Gender-specific motivation for higher education by participants in the “Serpin” programme

Issue 55, 2024

Aigul Beissenova, Tatyana Rezvushkina, Korlan Muslimova, Gulzhan Alimbekova, Galiya Seifullina

Received 29.11.2023, Revised 02.02.2024, Accepted 28.02.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.136oj0

Abstract

Relevance. The relevance of the stated subject of study is determined by the number of issues associated with the lack or incorrect motivation for higher education of the participants of the “Serpin” programme.

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to investigate the gender-specific motivation for higher education among students who take part in the state-run “Serpin” programme.

Methodology. The basis of the methodological approach is a qualitative combination of theoretical research methods with diagnostic ones. In particular, analysis, synthesis, interpretation, generalisation and abstraction were used to identify theoretical approaches to explaining the concept of “gender-specific motivation” and its structural components; the comparative-historical, problem-comparative and structural method was used to characterise and analyse the motivation of students who chose to participate in the “Serpin” programme; and diagnostic methods, including questionnaires, interviews and tests, were used to investigate the gender-specific motivation of programme participants.

Results. The main findings of this study should be considered as the substantiation of various approaches to the definition of the concepts of “motivation” and “gender characteristics of motivation”, and the characterisation of the motivational system of the participants of the state programme “Serpin” and the substantiation of the gender characteristics of the motivation of receiving higher education by the participants of this educational programme.

Conclusions. The results, along with the conclusions formulated on their basis, are of practical value for the developers of the “Serpin” programme, teachers, and other specialists who are engaged in the implementation and study of this state programme in Kazakhstan.

Keywords: state programme; students; Kazakhstani youth; labour resources; employment

Suggested citation

Beissenova A, Rezvushkina T, Muslimova K, Alimbekova G, Seifullina G. Gender-specific motivation for higher education by participants in the “Serpin” programme. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):1360-1368. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.136oj0

Download article

References

  1. Rostovskaya TK, Kaliyev TK. State policy of Kazakhstan to involve girls and boys in technological education. Gend Dimens Digit Econ Strategy Action. 2018;1:102.
  2. Antonova OG, Khayrullina YuR, Shchanina YeV. Professional motivation and adaptation of students of technical specialties (based on concrete sociological research in the Republic of Tatarstan and the Republic of Kazakhstan. News High Educ Inst Volga Reg Soc Sci. 2020;3(55):61–70.
  3. Kozhakhiyeva M, Dragoev S, Uzakov Y, Nurgazezova A. Improving of the oxidative stability and quality of new functional horse meat delicacy enriched with sea Buckthorn (Hippophae Rhamnoides) fruit powder extracts or seed Kernel Pumpkin (Cucurbita Pero L.) flour. Compt Rendus L'Academ Bulgare Sci. 2018;71(1):132-140.
  4. Ospanov A, Muslimov N, Timurbekova A, Mamayeva L, Jumabekova G. The amino acid composition of unconventional poly-cereal flour for pasta. Period Tche Quim. 2020;17(34):1012-1025.
  5. Yegorenkova YeN. Socio-demographic aspects in the implementation of the “Serpin” program (on the example of S. Amanzholov East Kazakhstan State University). Assoc Newsl Hist Comput. 2017;46:62–71.
  6. Abzhanova S, Zhaksylykova G, Kulazhanov T, Baybolova L, Nabiyeva Z. Application of functional ingredients in canned meat production. Food Sci Tech (Brazil). 2022;42:e61122.
  7. Abilmazhinova NK, Abzhanova SA, Tayeva AM, Baybolova LK, Mukhtarkhanova RB. The use of antioxidants in the meat industry. Res J Pharm Bio Chem Sci. 2015;6(5):814-816.
  8. Baubekova GK, Dukhnovskaya YYe. Socio-demographic portrait of a 4th year student of the EMF studying under the program “Serpin-2050”. In: Materials of Regional Altynsarinsky Pedagogical Readings. Part II; 2018; Kostanay. Kostanay: KSPI; 2018. P. 313–7.
  9. Zhantemirova MB, Kakabayeva DS. Adaptation of first-year students who arrived from the southern regions under the program “Serpin-2050”. Act Probl Study Mass Conscious. 2015;13:277–91.
  10. Tulegenov ShT, Tulegenova ZhA, Yershatov KB. Physical fitness of students studying under the social project “Serpin-2050”. Act Probl Humanit Nat Sci. 2017;6:1–6.
  11. Chernysheva AV, Shubko KS. Motivation of students to receive higher education. Soc. 2021;2(21):1–6.
  12. Maltseva SM, Voronkova AA, Orinchuk VA, Syabitova KS. Motivation for higher education by first-year students. Russ J Educ Psychol. 2022;13(2):20–35.
  13. Krushelnitskaya OI, Polevaya MV, Tretyakova AN. Motivation for higher education and its structure. Psychol Pedagog Res. 2019;11(2):43-57.
  14. Shukurlu Y, Sharifova M. A biotechnological method for silkworm sex regulation. Anim Bio. 2023;1(1):1-16.
  15. Gracheva YuV. Gender Features as a Factor of Professional Self-Determination and Labor Choice of Students. Act Probl Humanit Nat Sci. 2014;3-2:136–9.
  16. Masanovic B, Gardasevic J, Arifi F. Relationship between foot length measurements and standing height: A prospective regional study among adolescents in southern region of Kosovo. Sport Mont. 2018;16(2):27-31.
  17. Kaldarbekova M, Uzakov Y, Chernukha I, Kurmanbekova A, Jetpisbayeva B. Studying the effect of multicomponent pickle on the quality of cooked and smoked horse meat product. Period Tche Quim. 2019;16(33):259-265.
  18. Digel I, Mussabalina D, Urdabayev M, Nurmukhametov N, Akparova A. Evaluating development prospects of smart cities: Cluster analysis of Kazakhstan's regions. Probl Perspect Manag. 2022;20(4):76-87.
  19. Gashi R, Ahmeti HG. Impact of social media on the development of new products, marketing and customer relationship management in Kosovo. Emerg Sci J. 2021;5(2):125-138.
  20. Spytska L. Sexual Disorders in Women: Causes and their Correction. Gaceta Med Caracas. 2023;131(4):933-943.
  21. Zamlynskyi VA, Kondratyuk VM, Livinskyi AI, Naida AV, Naida IS. Priority tasks and marine aquaculture development strategy. AIP Conf Proceed. 2022;2413:040015.
  22. Yerekesheva L. Youth of Central Asia. Peacebuilding Challenges. Comprehensive Research Review. Almaty: UNESCO; 2022.
  23. Krushelnitskaya OI. On the motivation of part-time students to receive higher education. Alma Mater High Sch Bull. 2016;2:36–42.
  24. Kurbatova LN. The role of higher education in the structure of life values of modern students. Mod Soc Quest Theory Methodol Methods Soc Res. 2013;1:130–5.
  25. Turmagambetova AS, Sokolova NS, Bogoyavlenskiy AP, Berezin VE, Lila MA, Cheng DM, Dushenkov V. New functionally-enhanced soy proteins as food ingredients with anti-viral activity. VirusDis. 2015;26(3):123-132.
  26. Zhumanova AZ, Mukhamediyeva GM, Rustemuly M. Development of the educational infrastructure of single-industry towns of the Republic of Kazakhstan (on the example of single-industry towns in the Karaganda region). Innov Paradigm Dev Mod Humanit Soc Sci. 2020;3:9–14.
  27. Sansyzbayeva G, Ashirbekova L, Nurgaliyeva K, Ametova Z, Asanova A. Realities and prospects of using green technologies in Kazakhstan. E3S Web Conf. 2020;159:07002.
  28. Kireyeva AA, Kuandyk Z, Kredina AA, Kangalakova D, Doszhan R. Analysis of the Input of Education and Innovation on Economic Growth in Kazakhstan. J Distrib Sci. 2023;21(1):23-31.
  29. Tokysheva G, Makangali K, Uzakov Y, Kakimov M, Vostrikova N, Baiysbayeva M, Mashanova N. The potential of goat meat as a nutrition source for schoolchildren. Potravin Slovak J Food Sci. 2022;16:398-410.
  30. Bätz K, Wittler S, Wilde M. Differences between boys and girls in extracurricular learning settings. Int J Environ Sci Educ. 2010;5(1):51–64.
  31. Clayton K, Blumberg F, Auld DP. The relationship between motivation, learning strategies and choice of environment whether traditional or including an online component. Br J Educ Technol. 2010;41:349–64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00993.x
  32. Creed M, Phillips LA. A meta-analytic review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Learn Individ Differ. 2011;21:337–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.03.002
  33. Eccles J. Gendered education and occupational choices: Applying Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Int J Behav Dev. 2011;35:195–201. DOI: 10.1177/0165025411398185
  34. Syzmanowicz A, Furnham A. Gender differences in self-estimates of general, mathematical, spatial and verbal intelligence: Four meta-analyses. Learn Individ Differ. 2011;21(5):493–504. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.001
  35. Soto CJ, John OP, Gosling SD, Potter J. Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011;100:330–48. DOI: 10.1037/a0021717
  36. Martin AJ. Should students have a gap year? Motivation and performance factors relevant to time out after completing school. J Educ Psychol. 2012;102:561–76. DOI: 10.1037/a0019321
  37. Beyer S. Why are women underrepresented in Computer Science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades. Comput Sci Educ. 2014;24(2):153–92. DOI: 10.1080/08993408.2014.963363
  38. Cerasoli CP, Ford MT. Intrinsic motivation, performance, and the mediating role of mastery goal orientation: A test of self-determination theory. J Psychol Interdiscip Appl. 2014;148(3):267–86. DOI: 10.1080/00223980.2013.783778
  39. Gnambs T, Hanfstingl B. The decline of academic motivation during adolescence: An accelerated longitudinal cohort analysis on the effect of psychological need satisfaction. Educ Psychol. 2016;36(9):1691–705. DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2015.1113236
  40. Wang MT, Degol JL. Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educ Psychol Rev. 2017;29(1):119–40. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x
  41. Patall EA, Steingut RR, Freeman JL, Pituch KA, Vasquez AC. Gender disparities in students’ motivational experiences in high school science classrooms. Sci Educ. 2018;102(5):951–77. DOI: 10.1002/sce.21461
  42. Aydargaliyeva NG. Analytical review of the higher education market in Kazakhstan over the years of reforms. Educ Cult Soc. 2020;1:64–72.
  43. Nurgaliyeva SA. Experimental verification of the methodology for the formation and development of students' creative thinking in the process of teaching the Russian language. Bull WKGU. 2016;2:61–8.
  44. Tashenev MZh. Improving the system of technical and vocational education during the years of Independence of Kazakhstan. Bull KazNU Hist Ser. 2022;104(1):154–9.
  45. Khayrullina YuR, Khizbullina RR. Professional motivation of students of technical specialties (on the materials of sociological research in the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Republic of Tatarstan). Bull Econ Law Sociol. 2018;3:196–9.
  46. Aydargaliyeva NG. Problems in the educational market of Kazakhstan at the present stage. Global Sci Innov Cent Asia. 2021;2(7):92–7.
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua