Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

ISSN 2415-8038 e-ISSN 2786-6688
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Definitions, patterns and history of the study of vowel harmony in the Kazakh language

Issue 56, 2024

Bekzhan Kopbosynov, Sandybai Boranbayev, Meruert Kopbaeva, Bakyt Taspolatov, Medeu Alimbaev

Received 24.01.2024, Revised 08.04.2024, Accepted 28.06.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.181fl9

Abstract

Relevance. Since phonological changes at the junction of morphemes, in particular in the consonantism system, have not been sufficiently studied. The formation of an idea of synharmonic processes is relevant in modern linguistic science.

Purpose. The research purpose was to study the sound parameters, phonological features and synharmonism on the example of the Kazakh, Turkish and English languages.

Methodology. The following methods were used to achieve the research purpose: comparative, structural, phonetic, analytical and synthetic.

Results. This article presents definitions, patterns and four stages in the history of the study of vowel harmony in the Kazakh language. To determine the level of labial harmony of Kazakh vowels, a table of comparison with other Turkic languages was presented. In this paper, the main phonological changes at the junction of the root and affixal morphemes and their expression in the sound plane were noted, the influence of phonetics on other language levels was assessed. The idea of four main timbres in the Kazakh language has been formed: soft, hard, rounded and unrounded, the features of vocal and consonant synharmonism. Methods for improving the identification of sound parameters and the formation of phonetic speech patterns using machine technologies are considered.

Conclusions. The study concludes that while Kazakh and Turkish share similarities in vowel harmony patterns, they differ in application, and English exhibits a largely disharmonious sound structure with some exceptions in borrowed words.

Keywords: vowels and consonants; phoneme; sound system; affix; morphemic junction

Suggested citation

Kopbosynov B, Boranbayev S, Kopbaeva M, Taspolatov B, Alimbaev M. Definitions, patterns and history of the study of vowel harmony in the Kazakh language. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(56):1819-1827. DOI: 10.54919/physics/56.2024.181fl9

Download article

References

  1. Kenzhigozhina K, Nurmuhametova K, Berkutbayeva M, Meiramova A, Kapesova T. Phonetic features of spoken English and Kazakh languages (theoretical and experimental research). XLing. 2020;13(2):166-175.
  2. Dzhusupova UT. Prosodica of the Turkic Word. Eur J Human Soc Sci. 2022;7:160-164.
  3. Guven S, Friedmann N. Vowel dyslexia in Turkish: A window to the complex structure of the sublexical route. PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0249016.
  4. Shende AM. Importance of Phonetics in English Language. UGC Care Group I List J. 2022;12(1):530-534.
  5. Eratalay S. On G > V Change And /G/ Falling in Turkish. Int J Lang Liter Cult Stud. 2021;4(1):141-152.
  6. Darkulova KN, Aulbekova ZhS, Kemelova JB. Synharmonism as a means of prosodic organization of the syntagm. Mod Probl Sci Educ. 2013;6:6-11.
  7. Baitursynov A. Language education. Almaty: Ridna Mova; 1992.
  8. Zhubanov K. Studies in the Kazakh language. Almaty: Gylym; 1999.
  9. Kopbossynov BK, Boranbayev SR. Study of the Law of Synharmonism in the Kazakh Language. Iasaui Univ Habar. 2022;4(126):19-28.
  10. Kuanyshbai M, Akhaeva AS. Researches of the scientist K. Zhubanov on phonetics. Taraz: M.Kh. Dulaty Taraz Regional University; 2023.
  11. Demir N. Vowel harmony in Laz Turkish. Proceed Worksh Turkic Lang Cont Turk. 2020;5(1):56-60.
  12. Uiz F. Phonology in a Nutshell. Agadir: University of Ibn Zohr; 2022.
  13. Turkish Language Class. Consonant Harmony; 2022. https://turkishonline.eu/consonant-harmony-in-the-turkish-language/
  14. Radlov VV. Experience of dictionaries of Turkic dialects. Moscow: Oriental Literature Publishing House; 1963.
  15. Batmanov I. The phonetic system of the modern Kyrgyz language. Kazan: Kirgizgosizdat; 1946.
  16. McCollum AG, Chen S. Illustration of the IPA Kazakh. J Int Phon Assoc. 2021;45:221-228.
  17. Derin M, Harada T. Universal Dependencies for Old Turkish; 2021. https://aclanthology.org/2021.udw-1.11.pdf.
  18. Stachowski M. Proto-Slavic palatal consonants and Proto-Turkic vowel harmony. Slav Yearb. 2020; LXIX:121-132.
  19. Unal AD. Speech Sounds of Turkish and English: Comparison and Contrast. Anadolu: Anadolu University; 2018.
  20. Varol M. The Influence of Turkish Sound System on English Pronunciation. Florida: The Florida State University; 2012.
  21. Martin A, White J. Vowel harmony and disharmony are not equivalent in learning. Ling Inquir. 2019;52(1):1-20.
  22. Kiparsky P, Pajusalu K. Towards a Typology of Disharmony. Ling Rev. 2003;20(2-4):217-241.
  23. Perea M, Hyona J, Marcet A. Does vowel harmony affect visual word recognition? Evidence from Finnish. J Expe Psych Learn Memor Cogn. 2022;48(12):2004-2014.
  24. Ahn EP, Chodroff E. VoxCommunis: A Corpus for Cross-linguistic Phonetic Analysis. Proceed 13th Conf Lang Resour Eval. 2022;6:5286–5294.
  25. Alderete J, O'Seaghdha PG. Language generality in phonological encoding: Moving beyond Indo-European languages. Lang Ling. 2022;16(7):e12469.
  26. Jonge K, Maxwell O, Zhao H. Learning on the Field: L2 Turkish Vowel Production by L1 American English-Speaking NGOs in Turkey. Lang. 2022;7(4):252-257.
  27. Gafos A. Consonant harmony, disharmony, memory and time scales. Proceed Soc Comp Ling. 2021;4(19):1-19.
  28. Owusu S, Kwasi A. The Influence of Akan Vowel Harmony on Pronunciation of Native Akan Speakers of English. Int J Engl Lang Ling Res. 2021;9(7):1-10.
Make a Submission

Indexing

  • Scopus logo
  • WorldCat logo
  • OpenAIRE logo
  • Crossref logo
  • VNLU logo
  • Professional publications of Ukraine logo
  • BASE logo
  • Google Scholar logo

info@physics.uz.ua