Teaching the processes of mountain formation in physical geography using multimedia technologies (Kazakhstan)

Issue 55, 2024

Muratbek Aliev, Aliya Beisenova, Kulyash Kaimuldinova, Duman Aliaskarov,

Received 17.10.2023, Revised 11.01.2024, Accepted 27.02.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.89bs3

Abstract

Relevance. Physical geographical education plays an important role in the system of geographical education. Without mastering physical and geographical knowledge, it is impossible to form knowledge about the process of mountain formation. Teachers can clearly present the dynamic development of the process of mountain formation using multimedia technology in class rooms. However, electronic textbooks, which present an effective method of teaching through multimedia technologies, are not enough. Today, the importance of multimedia applications has increased with the mass distance learning of schoolchildren during the pandemic.

Purpose. The study aims at developing an effective methodological basis for teaching the mountain-forming process in school geography.

Methodology. Despite the works of scientists who have theoretically studied multimedia technologies, the methodology is not sufficiently studied for introducing new technologies into the learning process. This, in turn, requires a thorough study of the pedagogical aspects of multimedia technologies in geography.

Results. This paper analyses the features of teaching geography in Kazakhstan focusing on the analysis of the important role of physical geography in the system of geographical education. This article considers the problem of teaching mountain-forming processes in physical geography. A broad theoretical analysis of folded, wrinkled, folded-axillary mountains was carried out with the classification of mountains by formation, age and height. These data were taken as the theoretical basis of the methodology of teaching the process of mountain formation.

Conclusions. The article defines how multimedia technologies can be used in teaching geography in schools of Kazakhstan. The authors proposed a methodology for teaching the process of mountain formation using a multimedia textbook.

Keywords: physical geography; the process of mountain formation; multimedia technologies; geographical methods of teaching; classification of mountains

Suggested citation

Aliev M, Beisenova A, Kaimuldinova K, Aliaskarov D. Teaching the processes of mountain formation in physical geography using multimedia technologies (Kazakhstan). Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):893-906. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.89bs3

Download article

References

  1. Hofstetter FT. Multimedia. New York: Mc Graw Hill International; 2001.
  2. Stolbova NA. The use of multimedia in geography lessons and in extracurricular activities; 2013. https://urok.1sept.ru/
  3. Dong S. Application of multimedia technology in the course teaching of geography of China. 7th International Conference on Education, Management, Computer and Society (EMCS 2017). Advan Comp Sci Res (ACSR). 2017;61. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/emcs-17/25876064
  4. Zhang M. Application of multimedia technology in effective classroom teaching in middle-school geography. J China Three Gorges Uni. 2012;2012(34):223-224.
  5. Cerghit I. Sisteme de instruire alternative i complementare. structuri, stiluri, strategii. Carol: Polirom; 2008.
  6. Klimenko TN. The use of information technology in geography lessons. Geographic Education; 2010. https://urok.1sept.ru/
  7. Nabiev AA. Innovative technologies in science and education: Actual issues and achievements: monograph. Penza: ICNS "Science and Education"; 2016.
  8. Kent A. Geography changes and challenges. In: M. Smith (Ed.), Teaching Geography in Secondary Schools a Reade (pp. 3-20). London: RoutledgeFalmer; 2002.
  9. Sporea R, Matache M. Geomedia – Multimedia manual for the study of physical geography; 2014. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229003071
  10. Vaughan T. Multimedia: Making it work. New York: MC Graw Hill; 2011.
  11. Gakaev RA, Irazova MA. Educational technologies at the lessons of geography in a modern school. Educ Upbrin. 2015;2015(3):4-7.
  12. Kinzel M, Wright D. Using geovisualizations in the curriculum: Do multimedia tools enhance geography education? Environmental Systems Research Institute Education User’s Conference August; 2008. https://proceedings.esri.com/library/userconf/educ08/educ/papers/pap_1290.pdf
  13. Haubrich H. International charter on geographical education. Nurnberg: IGUCGE; 1994.
  14. Bennets T. The links between understanding, progression and assessment in the secondary geography curriculum. Geog. 2005;90(2):152-170.
  15. Domaratskiy Y, Kovalenko O, Kachanova T, Pichura V, Zadorozhnii Y. Analysis of the Effectiveness of Biological Plant Protection on Sunflower Productivity under Different Cenosis Density under the Non-Irrigated Conditions of the Steppe Zone. Eco Eng Environ Tech. 2023;24(9):45-54.
  16. Harrower M, MacEachern A, Griffin A. Design and assessment of a geographic visualization tool to support earth science learning. Cartog Geog Info Sci. 2000;27(4):279-293.
  17. Lindner-Fally M. Digital:earth: At – Centre for teaching and learning geography and geoinformatics. Procedia HERODOT Conference; 2009. http://www.herodot.net/conferences/Ayvalik/papers/geotech12.pdf
  18. Fialko N, Dinzhos R, Sherenkovskii J, Meranova N, Prokopov V, Babak V, Korzhyk V, Izvorska D, Lazarenko M, Makhrovskyi V. Influence on the thermophysical properties of nanocomposites of the duration of mixing of components in the polymer melt. East-Eur J Enter Tech. 2022;2(5-116):25-30.
  19. Analytical materials for teaching the subject "Geography". Astana: National Academy of Sciences named after Altynsarin; 2015.
  20. Development of guidelines for teaching the subject "Geography" in the context of updating the content of education (grades 7-9). Methodical manual. Astana: National Academy of Education named after Altynsarin; 2017.
  21. Soloviev AI. Methodical manual for physical geography of the USSR. Almaty: Nauka; 1980.
  22. Karatabanov RA. Geography. For 8th grade students of secondary schools. Almaty: Almatykitap Publishing House; 2018.
  23. Polovinkin AA. Methods of teaching physical geography. Alma-Ata: Kazakh State Educational and Pedagogical Publishing House; 1955.
  24. Gvozdetsky NA, Golubchikov YuN. Mountains. Moscow: Mysl; 1987.
  25. Beisenova AS. Physical geography of Kazakhstan. Almaty: Ulagat Publishing House; 2013.
  26. Yazıcı H, Demirkaya H. Views of student teachers on information technology integration in geography teaching. Sci Res Ess. 2010;5(13):1746-1753.
  27. Kozak IB. The use of multimedia technologies in the formation of geological and geomorphological knowledge of students. Pedagogy and Psychology, Theory and Teaching Methods; 2008. https://lib.herzen.spb.ru/
  28. Kovalenko O, Gamajunova V, Neroda R, Smirnova I, Khonenko L. Advances in nutrition of sunflower on the southern steppe of Ukraine. Soil Under Stress: More Work Soil Sci Ukr. 2021;1:215-223.
  29. Latka K, Kołodziej W, Rajski R, Pawuś D, Chowaniec J, Latka D. Outpatient Spine Surgery in Poland: A Survey on Popularity, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. Risk Manag Healthcare Pol. 2023;16:1839-1848.
  30. Schultz RB, Kerski JJ, Patterson TC. The use of virtual globes as a spatial teaching tool with suggestions for metadata standards. J Geog. 2008;107(1):27-34.
  31. Helmer JW, Bloch N. Teaching geography in the blogosphere. Geog Teach. 2010;2:73-76.
  32. Kuzembekova GB, Kirkimbayeva ZhS, Maulanov AZ, Sarsembaeva NB, Paritova AE. Pathological morphology of cattle Leptospirosis in Kazakhstan. Glob Vet. 2013;11(6):81-784.
  33. Rehman HU, Darus M, Salah J. Generalizing Certain Analytic Functions Correlative to the n -th Coefficient of Certain Class of Bi-Univalent Functions. J Mathem. 2021;2021:6621315.
  34. Tyliszczak B, Kudłacik-Kramarczyk S, Drabczyk A, Bogucki R, Olejnik E, Kinasiewicz J, Głąb M. Hydrogels containing caffeine and based on Beetosan®–proecological chitosan–preparation, characterization, and in vitro cytotoxicity. Int J Pol Mater Pol Biomater. 2019;68(15):931-935.
  35. Latka K, Kozlowska K, Waligora M, Kolodziej W, Latka D. Effect of DiscoGel treatment of the intervertebral disc at MRI. Clin Radiol. 2023;78(12):928-934.
  36. Afgan I, Kahil Y, Benhamadouche S, Ali M, Alkaabi A, Sofiane Berrouk A, Sagaut P. Cross flow over two heated cylinders in tandem arrangements at subcritical Reynolds number using large eddy simulations. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2023;100:109115.
  37. Kerimkhulle S, Mukhanova A, Kantureyeva M, Koishybaeva M, Azieva G. Applying a housing construction model to improve a small town demographic dynamics. AIP Conf Proceed. 2023;2700:040047.
  38. Alkaabi AK, King JC. Benchmarking COMSOL Multiphysics Single-Subchannel Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis of a TRIGA Reactor with RELAP5 Results and Experimental Data. Sci Tech Nucl Install. 2019;2019:4375782.
  39. Barlybayev A, Zhetkenbay L, Karimov D, Yergesh B. Development neuro-fuzzy model to predict the stocks of companies in the electric vehicle industry. East-Eur J Enter Tech. 2023;4(4(124)):72-87.
  40. Niyazbekova S, Zverkova A, Sokolinskaya N, Kerimkhulle S. Features of the «Green» strategies for the development of banks. E3S Web Conf. 2023;402:08029.
  41. de Vecchis G, Pasquinelli D’allegra D, Pesaresi C. Geography in Italian schools (An example of a cross-curricular project using geospatial technologies for a practical contribution to educators). Int Geog Educ Online. 2011;1(1):4-25.
  42. Fialko N, Dinzhos R, Sherenkovskii J, Meranova N, Navrodska R, Izvorska D, Korzhyk V, Lazarenko M, Koseva N. Establishing Patterns In The Effect Of Temperature Regime When Manufacturing Nanocomposites On Their Heat-Conducting Properties. East-Eur J Enter Tech. 2021;4(5-112):21-26.
  43. Salah J, Rehman HU, Buwaiqi IA. Inclusion results of a generalized mittag-leffler-type poisson distribution in the k-uniformly janowski starlike and the k-janowski convex functions. Mathem Statist. 2023;11(1):22-27.
  44. Aliev MD, Beisenova AS. Opportunities to use multimedia technology in the learning process. Natur Geog Sci. 2018;2(56):145-149.
  45. Tyliszczak B, Drabczyk A, Kudłacik-Kramarczyk S, Rudnicka K, Gatkowska J, Sobczak-Kupiec A, Jampilek J. In vitro biosafety of pro-ecological chitosan-based hydrogels modified with natural substances. J Biomed Mater Res - Part A. 2019;107(11):2501-2511.
  46. Barlybayev A, Sankibayev A, Kadyr Y, Amangeldy N, Sabyrov T. Predicting Used-Vehicle Resale Value in Developing Markets: Application of Machine Learning Models to the Kazakhstan Car Market. Ing Syst Inf. 2023;28(5):1237-1246.
  47. Kerimkhulle S, Kerimkulov Z, Aitkozha Z, Saliyeva A, Taberkhan R, Adalbek A. The Classification of Vegetations Based on Share Reflectance at Spectral Bands. Lect Notes Networks Syst. 2023;724;95-100.
  48. Wathore NG. Utility of instructional materials in the teaching geography at higher secondary level. Int Educ E-J. 2012;I(III):115-122.
  49. Wang YM. On the applications of multimedia in geography teaching. Sci Tech Info. 2009;(13):602.
  50. Ichshanova A, Taubaev U, Absatirov G, Kirkimbaeva Z, Radojicic B. Carrier state of pasteurellosis in saiga antelopes in the western Kazakhstan region. Indian Vet J. 2018;95(8):17-18.
  51. Kerimkhulle S, Azieva G, Saliyeva A, Mukhanova A. Estimation of the volume of production of turbine vapor of a fuel boiler with stochastic exogenous factors. E3S Web Conf. 2022;339:02006.
  52. Bishop MP, Shroder JF. Integration of computer technology and interactive learning in geographic education. J Geog High Educ. 1995;19(1):97-110.
  53. Nandi M. The use of interactive multimedia in learning geography in schooling. GEA J Geog Depart. 2006;6(1):20-26.
  54. Elizabeth AW, Joann CV, Cynthia AB. Evaluation of teaching product geomorphology using computer-based tools. J Geog High Educ. 1999;23(2):167-179.
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua