Innovative model of interaction of subjects in the higher education market

Issue 55, 2024

Adiya Iskakova, Gulnara Nurmukhanova

Received 29.09.2023, Revised 12.02.2024, Accepted 14.03.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.184bq3

Abstract

Relevance. The relevance of the subject matter lies in the need to ensure the availability and quality of modern higher education in the market and the presence of problems of interaction between individual subjects represented in this market.

Purpose. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the prospects for building an innovative model of interaction between subjects of higher education in the conditions of modern market relations.

Methodology. The basis of the methodological approach in this study is a combination of methods of empirical modelling of the interaction of subjects of the higher education market of Kazakhstan with a statistical analysis of the results of the application of this model and a systematic analysis of the process of introducing innovations into the educational environment of universities in the country.

Results. In the course of the research, the results were obtained that determine the general principles of constructing a model considered within the framework of the stated topic, and key aspects of the interaction of subjects in this model. It is established that the process of introducing innovations into the higher education system of the Republic of Kazakhstan is inextricably linked with the realities of the economic situation formed in the state and the level of its influence on the development of this system. The key subjects of the higher education market in Kazakhstan are identified, and the differentiation of the level of their interaction within the framework of the considered innovation model is given.

Conclusions. The practical significance of the results obtained is conditioned by the possibility of their use in creating a fundamentally new model of interaction between subjects of the modern higher education market, through the introduction of innovations into the pedagogical environment of higher educational institutions and thereby ensuring a higher level of graduate training.

Keywords: learning; educational process; training of qualified personnel; innovations in teaching; programme disciplines; business contacts

Suggested citation

Iskakova A, Nurmukhanova G. Innovative model of interaction of subjects in the higher education market. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):1843-1852. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.184bq3

Download article

References

  1. An AE. Innovative activity of universities as the basis for the formation of a knowledge-intensive economy. Almaty: Al-Farabi Kazakh National University; 2014.
  2. Maralbayeva ShM, Nikiforova NV, Khan IG. The main paradigms of entrepreneurial education in universities: Kazakhstani and international experience. Bull Kazakh Nation Women Ped Uni. 2020;4(84):126-141.
  3. Pak YuN, Pak DYu, Nuguzhinov ZhS. Updating educational programs of higher education in the context of the development of the national system of qualifications. Time Chang. 2020;10:9-16.
  4. Mutalieva ASh, Akhtanova SK. Pedagogy of the 21st century: Innovative teaching methods. Uni: Psychol Educ. 2020;3(69):1-5.
  5. Fromm J, Radianti J, Wehking C, Stieglitz S, Majchrzak TA, vom Brocke J. More than experience? – On the unique opportunities of virtual reality to afford a holistic experiential learning cycle. Inter High Educ. 2021;50:100804.
  6. Sulima SB. Prerequisites for improving the system of higher education in Kazakhstan. 2008. https://www.vestnik-kafu.info/journal/16/604.
  7. Kuanshaliev D. The market of higher education services in Kazakhstan is worth $300-350 million. 2014. https://forbes.kz/process/education/ekonomiya_na_buduchem.
  8. National report on the development of the higher education system of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2022. http://old.unesco.kz/education/he/kazakh/kazakh_ru.htm.
  9. Co MJ, Kerbage SH, Willetts G, Garvey L, Bhattacharya A, Croy G, Mitchell B. Students coping with change in higher education: An overview. Educ Res Rev. 2023;38:100508.
  10. Egambergiev M, Kozymbakova F. Integration of higher education in the Republic of Kazakhstan national innovation systems. Social Behav Sci. 2014;131:224-228.
  11. Watty K, McKay J, Ngo L. Innovators or inhibitors? Accounting faculty resistance to new educational technologies in higher education. J Account Educ. 2016;36:1-15.
  12. Zakirova GD, Shaikhutdinov EM. Some integration conditions higher education in Kazakhstan to the Bologna Process: structure, content, science, personnel. Almaty: National Tempus Program Office in Kazakhstan; 2011.
  13. Gittings L, Taplin R, Kerr R. Experiential learning activities in university accounting education: A systematic literature review. J Account Educ. 2020;52:100680.
  14. Tuymebaev Zh. Innovative science is the basis of a New Kazakhstan. Kazakh Truth. 2022;4:9.
  15. Beisebenov A. In Kazakhstan, the level of work of university graduates has increased. 2023. https://24.kz/ru/news/obrazovanie-i-nauka/item/583830-v-kazakhstane-vyros-uroven-trudoustrojstva-sredi-vypusknikov-vuzov.
  16. Universities will switch to per capita funding-MES RK. 2021. https://kapital.kz/economic/100387/vuzy-pereydut-na-podushevoye-finansirovaniye-mon-rk.html.
  17. Lopez BM, Chavez PL, Cordero EG. Visual thinking and cooperative learning in higher education: HOW does its implementation affect marketing and management disciplines after COVID-19? Int J Manag Educ. 2023;21(2):100797.
  18. Wang C, Fu B. A study on the efficiency of allocation and its influencing factors on innovation and entrepreneurship education resources in Chinese universities under the five-in-one model. Int J Manag Educ. 2023;21(1):100755.
  19. Brown P, Sadik S, Xu J. Higher education, graduate talent and the prospects for social mobility in China’s innovation nation. Int J Educ Res. 2021;109:101841.
  20. Amirbekova A, Karabayev G, Mamedov S. Architecture and Planning of Residential Complexes in Kazakhstan. ISVS. 2023;10(8):213-222. DOI: 10.61275/ISVSej-2023-10-08-15
  21. Afgan I, Kahil Y, Benhamadouche S, Ali M, Alkaabi A, Sofiane Berrouk A, Sagaut P. Cross flow over two heated cylinders in tandem arrangements at subcritical Reynolds number using large eddy simulations. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2023;100:109115.
  22. Amidu MA, Ali M, Alkaabi AK, Addad Y. A critical assessment of nanoparticles enhanced phase change materials (NePCMs) for latent heat energy storage applications. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):7829. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-34907-0
  23. Ziberi B, Alili MZ. Economic Growth in the Western Balkans: A Panel Analysis. South East Eur J Econ Busin. 2021;16(2):68-81. DOI: 10.2478/jeb-2021-0015
  24. Papadakis N, Drakaki M. The development of the European education policy, its reform agenda and the impact of neoliberalism and economic rationale: The case of the “Work Programme Education & Training 2010”, within the framework of the EU Lisbon strategy (2000-2010). Int J Educ Res. 2023;117:102130.
  25. Jabagiyeva KR, Abduramanov A, Zhundibaeva BK, Zhumadilova AK. Theoretical basis of head loss definition in hydro cycle. Glob J Pure Appl Mathem. 2016;12(1):575-584.
  26. Pirahandeh M, Kim D-H. MS scheduler: New, scalable, and high-performance sparse AVX-2 parity encoding and decoding technique for erasure-coded cloud storage systems. Future Gener Comp Syst. 2022;126:123-135.
  27. Garcia-Martinez JA, Gutierrez-Hita C, Sanchez-Soriano J. Microeconomic education, strategic incentives, and gender: An oligopoly classroom experiment with social interaction. Int Rev Econ Educ. 2019;30:100148.
  28. Eberle M, Oberrauch L. What a difference three years of economics education make: Evidence from lower stream schools in Germany. Int Rev Econ Educ. 2023;42:100259.
  29. Schmiedehaus E, Cordaro M, Perrotte J, Stern M, Dailey S, Howard K. The great resignation in higher education: An occupational health approach to understanding intentions-to-quit for faculty in higher education. Teach Teach Educ. 2023;123:103992.
  30. Abbasova S, İsmayılov V, Trusova N. Problems of financing the state budget deficit. Sci Bull Mukachevo State Univer. Ser Econ. 2023;10(4):9-19. DOI: 10.52566/msu-econ4.2023.09
  31. Khan NA, Vambol V, Vambol S, Bolibrukh B, Sillanpaa M, Changani F, Esrafili A, Yousefi M. Hospital effluent guidelines and legislation scenario around the globe: A critical review. J Environ Chem Engin. 2021;9(5):105874.
  32. Whitworth A. Invisible success: Problems with the grand technological innovation in higher education. Comp Educ. 2012;59(1):145-155.
  33. Tulkinbekov K, Pirahandeh M, Kim D-H. _Coalesced Leveldb for Small Data. Int Conf Ubiq Future Networks ICUFN. 2019;2019-July:567-569. DOI: 10.1109/ICUFN.2019.8806187
  34. Korobko B. Investigation of energy consumption in the course of plastering machine's work. East-Eur J Enterp Technol. 2016;4(8-82):4-11.
  35. Selvakumar RD, Wu J, Afgan I, Ding Y, Alkaabi AK. Melting performance enhancement in a thermal energy storage unit using active vortex generation by electric field. J Energy Stor. 2023;67:107593. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2023.107593
  36. Wiseman AW, Anderson E. ICT-integrated education and national innovation systems in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Comp Educ. 2012;59(2):607-618.
  37. Deepak Selvakumar R, Wu J, Ding Y, Alkaabi AK. Melting behavior of an organic phase change material in a square thermal energy storage capsule with an array of wire electrodes. Appl Therm Engin. 2023;228:120492.
  38. Loxha A. Do remittances reduce poverty in kosovo? - A counterfactual analysis. South East Eur J Econ Busin. 2019;14(2):117-132.
  39. Alkaabi AK, King JC. Benchmarking COMSOL Multiphysics Single-Subchannel Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis of a TRIGA Reactor with RELAP5 Results and Experimental Data. Sci Technol Nucl Install. 2019;2019:4375782. DOI: 10.1155/2019/4375782
  40. Pirahandeh M, Kim D-H. A New Energy-Aware GPU Based Erasure Coding Scheduler for Cloud Storage Systems. Int Conf Ubiq Future Networks, ICUFN. 2018;2018-July:619–621. DOI: 10.1109/ICUFN.2018.8436594
  41. Ahn C, Pirahandeh M, Kim D-H. Dynamic allocation of replication and erasure codes for enhancing storage efficiency in openstack swift. In: 2020 International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication, ICEIC 2020 (article number: 9051133). Barcelona: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2020.
  42. Sharif R. The relations between acculturation and creativity and innovation in higher education: A systematic literature review. Educ Res Rev. 2019;28:100287.
  43. Drobyazko S, Bondarevska O, Klymenko D, Pletenetska S, Pylypenko O. Model for forming of optimal credit portfolio of commercial bank. J Manag Inform Decis Sci. 2019;22(4):501-506.
  44. Leontyev A, Ketners K. The improvement of decision-making in the latvian tax system: cases of irreducible incompatibility taking into account reliability, equity and efficiency criteria. Intell Econ. 2023;17(2):322-343.
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua