Mussaibekov R, Kappassova S, Atayev B, Rakhimzhanov B, Suleimenov K. On the essence and main components of the research approach in teaching mathematics at school. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):1975-1984. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.197vy5
On the essence and main components of the research approach in teaching mathematics at school
Rashid Mussaibekov, Sandugash Kappassova, Berik Atayev, Bauyrzhan Rakhimzhanov, Kenessary Suleimenov
https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.197vy5
Abstract
Relevance. The modern stage of social development is characterized by the rapid progress of science, which is expressed in deep study of mathematical methods for modelling natural phenomena and various processes, that is, a lot of attention is paid to methods of mathematical modelling.
Purpose. This paper studies the problem that without an appropriate research approach in teaching mathematics, i.e., without the organization of the educational process and the implementation of critical analysis and cognitive thinking, it is impossible to form a high level of critical thinking.
Methodology. The main method for conducting the study was the method of content analysis, and other general theoretical methods were also used.
Results. For a detailed study of critical analysis and cognitive thinking, some works of researchers concerning the thinking process are cited. At the same time, research is being carried out in the areas of critical analysis and cognitive thinking, which are confirmed by various examples. In conclusion, it must be said that only a thorough analysis can lead to a more complete study of the topic. The directions of critical analysis and cognitive thinking, as well as their interactions, will be shown on specific examples of educational school material. It is clear that critical analysis and cognitive thinking requires development and improvement.
Conclusions. The practical significance of the study lies in the formation of specific characteristics of critical analysis and cognitive thinking within the research approach.
Keywords: critical analysis; counterexample; signs of equality of triangles; arithmetic and geometric progressions; cognitive thinking
Suggested citation
References
- Luiza R, Rabiga K, Amina A, Borashkyzy AU, Uaidullakyzy E, Bakhytgul S. Formation of research skills of students through solving problems in teaching mathematics in primary classes. Cypriot J Educ Sci. 2022;17(8):2567-2579.
- Zhanys AB, Dautov AO, Aktayeva AU, Askarova AZ. Thinking development and aesthetic education of students in the process of teaching mathematics by example solutions for one problem. IOP Conf Series: Mater Sci Engineer. 2020;934(1):012045.
- Mussaibekov R. Research approach in the process of teaching mathematics. Sci Heritag. 2021;80:51-55.
- Zhadyra K, Marat S, Bagdat K. The current state of teaching probability theory and mathematical statistics in secondary schools in Kazakhstan. Rev Int Geograph Educ Online. 2021;11(5):2467-2478.
- Visnovska J, Cortina JL. Teaching, teachers, and teaching resources in mathematics education research. Asia-Pacific J Teach Educ. 2022;50(2):156-164.
- Pogorelov AV. Geometry: A textbook for grades 7-11 of the environment. Moscow: Prosveshcheniye; 1995.
- Smirnov VA, Tuyakov EA.Geometry. Textbook for the 7th grade of general education. Almaty: Mektep; 2018.
- Mishra L, Gupta T, Shree A. Research-based teacher education from stake holders point: A case study. Uni J Educ Res. 2020;8(9):3895-3901.
- Toquero CMD. “Real-world:” preservice teachers' research competence and research difficulties in action research. J Appl Res High Educ. 2021;13(1):126-148.
- Tinh PT, Le TTT, Nguyen P-T, Le CD, Nguyen M-T, Nguyen T-T. Preparing pre-service teachers for mathematics teaching at primary schools in Vietnam. Eurasia J Math, Sci Tech Educ. 2021;17(5):em1966.
- Suyitno H, Zaenuri Sugiharti E, Suyitno A, Baba T. Nationalism and integrity values in teaching-learning process of mathematics at elementary school of Japan. J Physic: Conf Series. 2019;1321(2):022116.
- Berseneva OV. Competence-oriented tasks as a means of improving the research competencies of future mathematics teachers. Inter J “World Sci”. 2015;3(3):1-17.
- Barana A, Casasso F, Fissore C, Marchisio M, Roman F. Mathematics education in lower secondary school: four open online courses to support teaching and learning. In: 18th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2021) (pp. 95-102). London: Springer; 2021.
- Nogaybaeva G. Development of STEM education in the world and Kazakhstan. Educ Count. 2016;57:20.
- Muanifah MT, Rhosyida N, Trisniawati T, Anggraheni R, Maghfiroh N, Kurniasih A, Sa'Diyah H. Reciprocal teaching approach towards mathematics learning outcome of elementary school teacher education students. J Physic: Conf Series. 2021;1987(1):012028.
- Rijal A, Azimi A. Development of digital mathematics teaching materials in elementary schools using whiteboard animation for primary teacher education students STKIP PGRI lubuklinggau. J Physic: Conf Series. 2021;1987(1):012002.
- Liu Q, Wang F, Lin F, Yao C, Wang Y. Research on differentiated training program of primary school mathematics education based on artificial intelligence. In: International Conference on Information and Education Technology (pp. 268-273). ICIET: Matsue; 2022.
- Syaifuddin M. Implementation of authentic assessment on mathematics teaching: Study on junior high school teachers. Euro J Educ Res. 2020;9(4):1491-1502.
- Maximo-Pereira M, Cunha AM. The teacher who develops inquiry-based science teaching: What do the research say? Investig Ensin Cienc. 2021;26(3):134-156.
- Kazima M, Longwe J, Gobede F. Improving teaching and learning mathematics in Malawi primary schools: A review of reforms, interventions, successes and challenges. J Appl Learn Teach. 2022;5(2):81-89.
- Tan P, Padilla A, Lambert R. A critical review of educator and disability research in mathematics education: A decade of dehumanizing waves and humanizing wakes. Rev Educ Res. 2022;92(6):871-910.
