Methodological approaches to the development of linguistic personality: structure, formation ways, social and cultural components

Issue 55, 2024

Makpal Khamitova, Altynay Tymbolova, Ainur Kushkimbaeva, Indira Sultaniyazova, Gulmira Esirkepova

Received 30.11.2023, Revised 13.01.2024, Accepted 26.02.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.97nk2

Abstract

Relevance. The motivation to learn a language and form a new linguistic identity is more relevant than ever since languages, more and less spread, are the means of communication in the modern globalised world.

Purpose. The aim of the article was to outline the model of its formation, with the steps to achieve it, which include considering the structure of the phenomenon, recognising the ways of language identity formation, determining the approaches to its formation, and also to single out the important components.

Methodology. The study used the basic methods of knowledge: analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, and general scientific methods: generalisation, abstraction, classification, modelling, structural method, and method of analytic and synthetic processing of information.

Results. The notion of linguistic personality has been defined, and approaches to describing its structure have been studied.  It is pointed out that the development of linguistic personality is based on the specific structure of the concept of learning and the cultural potential inherent in it. An algorithm for the formation of a certain linguocultural type of linguistic personality is outlined, which supposes the allocation of conceptual, image-perceptual, and value aspects, and the presence of an important sociocultural component. It is highlighted that the basic element of the mentioned element is filled with ethnically specific components, defined as “the cultural potential of a linguistic personality”. It's also emphasised, that the theory of evolution of Kazakh linguistic personality needs to fill in its structural system characteristics, constructed on the basis of the results of the study of Kazakh linguistics.

Conclusions. The valuable content in ethnolinguistics, ethnopedagogy, history, culturology, etc., that preserves and enriches the Kazakh culture, is established, from where the material should be derived. The article is of interest to linguists, who study linguistic personality, culturologists, educators, and sociologists.

Keywords: communication; motivation; symbol; linguistic formulas; cultural potential; national identity

Suggested citation

Khamitova M, Tymbolova A, Kushkimbaeva A, Sultaniyazova I, Esirkepova G. Methodological approaches to the development of linguistic personality: structure, formation ways, social and cultural components. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):972-982. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.97nk2

Download article

References

  1. Sahragard R, Baharloo A, Soozandehfar SMA. A Closer Look at the Relationship between Academic Achievement and Language Proficiency among Iranian EFL Students. Theory Pract Lang Stud. 2011;1(12):1740-1748.
  2. Perez CO, London K, Otgaar H. A review of the differential contributions of language abilities to children’s eyewitness memory and suggestibility. Develop Rev. 2022;63:101009.
  3. Caplan JE, Adams K, Boyd RL. Personality and Language. In: B.J. Carducci, C.S. Nave (Eds.), The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences: Models and Theories (pp. 311-316). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118970843.ch52
  4. Saghitova AF, Suleymanova AK. Language consciousness as a synthesis of universal and ethnically specific. World Sci, Cult Educ. 2018;2(69):619-622.
  5. Abildinova ZB. Linguistic consciousness as a psycholinguistic phenomenon. Neophil. 2018;4(14):33-43.
  6. Bogin GI. The model of linguistic personality in its relation to the varieties of texts. Kalinin: Kalinin State University; 1986.
  7. Bogin GI. Gaining the ability to understand: An introduction to hermeneutics. Moscow: Psychology and Business Online; 2001.
  8. Krasnykh VV. Culture, cultural memory and linguistic culture: their main functions and role in cultural identification. Bull Moscow State Uni. 2012;3:67-74.
  9. Karasik VI. Linguistic personality as a subject of anthropological linguistics. Izvestia Volgograd State Ped Uni. 2011;8(62):109-115.
  10. Karasik VI. Discourse Manifestation of Personality. Rus J Ling. 2016;20(4):56-77.
  11. Ivantsova EV. About the term “language personality”: origins, problems, prospects of use. Tomsk State Uni J Phil. 2010;4(12):24-32.
  12. Shaposhnikova IV. Identification modes of the Russian language personality in an era of change. Moscow: LRC Publishing House; 2020.
  13. Lado R. Linguistics across Cultures: Applied linguistics for language teachers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1957.
  14. Damen L. Culture Learning: The Fifth Dimension in the Language Classroom. Boston: Addison Wesley; 1987.
  15. Richards JC, Rogers TC. Approaches and methods in language teaching: A description and analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1986.
  16. Saucier G, Goldberg LR. The language of personality: Lexical perspectives on the five-factor model. In: J.S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 21-50). New York: Guilford Press; 1996.
  17. Dewaele JM, Furnham A. Personality and speech production: A pilot study of second language learners. Person Indiv Differ. 2000;28(2):355-365.
  18. Hirsh JB, Peterson JB. Personality language use in self-narratives. J Res Person. 2009;43(3):524-527.
  19. Pogacar R, Mecit A, Gao F, Shrum LJ, Lowrey TM. Language and consumer psychology. In: L.R. Kahle, T.M. Lowrey, J. Huber (Eds.), APA handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 451-470). Washington: American Psychological Association; 2022.
  20. Sung-Yul Park J. Linguistic identities; 2013. https://cutt.ly/bGRGBq4.
  21. Suleymenova ED. New scientific paradigms in the Kazakh science of the Russian language. In: Russian language as a language of intercultural and business cooperation in the multilingual context of Eurasia (pp. 3-25). Astana: Kazakhstan Multidisciplinary Institute “Parasat”; 2009.
  22. Amenova KS. Formation of a linguistic personality in the context of intercultural communication. In: Pedagogy: traditions and innovations: materials of the IV International Scientific Conference (pp. 79-81). Chelyabinsk: Dva komsomoltsa; 2013.
  23. Baigarina GP. Kazakhstani socio-political picture of the world in metalinguistic commenting. In: Ye.A. Zhuravleva (Ed.), Problems of intercultural communication in modern society: international collection of scientific papers (Kazakhstan-Hungary) (pp. 10-15). Astana: KаzServicePrint LTD; 2014.
  24. Zhuminova AB. The Phenomenon of the Diversification of Russian Language in Kazakhstan; 2019. https://elar.rsvpu.ru/bitstream/123456789/30229/1/sprz_2019_8_09.pdf.
  25. Utebaliyeva G, Yesbulatova R. Dialogue as a way of organizing the communicative-cognitive activity of a secondary linguistic personality. Acta Uni Lodziensis. Folia Ling Ros. 2016;13:111-120. https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-8025.13.12
  26. Mankeeva Zh. Linguistic personality. How did Kh. Dosmukhamedov rise to this level?; 2013.https://anatili.kazgazeta.kz/news/14888.
  27. Karimov BR. The contribution of Kazakhstan to the development of the Turkic civilization and the prospects for the development of the Kazakh language in the system of Turkic languages; 2015. https://articlekz.com/article/20094.
  28. Ermekbay ZhA. The cultural heritage of the people of Kazakhstan in the Eurasian Space. Proceed Altai State Academ Cult Art. 2017;2(12):213-216.
  29. Akkuzova AA. Anthropocentric paradigm: communicative and pragmatic potential of a literary text (based on the works of D. Isabekov). Kostanay: A. Baitursynov Kostanay Regional University; 2020.
  30. Mankeeva Zh. Studying the problems of “linguistic persona”. Almaty: Arys; 2010.
  31. Mazhitayeva SD, Rapisheva ZY, Tuite YT, Nygmetova N, Zhetpisbay S, Saule BK. The Theory of Linguistic Personality, Its Structural and System Characteristics. Opcion. 2019;35:86-101.
  32. von Humboldt W. On the difference in the structure of human languages and its influence on the spiritual development of humanity. Moscow: Progress; 1984.
  33. Weisgerber JL. Muttersprache und Geistesbildung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. [in German]; 1929.
  34. Vinogradov VV. About artistic prose. Moscow: Gosizdat; 1930.
  35. Whorf BL. Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 1964.
  36. Mowrer OH. Learning Theory and Personality Dynamics. New York: Ronald Press; 1950.
  37. Hymes DH. On Communicative Competence. In: J.B. Pride, J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics. Selected Readings. (pp. 269-293). Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1972.
  38. De Beaugrande R. Text, Discourse and Process: Towards a Multidisciplinary Science of Texts. Hoboken: ‎Prentice Hall Press; 1980.
  39. Karaulov YuN. Russian language and linguistic personality. Moscow: Nauka; 1987.
  40. Hymes DН. Models for the Interaction of Language and Social Life. In: J.J. Gumperz, D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 35-71). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell; 1991.
  41. van Dijk TA. Discourse as Structure and Process: Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: SAGE Publications; 1997.
  42. Karaulov YuN. Russian language and linguistic personality. Moscow: Publishing house LKI; 2010.
  43. Kerasheva ZI. Language is a valuable source for learning the history of a people. Bull Adyghe State Uni. 2008;1:1-5.
  44. Ilyasova RS. Culturological aspect of the linguistic personality study. Sci Alman Black Sea Reg Count. 2016;2(6):49-52.
  45. Andrews M. What About Linguistic Identity? J Lang Liter Educ. 2010;6(2):85-102.
  46. Baldwin J. If Black English isn't a Language, Then Tell Me, What Is? Black Schol. 1997;27(1), 5-6.
  47. Graves T. What is linguistic identity?; 2022.  https://www.quora.com/What-is-linguistic-identity.
  48. Gee JP. Chapter 3: Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research in Education. Rev Res Educ. 2000;25(1):99-125.
  49. Lanning K, Pauletti RE, King LA, McAdams DP. Personality development through natural language. Natur Human Behav. 2018;2(5):327-334
  50. Norton B. Identity and Language Learning: Extending the Conversation. Toronto: Multilingual Matters; 2013.
  51. Ricento T. Considerations of identity in L2 learning. In: E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research on second language teaching and learning (pp. 895-911). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2005.
  52. Zuengler J, Miller E. Cognitive and Sociocultural Perspectives: Two Parallel SLA worlds? TESOL Quart. 2006;40(1):35-58.
  53. Rahimian M. Identity Issues among Post-secondary Nonnative Students in an English-Speaking Country. Proced – Social Behav Sci. 2015;174:305-312.
  54. Hauser MD, Chomsky N, Fitch WT. The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve? Sci. 2002;298(5598):1569-1579.
  55. Sukhikh SA. Personality in the communication process. Krasnodar: Southern Institute of Management; 2004.
  56. Fesenko OP. Structure of Linguistic Personality in the Aspect of the Center-Periphery Theory. Mid-East J Sci Res. 2013;16(3):397-401.
  57. Byram M. Languages and Identities. Preliminary study. Languages of Education; 2006. https://cutt.ly/iGRN8qm.
  58. Fialko N, Dinzhos R, Sherenkovskii J, Meranova N, Aloshko S, Izvorska D, Korzhyk V, Lazarenko M, Mankus I, Nedbaievska L. Establishment of regularities of influence on the specific heat capacity and thermal diffusivity of polymer nanocomposites of a complex of defining parameters. East-Eur J Enter Tech. 2021;6(12(114)):6-12.
  59. Stek K. Personality Development in Higher Education in the Era of Industry 4.0: Comparing educational practices and philosophies in Industry 1.0 and Industry 4.0; 2022. https://cutt.ly/5GRMvoT.
  60. Al-Hoorie AH, Szabó F. (Eds.). Researching Language Learning Motivation: A Concise Guide. London: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2022.
  61. Lou NM. Acculturation in a postcolonial context: Language, identity, cultural adaptation, and academic achievement of Macao students in Mainland China. Int J Intercult Relat. 2021;85:213-225.
  62. Adilova AS. Representation, semantics, structure of intertextuality in modern Kazakh works of art. Almaty: Al-Farabi Kazakh National University; 2009.
  63. Borisov YuS, Korzhik VN, Kunitskii YaA, Revo SL, Gritskiv YaP. Structural transformations in thermal spray coatings of Ni60Nb40 alloy in vacuum annealings. Sov Powder Metall Metal Ceram. 1986;25(10):821-826.
  64. Sun J, Bieliatynskyi A, Krayushkina K, Akmaldinova O. Research of properties on graphite conductive slag in asphalt concrete. E3S Web Conf. 2020;175:11015.
  65. Fialko N, Dinzhos R, Sherenkovskii J, Meranova N, Navrodska R, Izvorska D, Korzhyk V, Lazarenko M, Koseva N. Establishing Patterns In The Effect Of Temperature Regime When Manufacturing Nanocomposites On Their Heat-Conducting Properties. East-Eur J Enter Tech. 2021;4(5-112):21-26.
  66. Raj P, Padiyath N, Semioshkina N, Foulon F, Alkaabi AK, Voigt G, Addad Y. Transfer of Natural Radionuclides from Soil to Abu Dhabi Date Palms. Sustainab (Switz). 2022;14(18):11327.
  67. Babak V, Dekusha O, Kovtun S, Ivanov S. Information-measuring system for monitoring thermal resistance. CEUR Workshop Proceed. 2019;2387:102-110.
  68. Korzhyk V, Khaskin V, Grynyuk A, Ganushchak O, Peleshenko S, Konoreva O, Demianov O, Shcheretskiy V, Fialko N. Comparing Features In Metallurgical Interaction When Applying Different Techniques Of Arc And Plasma Surfacing Of Steel Wire On Titanium. East-Eur J Enter Tech. 2021;4(12-112):6-17.
  69. Korzhyk V, Illiashenko E, Khaskin V, Peleshenko S, Perepychay A. Forecasting the results of hybrid laser-plasma cutting of carbon steel. East-Eur J Enter Tech. 2020;2(1-104):6-15.
  70. Bieliatynskyi A, Yang S, Pershakov V, Shao M, Ta M. The use of fiber made from fly ash from power plants in China in road and airfield construction. Construct Build Mater. 2022;323:126537.
  71. Babak VP, Shchepetov VV. Wear Resistance of Amorphous-Crystalline Coatings with Lubricants. J Frict Wear. 2018;39(1):38-43.
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua