Methodology of teaching future computer science teachers to create and use open educational resources

Issue 55, 2024

Zhanar Altynbekova, Bektas Bostanov, Serik Kenesbayev, Maral Ongarbayeva, Zhanna Sadirmekova

Received 21.11.2023, Revised 11.02.2024, Accepted 25.03.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.233cu7

Abstract

Relevance. At the moment, getting an education is not limited to attending higher educational institutions, the development of the Internet and the emergence of an increasing number of open and accessible online educational courses opens up new learning opportunities.

Purpose. The purpose of this paper is to substantiate the need to format the education system of future computer science teachers based on the creation and use of open educational resources in their learning process.

Methodology. The methodological basis of the study is based on the use of such research methods as analysis, synthesis, and actualisation applied in the framework of a pedagogical experiment.

Results. The result of the study is the assessment of the degree of development of Internet technologies and educational resources aimed at ensuring the accessibility of education. The world experience of forming an optimal model of education, which is aimed at training future computer science teachers to create and use OER, has been considered. The results demonstrate that for the effective use of open educational resources, it is necessary to ensure their safety. It is also determined that not all open educational resources meet the required level of quality of the information and educational materials provided by them. It is indicated that modern society is at the stage that demonstrates a high level of trust and loyalty to various educational Internet materials and resources, which necessitates their comprehensive study.

Conclusions. A clear understanding of the requirements of modern society for the process of obtaining education indicates the ways to adapt the educational environment. The significance of the results is expressed in the development of the methodology of the teaching process of modern computer science teachers based on the creation, implementation, and use of open educational resources.

Keywords: information technologies; training of specialists; learning opportunities; informatisation; pedagogical activity

Suggested citation

Altynbekova Z, Bostanov B, Kenesbayev S, Ongarbayeva M, Sadirmekova Z. Methodology of teaching future computer science teachers to create and use open educational resources. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):2337-2347. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.233cu7

Download article

References

  1. Karunanayaka SP, Naidu S. Ascertaining impacts of capacity building in open educational practices. Distan Educ. 2020;41(2):279-302.
  2. Kenebaeva AS, Khibina NN, Dabyltaeva MM. Distance learning at KazNatsWPU in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Report on the results of the institutional study. Bull Kazakh Nation Women Teach Train Uni. 2020;20:14-33.
  3. Huang R, Tlili A, Chang TW, Zhang X, Nascimbeni F, Burgos D. Disrupted classes, undisrupted learning during COVID-19 outbreak in China: Application of open educational practices and resources. Smart Learn Env. 2020;7:19.
  4. Baymakhanova GK, Baymakhan SN, Summers D. Open educational resources in education: effectiveness, targeting, prospects. Bull Karaganda Uni, Series: Ped. 2020;2(98):46-53.
  5. Ongarbaeva AD. Methodology for preparing future teachers of informatics for the creation of electronic educational resources: Bishkek: I. Arabaev Kyrgyz State University; 2020.
  6. Tillinghast B. Developing an open educational resource and exploring oer-enabled pedagogy in higher education. IAFOR J Educ. 2020;8(2):159-174.
  7. De Langen F. Sustainability of open education through collaboration. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2018;19(5):95-111.
  8. Qurat-ul-Ain Shahid F, Aleem M, Islam MA, Iqbal MA, Yousaf MM. A review of technological tools in teaching and learning computer science. Eurasia j math, sci tech Educ. 2019;15(11):em1773.
  9. Ginters E, Mezitis M, Aizstrauta D. Sustainability simulation and assessment of bicycle network design and maintenance environment. In: 2018 International Conference on Intelligent and Innovative Computing Applications, ICONIC 2018 (8601225). Plaine Magnien: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2018.
  10. Trus I, Gomelya N, Halysh V, Radovenchyk I, Stepova O, Levytska O. Technology of the comprehensive desalination of wastewater from mines. East-Eur J Enter Tech. 2020;3(6-105):21-27.
  11. McGowan V. Institution initiatives and support related to faculty development of open educational resources and alternative textbooks. Open Learn. 2020;35(1):24-45.
  12. Song T-G, Pirahandeh M, Ahn C-J, Kim D-H. GPU-accelerated high-performance encoding and decoding of hierarchical RAID in virtual machines. J Supercomp. 2018;74(11):5865-5888.
  13. Rimmer W. Responding to the coronavirus with open educational resources. Int J TESOL Stud. 2020;2(2). https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA633468241&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=26326779&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7Edc6d480f&aty=open+web+entry
  14. Gillet D, Vonèche-Cardia I, Farah JC, Hoang KLP, Rodríguez-Triana MJ. Integrated model for comprehensive digital education platforms. In: IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1587-1593). Tunis: IEEE; 2022.
  15. Barlybayev A, Zhetkenbay L, Karimov D, Yergesh B. Development neuro-fuzzy model to predict the stocks of companies in the electric vehicle industry. East-Eur J Enter Tech. 2023;4(4(124)):72-87.
  16. Doi C, Lucky S, Rubin JE. Open educational resources in the time of COVID-19: Two case studies of open video design in the remote learning environment. Knowl Creat, Dissemin, Preserv Stud. 2022;6(1):1-15.
  17. Rehman HU, Darus M, Salah J. Generalizing Certain Analytic Functions Correlative to the n -th Coefficient of Certain Class of Bi-Univalent Functions. J Mathem. 2021;2021:6621315.
  18. Kerimkhulle S, Obrosova N, Shananin A, Tokhmetov A. Young Duality for Variational Inequalities and Nonparametric Method of Demand Analysis in Input–Output Models with Inputs Substitution: Application for Kazakhstan Economy. Mathem. 2023;11(19):4216.
  19. Salah J. Note on the modified caputo’s fractional calculus derivative operator. Far East J Mathem Sci. 2016;100(4):609-615.
  20. Luo T, Hostetler K, Freeman C, Stefaniak J. The power of open: Benefits, barriers, and strategies for integration of open educational resources. Open Learn. 2020;35(2):140-158.
  21. Grimaldi PJ, Mallick DB, Waters AE, Baraniuk RG. Do open educational resources improve student learning? Implications of the access hypothesis. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0212508.
  22. Virnes M, Leinonen T. Developing teacher competence in open educational resources: An example of a professional development program in Finland. Connect Learn Sum. 2019;3:3-24.
  23. Mncube LS, Tanner M, Chigona W. The commodification of open educational resources for teaching and learning by academics in an open distance e-learning institution. In: Proceedings of the 1st Virtual Conference on Implications of Information and Digital Technologies for Development (pp. 777-791). 2021. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2108/2108.09938.pdf
  24. Piera MA, Buil R, Ginters E. State space analysis for model plausibility validation in multi-agent system simulation of urban policies. J Simulat. 2016;10(3):216-226.
  25. Abdymanapov SA, Barlybayev A, Kuzenbaev BA. Quality Evaluation Fuzzy Method of Automated Control Systems on the LMS Example. IEEE Acc. 2019;7:138000-138010.
  26. Asadchykh O, Sorokina N, Pereloma T, Popova O, Konotopets V. Mobile applications in developing phonetic competence of the Chinese language. Glob Chin. 2024;10(1):21-36.
  27. Stracke CM, Downes S, Conole G, Burgos D, Nascimbeni F. Are MOOCs open educational resources? A literature review on history, definitions and typologies of OER and MOOCs. Open Prax. 2019;11(4):331-341.
  28. Maraj A, Jakupi G, Rogova E, Grajqevci X. Testing of network security systems through DoS attacks. In: 2017 6th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing, MECO 2017 - Including ECYPS 2017, Proceedings (7977239). Bar: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2017.
  29. Avila C, Baldiris S, Fabregat R, Graf S. Evaluation of a learning analytics tool for supporting teachers in the creation and evaluation of accessible and quality open educational resources. British J Educ Tech. 2020;51(4):1019-1038.
  30. Hamora LA, Rabaya MB, Pentang JT, Pizaña AD, Gamozo MJD. Students’ evaluation of faculty-prepared instructional modules: Inferences for instructional materials review and revision. J Educ, Manag Develop Stud. 2022;2(2):20-29.
  31. Kerimkhulle S, Dildebayeva Z, Tokhmetov A, Amirova A, Tussupov J, Makhazhanova U, Adalbek A, Taberkhan R, Zakirova A, Salykbayeva A. Fuzzy Logic and Its Application in the Assessment of Information Security Risk of Industrial Internet of Things. Symm. 2023;15(10):1958.
  32. Maraj D, Maraj A, Hajzeraj A. Application interface for gesture recognition with Kinect sensor. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Applications, ICKEA 2016 (pp. 98-102). Singapore: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2016.
  33. Kochkarev D, Azizov T, Galinska T. Bending deflection reinforced concrete elements determination. MATEC Web Conf. 2018;230:02012.
  34. Ahn C, Pirahandeh M, Kim D-H. Dynamic allocation of replication and erasure codes for enhancing storage efficiency in openstack swift. In: 2020 International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication, ICEIC 2020 (9051133). Barcelona: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2020. DOI: 10.1109/ICEIC49074.2020.9051133
  35. Latka K, Kolodziej W, Pawlak K, Sobolewski T, Rajski R, Chowaniec J, Olbrycht T, Tanaka M, Latka D. Fully Endoscopic Spine Separation Surgery in Metastatic Disease—Case Series, Technical Notes, and Preliminary Findings. Med (Lith). 2023;59(5):993
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua