigms in contract law in the American, European and Russian legal doctrines. J Adv Res Law Econ. 2018;9(5):1660-1666.
  17. Oh SJ. Publication contracts and their legal interpretation in Korea. Sci Ed. 2018;5(1):21-25.
  18. Wilson J. The moral sense. New York: Free Press; 1997.
  19. Townley A, Jones A. The role of emails and covering letters in negotiating a legal contract: A case study from Turkey. Eng Spec Purp. 2016;44:68-81.
  20. Westermarck E. Origin and development of moral ideas. London: Macmillan; 1906.
  21. Verdross A. International law. Moscow: Inostrannaya Literatura; 1959.
  22. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights.
  23. Shepheard ML. The potential for improved water management using a legal social contract. J Wat Law. 2011;22(2-3):95-108.
  24. Grotius H. The rights of war and peace. Carmel: Liberty Fund; 2005.
  25. Governatori G, Idelberger F, Milosevic Z, Riveret R, Sartor G, Xu X. On legal contracts, imperative and declarative smart contracts, and blockchain systems. Artif Intell Law. 2018;26(4):377-409.
  26. Sorokin P. Man. Civilization. Society. Moscow: Politizdat; 1992.
  27. United Nations Charter. 1945. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter.
  28. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. 1966. https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en.
  29. Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe (CSCE): Final Act of Helsinki. 1975. https://www.refworld.org/docid/3dde4f9b4.html.
  30. Statute of the International Court of Justice. 1945. https://www.icj-cij.org/en/statute.
  31. Toynbee AJ. Civilization before the judgment of history. Moscow: Rolf; 2002.
  32. Ilyin IA. General doctrine of law and state. Moscow: AST; 2006.
  33. Aurelius M. Reflections. St. Petersburg: Nauka; 1993.
  34. Tolstoy L. Confession. What is my faith? What is art? Moscow: Knizhnyy Klub Knigovek; 2015.
  35. Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States. 1933. https://www.jus.uio.no/english/services/library/treaties/01/1-02/rights-duties-states.xml.
  36. Draft Declaration on Rights and Duties of States. 1949. https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft_articles/2_1_1949.pdf.
  37. Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America). 1986. https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/70/judgments.
  38. Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America). 2003. https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/90/judgments.
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua