Pedagogical requirements for developing a culture of environmental safety among students in the educational space of higher education institutions

Issue 55, 2024

Inkar Dzhakupova, Alikhan Bozhbanov, Elmira Assembayeva, Saule Almagambetova, Zhaxykul Sadykova

Received 05.10.2023, Revised 11.01.2024, Accepted 04.03.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.164ak0

Abstract

Relevance Dynamic changes in social relations have a dramatic impact on the environment. This is evidenced by several factors revealing the detrimental impact of human, particularly professional, activities on the environment. The issue of relevance related to the development of ecological culture among young people is quite high today, both in scientific doctrine and among practitioners.

Purpose. The research aims to analyze the approaches to the formation of environmental safety culture within higher education institutions.

Methodology. To achieve it, a system of methodological tools was used, namely the method of analysis, synthesis, abstraction, comparison, deduction, and questioning.

Results. As a result, it was possible to conclude an in-depth analysis of the "ecological culture" concept, to investigate its main properties expressed in the educational environment. It was possible to reveal different approaches to effective development and provision of ecological safety in the university. In addition, recommendations for integrating students' knowledge about environmental safety into their future professional activities have been formed. It has been proved that the process of ecological culture formation in students should be proportional and interconnected with the study of other disciplines. Due to such an approach, it is possible to develop both personal qualities of students concerning the environment and prepare them for future professional activity. Consequently, the formation of quality environmental security in the university is the key to enhancing the role of principles that relate to environmental protection and ecology in general.

Conclusions. The practical value of the research is in the fact that the findings obtained therein can be effectively used by teachers and methodologists in the development or improvement of existing curricula in higher education institutions.

Keywords: university; educational-professional activity; environment protection; project technology; nature

Suggested citation

Dzhakupova I, Bozhbanov A, Assembayeva E, Almagambetova S, Sadykova Z. Pedagogical requirements for developing a culture of environmental safety among students in the educational space of higher education institutions. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):1640-1649. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.164ak0

Download article

References

  1. Chong SW. Reconsidering student feedback literacy from an ecological perspective. Asses Evaluat High Educ. 2021;46(1):92-104.
  2. Dzhakupova IB, Bozhbanov AZh, Yegeubayeva SS. The structure of environmental safety in the educational space of the university. Citis. 2022b;1(31):278-289.
  3. Duisenova S, Kylyshbaeva B, Avsydykova K, Ishanov Y. Sociological analysis of educational strategies in the system of higher education in Kazakhstan. Space Cult, India. 2020;7(4):181-193.
  4. Han Z, Xu A. Ecological evolution path of smart education platform based on deep learning and image detection. Microproc Microsyst. 2021;80:103-113.
  5. Shafiei A, Maleksaeidi H. Pro-environmental behavior of university students: Application of protection motivation theory. Global Ecol Conserv. 2020;22:9-18.
  6. Achille C, Fiorillo F. Teaching and learning of cultural heritage: Engaging education, professional training, and experimental activities. Heritag. 2022;5(3):2565-2593.
  7. Ross N. Anthropocentric tendencies in environmental education: a critical discourse analysis of nature-based learning. Ethic Educ. 2020;15(3):355-370.
  8. Susanto R, Rachmadtullah R, Rachbini W. Technological and pedagogical models: Analysis of factors and measurement of learning outcomes in education. J Ethnic Cult Stud. 2020;7(2):1-14.
  9. Ardoin NM, Bowers AW, Gaillard E. Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Bio Conserv. 2020;241:108224.
  10. Dzhakupova IB, Bozhbanov AJ, Abdykarimova AP. Forming a culture of environmental safety in Kazakhstan’s higher schools. Colloq-J. 2022a;6(129):18-20.
  11. Ali QM, Nisar QA, Qammar R, Abbass K. Greening the workforce in higher educational institutions: The pursuance of environmental performance; 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19888-3.
  12. Khan MS, Terason S. Encouraging pro‐environmental behavior in university employees: An approach toward environmental sustainability as moderated by green organizational culture. J Commun Psychol. 2022;50(3):1454-1469.
  13. Esteban IM, Musitu Ferrer D, Amador Munoz LV, Claros FM, Olmedo Ruiz FJ. University as change manager of attitudes towards environment (The importance of environmental education). Sustain. 2020;12(11):4568.
  14. Arik S, Yilmaz M. The effect of constructivist learning approach and active learning on environmental education: A meta-analysis study. Int Electron J Env Educ. 2020;10(1):44-84.
  15. Kovalenko O, Gamajunova V, Neroda R, Smirnova I, Khonenko L. Advances in nutrition of sunflower on the southern steppe of Ukraine. Soils Under Stress: More Work Soil Sci Ukraine. 2021;1:215-223.
  16. Gamayunova V, Kovalenko O, Smirnova I, Korkhova M. The Formation of the Productivity of Winter Wheat Depends on the Predecessor, Doses of Mineral Fertilizers and Bio Preparations. Sci Hor. 2022;25(6):65-74. https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor.25(6).2022.65-74.
  17. Ahmadov F, Ahmadov G, Akbarov R, Aktag A, Budak E, Doganci E, Gurer U, Holik M, Kahraman A, Karaçali H, Lyubchyk S, Lyubchyk A, Mammadli A, Mamedov F, Nuruyev S, Pridal P, Sadigov A, Sadygov Z, Urban O, Yilmaz E, Yilmaz O, Zich J. Investigation of parameters of new MAPD-3NM silicon photomultipliers. J Instrument. 2022;17(1):C01001.
  18. Lyubchyk SI, Lyubchyk SB, Lyubchyk AI. Characterization of adsorption properties inherent to zirconia dioxide for different positions of yttrium in the ZrO2–Y2O3 lattice. Semicond Phys, Quant Electr Optoelectr. 2022;25(4):362-371. https://doi.org/10.15407/spqeo25.04.362.
  19. Kerimkhulle S, Kerimkulov Z, Aitkozha Z, Saliyeva A, Taberkhan R, Adalbek A. The Classification of Vegetations Based on Share Reflectance at Spectral Bands. Lect Notes Networks Syst. 2023;724 LNNS:95-100.
  20. Kerimkhulle S, Kerimkulov Z, Bakhtiyarov D, Turtayeva N, Kim J. In-Field Crop-Weed Classification Using Remote Sensing and Neural Network. SIST 2021 - 2021 IEEE Int Conf Smart Inform Syst Technol. 2021;1:9465970. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIST50301.2021.9465970.
  21. Domaratskiy Y, Kovalenko O, Kachanova T, Pichura V, Zadorozhnii Y. Analysis of the Effectiveness of Biological Plant Protection on Sunflower Productivity under Different Cenosis Density under the Non-Irrigated Conditions of the Steppe Zone. Ecolog Engin Environ Technol. 2023;24(9):45-54.
  22. Fedoniuk T, Bog M, Orlov O, Appenroth KJ. Lemna aequinoctialis migrates further into temperate continental Europe—A new alien aquatic plant for Ukraine. Feddes Repertor. 2022;133(4):305-312.
  23. Kachanova T, Manushkina T, Kovalenko O. Features of growth and development of Lavandula angustifolia when grown under drip irrigation conditions in the Southern Steppe zone of Ukraine. Sci Hor. 2023;26(3):81-91. https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor3.2023.81.
  24. Asanova E, Maygulakova L, Karabaeva R, Almazbekova B, Irgashev A. Morphometric characters of the whitefish ludoga (coregonus lavaretus ludoga) in connection with the lake Issyk-Kul ecological and geographical conditions and its introduction. E3S Web Conf. 2023;380:01018.
  25. Irgashev A, Nurgaziev R, Nurmanov C, Asanova E, Ishenbaeva S. Respiratory form of infectious rhinotracheitis: Analysis of immunomorphological reactions. Sci Hor. 2023;26(10):33-43. https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor10.2023.32
  26. Hadjichambis AC, Paraskeva-Hadjichambi D. Education for environmental citizenship: The pedagogical approach. Concept Env Citizen 21st Cent Educ. 2020;4:237-261.
  27. Yerzhanova AE, Kerimkhulle SY, Abdikerimova GB, Makhanov M, Beglerova ST, Taszhurekova ZK. Atmospheric correction of landsat-8 / Oli data using the flaash algorithm: Obtaining information about agricultural crops. J Theor Appl InformTechnol. 2021;99(13):3110-3119.
  28. Kerimkhulle S, Aitkozha Z, Saliyeva A, Kerimkulov Z, Adalbek A, Taberkhan R. Agriculture, Hunting, Forestry, and Fishing Industry of Kazakhstan Economy: Input-Output Analysis. Lect Notes Networks Syst. 2023;596 LNNS:786-797.
  29. Larson K. Serious games and gamification in the corporate training environment: A Literature Review. Techtrend. 2020;64(2):319-328.
  30. Castellanos PM, Queiruga-Dios A. From environmental education to education for sustainable development in higher education: a systematic review. Int J Sustain High Educ. 2021;23(3):622-644.
  31. Ishenbayeva S, Irgashev A, Nurgaziev R, Omoeva T, Zholoybekov A. Pathomorphological analysis of tumors in cats in the city of Bishkek. E3S Web Conf. 2023;380:01019.
  32. Irgashev A, Kalandarova Z, Amirakulov M, Yethindra V, Tagaev T. Age-dependent alterations in gross appearance and histology of the conjunctiva-associated lymphoid tissue (Calt) in pigs. Vet Pract. 2020;21(1):38-41.
  33. Pihkala P. Eco-anxiety and environmental education. Sustain. 2020;12(23):101-114.
  34. Doroshkevich AS, Zakharova AS, Oksengendler BL, Lyubchyk AI, Lyubchyk SI, Lyubchyk SB, Tatarinova AA, Kirillov AK, Vasilenko TA, Gorban OO et al. The Rectifying Contact of Hydrated Different Size YSZ Nanoparticles for Advanced Electronics. Nanomat. 2022;12(24):4493. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12244493.
  35. Guimaraes PR. The structure of ecological networks across levels of organization. Ann Rev Ecol, Evol, Syst. 2020;51:433-460.
  36. Khardazi S, Zaitouni H, Neqali A, Lyubchyk S, Mezzane D, Amjoud M, Choukri E, Kutnjak Z. Enhanced thermal stability of dielectric and energy storage properties in 0.4BCZT-0.6BTSn lead-free ceramics elaborated by sol-gel method. J Phys Chem Solids. 2023;177:111302.
  37. Dikanbayeva AK, Auyeshov AP, Satayev MS, Pirminova IV, Yeskibayeva CZ, Arynov KT. Influence of structural and molecular features of chrysotile on interaction within acid-chrysotile system. Rasayan J Chem. 2022;15(2):979-983.
  38. Georgiou Y, Hadjichambis AC, Hadjichambi D. Teachers’ perceptions on environmental citizenship: A systematic review of the literature. Sustain. 2021;13(5):2622.
  39. Auyeshov A, Satimbekova A, Arynov K, Bekaulova A, Yeskibayeva S, Idrisheva Z. Environmentally friendly and resource-saving technology for disposal of dusty asbestos- containing wastes and production of magnesium salts. ARPN J Engin Appl Sci. 2021;16(9):987-990.
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua