Creating a STEAM project with students as an indicator of the effectiveness of training future biologists

Issue 56, 2024

Symbat Ibadulla, Kalampyr Zhumagulova, Asia Maimatayeva

Received 09.11.2023, Revised 28.03.2024, Accepted 22.04.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.176dy7

Abstract

Relevance. In the modern world, biology is becoming an increasingly complex and multidimensional science that encompasses numerous subfields. Therefore, future specialists in this field need to possess not only deep knowledge of core disciplines but also a broad outlook, including competencies in technology, mathematics, and the arts.

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of training focused on the creation of STEAM projects in terms of training future biologists.

Methodology. The methodology of the study included the analysis of 41 projects conducted by 11 teachers of higher educational institutions in Kazakhstan for 5 years. Project classification methods included such aspects as the integration of educational material, problem-solving, search for answers to scientific questions, development of technical devices, cooperation of students, biological content of projects, high involvement and quality of assessment, and creativity. Data collection was conducted through direct observations in classrooms and at events and conducting interviews with teachers.

Results. The results showed that specialised teachers of biological disciplines, as a rule, avoided transdisciplinary projects, while teachers of non-biological disciplines often overlooked biological content in interdisciplinary projects. Biology teachers often avoided teaching methods based on device development, but they emphasised high standards of knowledge and fostered a positive perception of their disciplines through projects that involved discussion and meaningful feedback.

Conclusions. The research findings indicate that combining conventional teaching methods with integrated approaches to delivering the material can be a way to solidify fundamental biological knowledge necessary for further, more advanced education, and prepare students to apply their knowledge and skills in practical situations. The results obtained can be used in pedagogical practice for the effective implementation of project-oriented learning.

Keywords: pedagogy for higher education; interdisciplinary training; integration of educational material; practical training; quality of assessment

Suggested citation

Ibadulla S, Zhumagulova K, Maimatayeva A. Creating a STEAM project with students as an indicator of the effectiveness of training future biologists. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(56):1767-1776. DOI: 10.54919/physics/56.2024.176dy7

Download article

References

  1. Thibaut L, Ceuppens S, De Loof H, De Meester J, Goovaerts L, Struyf A, Boeve-de Pauw J, Dehaene W, Deprez J, De Cock M, Hellinckx L, Knipprath H, Langie G, Struyven K, Van de Velde D, Van Petegem P, Depaepe F. Integrated STEM education: a systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. Eur J STEM Educ. 2018;3(1): article number 2.
  2. Hawari ADM, Noor AIM. Project based learning pedagogical design in STEAM art education. Asian J Univ Educ. 2020;16(3):102-111.
  3. Nguyen KA, Borrego M, Finelli CJ, DeMonbrun M, Crockett C, Tharayil S, Shekhar P, Waters C, Rosenberg R. Instructor strategies to aid implementation of active learning: a systematic literature review. Int J STEM Educ. 2021;8(9):2-18.
  4. Diego-Mantecón JM, Prodromou T, Lavicza Z, Blanco TF, Ortiz-Laso Z. Implementing STEM projects through the EDP to learn mathematics: the importance of teachers’ specialization. ZDM Math Educ. 2022;53:1137-1148.
  5. Potari D, Psycharis G, Spiliotopoulou V, Triantafllou C, Zachariades T, Zoupa A. Mathematics and science teachers’ collaboration: Searching for common grounds. In: Proceedings of the 40th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME 40) (pp. 91-98). Szeged: PME; 2016.
  6. Quigley CF, Herro D, King E, Plank H. STEAM designed and enacted: understanding the process of design and implementation of STEAM curriculum in an elementary school. J Sci Educ Technol. 2020;29:499-518.
  7. Quigley CF, Herro D, Shekell C, Cian H, Jacques L. Connected learning in STEAM classrooms: Opportunities for engaging youth in science and math classrooms. Int J Sci Math Educ. 2020;18:1441-1463.
  8. Zheng J, Xing W, Zhu G, Chen G, Zhao H, Xie C. Profiling self-regulation behaviors in STEM learning of engineering design. Comp Educ. 2020;143:103669.
  9. Lasa A, Abaurrea J, Iribas H. Mathematical content on STEM activities. J Math Educ. 2020;11(3):333-346.
  10. Burghardt MD, Hacker M. Informed design: A contemporary approach to design pedagogy as the core process in technology. Technol Teach. 2004;64(1);6-8. 
  11. Altan EB, Tan S. Concepts of creativity in design based learning in STEM education. Int J Technol Des Educ. 2021;31:503-529.
  12. Samsudin MA, Jamali SM, Zain ARM, Ebrahim NA. The effect of STEM project based learning on self-efficacy among high-school physics students. J Turk Sci Educ.2020;16(1):94-108.
  13. Valko N, Kushnir N, Osadchyi V. Cloud technologies for STEM education. CTE Worksh Proc. 2020;2643:416-434.
  14. Chaaban Y, Qadhi S, Du X. Student teachers’ perceptions of factors influencing learner agency working in teams in a STEAM-based course. Euras J Math Sci Technol Educ. 2021;17(7):em1980.
  15. Al Salami MK, Makela CJ, de Miranda MA. Assessing changes in teachers’ attitudes toward interdisciplinary STEM teaching. Int J Technol Des Educ. 2017;27:63-88.
  16. Lin KY, Wu YT, Hsu YT, Williams PJ. Effects of infusing the engineering design process into STEM project-based learning to develop preservice technology teachers’ engineering design thinking. Int J STEM Educ. 2021;8:1.
  17. Bhakti YB, Astuti IAD, Okyranida IY, Asih DAS, Marhento G, Leonard L, Yusro AC. Integrated STEM project based learning implementation to improve student science process skills. J Phys Conf Ser. 2020;1464:012016.
  18. Han S, Capraro R, Capraro MM. How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) project-based learning (PBL) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of student factors on achievement. Int J Sci Math Educ. 2015;13:1089-1113.
  19. Han S, Rosli R, Capraro MM, Capraro R. The effect of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) project based learning (PBL) on students’ achievement in four mathematics topics. J Turk Sci Educ. 2016;13(S):3-29.
  20. Mystakidis S, Christopoulos A, Pellas N. A systematic mapping review of augmented reality applications to support STEM learning in higher education. Educ Inform Technol. 2022;27:1883-1927
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua