Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

ISSN 2415-8038 e-ISSN 2786-6688
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Development of professional competencies of future technical university specialists through professionally-oriented teaching of mathematics

Issue 56, 2024

Zinegul Yergalauova, Alma Abylkassymova, Larissa Kainbaeva

Received 12.01.2024, Revised 24.04.2024, Accepted 03.06.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.138xt5

Abstract

Relevance. In modern conditions of globalisation, the issue of the prospects for the organisation of professionally oriented mathematics education in the Republic of Kazakhstan is one of the most important problems for improving the quality of technical education in the state.

Purpose. The purpose of the study is the analysis and practical implementation of the methodological component to increase the levels of readiness of future specialists of a technical university for the development of professional competencies, as a guarantee of the education of a competent specialist ready to carry out professional activities.

Methodology. The following methods are used: analysis, comparison, systematisation, classification, generalisation and experiment, and methods of mathematical statistics.

Results. The study conducted at Korkyt Ata Kyzylorda University developed a methodological toolkit aimed at enhancing the professional competencies of future technical university specialists through professionally-oriented mathematics education. Key findings include the identification of effective pedagogical conditions, such as diverse educational activities, the activation of independent cognitive work, the integration of digital technologies in mathematics education, and the use of professionally-oriented tasks, which collectively contribute to higher levels of readiness among students.

Conclusions. The research underscores the importance of a structured approach to professionally-oriented mathematics education in technical universities. By implementing a methodological system that incorporates components and criteria of readiness, educational institutions can significantly improve the professional competencies of future specialists. The study suggests that further refinement of these methodologies can continue to elevate the quality of technical education in the Republic of Kazakhstan, ensuring that graduates are well-prepared for professional activities.

Keywords: higher education; teaching methods; components of readiness; pedagogical conditions of training; digital technologies

Suggested citation

Yergalauova Z, Abylkassymova A, Kainbaeva L. Development of professional competencies of future technical university specialists through professionally-oriented teaching of mathematics. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(56):1385-1395. DOI: 10.54919/physics/56.2024.138xt5

Download article

References

  1. Hancı-Azizoglu EB. Culturally and linguistically diverse students: (Re)imagining multilingual education. In: Interdisciplinary Approaches Toward Enhancing Teacher Education. Hershey: IGI Global; 2020.
  2. Efthymiou E, Kington A. The development of inclusive learning relationships in mainstream settings: A multimodal perspective. Cogent Ed. 2017;4(1):1304015.
  3. Aitbaeva AB, Shaihozova ZhN. Rethinking pedagogy in the digital age or instructional design issues. J Ed Sci. 2022;2(71):4-12.
  4. Susanto HA, Hobri, Nugrahaningsih TK. Developing a handbook on multimedia integration in mathematics teaching for Indonesian primary school students. Int J Ed Math Sci Tech. 2021;9(2):236-251.
  5. O’Sullivan M. Professional lives of Irish physical education teachers: Stories of resilience, respect and resignation. Phys Ed Sport Ped. 2006;11(3):265-284.
  6. Ozhybaeva ZM, Nurmukhanbetova NN. The use of stem technologies as a way to increase the motivation of students in chemistry lessons in the conditions of the renewal of education in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Sci Atl. 2021;4:52-59.
  7. Marougkas A, Troussas C, Krouska A, Sgouropoulou C. Virtual reality in education: A review of learning theories, approaches and methodologies for the last decade. Electronics. 2023;12(13):2832.
  8. Palais RS. The visualization of mathematics: Towards a mathematical exploratorium. Not Am Math Soc. 1999;46(6):647-658.
  9. Ilyina T. Methodology for studying the motivation of studying in a university. Ed Psych. 2023;11(2):123-134.
  10. Kovalchuk V, Marynchenko I, Yashchuk S. Creation of a favorable educational environment in higher education institutions of Ukraine. In: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference “Society. Integration. Education.” Rezekne: Rezekne Academy of Technologies; 2020.
  11. Crome R, Farrar R, O’Connor P. What is autonomous learning? Disc Learn Teach Philos Rel Stud. 2009;9(1):111-125.
  12. Abualrub I, Karswth B, Stensaker B. The various understandings of learning environment in higher education and its quality implications. Qual High Ed. 2013;19(1):90-110.
  13. State Program for the Development of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2020-2025. 2019. https://kaznpu.kz/docs/3.02.2020.22.pdf.
  14. Wright GB. Student-centered learning in higher education. Int J Teach Learn High Ed. 2011;23(3):92-97.
  15. Trubacheva S, Zamaskina P. Design of the gymnasium educational environment with taking into account the features of distance learning. Sci Bull Uzhhorod Univ Ser Ped Soc Work. 2020;2(47):195-198.
  16. Aggarwal JC. Essentials of educational technology, innovations in teaching-learning. New Delhi: Vikash Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.; 2014.
  17. Cavite FAM, Marcial DE. Correlates of learning satisfaction and learning engagement in online distance education. Inf Tech Learn Tools. 2022;90(4):118-135.
  18. Stokking K, Leenders F, De Jong J, Tartwijk J. From student to teacher: Reducing practice shock and early dropout in the teaching profession. Eur J Teach Ed. 2003;26(3):329-350.
  19. Asaduzzaman A, Asmatulu R. Teaching parallel programming for time-efficient computer applications. Int J Comp Appl. 2014;90(7):18-25.
  20. Bergmann J. Solving the homework problem by flipping the learning. Alexandria: ASCD; 2020.
  21. O’Hara S, Pritchard RH. Meeting the challenge of diversity: Professional development for teacher educators. Teach Ed Quart. 2008;35(1):43-61.
  22. Rudd P, Teeman D, Marshall H, Mundy E, White K, Lin Y, Morrison J, Yeshanew T, Cardozo V. Harnessing Technology Schools Survey 2009: Analysis report. Becta. 2009:1-96.
  23. Scharle A, Szabo A. Learner autonomy: A guide to developing learner responsibility (Cambridge handbooks for language teachers). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
Make a Submission

Indexing

  • Scopus logo
  • WorldCat logo
  • OpenAIRE logo
  • Crossref logo
  • VNLU logo
  • Professional publications of Ukraine logo
  • BASE logo
  • Google Scholar logo

info@physics.uz.ua