Genological stratification of diplomatic discourse on social network X (based on the material of the countries of the Romance and Germanic language areas)

Issue 55, 2024

Olga Ponomarenko, Iryna Smushchynska, Olena Popivniak, Olena Tyshchenko, Valentyna Kovalchuk

Received 17.10.2023, Revised 11.01.2024, Accepted 04.03.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.165co7

Abstract

Relevance. The rapid advancement in technology has profoundly impacted various aspects of human life, including communication. The advent of the internet and microblogs like X has revolutionized not only personal and professional interactions but also diplomatic discourse. This evolution presents new avenues for philological research, particularly in the domain of communicative linguistics.

Purpose. The purpose of this article is to determine, describe and make an attempt to predict the levels and structure of genres of diplomatic discourse in the coming decades using examples of its manifestations on X in the best traditions of classical linguistics schools and considering the achievements of new research areas in linguistics.

Methodology. The analysis utilises a comprehensive review of existing literature on discourse theory and internet communication genres. It incorporates a detailed examination of X’s role in modern diplomatic interactions to propose a new stratification matrix for genres termed twiplomatics.

Results. The article highlights the genres of tweeting as the implementation of diplomatic discourse within the framework of virtual (internet) communication on the example of the social network (microblog) X. A contribution is made to the development of the theory of genological theory, in particular, the genre of virtual communication. A hierarchical stratification of speech genres for twiplomatics is offered.

Conclusions. The findings contribute significantly to the field of discourse genology by providing a structured genre classification system for diplomatic discourse on X. This research not only enriches our understanding of digital communication dynamics but also sets a foundation for future studies in virtual communication genres, potentially guiding the development of more effective digital diplomatic strategies.

Keywords: tweet; genre; virtual communication; communicative linguistics; microblog

Suggested citation

Ponomarenko O, Smushchynska I, Popivniak O, Tyshchenko O, Kovalchuk V. Genological stratification of diplomatic discourse on social network X (based on the material of the countries of the Romance and Germanic language areas). Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):1657-1663. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.165co7

Download article

References

  1. Batsevich FS. Linguistic genealogy: Problems and prospects. Lviv: PAIS; 2005.
  2. Serazhym KS. Discourse as a sociolinguistic phenomenon of modern communicative space (methodological, pragmatic-semantic and genre-linguistic aspects: on the material of the political variety of the Ukrainian mass discourse). Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv; 2003.
  3. Kusko K, editor. Discourse of foreign language communication. Lviv: Ivan Franko National University of Lviv; 2001.
  4. Shchipitsina LYu. Genres of computer-mediated communication. Arkhangelsk: Pomor State University M.V. Lomonosov; 2009.
  5. Jönsson Chr, Hall M. Communication: An essential aspect of diplomacy. Int Stud Perspect. 2003;4(2):195–210.
  6. Crystal D. Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
  7. Selivanova OO. Modern linguistics: Terminological encyclopedia. Poltava: Dovkillya-K; 2006.
  8. Oleksenko IP. Speech genre of the Internet in the context of linguistic genre studies. Sci Bull Int Humanit Univ. 2015;19(2):105–7.
  9. Crowston, K. Internet genres. Syracuse: Syracuse University School of Information Studies; 2010. 38 p.
  10. Vikulova LG, Makarova IV, Novikov NV. Institutional discourse of digital diplomacy: New communication practices. Bulletin of the Volgograd State University. 2016;15(3):54–65.
  11. Goroshko EI, Polyakova TL. Political twitting as a new digital genre. J Psycholinguist. 2014;19:92–103.
  12. Ponomarenko OV. Diplomatic discourse in Twitter: Twitter and twitter as new genres of diplomatic communes. Style Translat. 2018;1(5):282–97.
  13. Torrealba AA. Twiplomacy: The impact of the social network Twitter on diplomacy. Bull Peoples Friendship Univ Russ. 2015;15(3):152–66.
  14. Bakhtin MM. Aesthetics of verbal creativity. Moscow: Iskusstvo; 1986.
  15. Dementyev VV. Theory of speech genres. Moscow: Znak; 2010.
  16. Shmelova TV. Model of the speech genre. Genres Speech. 1997;1-2:57–65.
  17. Gasparov BM. Language, memory, image. Linguistics of linguistic existence. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye; 1996.
  18. Vezhbitska A. Speech genres. Genres Speech. 1997;1:99–111.
  19. Hayda SV. Conversational genres. Speech Genres. 1999;2:103–12.
  20. Dedukhno AV, Sizonenko NM. Subgenres and genroids of the scientific article. SWorld. 2015;8(3):90–5.
  21. Dementyev VV, Sedov KF. Sociopragmatic aspect of the theory of speech genres. Saratov: Saratov Pedagogical Institute; 1998.
  22. Zelinska O, Galaziuk N. International negotiation process as a tool of diplomacy. Econ Forum. 2023;1(3):68-72. https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2308-8559-2023-3-9.
  23. Loxha A. Do remittances reduce poverty in kosovo? - A counterfactual analysis. South East Eur J Econ Busin. 2019;14(2):117-32.
  24. Trachuk L, Kaznacheieva L. Tools Of Non-Verbal Internet Communication. Library Sci. Rec Stud. Informol. 2023;1:59-64. https://doi.org/10.32461/2409-9805.1.2023.276766
  25. Kerimkhulle S, Dildebayeva Z, Tokhmetov A, Amirova A, Tussupov J, Makhazhanova U, Adalbek A, Taberkhan R, Zakirova A, Salykbayeva A. Fuzzy Logic and Its Application in the Assessment of Information Security Risk of Industrial Internet of Things. Symmetry. 2023;15(10):1958.
  26. Maraj A, Jakupi G, Rogova E, Grajqevci X. Testing of network security systems through DoS attacks. In: 2017 6th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing, MECO 2017 - Including ECYPS 2017, Proceedings (article number 7977239). Bar: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/MECO.2017.7977239.
  27. Maraj D, Maraj A, Hajzeraj A. Application interface for gesture recognition with Kinect sensor. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Applications, ICKEA 2016 (pp. 98-102). Singapore: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2016.
  28. Dolzhenko N, Mailyanova E, Assilbekova I, Konakbay Z. Analysis of meteorological conditions significant for small aviation and training flights at the airfield “balkhash” for planning and flight safety purposes. News Nat Acad Sci Rep Kazakhstan, Ser Geol Techn Sci. 2021;2(446):62-7.
  29. Arosev, G. Twitter has clarified the rules for tweets of politicians [Internet]. DW: Deutsche Welle; 2019 [updated 2019 Oct. 16; cited 2024 Feb. 03]. Available from: https://cutt.ly/dRekERF
  30. Stoyan S. Diplomacy of Ukrainian statehood from the establishment to the present (the late 1910s - 2020s): Major international partners, dynamics, and specific features. Foreign Affairs. 2023;33(2):42-56. https://doi.org/10.46493/2663-2675.33(2).2023.42-56.
  31. Kerimkhulle S, Koishybayeva M, Alimova Z, Baizakov N, Azieva G. Created and Realization of a Demographic Population Model for a Small City. Proceed Engin Sci. 2023;5(3). https://doi.org/10.24874/PES05.03.003.
  32. Kerimkhulle S, Obrosova N, Shananin A, Tokhmetov A. Young Duality for Variational Inequalities and Nonparametric Method of Demand Analysis in Input–Output Models with Inputs Substitution: Application for Kazakhstan Economy. Mathem. 2023;11(19):4216.
  33. Adanbekova ZN, Omarova AB, Yermukhametova SR, Khudaiberdina GA, Tynybekov ST. Features of the conclusion of a civil transaction on the internet. Int J Electr Secur Digit Forens. 2022;14(1):19-36.
  34. Ziberi B, Alili MZ. Economic Growth in the Western Balkans: A Panel Analysis. South East Eur J Econ Busin. 2021;16(2):68-81.
  35. Sedov KF. Linguistics. Speech. Genristics. Genres Speech. 2009;6:23–40.
  36. Saliu H. The Evolution of the Concept of Public Diplomacy from the Perspective of Communication Stakeholders. Medij Istraziv. 2020;26(1):69-86.
  37. Dolzhenko N, Assilbekova I, Abzhapbarova A, Mussayeva G, Sarzhanov T. Unification of Training Programs for Aviation Professionals as a Flight Safety Criterion. J Aerospace Technol Manag. 2024;16:e0124.
  38. Dolzhenko N. The development of a mathematical model of professional training of aviation personnel participated in ensuring flight safety. East-Eur J Enterp Technol. 2023;4(4(124)):88-94.
  39. Zhussupbekova GG, Zhumabayeva AE, Zhakhina BB, Stukalenko NM, Kukubaeva AK. Use of communicative learning technologies for speech activity development of junior pupils. Espac. 2018;39(40). Available from: https://www.revistaespacios.com/a18v39n40/a18v39n40p35.pdf.
  40. Saliu HA. The specificis and complexit of EU public diplomacy. Soc Sci Forum. 2021;37(96-97):189-207.
  41. Lisiecka MZ. Diplomatic Ukrainian-Belarusian relations in the context of a full-scale war. Foreign Affairs. 2023;33(5):10-7. https://doi.org/10.46493/2663-2675.33(5).2023.10-17.
  42. Honcharenko VD, Shyhal DA. Technique of generalization of results of comparative historical and legal research. J Nat Acad Leg Sci Ukraine. 2021;28(3):74-84.
  43. Busel VT, editor. Large explanatory dictionary of the modern Ukrainian language. Kyiv: Perun; 2005.
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua