Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

ISSN 2415-8038 e-ISSN 2786-6688
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Intangible assets of an enterprise: Peculiarities of auditing and display in accounting

Issue 55, 2024

Nazakat Musayeva, Nigar Atakishiyeva, Ulkar Mammadova

Received 01.11.2023, Revised 24.02.2024, Accepted 18.03.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.284ep7

Abstract

Relevance. The research relevance is determined by the rapid development and introduction of intangible assets in enterprises causing issues of their proper accounting and subsequent audit.

Purpose. The research aims to analyse the accounting of intangible assets of the enterprise and to consider the peculiarities of their audit.

Methodology. The analysis method was used to establish that problems in accounting for intangible assets arise at each of its stages, which is ultimately reflected in the final stage of work with intangible assets – audit problems. The deduction method was used to establish that the double-entry accounting system significantly limits the completeness of information on intangible assets.

Results. According to the results of the research, as of 2023, the enterprises of Azerbaijan apply an international approach in the accounting of intangible assets. In addition to characteristic features of intangible assets and their nature, inaccuracies in international standards concerning intangible assets are the root cause of incorrect accounting and create many problems in their accounting and further audit. These problems impede stakeholder information and reduce confidence in financial reporting and subsequent decisions to develop the company’s competitive advantage in the market.

Conclusions. The practical significance of this study is determined the findings of the study help businesses to avoid the most common errors in accounting for intangible assets, improve their management efficiency, minimise risks and make informed decisions to achieve long-term sustainability and success in the market.

Keywords: stakeholder; international standards; audit problems; financial display; financial documentation

Suggested citation

Musayeva N, Atakishiyeva N, Mammadova U. Intangible assets of an enterprise: Peculiarities of auditing and display in accounting. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):2847-2854. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.284ep7

Download article

References

  1. IAS 38: Intangible assets. 2020. https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/publications/pdf-standards/english/2021/issued/part-a/ias-38-intangible-assets.pdf
  2. Katona K. Intangible assets as possible indicators for the growth of the Hungarian firms. Int J Account Info Manag. 2021;29(5):764-775.
  3. Peng YT, Zhang JY, Chang JS. Exploring the relevance of intangible assets and capital structure. Int J Trade, Econ Fin. 2021;12(6):144-148.
  4. Savickaitė Ž. The evaluation of company’s intangible assets’ influence for business value. Int J Econ Sci Appl Res. 2014;7(3):133-155.
  5. Dancaková D, Sopko J, Glova J, Andrejovská A. The impact of intangible assets on the market value of companies: Cross-sector evidence. Math. 2022;10(20):3819.
  6. Rozmatovna YU. Improvement of intangible assets accounting and auditing. Texas J Multidiscip Stud. 2022;9:102-104.
  7. Prabhawa АА, Nasih M. Intangible assets, risk management committee, and audit fee. Cogen Econ Fin. 2021;9:1956140.
  8. Wan X, Li Y. Evaluation and management of intangible assets of high-tech enterprises from the perspective of Monte Carlo and network security. Mobil Info Syst. 2021;2021:9661531.
  9. Krulický T, Junga P, Jägerová L. Valuation of intangible assets via application of the WARA approach in the agricultural sector. Entrepren Sustain Iss. 2022;10(2):495-509.
  10. Carabel TC, González AB, del Castillo Peces C. Intangible assets and business results of large companies. Intang Capit. 2021;17(2):108-123.
  11. Mazzi F, Slack R, Tsalavoutas I, Tsoligkas F. Exploring investor views on accounting for R&D costs under IAS 38. J Account Pub Policy. 2022;41(2):106944.
  12. O’Connell V, AbuGhazaleh N, Tahat Y, Whela G. The impact of R&D innovation success on the relationship between R&D investment and financial leverage. J Open Innov: Tech, Market, Complex. 2022;8(3), 129.
  13. Mohammadzadeh H. The impact of intangible assets and intellectual capital on audit risk. Iran J Account, Audit Fin Quart. 2020;4(1):35-47.
  14. Bagna E, Ramusino EC, Denicolai S. Innovation through patents and intangible assets: Effects on growth and profitability of European companies. J Open Innov: Tech, Market, Complex. 2021;7(4):220.
  15. Barker R, Lennard A, Penman S, Teixeira A. Accounting for intangible assets: Suggested solutions. Account Business Res. 2022;52(6):601-630.
  16. Ujwary-Gil A. Organizational network analysis: Auditing intangible resources. New York: Routledge; 2020.
  17. Al Karaki АSM, Al-Thuneibat AA. The impact of intangible assets and fair value measurement on audit fees: Empirical evidence from Jordanian banking sector. Jordan J Business Admin. 2022;18(2):223-243.
  18. Hellman N. Discussion of “Accounting for intangible assets: Suggested solutions”. Account Business Res. 2022;52(6):631-640.
  19. Niculita AL, Popa AF, Caloiana F. The intangible assets – A new dimension in the company’s success. Proced Econ Fin. 2012;3:304-308.
  20. Jawad MA. The extent to which auditors can audit intangible assets in accordance with the objectives of the economic units (A proposed model for the adoption of the international standard of auditing 300 planning and 500 evidence in the Iraqi environment). Transylvan Rev. 2019;27(42):180-192.
  21. Abu N, Jaffar R. Audit committee effectiveness and key audit matters. Asia J Account Govern. 2020;14:1-12.
  22. Xhafka E, Teta J, Philippov DI, Kostyrin EV, Leelang S, Nikolaeva IV, Maramygin MS, Ruban-Lazareva NV, Muda I, Dudnik OV. Private Health Insurance in the Post-Pandemic Era: Spatial Econometric Market Development Analysis. Emerg Sci J. 2023;7(6):2080–2096.
  23. Nazarchuk O, Dmyrtriiev D, Babina Y, Faustova M, Burkot V. Research of the activity of local anesthetics and antiseptics regarding clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii as pathogens of postoperative infectious complications. Acta Biomed. 2022;93(1):e2022003.
  24. Zholdasbekova A, Biyashev KB, Biyashev BK, Sarybaeva DA, Zhumanov KT. Method for producing attenuated Salmonella strain. J Pharm Sci Res. 2018;10(1):162-163.
  25. Abzhaliyeva AB, Biyashev KB, Biyashev BK, Orazaliev DM, Turabekov MR, Taipova AA. Prevalence of intestinal pathogens in animals, food products of animal origin and in the environmental objects. J Pharm Sci Res. 2018;10(2):246-247.
  26. Kaldarbekova M, Uzakov Y, Chernukha I, Kurmanbekova A, Jetpisbayeva B. Studying the effect of multicomponent pickle on the quality of cooked and smoked horse meat product. Period Tche Quim. 2019;16(33):259-265.
  27. Zheleuova ZS, Uzakov YM, Shingisov AU, Alibekov RS, Khamitova BM. Development of halal cooked smoked beef and turkey sausage using a combined plant extracts. J Food Process Preserv. 2021;45(1):e15028.
  28. Makangali K, Taeva A, Lisitsyn A, Uzakov Y, Konysbaeva D, Victoria G. Study of the national cooked smoked meat products while tests with laboratory animals at the pathology models with the purpose to confirm the set of biocorrective features. Curr Res Nutrit Food Sci. 2018;6(2):536-551.
  29. Biyashev KB, Biyashev BK, Saribayeva DA. Persistence of the Escherichia coli 64G-Probiotic Strain in the Intestine of Calves. Biol Med. 2016;8(2):2-3.
  30. Biyashev KB, Kirkimbaeva ZS, Biyashev BK, Makbuz AZ, Bulegenova MD. Determination of the level of resistance of probiotic strain escherichia coli 64g to hydrochloric acid, bile and antimicrobial agents. Ecol, Environ Conserv. 2019;25(4):1930-1933.
  31. Fedoniuk TP, Pyvovar PV, Skydan OV, Melnychuk TV, Topolnytskyi PP. Spatial structure of natural landscapes within the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone. J Water Land Develop. 2024;60:79-90.
  32. Shyle I, Xhafka E, Teta J. Challenges of Albanian Companies for Sustainable Development in the Era of Industry 4.0. Lect Notes Networks Syst. 2021;233:260-269.
  33. Xhafka E, Teta J, Agastra E. Mobile environmental sensing and sustainable public transportation using ICT Tools. Acta Phys Polon A. 2015;128(2):122-124.
  34. Bodi I, Piperi E, Xhafka E, Teta J, Kosta M. Role of Industry 4.0 in Albanian Industry Transformation: An Integrated Understanding of Industry 4.0. Lect Notes Networks Syst. 2021;233:251-259.
  35. Shustik LP, Pogoriliy VV, Kravchuk VI, Hrynenko OA, Zanko MD, Babynets TL. Influence of structural characteristics of harrow teeth on the dynamics of their abrasive wear and resource forecast. Int J Engin Res Technol. 2020;13(12):4454–4463.
  36. Selvakumar RD, Wu J, Afgan I, Ding Y, Alkaabi AK. Melting performance enhancement in a thermal energy storage unit using active vortex generation by electric field. J Energy Storage. 2023;67:107593.
  37. Amidu MA, Ali M, Alkaabi AK, Addad Y. A critical assessment of nanoparticles enhanced phase change materials (NePCMs) for latent heat energy storage applications. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):7829.
  38. Teta J, Xhafka E. Impact of Total Quality Management in Productivity. Econ Affairs (New Delhi). 2023;68:861-867.
  39. Uzakov YM, Ospanova DA. Study of the morphological structure and nutritional value of lamb. World Appl Sci J. 2013;27(4):479-482.
  40. Uzakov YM, Ospanova DA. Research of chemical and amino-acid composition of the complex cutting of carcass. Bulgar J Agricult Sci. 2014;20(5):1090-1093.
  41. Bulegenova M, Biyashev K, Kirkimbaeva Z, Biyashev B, Ermagambetova S, Oryntayev K, Altenov A. The effect of the drug enterocol on the humoral factors of calf body resistance. Adv Anim Vet Sci. 2019;7(8):674-680.
  42. Zhakupova AA, Biyashev KB, Biyashev BK, Ermagambetova SE, Nurgozhayeva GM. Performance test of the drug enterocol. J Pharm Sci Res. 2017;9(10):1941-1942.
  43. Sinoimeri D, Teta J, Prifti V, Lazaj A. Information Technology in Supply Chain Management. Case Study. Lect Notes Multidisc Industr Engin. 2024;Part F2090:35-44.
  44. Sinoimeri D, Teta J. Supply Chain Management Performance Measurement. Case Studies from Developing Countries. Int J Membr Sci Technol. 2023;10(2):1323-1331.
Make a Submission

Indexing

  • Scopus logo
  • WorldCat logo
  • OpenAIRE logo
  • Crossref logo
  • VNLU logo
  • Professional publications of Ukraine logo
  • BASE logo
  • Google Scholar logo

info@physics.uz.ua