Preparation of bachelors for professionally oriented teaching of mathematics to schoolchildren at a pedagogical university

Issue 55, 2024

Alma Abylkassymova, Bakhytkul Kaskatayeva, Rymkul Kaparova, Roza Ysmagul, Farida Nametkulova

Received 23.11.2023, Revised 09.02.2024, Accepted 28.03.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.242wd3

Abstract

Relevance. In accordance with the requirements of modern society, it has become necessary to change approaches to teaching in pedagogical higher educational institutions. The problem of preparing bachelors in the speciality “Mathematics” for professionally oriented teaching of mathematical disciplines to schoolchildren is becoming urgent.

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to identify methods and forms of professionally oriented mathematics teaching in the educational process of pedagogical higher educational institutions.

Methodology. Methods of analysis and synthesis, comparison, pedagogical observation, interviews, and questionnaires were used to achieve the goal.

Results. During the study, it was established that the method of mathematical modelling can be the basis for professionally oriented teaching of mathematics, and the use of modern technologies can improve the educational process. A survey was conducted among students of the Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, A. Baitursynov Kostanay Regional University, Korkyt Ata Kyzylorda University to determine the relevant problems in the preparation of bachelors of the speciality “Mathematics”. Based on the results obtained, a model of bachelor’s degree preparation for professional activity and professionally oriented education of schoolchildren was built, the effectiveness of which was tested.

Conclusions. The results of the study demonstrated that the method of mathematical modelling is effective in preparing students for professionally oriented teaching of schoolchildren and the formation of their mathematical literacy. In addition, after introducing the proposed model into the educational process, students’ readiness for professional activity and professionally oriented training increased by 19%, demonstrating its positive impact on the preparation of bachelors. The results of this study can be used by the management of pedagogical higher educational institutions and teachers to improve the educational process and effectively form the professional competencies of future specialists.

Keywords: educational methods; students’ competencies; practical skills; modelling method; innovative technologies

Suggested citation

Abylkassymova A, Kaskatayeva B, Kaparova R, Ysmagul R, Nametkulova F. Preparation of bachelors for professionally oriented teaching of mathematics to schoolchildren at a pedagogical university. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):2423-2434. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.242wd3

Download article

References

  1. Yessikyzy А, Smagulov Е, Temerbekova А, Tanabayeva A. Basic provisions of logical thinking formation in teaching mathematics. Bull Zhetysu Univ named I. Zhansugurov. 2020;94(2):27–32.
  2. Stanogina NV. 2023. On the development of mathematical literacy in schoolchildren. In: Sultangazinsky Readings: Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference “Current Issues in the Development of Modern Education”; 2023 March 15; Kostanay. Kostanay: A. Baitursynov Kostanay Regional University. P. 16-18.
  3. Bubich AA, Osipova SV. Using organizational forms in teaching mathematics to junior school children as a condition for their formation independence. In: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference “Priority Areas of Research: Analysis and Management” (pp. 208-217); 2021 March 17-18; Atyrau. Atyrau: Bilim Innovations Group; 2021. P. 208-217.
  4. Ospanova NB, Pak NI, Kamalova GB. Preparation of a future mathematics teacher for the implementation of the STEAM approach in education. Bull Phys Math Sci. 2022;79(3):134–42. DOI: 10.51889/9109.2022.18.50.016.
  5. Tkachev AV, Smagulov EZh. Methodological aspects of implementation of teaching mathematics of economic models using a bot-textbook. Bull Kazakh Ablai Khan Univ Int Relat World Lang Ser Pedagog Sci. 2023;70(3). DOI: 10.48371/PEDS.2023.70.3.016.
  6. Toibazarov DB, Tazhiev M, Tokanov MM. Problems of using applied tasks in teaching math students. Bull Kazakh Natl Women's Teach Train Univ. 2020;3:55–63.
  7. Kaskataeva BR, Кokazhaeva AB, Kazbеk Zh. Mathematical modeling as a tool for increasing the mathematical literacy of students. Bull Kazakh Natl Women's Teach Train Univ. 2021;1:58–66. DOI: 10.52512/2306-5079-2021-85-1-58-66.
  8. Satbaev SK. Teachers’ approaches to teaching mathematics through the context of real-life situations in primary school. Proc Int Young Scholars Workshop. 2020;9. DOI: 10.47344/iysw.v9i0.227.
  9. Temel H, Altun M. The effect of problem-solving strategies education on developing mathematical literacy. Necatibey Egitim Fak Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Egitimi Derg. 2022;16(2):275–303. DOI: 10.17522/balikesirnef.1164584.
  10. Breda A, Pochulu M, Sánchez A, Font V. Simulation of teacher interventions in a training course of mathematics teacher educators. Mathematics. 2021;9(24):3228. DOI: 10.3390/math9243228.
  11. Limbong DMC, Napitupulu E. Application of a realistic mathematical approach to improve students’ mathematical literacy ability. Formosa J Multidiscip Res. 2023;2(1):145–62. DOI: 10.55927/fjmr.v2i1.2693.
  12. Suchanek M, Szmelter-Jarosz A. Car enthusiasm during the second and fourth waves of COVID-19 pandemic. Hum Soc Sci Commun. 2023;10(1):593.
  13. Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan. “On Approval of the State Programme for the Development of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2020-2025” [Internet]. 2019. [cited 2024 Feb. 19]. Resolution No. 988. 2019 December 27. Available from: https://adilet.zan.kz/kaz/archive/docs/P1900000988/27.12.2019.
  14. Results of Kazakhstan: Student performance (PISA 2022) [Interenet]. OECD; 2022. [cited 2024 Feb. 19]. Available from: https://gpseducation.oecd.org/CountryProfile?primaryCountry=KAZ&treshold=10&topic=PI.
  15. International Results in Mathematics and Science (TIMSS) [Internet]. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center; 2019 [cited 2024 Feb. 19]. Available from: https://timss2019.org/reports/achievement/.
  16. Jelahu RA, Loka Son A, Bete H, García-García J, Sudirman S, Alghadari F. Profile of middle school students’ mathematical literacy ability in solving number pattern problems. Int J Sci Educ Cult Stud. 2023;2(1):1–14. DOI: 10.58291/ijsecs.v2i1.72.
  17. Jarassova GS, Seitkhanova AK, Tokzhigitova AN. The impact of university mathematics teacher training programs on the quality of education in schools. Bull Ser Pedagog Sci. 2021;72(4):133–42. DOI: 10.51889/2021-4.1728-5496.16.
  18. Kerimkhulle S, Saliyeva A, Makhazhanova U, Kerimkulov Z, Adalbek A, Taberkhan R. The input-output analysis for the wholesale and retail trade industry of the Kazakhstan statistics. E3S Web Conf. 2023;376:05023.
  19. Nurwahid M, Ashar S. A literature review: Efforts to overcome student’s mathematical literacy. J Eksakta Pendidikan. 2022;6(2):214–21. DOI: 10.24036/jep/vol6-iss2/666.
  20. Marsitin R, Sesanti NR. Developing an electronic module based on mathematical literacy to enhance students’ mathematical reasoning. J Elemen. 2023;9(1):197–210. DOI: 10.29408/jel.v9i1.6915.
  21. Kerimkhulle S, Kerimkulov Z, Aitkozha Z, Saliyeva A, Taberkhan R, Adalbek A. The Classification of Vegetations Based on Share Reflectance at Spectral Bands. Lect Not Networks Syst. 2023;724:95-100.
  22. Kaskatayeva B, Andassova M. Mathematical modelling as a means of formation of methodical competence of the prospective teacher. In: Proceedings of the 13th International scientific conference: “Rural Environment. Education. Personality. (REEP)”; 2020 May 8-9; Jelgava. Jelgava: Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies; 2020. P. 228-235. DOI: 10.22616/REEP.2020.027.
  23. Selvakumar RD, Wu J, Alkaabi AK. Electrohydrodynamic acceleration of charging process in a latent heat thermal energy storage module. Appl Therm Eng. 2024;242:122475.
  24. Salah J, Rehman HU, Buwaiqi IA. Inclusion results of a generalized mittag-leffler-type poisson distribution in the k-uniformly janowski starlike and the k-janowski convex functions. Mathem Statist. 2023;11(1):22-27.
  25. Ali M, Alkaabi AK, Alameri SA, Afgan I. Thermal analysis of baffle jetting in fuel rod assembly. Phys Fluids. 2022;34(11):115133.
  26. Biluk I, Shareyko D, Fomenko A, Havrylov S, Savchenko O, Stavinskiy R. Construction and Adjustment of a Vibration Machine Based on a Complete Electric Drive. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Modern Electrical and Energy Systems, MEES 2019 (pp. 114-117). Kremenchuk: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2019. DOI: 10.1109/MEES.2019.8896563
  27. Zaldívar-Rojas JD, Rivera SAQ, Ramírez GM. Mathematical modeling in teachers’ training process. IE Rev Investig Educ REDIECH. 2017;8(15):87–110. DOI: 10.33010/ie_rie_rediech.v8i15.63.
  28. Salah J. Some remarks and propositions on riemann hypothesis. Mathem Statist. 2021;9(2):159-165.
  29. Hwang S, Han S. A study on mathematical modeling trends in Korea. J Educ Res Math. 2023;33(3):639–66.
  30. Shahini E, Myalkovsky R, Nebaba K, Ivanyshyn O, Liubytska D. Economic and biological characteristics and productivity analysis of sunflower hybrids. Sci Horiz. 2023;26(8):83-95.
  31. Ismailova J, Delikesheva D, Abdukarimov A, Zhumanbetova N, Sarsenova A. Development and application of fluid characterization algorithms to obtain an accurate description of a pvt model for Kazakhstani oil. East-Eur J Enter Tech. 2023;5(6(125)):6-20.
  32. Rum AM, Juandi D. Students mathematical literacy viewed from cognitive style: Systematic literature review. Jambura J Math Educ. 2023;4(1):1–10. DOI: 10.34312/jmathedu.v4i1.17438.
  33. Poier S, Suchanek M. The effects of higher-order human values and conspiracy beliefs on COVID-19-related behavior in Germany. J Publ Health (Germ). 2024; DOI:10.1007/s10389-024-02210-5
  34. Can Yurt E. A comparison of mathematics teacher training and elementary mathematics curricula in Finland, South Korea and Türkiye. Int J Educ Stud Policy. 2022;3(2):38–68. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7584715.
  35. Incikabi S, Sadak M, Incikabi L. Identifying mathematical literacy demands in Turkish, Singaporean and Australian textbooks. Acta Educ Generalis. 2023;13(1):147–69. DOI: 10.2478/atd-2023-0008.
  36. Nurfadilah I, Nindiasari H, Fatah A. Using realistic mathematics education in mathematical problem-solving ability based on students’ mathematical initial ability. Prima J Pendidik Matematika. 2021;5(1):35–46. DOI: 10.31000/prima.v5i1.3166.
  37. Torres Castillo R. Teacher training and quality of mathematics education. Green World J. 2022;5(1):009. DOI: 10.53313/gwj51009.
  38. Cruz-Rojas GA. Documentary review on the training and knowledge of mathematics teachers. Tecné Episteme Didaxis. 2022;52:175–92. DOI: 10.17227/ted.num52-17075.
  39. Mangarin RA, Chan LV. Needs analysis on the competence of secondary school mathematics teachers: Springboard for a teacher training module. Int J Res Innov Soc Sci. 2021;5(3):168–77.
  40. Ningtiyas FA, Jailani. Does teacher’s training affect the pedagogical competence of mathematics teachers? J Phys Conf Ser. 2018;1097:012106. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012106.
  41. Suryanti S, Nusantara T, Parta IN, Irawati S. Problem-based task in teacher training program: Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and practices. J Math Educ. 2022;13(2):257–74. DOI: 10.22342/jme.v13i2.pp257-274.
  42. Tamani S, Abouhanifa S, Amad Z, Elkhouzai E, Radid M. Evaluation of the qualifying training of new teachers of mathematics: Case of the training of the CRMEF of Settat-Morocco. J Educ Soc Res. 2021;11(5):189–200. DOI: 10.36941/jesr-2021-0117.
  43. Dede Y, Taşpinar Şener Z. Mathematical modeling from the eyes of preservice teachers. Rev Lat Am Investig Matem Educ. 2021;24(2):121–50. DOI: 10.12802/relime.21.2421.
  44. Moreno-Pino FM, Jiménez-Fontana R, Domingo JMC, Goded PA. Training in mathematics education from a sustainability perspective: A case study of university teachers’ views. Educ Sci. 2022;12(3):199. DOI: 10.3390/educsci12030199.
  45. Çakıroğlu Ü, Güler M, Dündar M, Coşkun F. Virtual reality in realistic mathematics education to develop mathematical literacy skills. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2023:1–13. DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2023.2219960.
  46. Gaston JL, Lawrence BA. Supporting teachers’ learning about mathematical modeling. J Math Res. 2015;7(4):1–11. DOI: 10.5539/jmr.v7n4p1.
  47. Shahini S, Shahini E, Koni B, Shahini Z, Shahini E, Bërxolli A. Enhanced Tomato Yield via Bumblebee Pollination: A Case Study in Durres, Albania. Int J Des Nat Ecodyn. 2023;18(4):905-914.
  48. Mehmeti B, Kelmendi J, Iiljazi-Shahiqi D, Azizi B, Jakovljevic S, Haliti F, Anić-Milošević S. Comparison of shear bond strength orthodontic brackets bonded to zirconia and lithium disilicate crowns. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2019;53(1):17-27.
  49. Kerimkhulle S, Dildebayeva Z, Tokhmetov A, Amirova A, Tussupov J, Makhazhanova U, Adalbek A, Taberkhan R, Zakirova A, Salykbayeva A. Fuzzy Logic and Its Application in the Assessment of Information Security Risk of Industrial Internet of Things. Symm. 2023;15(10):1958.
  50. Vishnu R, Selvakumar RD, Alkaabi AK, Vengadesan S. Active vortex generation and enhanced heat transfer in a 3D minichannel by Onsager–Wien effect. Appl Therm Eng. 2023;233:121064.
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua