Features of measures to prevent victim behaviour among adolescents in Kazakhstan

Issue 55, 2024

Meiramkul Murzagulova, Kalipa Atemova, Kamchat Yessenova, Aigul Alchimbayeva, Elmira Pshenayeva

Received 29.10.2023, Revised 05.02.2024, Accepted 07.03.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.114cp4

Abstract

Relevance. The relevance of the study is due to the need to expand the methods of prevention of victim behaviour, which are taught by future social educators, due to the growing demand for reducing the level of domestic violence in Kazakhstan by helping teenage girls in difficult life situations.

Purpose. The purpose of this paper is to identify effective methods of preventing victim behaviour in adolescent girls and compile a methodology for preventing the consolidation of the victim component of the personality.

Methodology. The leading approach to this problem is the longitudinal research method, which allowed achieving the set goal and evaluating the effectiveness of the developed methodology for preventing victim behaviour. The following methods were also used in the course of the study: testing using the methodology for determining the propensity to victim behaviour, natural experiment, observation, classification, comparative method, system analysis, synthesis, deduction, and analysis of scientific sources.

Results. The paper presents the results of a longitudinal study, which showed the effectiveness of the proposed technique at the level of 37.9% for teenage girls with previously identified victimisation. The paper also reveals the individual factors of victim behaviour formation, describes the processes of social and personal activity that directly affect the formation of a person's self-esteem, identifies the features of self-esteem of teenage girls, suggests a number of measures and practices aimed at preventing and reducing victimisation by adjusting self-esteem to a normal level, justifies the choice of proposed measures and practices aimed at to prevent and reduce victim behaviour in the selected category.

Conclusions. The materials of the study are of practical value for theorists and practitioners of social pedagogy due to the fact that the developed programme for the prevention of victim behaviour has been tested empirically and has shown its effectiveness when used in working with students of middle and high schools.

Keywords: methods of prevention of the victim component of personality; social pedagogy; longitudinal study of victim behaviour; self-esteem of adolescent girls; passive behaviour model; art therapy

Suggested citation

Murzagulova M, Atemova K, Yessenova K, Alchimbayeva A, Pshenayeva E. Features of measures to prevent victim behaviour among adolescents in Kazakhstan. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):1144-1152. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.114cp4

Download article

References

  1. Odintsova M. Types of victim's behavior. Diagnosing role-based victimization. Samara: Bahrakh-M; 2013.
  2. Yakovleva N. Education of the character of orphans. Moscow: Flinta; 2014.
  3. Malm E, Henrich C. Longitudinal Relationships Between Parent Factors, Children’s Bullying, and Victimization Behaviors. Child Psychiat Hum Develop. 2019;50(5):789-802.
  4. Grace J. Victim Vulnerability, Risk Prediction and Victim Blaming. In: Domestic Abuse Disclosure Schemes (pp. 31-65). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2022.
  5. Lopes de Sousa M, Peixoto M, Cruz S. The association of social skills and behaviour problems with bullying engagement in Portuguese adolescents: From aggression to victimization behaviors. Curr Psychol. 2021;2021:1-14.
  6. Ezzatibabi M, Ghasemi G. Comparison of Self-control with Bullying-Victim Behavior in Students with or without Learning Disability. J Learn Disabil. 2021;10(3):356-365.
  7. Kaplan Y, Gulek S. Examination of the Correlation Between 8th grade Students’ Cyber Bully/Victim Behaviors and their Self-confidence Values. Open J Educ Res. 2021;5(2):353-364.
  8. Andronnikova O. Psychological factors in the occurrence of victim behavior in adolescents. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University; 2005.
  9. Berg MT, Schreck CJ. The meaning of the victim-offender overlap for criminological theory and crime control policy. Ann Rev Criminol. 2022;5:277-297.
  10. Spytska L. Sexual Disorders in Women: Causes and their Correction. Gaceta Med Carac. 2023;131(4):933-943.
  11. Spytska L. Social-psychological peculiarities of youth with delinquent behavior. Youth Voice J. 2023;2:9-17.
  12. Kirkwood S, Roesch-Marsh A, Cooper S. Evaluating social pedagogy in the UK: Methodological issues. Qualit Social Work. 2019;18(1):8-23.
  13. Abdrasulov E, Saktaganova A, Saktaganova I, Zhenissov S, Toleuov Z. Legal awareness and its significance when determining the nature of a person’s legal behaviour. Int J Electr Secur Dig Forens. 2023;15(6):578-590.
  14. Yara O, Artemenko O, Lytvyn O, Ladychenko V, Gulac О. Legal principles of activities of public administration entities, which carry out measures in the field of prevention and control of domestic violence. Relac Internac Mundo Atual. 2021;4(33):51-71.
  15. Pfefferbaum B. Children’s Psychological Reactions to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Curr Psychiat Report. 2021;23(11):75.
  16. Teijon-Alcala M, Birkbeck C. Victimization, Crime Propensity, and Deviance: A Multinational Test of General Strain Theory. J Contemp Crim Justice. 2019;35(4):410-430.
  17. Gnatenko KV, Yaroshenko OM, Anisimova HV, Shabanova SO, Sliusar AM. Prohibition of discrimination as a principle of social security in the context of ensuring sustainable well-being. Riv Stud Sosten. 2020;2020(2):173-187.
  18. Fominykh E. Victimity as deviation at the level of psychology of personality and social community. In: Actual problems of personality psychology: scientific-practical conference (pp. 54-59). Novosibirsk: SibAK; 2009.
  19. Ndari S, Tasya F. Art therapy on bullying-victims behavior aged 5-6. J Early Child Educ. 2021;3(2):138-151.
  20. Malkina-Pykh I. Victimology. Psychology of victim behavior. Saint Petersburg: Peter; 2018.
  21. Dvir M, Nagar M. Would victims blame victims? Effects of ostracism, sexual objectification, and empathy on victim blaming. Front Psychol. 2022;13:912698.
  22. Borysova VI, Ivanova KY, Iurevych IV, Ovcharenko OM. Judicial protection of civil rights in Ukraine: National experience through the prism of European standards. J Adv Res Law Econ. 2019;10(1):66-84.
  23. Khristenko V. Psychology of victimization. Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix; 2004.
  24. Tacij VJ, Tjutjugin VI, Grodeckij JV. Conceptual model establish responsibility for offense in the legislation of Ukraine (draft). Criminol J Baikal Nat Univ Econ Law. 2014;2014(3):166-183.
  25. "Ordinary things": an exhibition devoted to the fight against domestic violence opened in Kazakhstan. 2021. Available from: https://news.un.org/ru/story/2021/11/1414522
  26. McWood L, Erath S, El-Sheikh M. Longitudinal associations between coping and peer victimization: Moderation by gender and initial peer victimization. Social Development; 2022. DOI: 10.1111/sode.12623.
  27. Dias D, Rocha M, Pinheiro Mota C. Bullying in Adolescents in Secondary School: Role of Peer Attachment on the Aggressor and Victim Behavior. Rev Crítica Ciênc Socia. 2019;120:79-104.
  28. Spytska L. Symptoms and Main Differences between a Psychopath and a Sociopath. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2024;212(1):52-56.
  29. Spytska L. Social and psychological features of affective disorders in people during crisis periods of life. Soc Regist. 2023;7(4):21-36.
  30. Osman W, El-Maksoud M, Elkhalek H. A psychoeducational intervention for teachers about bullying behavior prevention among secondary school students. Mid East Curr Psychiat. 2022;29:46.
  31. Stepanov VA, Bocharova AV, Saduakassova KZ, Marusin AV, Koneva LA, Vagaitseva KV, Svyatova GS. Replicative study of susceptibility to childhood-onset schizophrenia in Kazakhs. Genet. 2015;51(2):227-235.
  32. Salimova AZ, Kutuev IA, Khusainova RI, Akhmetova VL, Svyatova GS, Berezina GM, Khusnutdinova EK. Analysis of ethnogeographic groups of Kazakhs based on nuclear genome DNA polymorphism. Russ J Genet. 2005;41(7):794-800.
  33. Briceño E, Chan JCA, Pinto Loria ML, Rosado Che GJ. Child personality and violence prevention: prosocial behavior profile. J Educ Res. 2017;2(12):64-81.
  34. Yaroshenko OM, Sliusar AM, Sereda OH, Zakrynytska VO. Legal relation: The issues of delineation (on the basis of the civil law of Ukraine). Asia Life Sci. 2019;2:719-734.
  35. Beisbekova GK, Konussova VT, Ismagulov KE, Saktaganova IS, Mukasheva AA. Problems of concretization of legal norms in Kazakhstan. J Adv Res Law Econ. 2019;10(1):52-57.
  36. Spytska L. Global practice of reducing the level of tobacco consumption through legislative regulation. Med Law. 2023;42(2):407-422.
  37. Saktaganova I, Surkova S, Smatlayev B, Zhussupov A, Abdilov K. Effectiveness of human protection from domestic violence under the administrative legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Riv Stud Sosten. 2023;13(1):279-294.
  38. Shapoval R, Bytiak I, Khrystynchenko N, Solntseva K. Problematic issues of the administrative and legal status of the police in the Baltic States (Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia). J Adv Res Law Econ. 2018;9(1):295-306.
  39. Karnaukh B. Standards of proof: A comparative overview from the Ukrainian perspective. Access Justice East Eur. 2021;4(2):25-43.
  40. Dzhansarayeva RY, Dilbarkhanova ZR, Malikova SB, Atakhanova GM, Daubassova SS. Countermeasures to bioterrorism acts. Biosci Biotechnol Res Asia. 2015;12(2):1849-1856.
  41. Hyliaka O, Mernyk A, Yaroshenko O, Gnatenko K, Sliusar A. The right to euthanasy how the fourth generation human right. Georg Med News. 2020;308:175-180.
  42. Ilderbayeva G, Zhetpisbaev B, Ilderbayev О, Taldykbayev Zh, Bekeeva S. Metabolic processes of organism in remote period after the combined effects of radiation and emotional stress. Georg Med News. 2016;250:76-82.
  43. Ilderbayev O, Okassova A, Rakhyzhanova S, Ilderbayeva G, Zhazykbayeva L. The levels of oxidative stress in a combination of stress factors. J Med Life. 2022;2022(8):927-931.
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua