Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

ISSN 2415-8038 e-ISSN 2786-6688
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

A model of the process for forming the readiness of future mathematics teachers to teach schoolchildren in the context of the PISA-2021 concept

Issue 56, 2024

Kuanysh Nurpeyssov, Duisebek Nurgabyl

Received 16.11.2023, Revised 28.02.2024, Accepted 18.04.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.124vt0

Abstract

Relevance. The relevance of the research topic lies in the fact that educational tasks in geometry contribute to the formation and development of mental abilities, spatial imagination, which are necessary in logistics, architecture and construction, mechanical engineering, cartography and other fields of applied science.

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to study the stage of training of future mathematics teachers in the direction of implementing the PISA-2021 concept.

Methodology. Among the theoretical research methods, analysis and synthesis, the method of comparison and generalization were used. At the stage of the empirical part, an experimental pedagogical study was conducted on the basis of three universities of Kazakhstan.

Results. The article examines the issue of designing the learning process in the context of forming the readiness of future mathematics teachers to carry out pedagogical activities. A system of content components of the future teacher's general readiness to teach schoolchildren was determined. The signs and stages of formation of the readiness of future mathematics teachers to teach schoolchildren in the context of the PISA-2021 concept have been identified. A model of the process of forming the professional readiness of future mathematics teachers to teach schoolchildren in the context of the formation and development of their mathematical thinking, spatial ideas, and divergent thinking has been built skills of the 21st century.

Conclusions. The study confirms the effectiveness of a new model for preparing future math teachers, showing high student proficiency in mathematical and pedagogical skills, while noting potential for broader application and challenges in implementation due to current school curriculum limitations.

Keywords: readiness components; stages of the learning process; thinking abilities; geometric problems; section of polyhedra

Suggested citation

Nurpeyssov K, Nurgabyl D. A model of the process for forming the readiness of future mathematics teachers to teach schoolchildren in the context of the PISA-2021 concept. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(56):1240-1250. DOI: 10.54919/physics/56.2024.124vt0

Download article

References

  1. OECD. The future of education and skills. Education 2030; 2018. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf
  2. PISA 2021 Mathematics Framework (Draft); 2018. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa-2021-mathematics-framework-draft.pdf
  3. Karatepe R, Akay C. The study of the relationship between 21st-century learner skills, individual innovativeness and epistemological beliefs of teacher candidates by structural equation modelling. South Afric J Educ. 2020;40(2):1795.
  4. Semilarski H, Soobard R, Rannikmäe M. Promoting students' perceived self-efficacy towards 21st century skills through everyday life-related scenarios. Educ Sci. 2021;11(10):570.
  5. Haug BS, Mork SM. Taking 21st century skills from vision to classroom: What teachers highlight as supportive professional development in the light of new demands from educational reforms. Teach Teach Educ. 2021;100:103286.
  6. Erten P. Analyzing vocational high schools within the 21st century learner and teacher skills spectrum. Egit Bilim Educ Sci. 2022;47(209):261-291.
  7. Bakar MAA, Ismail N. Exploring students’ metacognitive regulation skills and mathematics achievement in implementation of 21st century learning in Malaysia. Probl Educ 21st cent. 2020;78(3):314-327.
  8. Lavi R, Tal M, Dori YJ. Perceptions of STEM alumni and students on developing 21st century skills through methods of teaching and learning. Stud Educ Eval. 2021;70:101002.
  9. García PC, Cenjor MJC, Palop PF. Group games in mathematics learning: A resource for everyone. In: 9th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (pp. 4918-4923). Madrid: INTED; 2015.
  10. Mukhametkaliev T. National higher education in the context of state independence: a look into the third decade until 2020. Moder Educ. 2012;86(2):30-33.
  11. Kong YT, Kayumova LR, Zakirova VG. Simulation technologies in preparing teachers to deal with risks. Eur J Math Sci Tech Educ. 2017;13(8):4753-4763.
  12. Ballantyne J, Flynn L, Olm-Madden T. Problem-Seeking in teacher education: empowering students to grapple with the complexities of the profession. Austral J Teach Educ. 2020;45(5):38-61.
  13. Li X, Wang W. Exploring spatial cognitive process among STEM students and its role in STEM education a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Sci Educ. 2020;30(1):121-145.
  14. Sydykov BD, Kenesbaev SM. Didactic foundations for the formation of a model of professional competence of a future specialist. Bull KazNPU Abai. 2014;1:76-79.
  15. Sokolova NA, Sivrikova NV, Chernikova EG, Ptashko TG, Harlanova EM, Roslyakova SV. Conflict management training for future educators. Educ Sci J. 2020;22(7):101-124.
  16. Byrka M, Sushchenko A, Lukashiv T. Components of ICT competence of teachers of mathematics and informatics. Inform Tech Learn Tool. 2019;74(6):225-237.
  17. Gagnier KM, Fisher KR. Unpacking the black box of translation: A framework for infusing spatial thinking into curricula. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020;5(1):29.
  18. Burte H, Gardony AL, Hutton A, Taylor HA. Elementary teachers' attitudes and beliefs about spatial thinking and mathematics. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020;5(1):17.
  19. Battista M.. Thoughts on elementary students' reasoning about 3-d arrays of cubes and polyhedra. In: 2nd International Curriculum Conference on Future Curricular Trends in School Algebra and Geometry (pp. 183-199). Chicago: University of Chicago 2010.
  20. Lee KH, Ko ES, Song SH. The analysis of activity that gifted students construct defination of regullar polyhedra. In: 31st Conference of the International-Group-for-the-Psychology-of-Mathematic-Education (pp. 153-160). Seoul: The Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics; 2007.
  21. Sorby SA, Panther GC. Is the key to better PISA math scores improving spatial skills? Math Educ Res J. 2020;32(2):213-233.
  22. Doil M, Pietzner V. Structure of science teacher education in PISA leading countries: A systematic review. Educ Sci 2023;13(8):826.
  23. Susilowati NE, Muslim M, Efendi R, Samsudin A. PISA 2021 creative thinking instrument for students: Physics teachers’ perceptions. Indon J Sci Math Educ. 2022;5(2):194-209.
  24. Viac C, Fraser P. Teachers’ well-being: A framework for data collection and analysis. OECD Educ Work Paper. 2020;213:1-80.
  25. Weng KH, Eng GT. K-12 school mathematics curriculum: Insights on development, renewal and future orientation. In: Singapore Math and Science Education Innovation: Beyond PISA (pp. 107-135). Singapore: Springer; 2021.
  26. Balagtas MU. Alignment of the Philippine mathematics teacher education curriculum with the programme for international student assessment. Eur J Math Sci Educ. 2021;2(2):145-161.
  27. Wu LT, Wang TY, Shy HY. What are the reasons why preservice mathematics teachers endorse the integration of technology in mathematics class? In: Proceedings of the 44th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 295-302). Khon Kaen: PME; 2021.
Make a Submission

Indexing

  • Scopus logo
  • WorldCat logo
  • OpenAIRE logo
  • Crossref logo
  • VNLU logo
  • Professional publications of Ukraine logo
  • BASE logo
  • Google Scholar logo

info@physics.uz.ua