Peculiarities of content and language integrated learning technology usage in physics

Issue 55, 2024

Gulmira Kystaubayeva

Received 19.12.2023, Revised 03.02.2024, Accepted 29.02.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.5pli1

Abstract

Relevance. The research relevance is predefined by the fact that the problem of interculturalism and ethnic diversity in Kazakhstan requires the usage of different language education programs for science education. Currently, the importance of trilingual education in Kazakhstan has increased significantly. In this sense, most programs are based on the methodology known as content and language integrated learning (CLIL).

Purpose. The research aims to analyze the possibilities and characteristics of the implementation of context- and language-integrated education for teaching the discipline “Physics” in universities in Kazakhstan.

Methodology. The following methods were used: generalization, induction, and comparative.

Results. The results established that by using a language other than their native language, students expand their professional competence, where foreign speech gradually becomes part of their everyday reality and cultural context. In doing so, it is possible not only to develop communicative skills but also to integrate the content of physical science in a more meaningful aspect for the student. In Kazakhstan, most educational institutions choose English for the development of multilingual education. The most important factor in considering a language part of the student’s communicative universe is its contextualization in a world of interests and motivations. The relationship between language learning and content definition should be based on real and meaningful experiences. In this way, the student organically integrates and internalizes the knowledge presented.

Conclusions. The practical significance lies in the use and effective implementation of the results of the study by researchers and teachers of physics in higher education institutions in the Republic of Kazakhstan.

Keywords: contextual language education; multilingual education; foreign language; communication skills; culture

Suggested citation

Kystaubayeva G. Peculiarities of content and language integrated learning technology usage in physics. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):51–60. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.5pli1

Download article

References

  1. Admiraal W, Westhoff GJ, De Bot K. Evaluation of bilingual secondary education in the Netherlands: Students’ language proficiency in English. Educ Res Eval. 2006;12(1):75-93. DOI: 10.1080/13803610500392160.
  2. Fajardo Dack TM, Argudo J, Abad M. Language and teaching methodology features of CLIL in university classrooms: A research synthesis. Colombian Appl Ling J. 2020;22(1):40-54. DOI: 10.14483/22487085.13878.
  3. Bespartochna O, Ovdiichuk L, Piddubna N. Features of the introduction of innovative technologies in the professional training of teachers. J Times Spaces Educ. 2021;14(33):e16604. DOI: 10.20952/revtee.v14i33.16604.
  4. Akugizibwe E, Ahn JY. Perspectives for effective integration of e-learning tools in university mathematics instruction for developing countries. Educ Inform Technol. 2020;25(2):889-903. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-019-09995-z.
  5. Czerkawski B, Berti M. Learning experience design for augmented reality. Res Learn Technol. 2021;29:2429-35. DOI: 10.25304/rlt.v29.2429.
  6. Bakker A, Cai J, Zenger L. Future themes of mathematics education research: An international survey before and during the pandemic. Educ Stud Math. 2021;107(1):1-24. DOI: 10.1007/s10649-021-10049-w.
  7. Hillmayr D, Ziernwald L, Reinhold F, Hofer SI, Reiss KM. The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis. Comp Educ. 2020;153:103897. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103897.
  8. Khirwadkar A, Khan SI, Mgombelo J, Obradovic-Ratkovic S, Forbes WA. Reimagining mathematics education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Brock Educ J Educ Res Pract. 2020;29(2):42-6. DOI: 10.26522/brocked.v29i2.839.
  9. Ramirez-Casalvolone N. Synergistic team teaching for professional development: A case study approach. Pensamiento Act J. 2020;20(35):74-80. DOI: 10.15517/pa.v20i35.
  10. Schietroma E. Innovative stem lessons, CLIL, and ICT in multicultural classes. J e-Learn Know Soc. 2019;15(1):183-93. DOI: 10.20368/1971-8829/1587.
  11. Nykiporets S, Ibrahimova L. Communicative competence development among students of non-linguistic universities with the help of CLIL approach in foreign language lessons. Grail Sci. 2021;5:226-31. DOI: 10.36074/grail-of-science.04.06.2021.043.
  12. Wannapiroon P, Nilsook P, Kaewrattanapat N, Wannapiroon N, Supa W. Augmented reality interactive learning model, using the imagineering process for the SMART classroom. TEM J. 2021;10(3):1404-17. DOI: 10.18421/TEM103-51.
  13. Hussain S. It’s never too late to mend: Potentials of CLIL pedagogical approach to internationalize Ethiopian journalism education. Creat Educ. 2019;10(10):2246-69. DOI: 10.4236/ce.2019.1010162.
  14. Dalton-Puffer C, Smit U. Content and language integrated learning: A research agenda. Lang Teach. 2013;46(4):545-59. DOI: 10.1017/S0261444813000256.
  15. Issabekova G, Abdrakhman G, Duisenova N, Kudabayeva P, Kulakhmet M. The results of CLIL subject-linguistic integrated training in the educational system of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Psychol Educ J. 2020;57(9):1915-22. DOI: 10.17762/pae.v57i9.548.
  16. Capone R, Del Sorbo MR, Fiore O. A flipped experience in physics education using CLIL methodology. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ. 2017;13(10):6579-82. DOI: 10.12973/ejmste/77044.
  17. Gilbert A, Tait-McCutcheon S, Knewstubb B. Innovative teaching in higher education: Teachers’ perceptions of support and constraint. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2021;58(2):123-34. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2020.1715816.
  18. Mukataeva Z, Dinmukhamedova A, Kabieva S, Baidalinova B, Khamzina S, Zekenova L, Aizman R. Comparative characteristics of developing morphofunctional features of schoolchildren from different climatic and geographical regions. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2023;36(2):158-166. DOI: 10.1515/jpem-2022-0474.
  19. Tasbulatova GS, Umbetov AU, Sadykova BS, Uzakova BZ, Abdrakhmanova MT. Comparative characteristics of the cardiovascular parameters in 7-11-year-old boys residing in northern and southern Kazakhstan. Zeitschrift Gefassmedizin. 2020;17(2):13-15.
  20. Mazakov T, Wójcik W, Jomartova S, Karymsakova N, Ziyatbekova G, Tursynbai A. The stability interval of the set of linear system. Int J Electr Telecomm. 2021;67(2):155-161. DOI: 10.24425/ijet.2021.135958.
  21. Block D, Moncada-Comas B. English-medium instruction in higher education and the ELT gaze: STEM lecturers’ self-positioning as NOT English language teachers. Int J Biling Educ Biling. 2022;25(2):401-17. DOI: 10.1080/13670050.2019.1689917.
  22. Sharata N, Kravchenko T, Poberezhets H, Berezovska T. Formation of professional competencies of foreign students using the communicative method. Youth Voice J. 2023;3(special Issue):9-20.
  23. Allcoat D, Hatchard T, Azmat F, et al. Education in the digital age: Learning experience in virtual and mixed realities. J Educ Comput Res. 2021;59(5):795-816. DOI: 10.1177/0735633120985120.
  24. Arno-Macia E, Mancho-Bares G. The role of content and language in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at university: Challenges and implications for ESP. Eng Specific Purp. 2015;37:63-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.007.
  25. Khussain B, Brodskiy A, Sass A, Teltayev B, Rakhmetova K. Research of the thermal effect on the Fe-Cr-Al alloy foil in the initial state and with the deposited secondary support. Zeitschr Naturforsch- Sect A J Phys Sci. 2023;78(3):271-280. DOI: 10.1515/zna-2022-0272.
  26. Santangelo J, Cadieux M, Zapata S. Developing student metacognitive skills using active learning with embedded metacognition instruction. J STEM Educ Innov Res. 2-21;22(2):51-63. Available from: https://www.jstem.org/jstem/index.php/JSTEM/article/view/2475.
  27. Zaki HO, Rashid SFA, Adznan S. Media Sosial dan Iklan Tajaan: Analisis Bibliometrik dan Rangkaian (Social Media and Sponsored Ads: Bibliometric and Networking Analysis). J Pengurus. 2023;68(2023). DOI: 10.17576/pengurusan-2023-68-05.
  28. Yildirim FS. Effectiveness of augmented reality implementation methods in teaching science to middle school students. Int J Curric Instruct. 2021;13(2):1024-38. Available from: https://ijci.globets.org/index.php/IJCI/article/view/611.
  29. Aliaskar M, Mazakov T, Mazakova A, Jomartova S, Shormanov T. Human voice identification based on the detection of fundamental harmonics. In: ENERGYCON 2022 - 2022 IEEE 7th International Energy Conference, Proceedings. Riga: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2022. DOI: 10.1109/ENERGYCON53164.2022.9830471.
  30. Usin Z, Usina Z, Kistaubayev Y, Baidalinova B. Innovative methods to increase health efficiency of training exercises in sports. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2015;35(2):230-233.
  31. Yensenov KA, Naimanbayev BR, Orazbakov AZ, Nurbekova RK, Bulgynbaeva AK. Rehabilitation of Deportees to Kazakhstan. Migrat Lett. 2022;19(5):667-676. DOI: 10.33182/ml.v19i5.2342.
  32. Karassayev GM, Yensenov KA, Naimanbayev BR, Oskembay AA, Ermukhanova HK. History of regional relations in foreign political activity of the republic of kazakhstan (1991-2014). J Nat Acad Leg Sci Ukraine. 2021;28(3):119-128. DOI: 10.37635/jnalsu.28(3).2021.119-128.
  33. Soroko NV. The augmented reality functions to support the STEM education at general education institutions. Phys Math Educ. 2021;3(29):24-30. DOI: 10.31110/2413-1571-2021-029-3-004.
  34. Kerimkhulle S, Koishybayeva M, Alimova Z, Baizakov N, Azieva G. Created and Realization of a Demographic Population Model for a Small City. Proceed Engin Sci. 2023;5(3). DOI: 10.24874/PES05.03.003.
  35. Kerimkhulle S, Mukhanova A, Kantureyeva M, Koishybaeva M, Azieva G. Applying a housing construction model to improve a small town demographic dynamics. AIP Conf Proceed. 2023;2700:040047. DOI: 10.1063/5.0125066.
  36. Basterrechea M, Leeser MJ. Language-related episodes and learner proficiency during collaborative dialogue in CLIL. Lang Awar. 2019;28(2):97-113. DOI: 10.1080/09658416.2019.1606229.
  37. Karasayev GM, Yensenov KA, Zhumagulov BS, Aldabergenov KM, Batkeeva BT. The historical aspects of economic and legal international relations of independent kazakhstan and china (1991-1997). J Adv Res Law Econ. 2019;10(5):1444-1451. DOI: 10.14505/jarle.v10.5(43).12.
  38. Barlybayev A, Sankibayev A, Kadyr Y, Amangeldy N, Sabyrov T. Predicting Used-Vehicle Resale Value in Developing Markets: Application of Machine Learning Models to the Kazakhstan Car Market. Ingen Syst d'Inform. 2023;28(5):1237-1246. DOI: 10.18280/isi.280512.
  39. Kerimkhulle S, Saliyeva A, Makhazhanova U, Kerimkulov Z, Adalbek A, Taberkhan R. The estimate of innovative development of construction industry in the Kazakhstan. E3S Web Conf. 2023;389:06004. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202338906004.
  40. Karasayev GM, Zhaxygeldinov ZN, Naimanbayev BR, Auanasova AM, Khalidullin GK. History of European Union - Kazakhstan Relations (1991-2001). Cuadern Eur Deusto. 2023;68:183-197. DOI: 10.18543/ced.2702.
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua