Training of the future physics teachers for implementation of the tasks of physical and environmental education

Issue 55, 2024

Zhadyra Yermekova, Nina Stukalenko, Elmira Kozhabekova, Assiya Kukubayeva

Received 14.11.2023, Revised 01.02.2024, Accepted 28.02.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.117iv7

Abstract

Relevance. The article is devoted to the problem of training of the future physics teachers for implementation of the tasks of physical and environmental education in Kazakhstan.  The training of teachers in related subjects for integrated learning has become the main difference between the updated content of education, which has been introduced into the general education system of the Republic of Kazakhstan since 2016.

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to theoretically characterize the training of future physics teachers for implementation of the tasks of physical and environmental education.

Methodology. In the course of the study, a set of methods has been used, including the following groups: general scientific (analysis, synthesis, classification, generalization, deduction, induction), specific scientific (modeling method, system analysis, structural-logical analysis); empirical (interviews with lecturers and teachers). In the process of training of a physics teacher for implementation of the tasks of physical and environmental education, it is necessary to constantly monitor the issues of how the future physics teacher owns the actual material, how he uses modern innovative teaching technologies.

Results. It has been revealed that the specialist’s scientific style of thinking focuses on the realization of his objective need to master the culture of using the physical-ecological approach as the main adequate method used in the real educational activities. It has been determined that the lecture-laboratory form is the most common form in training of the future physics teachers.

Conclusions. The practical significance of the work lies in the fact that the main provisions of the study can be used by scientists in further searches regarding the improvement of foundations for training of the future physics teachers to implement the tasks of physical and environmental education and to develop the teaching aids and methodological recommendations.

Keywords: teaching physics; updated content of education; professional training of teachers; development of education in Kazakhstan

Suggested citation

Yermekova Z, Stukalenko N, Kozhabekova E, Kukubayeva A. Training of the future physics teachers for implementation of the tasks of physical and environmental education. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):1177-1187. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.117iv7

Download article

References

  1. Artykbayeva EV. Theory and Technology of E-Learning in Secondary School. Almaty: Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University; 2010.
  2. Tokarev P. The System of Methodical Training a future physics teacher in Pedagogical IHEs in Сonditions of the new Educational Standards Implementation. Prof Educ: Method, Theor Techn. 2019;10:237-252.
  3. Kholina S, Babenko O. Model of advanced training of physics teachers at the present stage. Web Conf. 2020;210:18116.
  4. Myamesheva G. The virtue in the modern smart world. Bull KazNU. Ped Sci Series. 2015;44(1):152-156.
  5. Sagimbayeva AE. Theoretical and Methodological Basis of Training of Future Teachers of Informatics for Monitoring and Evaluation of Students’ Knowledge. Almaty: Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University; 2017.
  6. Makovec D. The teacher’s role and professional development. Int J Cognit Res Sci, Engineer Educ. 2018;6(2):33-45.
  7. Glenn E. Training new researchers on how to understand and develop their profiles; 2021. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/1162372/Teaching-the-Importance-of-Profiles-at-UNMC_Scopus-case-study_WEB.pdf.
  8. Teplytskyi O, Teplytskyi I, Semerikov SO, Soloviev V. Professional training of science and mathematics teachers using computer modeling. Kryvyi Rih: Kryvyi Rih National University; 2015.
  9. Semerikov S, Shokalyuk S, Mintiy I, Voloshanenko O, Kulinich B. Generation of mathematical tasks by SAGE Web-SCM. In: Materials of the fifth scientific and practical conference FOSS Lviv 2015 (pp. 74-76). Lviv: LVEE; 2015.
  10. Archer L, Moote J, MacLeod E. Learning that physics is ‘not for me’: Pedagogic work and the cultivation of habitus among advanced level physics students. J Learn Sci. 2020;29(3):347-384.
  11. Argaw AS, Haile BB, Ayalew BT, Kuma SG. The effect of problem-based learning (PBL) instruction on students’ motivation and problem-solving skills of physics. Eurasia J Math, Sci Techn Educ. 2017;13(3):857-871.
  12. Watson J, Pape LD, Murin A, Gemin B, Vashaw L. Keeping Pace with K-12 Online Learning: An Annual Review of Policy and Practice. Colorado: Evergreen Education Group; 2011.
  13. Badina TA, Moiseyeva LV. Formation of an ecological worldview among students of geology. Yekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical University; 2018.
  14. Kirilova TA. Methods of using electronic educational resources in teaching future teachers to design and conduct physics lessons. Astrakhan: Astrakhan State University; 2021.
  15. Luniov SV, Nazarchuk PF, Burban OV. Calculation of the electron mobility for the Δ1 model of the conduction band of germanium single crystals. Semiconduct. 2014;48(4):438–441.
  16. Luniov SV, Burban OV, Nazarchuk PF. Electron scattering in the Δ1 model of the conduction band of germanium single crystals. Semiconduct. 2015;49(5):574–578.
  17. Zhekibayeva B, Kalimova A, Sarsekeyeva Z, Ossipova S, Zhukenova G. Research on integrated learning upon enhancing cognitive activity in primary school. J Intell Disabil - Diagn Treatm. 2020;8(3):396–405.
  18. Lyulenko S, Moroz L, Podzerey R. Formation of environmental competence of students as one of the urgent requests of modern society. Env Educ. 2020;2(29):16-19.
  19. Johnson-Anderson S, Lingutla R, Riley M. Empowering Underrepresented Students in Science: STEM Students Speak. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2022.
  20. Sarsekeyeva ZY, Zhekibayeva BA, Zhukenova GB, Sarsekeyeva NY, Mazhenova RB. Relations between undergraduate students' independent learning skills and their learning outcomes in education studies. Sci Educ Today. 2019;9(6):7–18.
  21. Fedosov AV, Luniov SV, Fedosov SA. Specific features of intervalley scattering of charge carriers in n-Si at high temperatures. Semiconduct. 2010;44(10):1263–1265.
  22. Fedosov AV, Luniov SV, Fedosov SA. Influence of uniaxial deformation on the filling of the level associated with A-center in n-Si crystals. Ukr J Phys. 2011;56(1):69–73.
  23. Amanah S, Wibowo FC, Astra I. Trends of Flipped Classroom Studies for Physics Learning: A Systematic Review. J Physic: Conf Series. 2021;1:012044.
  24. Caleon IS, Tan YSM, Cho YH. Does teaching experience matter? The beliefs and practices of beginning and experienced physics teachers. Res Sci Educ. 2018;48:117-149.
  25. Berdykulova G, Ipalakova M, Kamysbayev M, Daineko Y. Towards digital university: Experience of Kazakhstan. ACM Int Conf Proceed Ser. 2020;1:3410793. DOI: 10.1145/3410352.3410793
  26. Babak V, Dekusha O, Vorobiov L, Dekusha L, Kobzar S, Ivanov S. The Heat Exchange Simulation in the Device for Measuring the Emissivity of Coatings and Material Surfaces. 2019 IEEE 39th Int Conf Electron Nanotechnol ELNANO 2019 – Proceed. 2019;1:301–304.
  27. Ten A, Zaurenbekov B, Mikhail S, Baitasov Y, Avsievich V, Telemgenova A. Prospects for the development of physical culture and grassroots sports in the Republic of Kazakhstan. J Phys Educ Sport. 2022;22(9):2246–2253.
  28. Luniov S, Zimych A, Khvyshchun M, Yevsiuk M, Maslyuk V. Specific features of defect formation in the N­Si: Single crystals at electron irradiation. East-Eur J Enterp Technol. 2018;6(12-96):35–42.
  29. Luniov SV, Lyshuk VV, Maslyuk VT, Burban OV. Mechanisms of Electron Scattering in Uniaxially Deformed Silicon Single Crystals with Radiation Defects. Latvian Phys Techn Sci. 2019;56(5):45–57.
  30. Kalimova A, Zhekibayeva BA, Karimova R, Khamzina S, Fomina T. A study of pre-service teachers’ readiness for integrated learning in primary school. Cypr J Educ Sci. 2022;17(5):1567–1575.
  31. Sarsekeyeva ZY, Gorbunova NA, Zhekibayeva BA, Sarsekeyeva NY. Developing students’ cognitive culture through solving career-oriented tasks within the framework of initial teacher education. Sci Educ Today. 2019;9(4):7–18.
  32. Belytskyi D, Yermolenko R, Petrenko K, Gogota O. Application of machine learning and computer vision methods to determine the size of NPP equipment elements in difficult measurement conditions. Mach Energ. 2023;14(4):42–53.
  33. Maltabarova NA, Kokoshko AI, Abduldayeva AA, Shanazarov NA, Smailova GT. Innovation technologies in student's independent activity and creativity development: The case of medical education. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2019;14(11). DOI 10.3991/ijet.v14i11.10341
  34. Keller MM, Neumann K, Fischer HE. The impact of physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and motivation on students’ achievement and interest. J Res Sci Teach. 2017;54(5):586-614.
  35. Goldstein O. A project-based learning approach to teaching physics for pre-service elementary school teacher education students. Cogen Educ. 2016;3(1):1200833.
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua