Song H, Zhu J, Abykeeva-Sultanalieva T. Traditional ecological culture of China and Kyrgyzstan as a fundamental basis for the development of modern ecological civilization. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):2142-2150. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.214ep2
Traditional ecological culture of China and Kyrgyzstan as a fundamental basis for the development of modern ecological civilization
Huijin Song, Jianshe Zhu, Taalaigul Abykeeva-Sultanalieva
https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.214ep2
Abstract
Relevance. The relevance of this study is due to the deteriorating environmental situation both globally and in Kyrgyzstan and China.
Purpose. This article aims to examine the traditional ecological cultures of these countries and compare them in order to identify the most sustainable and harmonious way of coexistence between society and nature.
Methodology. Comparison was chosen as the leading method of research of this problem, which allowed for a comprehensive comparison of all key elements of the traditional ecological cultures of Kyrgyzstan and China. The following were also used: analysis, historical method, synthesis, method of systematization, deduction, and classification.
Results. The study revealed the essence of the traditional ecological cultures of China and Kyrgyzstan, their historical roots and sources of formation, analysed the contribution of classical Chinese philosophers to the development of the philosophy of reverence for nature, and cited quotes from their works reflecting the desire for balance and harmony in the use of natural resources. The study also revealed the historical background and symbols embodying respect for nature among the Kyrgyz, revealing the influence of shamanism and animism on the ecological culture of this people. The paper described the symbolic aspects related to animals and revealed their significance for the ancient Kyrgyz. A detailed comparison of the traditional ecological cultures of China and Kyrgyzstan included analyses of historical, natural, religious and social factors, which made it possible to identify the key features and principles underlying the harmonious relationship between man and nature in these countries.
Conclusions. The research materials can be integrated into contemporary environmental policy and practice, as they reveal valuable knowledge for promoting a sustainable ecological future of society.
Keywords: sustainable future; ancient knowledge and philosophy; comparative research; environment; nature and society
Suggested citation
References
- McMillen H, Campbell LK, Svendsen ES, Kealiikanakaoleohaililani K, Francisco KS, Giardina CP. Biocultural stewardship, Indigenous and local ecological knowledge, and the urban crucible. Ecol Societ. 2020;25(2):9.
- Yessymkhanova Z, Niyazbekova S, Dauletkhanova Z, Dzholdoshev N, Dzholdosheva T. Environmental safety in the countries bordering Kazakhstan in the context of sustainable development. E3S Web Conf. 2021;244:01016.
- Yu L, Kasimov U. Social construction of pastureland: Changing rules and resource-use rights in China and Kyrgyzstan. Int J Common. 2020;14(1):1-15.
- Hamelin N, Bhatti I. Energy usage, health issues, and pro-environmental behavior: Exploring the link and promoting energy change in Kyrgyzstan. Energ. 2023;16(19):6858.
- Bazarkulova T, Dzhanibekova V, Nurdinova K, Tokoeva G, Azimova Z, Amatova G, Eshenalieva D, Akmatova Z. The modernization process of traditional Kyrgyz society. J Posit Sch Psychol. 2022;6(11):1631-1635.
- Dzhumagazieva N. Criteria and aspects of environmental journalism based on the materials of Kyrgyz authors’ works. E3S Web Conf. 2020;210:17029.
- Kizanlikli M, Margazieva N, Asanova K, Gundogdu I. An assessment of eco hotel practices and green marketing perceptions: An eco-labelling model proposal for hotels in Kyrgyzstan. J Clean Product. 2023;420:138438.
- Beksultanova Ch, Mazhitova Z, Zhunushalieva G, Kozhakeyeva L, kyzy Nazira T, Shamshidenova F. Handicraft tourism in Kyrgyzstan: Features and prospects. E3S Web Conf. 2021;284:10001.
- Umuhoza J, Jiapaer G, Yin H, Mind’je R, Gasirabo A, Nzabarinda V, Umwali ED. The analysis of grassland carrying capacity and its impact factors in typical mountain areas in Central Asia – A case of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Ecol Indicat. 2021;131:108129.
- Machle E. Nature and heaven in the Xunzi: A study of the Tian Lun. New York: State University of New York Press; 1993.
- Jingfang J. Zhouyi: A new collection of biographies of the department of Rhetoric. Shenyang: Liao Hai Publishing House; 1998.
- Tzu L, Ching T. The complete book. Kunming: Yunnan People’s Press; 2013.
- Jiang W, Zhang H. Traditional Chinese culture and the construction of ecological civilization: From cultural genes to practical behaviors – Case studies in Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism. Chinese J Urban Env Stud. 2020;8(2):2050011.
- Zhang Z. Zhang Zai Qi. Beijing: Zhonghua Shubu; 1978.
- Wang G. Analects of Confucius. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju; 2010.
- Li X. Ten lectures on ancient Chinese civilization. Shanghai: Fudan University Press; 2003.
- Working Committee for Translation from Chinese. Manas. Xinjiang: Xinjiang People’s Publishing House; 2012.
- Aitmatov Ch. The white boat. Tianjin: Tianjin People’s Publishing House; 2017.
- Zhen L, Ishwaran N, Luo Q, Wei Y, Zhang Q. Role and significance of restoration technologies for vulnerable ecosystems in building an ecological civilization in China. Env Develop. 2020;34:100494.
- Sutton MQ, Anderson EN. An introduction to cultural ecology. Routledge; 2020.
- Huang P, Westman L. China’s imaginary of ecological civilization: A resonance between the state-led discourse and sociocultural dynamics. Energ Res Social Sci. 2021;81:102253.
- Salimjan G. Naturalized violence: Affective politics of China’s “ecological civilization” in Xinjiang. Human Ecol. 2021;49:59-68.
- Aronson J, Goodwin N, Orlando L, Eisenberg C, Cross AT. A world of possibilities: Six restoration strategies to support the United Nation’s decade on ecosystem restoration. Restor Ecol. 2020;28(4):730-736.
- Ludwig D, Macnaghten P. Traditional ecological knowledge in innovation governance: A framework for responsible and just innovation. J Respon Innov. 2019;7(1):26-44.
