Teaching family vocabulary during Ukrainian language lessons (communicative approach)

Issue 55, 2024

Tetiana Rudiuk

Received 23.11.2023, Revised 21.01.2024, Accepted 03.03.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.169ap6

Abstract

Relevance. The relevance of the study derives from the modern objective reality, which is represented by lack of attention to family lexical nominations of family members, the features of the names of communication lines and situational options for the latest use; identifying factors for improvement of interpersonal contacts; fostering a culture of mutual support, etc. (communicative approach).

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to theoretically substantiate and experimentally verify the effectiveness of this model and the chosen approach for the development of family lexical competence in high school.

Methodology. Research methods were theoretical (comparative and systematic analysis of philosophical, methodical, psychological, didactic and sociological literature); empirical (analysis of conceptual scientific principles of school education and universal ideas about family nomination, observation, comparison, survey (conversation, questionnaire for teachers and students), study and generalization of pedagogical experience); practical (problem-searching, modelling, pedagogical experiment, mathematical statistics, including quantitative and qualitative analysis of the results of experimental training). They allowed for comprehensive analysis of the problem and influencing it. The study was conducted at the Ivano-Frankivsk Vocational College of Vasyl Stefanyk at Precarpathian National University, involving 389 students.

Results. The implementation of the communicative approach significantly enhanced students' family lexical competence. Initial assessments showed low levels of competence, which substantially improved after the intervention, demonstrating the effectiveness of the model in a real educational setting.

Conclusions. Research materials can be useful for teachers, students, scholars, psychologists, methodologists, and anyone who seeks to consciously use the discussed nominations and enrich their own vocabulary; to take care of individual and collective responsibility for the strength of the family, which is the smallest unit of the state; master the practice of special interpersonal interaction within the personal life.

Keywords: teaching methods; linguistic approaches; language activities; competence; language and methodological content

Suggested citation

Rudiuk T. Teaching family vocabulary during Ukrainian language lessons (communicative approach). Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):1696-1704. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.169ap6

Download article

References

  1. Pentilyuk MI. Methods of teaching the native language in secondary schools. Kyiv: Lenvit; 2000.
  2. Shadiev R, Yang M. Review of studies on technology-enhanced language learning and teaching. Sustainability. 2020;12(2):524. DOI: 10.3390/su12020524.
  3. Shcherban PM. National upbringing in the family. Kyiv: Cultural Private Enterprise “Boryviter”; 2000.
  4. Demir S, Erdogan A. The role of teaching grammar in first language education. Eur J Educ Res. 2018;7(1):87–101. DOI: 10.12973/eu-jer.7.1.87.
  5. Solmaz O. A critical review of research on social networking sites in language teaching and learning. Contemp Educ Technol. 2018;9(3):315–30. DOI: 10.30935/cet.444120.
  6. Blaginin VM, Belkina NI. Family encyclopedia. Kyiv: Bogdana; 1996.
  7. Cao H, Amanbayeva MB, Maimatayeva AD, Unerbayeva ZO, Shalabayev KI, Sumatokhin SV, Imankulova SK, Childibayev JB. Methodology of research activity development in preparing future teachers with the use of information resources. Eurasia J Math, Sci Technol Educ. 2017;13(11):7399–410. DOI: 10.12973/ejmste/79792.
  8. Sylejmani B, Myrtaj N, Maliqi A, Gontarev S, Georgiev G, Kalac R. Physical fitness in children and adolescents in rural and urban areas. J Human Sport Exerc. 2019;14(4):866–75. DOI: 10.14198/jhse.2019.144.15.
  9. Spytska L. The difference in the world perception between a hysteric and a neurotic. Environ Soc Psychol. 2024;9(6):2229. DOI: 10.54517/esp.v9i6.2229.
  10. Spytsk L. Symptoms and main features of personality formation of a psychopath. Arch Psych Psychother. 2024;26(1):34–43. DOI: 10.12740/APP/172226.
  11. Fleming L, Slotta J. The pragmatics of kin address: a sociolinguistic universal and its semantic affordances. J Sociolinguistics. 2018;22(4):375–405. DOI: 10.1111/josl.12304.
  12. Amirbekova A, Karabayev G, Mamedov S. Architecture and Planning of Residential Complexes in Kazakhstan. ISVS E-J. 2023;10(8):213–22. DOI: 10.61275/ISVSej-2023-10-08-15.
  13. Kieliszek Z. Kant's Interpretations of Understanding “Family” as a Domestic Society. Stud Warmin. 2022;59:25–52. DOI: 10.31648/SW.7560.
  14. Bannikov D, Radkevich A. Analytical method for compiling and applying a ballast map for the traction unit Pe2U. East-Eur J Enterp Technol. 2019;2(1-98):6–14.
  15. Bannikov D, Yakovliev S. Development of dynamic integral evaluation method of technical state of one-section electric locomotive body. East-Eur J Enterp Technol. 2020;1(7-103):57–64.
  16. Buryachok AA. Names of kinship and kinship. Kyiv: ANURSR Publishing House; 1961.
  17. Ponomarev OD. Ukrainian word for everyone and for everyone. Kyiv: Lybid; 2012.
  18. Matsko LI, Gruba TL, Semenog OM, Symonenko TV. Ukrainian language 10-11 grades. Program for specialized training of students of secondary schools. Philological direction, profile – Ukrainian philology. Kyiv: Project. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine; 2017.
  19. Rivera GS, Tesoriero R, Gallud JA. Model-based approach to develop learning exercises in language-learning applications. IET Softw. 2018;12(3):206–14. DOI: 10.1049/iet-sen.2017.0085.
  20. Abreu-Tardelli LS, Apostolo MC. The role of the didactic model of textual genres in language teaching. Calidoscopio. 2018;16(3):361–8.
  21. Nagy IK. In between language teaching methods: do we need (to know about) methods at all? Acta Univ Sapientiae Philol. 2020;11(3):119–39. DOI: 10.2478/ausp-2019-0030.
  22. Spytska L. Inheritance of power in the XXI century: legal mechanisms for the transfer of presidential powers to controlled viceroys and family members in authoritarian regimes. Law Justice J. 2023;37(2):178–206.
  23. Dossanova N, Abdimanuly O, Maulenov A, Karbozov Y, Matbek N. Cultural interaction in the works of M. Zhumabayev as the basis for the development of a national literary tradition. Int J Soc, Cult Lang. 2021;9(2):41–53.
  24. Azimov EG, Shchukin AN. New dictionary of methodological terms and concepts (theory and practice of teaching languages). Moscow: Ikar Publishing House; 2009.
  25. Nusipalikyzy A, Almasbek M, Dosbol B, Koshenova TI, Mekebaeva LA. Echoes of the Turkic world and folklore in the holy book Avesta. Rupkatha J Interdisc Stud Human. 2020;12(4):28. DOI: 10.21659/rupkatha.v12n4.28.
  26. Masanovic B, Gardasevic J, Arifi F. Relationship between foot length measurements and standing height: A prospective regional study among adolescents in southern region of Kosovo. Sport Mont. 2018;16(2):27–31. DOI: 10.26773/smj.180605.
  27. Gardasevic J, Masanovic B, Arifi F. Relationship between tibia length measurements and standing height: A prospective regional study among adolescents in Southern Region of Kosovo. Sport Mont. 2018;16(3):51–5. DOI: 10.26773/smj.181009.
  28. Bannikov DO. Analysis of the causes of accidents of steel capacitive structures for bulk materials. Metallurg Min Indus. 2011;3(5):243–9.
  29. Darmawan T, Dewi AA, Mashuri H, Setiana SM. Teaching speaking with Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) approach. J Phys Conf Ser. 2020;1477(4):042017. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1477/4/042017.
  30. Sasstos LMD. The discussion of communicative language teaching approach hi language classrooms. J Educ E-Learn Res. 2020;7(2):104–9. DOI: 10.20448/journal.509.2020.72.104.109.
  31. Alkhdour A, Tiutkin O, Bannikov D, Heletiuk I. Substantiating the parameters for a non-circular structure of the mine shaft under construction in a heterogeneous rock massif. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 2023;1156(1):012008.
  32. Khatib M, Tootkaboni AA. Attitudes toward communicative language teaching: the case of EFL learners and teachers. Ikala. 2019;24(3):471–85. DOI: 10.17533/udea.ikala.v24n03a04.
  33. Natividad MRA, Batang BL. Students' perceptual learning styles and attitudes toward communicative language teaching. TESOL Int J. 2018;13(4):1–17.
  34. Baidrakhmanova M, Mamedov S, Karabayev G. Modern Classification of Mixed-use Residential Complexes. Civ Engin Architect. 2023;11(5):2533–42. DOI: 10.13189/cea.2023.110521.
  35. Sandugash R, Aygerim K, Gulzhanar J, Indira O, Makhsat K, Gheisari A. Formation of the Readiness of Future Educational Psychologists for the Organization of Psychodiagnostic Activities. Educ Res Int. 2022;2022:2132321. DOI 10.1155/2022/2132321.
  36. Spytska L. Anxiety and depressive personality disorders in the modern world. Acta Psychol. 2024;246:104285. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104285.
  37. Spytska L. Narcissistic Trauma Main Characteristics and Life Impact. J Nerv Ment Disease. 2024;212(5):255–60. DOI: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001760.
  38. Al-Muslim M, Ismail MF. Language teacher quality characteristics: what the literature shows. J Educ E-Learn Res. 2020;7(4):430–6. DOI: 10.20448/journal.509.2020.74.430.436.
  39. Moldаzhanova AA, Dzhumazhanova GK, Amanova AK, Kokoraeva AK. Improving the mechanism of youth employment in the commonwealth of independent states in the global context. J Entrepren Educ. 2019;22(1). https://www.abacademies.org/articles/improving-the-mechanism-of-youth-employment-in-the-commonwealth-of-independent-states-in-the-global-context-7813.html.
  40. Grein M. Progress in language teaching: from competence to dialogic competence-in-performance. Dialog Stud. 2018;31:61–81. DOI: 10.1075/ds.31.05gre.
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua