Innovative educational environment of the university as a factor in the development of integrative and creative thinking of a multilingual person

Issue 55, 2024

Karakat Nagymzhanova, Ainur Nurakenova, Meiramgul Zhorokpayeva, Samal Askarkyzy, Nagimash Toybazarova

Received 24.09.2023, Revised 08.01.2024, Accepted 19.03.2024

10.54919/physics/55.2024.207so4

Abstract

Relevance. The relevance of the study is conditioned by the need of modern society in specialists who are able to develop and improve their professional competence in accordance with the rapid and dynamic changes of society.

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to determine effective methods and approaches in the development of an integrative and creative style of thinking of students in higher educational institutions.

Methodology. The theoretical and methodological basis is the synthesis of qualitative methods of structural and functional analysis of innovative approaches in higher education, and an analytical investigation of the development of integrative and creative thinking style of multilingual students.

Results. This study presents the results reflecting the problem of implementing innovative approaches in the educational process, their content, forms, and methods of teaching. The paper also reveals the issues of psychological and pedagogical conditions for the development of creative and integrative thinking styles of students. The data obtained reflect the problem of adaptive learning technologies in the educational system, in particular, its individualisation in accordance with the learning vector of a multilingual person. At the same time, the paper examines the features of motivation and cognitive activity of multilingual students, the development of their divergent thinking and non-standard approach to solving problems associated with their future professional activities. In addition, as part of the scientific research, an experiment was conducted on the effectiveness of introducing innovative methods into the educational process, and a model was developed for improving pedagogical approaches in working with multilingual individuals to ensure a purposeful process of developing integrative and creative thinking in them.

Conclusions. The results obtained are of practical value for employees of the pedagogical sphere and psychologists of higher educational institutions, who can influence the development, implementation, and testing of modern training programmes to achieve the tasks set for higher education.

Suggested citation

Nagymzhanova K, Nurakenova A, Zhorokpayeva M, Askarkyzy S, Toybazarova N. Innovative educational environment of the university as a factor in the development of integrative and creative thinking of a multilingual person. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):2074-2086. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.207so4

Download article

References

  1. Zakirova DI. Innovative infrastructure of the university: Small innovative enterprise. Bull Turan Uni. 2020;3(87):270-275.
  2. Sultanbaeva JU, Seitov BR. Innovative technologies in teaching a foreign language methods of use. Statist, Accoun Audit. 2022;4(87):84-107.
  3. Suleimenova GS, Smagulov BS. Game technologies as a means of students’ creativity development. In: Proceedings of the V International Scientific and Practical Conference “Educational Environment: Theory and Practice” (pp. 77-83). Astrakhan: Astrakhan State University; 2022.
  4. Shaimardanov ZK, Rakhmetullina SZ, Segeda TA, Daniyarova KM. Networking as a new type of partnership in education and science. Bull Turan Uni. 2022;2(94):323-332.
  5. Egan A, Maguire R, Christophers L, Rooney B. Developing creativity in higher education for 21st century learners: A protocol for a scoping review. Int J Educ Res. 2017;82:21-27.
  6. Abugaliyeva G. Formation of multilingual competence of the future teacher through the knowledge of the folk traditions of the ethnic group of Kazakhstan. Bull Khalel Dosmukhamedov Atyrau Uni. 2022;64(1):46-54.
  7. Ospanova N. Multilingual education in the stem direction in schools in the conditions of updated content. Sci Atlas. 2021;4:12-18.
  8. Williams Sar modified creative tests. Divergent (creative) thinking test. 2023. https://ik-ptz.ru/dictations-on-the-russian-language--class-3/modificirovannye-kreativnye-testy-vilyamsa-sar-test-divergentnogo.html
  9. Kuleshnyk YaF, Senyk VV, Maherovska TV. The use of statistical methods for creation of cognitive test tasks. Sci Bull UNFU. 2018;28(8):122-128.
  10. Mutohhari F, Sutiman S, Nurtanto M, Kholifah N. Difficulties in implementing 21st century skills competence in vocational education learning. Int J Evaluat Res Educ. 2021;10(4):1229-1236.
  11. Gravett K, Baughan P, Rao N, Kinchin I. Spaces and places for connection in the Postdigital University. Postdigital Science and Education; 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00317-0
  12. Brečka P, Valentová M, Lančarič D. The implementation of critical thinking development strategies into technology education: The evidence from Slovakia. Teachin Teach Educ. 2022;109:103555.
  13. Zhou X. A conceptual review of the effectiveness of flipped learning in vocational learners’ cognitive skills and emotional states. Front Psychol. 2023;13:1039025.
  14. Zinger D, Tateand T, Warschauer M. Learning and teaching with technology: Technological pedagogy and teacher practice. In: The SAGE Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (pp. 577-593). London: SAGE; 2017.
  15. Wilson K. Critical reading, critical thinking: Delicate scaffolding in English for Academic Purposes (EAP). Think Skill Creat. 2016;22:256-265.
  16. Sun M, Wang M, Wegerif R. Effects of divergent thinking training on students’ scientific creativity: The impact of individual creative potential and domain knowledge. Think Skill Creat. 2020;37:100682.
  17. Maranna S, Willison J, Joksimovic S, Parange N, Costabile M. Factors that influence cognitive presence: A scoping review. Austral J Educ Tech. 2022;38(4):95-111.
  18. Selznick BS, Dahl LS, Youngerman E, Mayhew MJ. Equitably linking integrative learning and students’ innovation capacities. Innov High Educ. 2022;47:1-21.
  19. Nussbaum EM. Critical integrative argumentation: Toward complexity in students’ thinking. Educ Psychol. 2020;56(1):1-17.
  20. O’Keefe PA, Horberg EJ, Sabherwal A, Ibasco GC, Zainal AB. Thinking beyond boundaries: A growth theory of interest enhances integrative thinking that bridges the arts and sciences. Org Behav Human Decis Proces. 2021;162:95-108.
  21. Pinkow F. Creative cognition: A multidisciplinary and integrative framework of creative thinking. Creativity and Innovation Management; 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12541
  22. Envick BR. Design thinking methods for business plan development: A structured approach to idea generation that promotes creativity. Uni Nebraska Kearney. 2020;4(1):14-25.
  23. Kanlı E. Assessment of creativity: Theories and methods. In: Creativity – A Force to Innovation. Bangalore: IntechOpen; 2021. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/73433
  24. Ramasamy S, Pavithran VK, Anjalin JR. An insight on innovative teaching strategies: A cross-sectional survey among the oral medicine and radiology faculties in Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry, India. J Indian Academ Oral Med Radio. 2020;32(3):247-252.
  25. Chigbu BI, Ngwevu V, Jojo A. The effectiveness of innovative pedagogy in the Industry 4.0: Educational ecosystem perspective. Social Sci Human Open. 2023;7(1):100419.
  26. Draft Decree of the Republic of Kazakhstan “On Approval of the Concept for the Development of Education in the Republic of Kazakhstan until 2025”. 2021. https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/edu/documents/details/231703?lang=ru
  27. Maraj D, Maraj A, Hajzeraj A. Application interface for gesture recognition with Kinect sensor. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Applications, ICKEA 2016 (pp. 98-102). Singapore: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2016. DOI: 10.1109/ICKEA.2016.7803000
  28. Vishnu R, Selvakumar RD, Alkaabi AK, Vengadesan S. Active vortex generation and enhanced heat transfer in a 3D minichannel by Onsager–Wien effect. Appl Therm Eng. 2023;233:121064.
  29. Kolator B, Janulin M, Vrublevskyi O. Influence of traction conditions on the power balance in the vehicle 4wd system. IOP Conf Series: Mater Sci Eng. 2018;421(2):022014.
  30. Ruiz-Martín H, Bybee RW. The cognitive principles of learning underlying the 5E Model of Instruction. Int J STEM Educ. 2022;9:21.
  31. Ardelean M. Theoretical considerations on the formation of cognitive skills in students of sports classes. Ann “Dunarea de Jos” Uni Galati. Fasc XV, Physic Educ Sport Manag. 2019;2:8-10.
  32. Shi Y, Qu S. Cognitive ability and self-control’s influence on high school students’ comprehensive academic performance. Front Psychol. 2021;12:783673.
  33. Urhahne D, Wijnia L. Theories of motivation in education: An integrative framework. Educ Psychol Rev. 2023;35:45.
  34. Lo KWK, Ngai G, Chan SCF, Kwan K. How students’ motivation and learning experience affect their service-learning outcomes: A structural equation modeling analysis. Front Psychol. 2022;13:825902.
  35. Singh M, James PS, Paul H, Bolar K. Impact of cognitive-behavioral motivation on student engagement. Heliy. 2022;8(7):E09843.
  36. Geitz G, Donker A, Parpala A. Studying in an innovative teaching-learning environment: Design-based education at a university of applied sciences. Learning Environments Research; 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-023-09467-9
  37. Zhu W, Liu X, Seong D. Educational innovation in higher education: Role of innovative competencies, learning environment, student readiness and ideological and political education. Educ Admin: Theor Pract. 2023;29(1):178-197.
  38. Deppeler J, Corrigan D, Macaulay L, Aikens K. Innovation and risk in an innovative learning environment: A private public partnership in Australia. Euro Educ Res J. 2022;21(4):602-626.
  39. Cavadas B, Correia M. Students’ perceptions of an innovative learning environment in higher education: An exploratory analysis. Uni Murcia. 2022;22(2):1-14.
  40. Maraj A, Jakupi G, Rogova E, Grajqevci X. Testing of network security systems through DoS attacks. In: 2017 6th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing, MECO 2017 - Including ECYPS 2017, Proceedings (7977239). Bar: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2017.
  41. Paton BE, Chernets AV, Marinsky GS, Korzhik VN, Petrov VS. Prospects of using plasma technologies for disposal and recycling of medical and other hazardous waste. Part 1. Probl Spetsial Electrometall. 2005;(3):49-57.
  42. Ismailova J, Delikesheva D, Abdukarimov A, Zhumanbetova N, Sarsenova A. Development and application of fluid characterization algorithms to obtain an accurate description of a pvt model for Kazakhstani oil. East-Eur J Enter Tech. 2023;5(6(125)):6-20.
  43. Sunnatov N. Innovation as a factor in sustainable development. Al-Farabi J Socio-Human Res. 2021;2(74):88-98.
  44. Cherniha R, Serov M. Nonlinear systems of the Burgers-type equations: Lie and Q-conditional symmetries, Ansätze and solutions. J Mathem Analys Applicat. 2003;282(1):305-328.
  45. Paton BE, Chernets AV, Marinsky GS, Korzhik VN, Petrov VS. Prospects of using plasma technologies for disposal and recycling of medical and other hazardous waste. Part 2. Probl Spetsial Electrometall. 2005;(4):46-54.
  46. Sherov ShB, Dooranov NA, Bazarova NA. Higher education in Kyrgyzstan and its preparation for the requirements of global integration. Int J Human Natur Sci. 2022;2-2(65):71-74.
  47. Mehmeti B, Kelmendi J, Iiljazi-Shahiqi D, Azizi B, Jakovljevic S, Haliti F, Anić-Milošević S. Comparison of shear bond strength orthodontic brackets bonded to zirconia and lithium disilicate crowns. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2019;53(1):17-27.
  48. Higher education system. 2023. https://www.erasmusplus.org.tm/ru/higher-education-in-turkmenistan/system-of-higher-education/
  49. Zotsenko NL, Vinnikov YL. Long-Term Settlement of Buildings Erected on Driven Cast-In-Situ Piles in Loess Soil. Soil Mech Foundat Eng. 2016;53(3):189-195.
  50. New life for universities. 2022. https://noi.md/ru/analitika/novaya-zhizni-universitetov
  51. The project “Strengthening research, discoveries and innovations in the higher education system of Azerbaijan” is being implemented. 2019. https://science.gov.az/ru/news/open/9899
  52. Nowell L, Dhingra S, Andrews K, Gospodinov J, Liu C, Hayden KA. Grand challenges as educational innovations in higher education: A scoping review of the literature. Educ Res Int. 2020;2020:6653575.
  53. Lytras MD, Serban AC, Ruiz MJT, Ntanos S, Sarirete A. Translating knowledge into innovation capability: An exploratory study investigating the perceptions on distance learning in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic – The case of Mexico. J Innov Knowl. 2022;7(4):100258.
  54. Fumasoli T, Rossi F. The role of higher education institutions in transnational networks for teaching and learning innovation: The case of the Erasmus+ programme. Euro J Educ. 2021;56(2):200-218.
  55. Schultheiss T, Backes-Gellner U. Does updating education curricula accelerate technology adoption in the workplace? Evidence from dual vocational education and training curricula in Switzerland. The Journal of Technology Transfer; 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09971-9
  56. Bao L, Xu T. From psychology management innovation and education reform in the digital age: Role of disruptive technologies. Front Psychol. 2022;16(13):888383.
  57. Grüne E, Popp J, Carl J, Semrau J, Pfeifer K. Examining the sustainability and effectiveness of co-created physical activity interventions in vocational education and training: a multimethod evaluation. BMC Pub Health. 2022;22:765.
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua