Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

ISSN 2415-8038 e-ISSN 2786-6688
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Adoption of nomadic childcare practices by urban Kazakh families: A sociological analysis

Issue 56, 2024

Tatyana Rezvushkina, Baizhol Karipbayev, Eldos Zhumagulov, Natalya Karasseva, Mira Manassova

Received 16.12.2023, Revised 19.03.2024, Accepted 24.05.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.216va0

Abstract

Relevance. Kazakhstan’s modern social policy landscape has created challenges for urban families in managing childcare and household duties. This study examines the revival of nomadic cultural practices, specifically the employment of “female assistants”, as a response to these challenges.

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to investigate the experiences of urban Kazakh middle-class couples who adopt or revive the practice of employing “female assistants” for childcare and household management, exploring the underlying reasons for this trend.

Methodology. The research utilizes data from 11 individual semi-structured interviews with female assistants, conducted between 2014 and 2017. A qualitative analysis approach was employed to examine the complexities of this social phenomenon.

Results. The study reveals a complex interplay of familial obligations, gender roles, and economic necessities in the employment of “female assistants”. These arrangements often result in the exploitation of the assistants, who lose autonomy over their time and labour. The host families, while benefiting from the support, experience conflicting emotions about the fairness of the situation, often attempting to compensate through material means. Additionally, the study uncovers a significant invisibility of “female assistants” in symbolic representations and family hierarchies, contributing to the undervaluation of their work and social status.

Conclusions. The research illuminates how urban Kazakh families navigate the challenges of contemporary social policies by reviving and adapting nomadic cultural practices. It underscores the complex power dynamics, emotional labour, and symbolic representations associated with the role of “female assistants” in modern Kazakh households, pointing to the need for further diversification of social policies regarding motherhood and childcare.

Keywords: social policy; neo-traditionalism; Kazakh families; “female assistants”

Suggested citation

Rezvushkina T, Karipbayev B, Zhumagulov E, Karasseva N, Manassova M. Adoption of nomadic childcare practices by urban Kazakh families: A sociological analysis. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(56):2160-2167. DOI: 10.54919/physics/56.2024.216va0

Download article

References

  1. Zhurzhenko T. Gendered markets of Ukraine: Political economy of nation building. Vilnius: YSU Publishing House; 2008.
  2. Zdravomyslova Ye, Rorkikh A, Temkina A. A new way of life in Modern Russia: Gender studies of everyday life. St. Petersburg: House of the European University Publishing House; 2009.
  3. Abdrakhmanova BM. A specific type of kinship system among Kazakh Nomads: The Normative aspect of symbolism and ritual during marriage. Bul KarGU. 2005;4(2005):23-27.
  4. Popkov YV. The Phenomenon of sociocultural neo-traditionalism. St. Petersburg: Aletheia Publishing House; 2011.
  5. Lapshin VA. Forms of Neo-Traditionalism: North-West Federal District. Research Database “Russian Models of Archaization and Neotraditionalization”; 2014. http://neoregion.ru/szfo.html?PHPSESSID=1ce91e1b3a57218d3c4ab30aa05a582e.
  6. Shpakovskaya LL, Chernova ZhV. Discursive Practices of Modern Russian Parenthood. Wom Rus Soc. 2013;4(2013):15-21.
  7. Connell R. Gender and Power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Moscow: Novoye Literaturnoye Obozreniye; 2015.
  8. Tartakovskaya IN. Gender sociology. Moscow: Variant Publishing House; 2005.
  9. Tartakovskaya IN. Personal as political: The Second Wave of Feminism as an Echo of 1968. Emer Stoc. 2008;4.
  10. Fridan B. The feminine mystique. Moscow: Progress Publishing House; 1969.
  11. Beauvoir S. The Second Sex. St. Petersburg: Azbuka-Attikus Publishing House; 2017.
  12. Kislyakov NA. Essays on the history of family and marriage among the peoples of Central Asia and Kazakhstan. Leningrad: Science Publishing House; 1969.
  13. Klyashtornyy SG, Sultanov TI. Kazakhstan: A chronicle of three millennia. Almaty: Rauan Publishing House; 1992.
  14. Levshin AI. Description of the Kyrgyz Cossack or Kyrgyz Kaisat Hordes and Steppes. Almaty: Kitap Publishing House; 1996.
  15. Masanov NE, Abylkhozhin ZhV, Yerofeyeva IV, Alekseyenko AN, Baratova GS. History of Kazakhstan: Peoples and Cultures. Almaty: Kitap Publishing House; 2001.
  16. Stasevich IV. Social status of Women among Kazakhs: Traditions and modernity. St. Petersburg: Nauka Publishing House; 2011.
  17. Abashin S. Soviet village. Between colonialism and modernization. Moscow: Novoye Literaturnoye Obozreniye; 2015.
  18. The Large Explanatory Dictionary; 2018. http://gramota.ru/slovari/dic/?word=pomoshch'&all=x.
  19. Order of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 384 “On the concept of family and gender policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan until 2030”; 2016. https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/U1600000384
  20. Decree of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 1677. “Strategy for achieving gender equality for 2006-2016”; 2005. https://www.ndi.org/sites/default/files/Kazakhstan-Gender-Strategy-2006-2016.pdf
Make a Submission

Indexing

  • Scopus logo
  • WorldCat logo
  • OpenAIRE logo
  • Crossref logo
  • VNLU logo
  • Professional publications of Ukraine logo
  • BASE logo
  • Google Scholar logo

info@physics.uz.ua