Regulation of the provocation of a crime in the criminal legislation of foreign countries: what should Kazakhstan take into account?

Issue 55, 2024

Aigerim Zhiyengaliyeva, Yerzhan Bimoldanov, Aliya Seraliyeva

Received 17.11.2023, Revised 13.02.2024, Accepted 07.03.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.140qo5

Abstract

Relevance. The issue of provocation of a criminal offence in scientific discourse has attracted the attention of lawyers for quite a long time. It should be noted that it does not lose its relevance, since with the development of social relations, as well as changes in legal approaches to the performance of the functions of criminal law, only its development occurs. Moreover, at the moment there is no single approach to this category in the international community, namely regarding the appropriateness of regulating its use in society.

Purpose. The purpose of the work was described as conducting a comparative analysis of the features of the legislative consolidation of the provocation of a criminal offence in the legal acts of different states in order to use their experience in Kazakhstan.

Methodology. For this purpose, the methods of analysis and synthesis, comparison, deduction, formal legal, generalization were involved in the work.

Results. As a result, it was possible to study approaches to the category of provocation of a criminal offence in countries belonging to the Anglo-Saxon and Romano-Germanic legal families, as well as members of the Commonwealth of Independent States. In addition, the experience of states that do not regulate such a mechanism, in particular, make its application impossible, was studied. In the course of the analysis, attention was focused on the approaches that foreign states use regarding the provocation of a criminal offence and are a priority for Kazakhstan. The expediency of legislative consolidation of the above mechanism in the regulatory framework of Kazakhstan, as well as ways to implement this process, was established.

Conclusions. The practical value of the work was revealed in the possibility of using it by the legislators of Kazakhstan in reforming the sphere of criminal law, as well as by scientists in the course of studying the problem of provocation of a criminal offence.

Keywords: law enforcement practice; international experience; incitement; legal documents; offence

Suggested citation

Zhiyengaliyeva A, Bimoldanov Y, Seraliyeva A. Regulation of the provocation of a crime in the criminal legislation of foreign countries: what should Kazakhstan take into account?. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):1405-1413. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.140qo5

Download article

References

  1. Italia J. Provocation. Austral Quart. 2022;93(1):10-13.
  2. Al-Shawani NA, Ali NNJ. Provocation of the citizen by the policeman during the inspection procedures. Tikrit Uni J Right. 2022;6(1):125-148.‎
  3. Berdaliyeva AS, Kim AI, Seraliyeva AM, Gassanov AA, Dunentayev MV. Criminological measures to counteract corruption offences in the field of illegal gambling. J Finan Crime. 2023;30(1):4-23.
  4. Loburets AT, Naumovets AG, Vedula YuS. Diffusion of dysprosium on the (112) surface of molybdenum. Surf Sci. 1998;399(2-3):297-304.
  5. Rosenberg R. Human dignity and the doctrine of provocation: A new approach. Notre Dame J Law, Ethic Publ Policy. 2020;34:281.
  6. Barton-Crosby J, Hirtenlehner H. The role of morality and self-control in conditioning the criminogenic effect of provocation. A partial test of situational action theory. Deviant Behav. 2021;42(10):1273-1294.
  7. Muftuler-Bac M, Muftuler C. Provocation defence for femicide in Turkey: The interplay of legal argumentation and societal norms. Euro J Women Stud. 2021;28(2):159-174.
  8. Siubayeva NZ, Kalguzhinova AM, Ozbekov DO, Serikbayeva SS, Amirbek KS. Theory and practice of criminal law combating corruption in the Republic of Kazakhstan. J Finan Crime. 2021;1:22-26.
  9. Ambos K, Duff A, Roberts J, Weigend T, Heinze A. Core concepts in criminal law and criminal justice: Anglo-German dialogues. Cambrid Uni Press. 2020;1:1-16.
  10. Mégret F. International criminal justice, legal pluralism, and the margin of appreciation lessons from the European Convention on Human Rights. Harv Human Right J. 2020;33:57.
  11. German Code of Criminal Procedure. 1987. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stpo/englisch_stpo.html.
  12. Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany. 1949. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_gg/englisch_gg.html.
  13. Model Penal Code. 1962. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/model_penal_code_(mpc).
  14. Penal Law of New York. 1965. https://ypdcrime.com/penal.law/.
  15. Criminal Code of Ukraine. 2001. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14#Text.
  16. Criminal Code of the Republic of Belarus. 1999. https://pravo.by/document/?guid=3871&p0=hk9900275.
  17. Criminal Code of Georgia. 1999. https://matsne.gov.ge/ru/document/view/16426?publication=241.
  18. Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2014. https://online.zakon.kz/document/?doc_id=31575252#sub_id=0.
  19. Criminal Code of the Republic of Tajikistan. 1998. https://continent-online.com/Document/?doc_id=30397325.
  20. Marinković D, Kesić T. A contribution to defining of integrity testing in police: crime-investigating aspects. NBP-J Crim Law. 2020;25(1):15-30.
  21. Spytska L. Social and psychological features of affective disorders in people during crisis periods of life. Soc Regist. 2023;7(4):21-36.
  22. Crime in Germany – statistics & facts. 2022. https://www.statista.com/topics/6182/crime-in-germany/.
  23. Kennedy C. Defences: justification, excuse and provocation. Christian Crim Law. 2020;1:253-268.
  24. Is the criminal justice system working? Is the country getting safer? 2022. https://usafacts.org/state-of-the-union/crime/.
  25. Dauber MS. The curious absence of provocation affirmative defenses in assault cases. St. John Law Rev. 2021;95:195.
  26. Myrko B. Modern determinants of bribery provocation. Law Rev Kyiv Uni Law. 2020;1:409-415.
  27. Pavlenko A, Koshlak H. Design of processes of thermal bloating of silicates. Metall Min Indust. 2015;7(1):118-122.
  28. Pak YN, Pak DY. Parameter Optimization of the Radioisotope Gamma Albedo Method for Controlling Quality of Variable Composition Coals. J Min Sci. 2018;54(2):352-360.
  29. Karnym WZP. Odpowiedzialność za prowokację wykroczenia korupcyjnego. Knowl, Educ, Law, Manag. 2021;5(41):182-187. [in Polish].
  30. Stepanenko O, Stepanenko A, Shepotko M. Criminal liability for provoking bribery. Cuest Polít. 2021;39(69):493-507.
  31. Deryaev AR. Selection of drilling mud for directional production and evaluation wells. SOCAR Proceed. 2023;(3):51-57.
  32. Crime statistics. 2022. https://gbi.georgia.gov/services/crime-statistics.
  33. Ismailova J, Delikesheva D, Abdukarimov A, Zhumanbetova N, Sarsenova A. Development and application of fluid characterization algorithms to obtain an accurate description of a pvt model for Kazakhstani oil. East-Eur J Enter Tech. 2023;5(6(125)):6-20.
  34. Pre-trial investigations have begun. 2022. https://qamqor.gov.kz/crimestat/indicators/criminal.
  35. Sattler S, Veen F, Hasselhorn F, Mehlkop G, Sauer C. An experimental test of Situational Action Theory of crime causation: Investigating the perception-choice process. Social Sci Res. 2022;106:1-8.
  36. Buromenskiy M, Gutnyk V. The legal approach to the provocation of bribe as a variety of provocation of crime in case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. Sci Note Naukm. 2020;6:18-27.
  37. Spytska L. Psychological profile and prerequisites for the formation of the killer’s personality. Soc Leg Stud. 2023;6(1):41-48.
  38. Khodakivska O, Kobets S, Bachkir I, Martynova L, Klochan V, Klochan I, Hnatenko I. Sustainable development of regions: Modeling the management of economic security of innovative entrepreneurship. Int J Adv Appl Sci. 2022;9(3):31-38.
  39. Ozdoyev S, Popov V, Tileuberdi N, Huadong M. Paleographic conditions and oil-gas prospects in the alakol depression (East Kazakhstan). Int Multidiscip Sci GeoConf Surv Geo Min Eco Manag SGEM. 2020;2020(1.2):727-732.
  40. Koroviaka Y, Lubenets Т. Substantiation of the method for constructing the diagram of the horizontal belt conveyor tightness. Min Mineral Dep. 2017;11(3):111-116.
  41. Zabelov AY. Comparative legal analysis of responsibility for crime provocation in some countries of the Council of Europe. Amazon Invest. 2019;8(21):531-537.
  42. Migliorati M. Postfunctional differentiation, functional reintegration: the Danish case in Justice and Home Affairs. J Euro Publ Policy. 2022;29(7):1112-1134.
  43. Criminal Code of the Lithuanian Republic. 2000. https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalActPrint/lt?jfwid=rivwzvpvg&documentId=a84fa232877611e5bca4ce385a9b7048&category=TAD.
  44. Arkusha L, Torbas O. Provocation and control over the Commission of a Crime: Significance and correlation. Econ, Law Educ Res. 2021;170:141-145.
  45. Kartavtsev VS, Tomchuk IO, Prytula SA. Criminal and legal analysis of bribery provocation according to the legislation of Ukraine and foreign countries. Law Societ. 2020;4:227-235
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua