Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

ISSN 2415-8038 e-ISSN 2786-6688
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Expansions of the theatre at the times of quantum: Temptation by radicalism

Issue 56, 2024

Nelly Kornienko

Received 28.02.2024, Revised 03.06.2024, Accepted 05.07.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.243ab4

Abstract

Relevance. This article explores the emerging field of “quantum theatre” and critically examines attempts to apply quantum concepts to theatrical theory and practice.

Purpose. This article aims to evaluate the current state of quantum theatre research and propose new theoretical frameworks.

Methodology. The author conducts a critical analysis of existing literature on quantum theatre, including works by Carol Fisher, Naomi Iizuka, Anne Bogart, and others. The methodology involves examining these works through the lens of quantum physics principles, while cautioning against simplistic analogies.

Results. The analysis reveals that many current approaches to quantum theatre rely on superficial analogies to quantum phenomena without sufficient rigor. The author argues there is not yet a true “quantum theatre”, but rather early explorations of quantum-inspired ideas. The author proposes new theoretical frameworks drawing on Rupert Sheldrake’s morphogenetic fields and V.V. Nalimov’s “fields of consciousness” to understand theatrical phenomena.

Conclusions. This article concludes that more rigorous interdisciplinary approaches drawing on quantum physics, biology, and consciousness studies offer promising directions for future research. The author suggests that theatre and artistic culture in general as open non-linear systems operating based on self-organization, self-regulation and self-development, with high degrees of freedom, can provide a unique understanding of quantum phenomena at the macro level, potentially contributing to the fundamental principles of cognitive theory.

Keywords: morphogenetic fields; quantum biology; non-linear theatre; space-time in performance; post-non-classical art science

Suggested citation

Kornienko N. Expansions of the theatre at the times of quantum: Temptation by radicalism. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(56):2434-2443. DOI: 10.54919/physics/56.2024.243ab4

Download article

References

  1. Fischer CA. Theatre and quantum physics, partners for dramatic critical inquiry. Oakland: University of California; 2010.
  2. Fischer CA. Quantum theatre: A language for the voices of contemporary theatre. Mast Thes. 2004;1:2589.
  3. George DE. Quantum theatre – Potential theatre: A new paradigm? New Theat Quart. 1989;5(18):171-179.
  4. Herrington J. Directing with the viewpoints. Johns Hopk Univ Press. 2000;10(2):155-168.
  5. Guzmán R, Cervera JA. The origins of quantum drama and the critical view of Paul Ehrenfest. Rev Mex F´ısica E. 2017;63:33-47.
  6. Iizuka N. Polaroid stories. Woodstock: Dramatic Pub Co; 1997.
  7. Iizuka N. 36 views. New York: The Overlook Press; 2003.
  8. Korniienko N. Theatre and the quantum world: The temptations of free thinking. Kyiv: National Les Kurbas Centre; 2019.
  9. Korniienko N. Non-linear theater(art)knowledge: A post-non-classical landscape. From Faust to Proteus. Kyiv: Alterpres; 2014.
  10. Korniienko N. An invitation to chaos. Theater (artistic culture) and synergy. An attempt at non-linearity. Kyiv: National Les Kurbas Centre; 2010.
  11. Capra F. The turning point: Science, society, and the rising culture. London: Bantam; 1984.
  12. Capra F. The Tao of physics: An exploration of the parallels between modern physics and eastern mysticism. Boulder: Shambhala; 2010.
  13. Capek M. The philosophical impact of contemporary physics. London: Literary Licensing LLC; 2011.
  14. Bohr N. Atomic physics and human knowledge. New York: Dover Publications; 2010.
  15. Castaneda C. The teachings of Don Juan: A Yaqui way of knowledge. Washington: Washington Square Press; 1985.
  16. Suzuki DT, Conze E. On Indian Mahayana Buddhism. New York: Harper & Row; 1968.
  17. Koblyakov A. Foundations of the general theory of creativity (synergetic aspect). Phil Sci Tech. 2002;8(1):95-107.
  18. Koblyakov A. Synergetics, language, creativity. Synerg Art. 2002. http://spkurdyumov.ru/art/sinergetika-yazyk-tvorchestvo/
  19. Maikov V, Kozlov V. Transpersonal project: Pscyhology, anthropology, spiritual traditions. Moscow: Higher Education; 2007.
  20. Grof S. Journey in the search of oneself: measurements of consciousness and new perspectives of psychotherapy and internal research. Moscow: AST; 2005.
  21. Kluber A. People are controlled by matrixes; 2016. https://www.cluber.com.ua/lifestyle/interesno/2016/02/stanislav-grof-lyudmi-upravlyayut-matritsyi/
  22. Sheldrake R. The physics of angels. Moscow: Sofia Publishing House; 2003.
  23. Jung C. Psychology of the Unconscious: a study of the transformations and symbolisms of the libido, a contribution to the history of the evolution of thought. London: Kegan Paul Trench Trubner; 1916.
  24. Nalimov VV. The probability-based model of language. Moscow: Nauka; 1979.
Make a Submission

Indexing

  • Scopus logo
  • WorldCat logo
  • OpenAIRE logo
  • Crossref logo
  • VNLU logo
  • Professional publications of Ukraine logo
  • BASE logo
  • Google Scholar logo

info@physics.uz.ua