Abildina S, Dusembinova R, Sarsekeyeva Zh, Mukhametzhanova A, Aidarbekova K. Functional literacy development of junior schoolchildren based on digital educational resources. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(56):1295-1305. DOI: 10.54919/physics/56.2024.129ej5
Functional literacy development of junior schoolchildren based on digital educational resources
Saltanat Abildina, Raifa Dusembinova, Zhanar Sarsekeyeva, Aigul Mukhametzhanova, Kulzhan Aidarbekova
https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.129ej5
Abstract
Relevance. In the context of the reorganisation of the educational process policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the issue of teaching primary school children to develop functional literacy becomes urgent, which is an important step for modernising the educational system of the Republic of Kazakhstan and ensuring the competitiveness of the young generation.
Purpose. The study aims to develop and experimentally verify the model of functional literacy development of junior schoolchildren based on digital educational resources.
Methodology. The study employed analysis, comparison, systematisation, classification, generalisation, experiment, and methods of mathematical statistics.
Results. The concepts of “functional literacy”, “development of functional literacy of junior schoolchildren”, and “development of functional literacy based on digital educational resources” were defined. The research was conducted in general education schools “School-lyceum No. 66” and “School No. 16” (Karaganda). As part of the experiment, the development of the functional literacy of junior schoolchildren model was carried out, namely the implementation of components with selected methods of their formation and pedagogical conditions, which was used to improve the educational process in primary schools of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
Conclusions. The results of the conducted experiment formed promising directions for improving the educational process aimed at the development of functional literacy in the Republic of Kazakhstan through the formation of components, as well as pedagogical conditions and the development of methods of their implementation. The practical significance of the study consists in the development and implementation of the model, components, pedagogical conditions and methods of development of functional literacy of junior schoolchildren in the Republic of Kazakhstan.
Keywords: primary education; methodology of training organisation; meta-subject results; components; pedagogical conditions of training; digital technologies
Suggested citation
References
- Aitbaeva AB, Shaigozova ZhN. Re-study of pedagogy in the digital age or issues of teaching design. Bull Al-Farabi Kazakh Nat Univer Ped Sci Ser. 2022;71(2):4-12.
- Abualrub I, Karseth B, Stensaker B. The various understandings of learning environment in higher education and its quality implications. Qual Hig Educ. 2013;19(1):90-110.
- Aggarwal JC. Essentials of education technology. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House; 2014.
- Kovalchuk V, Marynchenko I, Yashchuk S. Creation of a favourable educational environment in the higher education institutions of Ukraine. In: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference: Society. Integration. Education (р. 465-480). Rezekne: Rezekne Academy of Technologies; 2020.
- Khashan OA, Alamri S, Alomoush W, Alsmadi MK, Atawneh S, Mir U. Blockchain-based decentralized authentication model for IoT-based e-learning and educational environments. Comp Mater Contin. 2023;75(2):3133-3158.
- Kazakhstan-2030 strategy: Prosperity, security and improvement of welfare of the citizens of Kazakhstan; 1997. https://leap.unep.org/en/countries/kz/national-legislation/kazakhstan-2030-strategy-prosperity-security-and-improvement.
- Aleksandrova SE. Formation of functional reading literacy of primary school students: problems and prospects. Domes Foreig Ped. 2023;1(5(95)):97-114.
- Dustov MK. Methodological techniques and tools used in organizing the training process of primary school students. Int Scient J Sci Innov. 2024;3(1):91-97.
- Efthymiou E, Kington A. The development of inclusive learning relationships in mainstream settings: A multimodal perspective. Cog Educ. 2017;4(1):1304015.
- Trubacheva S, Zamaskina P. Design of the gymnasium educational environment with taking into account the features of distance learning. Scient Bull Uzhhor Univer Ser Ped Soc Work. 2020;47(2):195-198.
- Tsarenko OM, Tsarenko IL. Methodological features of training students in professionally oriented disciplines. Scient Not Ser Ped Sci. 2020;1(191):175-178.
- Bar-On R. The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI). Psicothema. 2006;18:13-25.
- Wright GB. Student-centered learning in higher education. Int J Teach Learn Hig Educ. 2011;23(3):92-97.
- Marougkas A, Troussas C, Krouska A, Sgouropoulou C. Virtual reality in education: A review of theories, approaches and learning methodologies over the last decade. Electronics. 2023;12(13):2832.
- da Silva MG, Ferreira HS. Model of educational reconstruction as a theoretical and methodological contribution to the design of environments of science teaching and learning. Investig Sci Educ. 2020;25(1):262-281.
- Shaurya Som S, Rana A. IoT based educational model for better teaching-learning environment. In: 2020 8th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO) (pp. 824-828). Noida: IEEE; 2020.
- Cencelj Z, Aberšek MK, Aberšek B, Flogie A. Role and meaning of functional science, technological and engineering literacy in problem-based learning. J Balt Sci Educ. 2019;18(1):132-146.
- Habib K, Soliman T. Cartoons’ effect in changing children mental response and behavior. Open J Soc Sci. 2015;3(9):248-264.
- Zhao Y, Sánchez Gómez MC, Pinto Llorente AM, Zhao L. Digital competence in higher education: Students’ perception and personal factors. Sustainability. 2021;13(21):12184.
- O’Hara S, Pritchard RH. Meeting the challenge of diversity: Professional development of teacher educators. Teach Educ Quart. 2008;35(1):43-61.
