Development of the innovation system infrastructure of Kazakhstan in the context of the knowledge-intensive economy

Issue 55, 2024

Rysty Sabirova, Bibinur Korgan, Elmira Adiyetova, Karlygash Auyezova, Zhanat Yerniyazova, Ainur Kanatova

Received 05.11.2023, Revised 11.01.2024, Accepted 13.02.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.24fj4

Abstract

Relevance. The modern conditions of post-industrialism in the sphere of economic relations are influenced by some factors, in particular, institutional changes and the challenges of globalization. In turn, this is characterized by a new format that has an organizational and institutional focus.

Purpose. This research aims to elucidate the distinctions between the terms “institute” and “institution” within the context of the innovation economy.

Methodology. The study draws on theoretical and methodological foundations rooted in the national innovation system, synthesizing insights from foreign and domestic scholarship. Employing a system-structural and functional approach

Results. The research unveils a sequential hierarchy of institutional definitions, revealing inherent differences between “institute” and “institution”. It proposes a classification of institutions based on eight criteria, offering a nuanced understanding of institutional dynamics within the innovation economy. Notably, it introduces the concept of temporary and permanent institutions, elucidating their roles in periods of systemic modernization and legislative evolution.

Conclusions. The study underscores the necessity for clarity in conceptualizing institutional terms, particularly within the realm of institutionalism. 

Keywords: features of the economic system; innovations in the Republic of Kazakhstan; institutionalism; globalization; post-industrial information society

Suggested citation

Sabirova R, Korgan B, Adiyetova E, Auyezova K, Yerniyazova Zh, Kanatova A. Development of the innovation system infrastructure of Kazakhstan in the context of the knowledge-intensive economy. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):244–256. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.24fj4

Download article

References

  1. Alibekova G, Tleppayev A, Medem TD, Ruzanov R. Determinants of technology commercialization ecosystem for universities in Kazakhstan. J Asian Fin Econ Bus. 2019;6(4):271-9. DOI: 10.13106/jafeb.2019.vol6.no4.271.
  2. Di Meo C, Di Vaio M, Flammini F, Nardone R, Santini S, Vittorini V. ERTMS/ETCS virtual coupling: proof of concept and numerical analysis. IEEE Transact Intel Transport Syst. 2020;21(6):2545-56. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2019.2920290.
  3. Nurgalieva А, Karimbergenova М, Moldashbayeva L, et al. Sustainable development of single-industry towns as a factor of economic stabilization. Rep Nat Acad Sci Rep Kazakh. 2019;5(327):142-150. Available from: https://journals.nauka-nanrk.kz/reports-science/article/view/1780.
  4. Safaei M. Investigating the structure of strategies in developed countries to expand entrepreneurship and technology a case study: “US singularity university”. J Adv Res Dynam Control Syst. 2020;12(3):571-8. DOI: 10.5373/JARDCS/V12I3/20201225.
  5. Zhijun W, Wenjing L, Liang L, Meng Y. Low-rate DoS attacks, detection, defense, and challenges: A survey. IEEE Acces. 2020;8:43920-43. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2976609.
  6. Theeranattapong T, Pickernell D, Simms C. Systematic literature review paper: The regional innovation system-university-science park nexus. J Technol Trans. 2021;46(6):2017-50. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-020-09837-y.
  7. Pardo-Guerra JP. Where are the market devices? Exploring the links among regulation, markets, and technology at the securities and exchange commission, 1935-2010. Theory Soc. 2020;49(2):245-76. DOI: 10.1007/s11186-020-09383-4.
  8. Haghshenas M, Østerlie T. Coordinating innovation in digital infrastructure: The case of transforming offshore project delivery. In: R. Agrifoglio, R. Lamboglia, D. Mancini, F. Ricciardi (Eds.), Digital Business Transformation: Organizing, Managing and Controlling in the Information Age. Cham: Springer; 2020. P. 251-266. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-47355-6_17.
  9. Korgan BB, Sabirovа RK, Adietova EM. Innovative economy of Kazakhstan. News Nat Acad Sci Rep Kazakh S Soc Human Sci. 2019;4(326):123-9. DOI: 10.32014/2019.2224-5294.147.
  10. Kerimkhulle S, Baizakov N, Slanbekova, A, et al. The Kazakhstan Republic Economy Three Sectoral Model Inter-sectoral Linkages Resource Assessment. Lect Notes in Networks Syst. 2022;502:542-550.
  11. King K., Ford D, Haschker M, et al. Clinical and technical considerations of an open access telehealth network in South Carolina: definition and deployment. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(5):e17348. DOI: 10.2196/17348.
  12. Borisov YuS, Oliker VE, Korzhik VN, et al. Structural characteristics of flame-sprayed Fe-Ni-B alloy coatings. Sov Powder Metall. Met. Ceram. 1987;26(11):885-888.
  13. Van Noordwijk M, Gitz V, Minang PA, et al. People-centric nature-based land restoration through agroforestry: A typology. Land. 2020;9(8):251. DOI: 10.3390/land9080251.
  14. Bibri SE. The leading data-driven smart cities in Europe: Their applied solutions and best practices for sustainable development. In Advances in the Leading Paradigms of Urbanism and their Amalgamation: Compact Cities, Eco–Cities, and Data–Driven Smart Cities. Cham: Springer; 2020. P. 227-58. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-41746-8_9.
  15. Eito-Brun R. Synergies between web-based open innovation platforms and open information infrastructures. In Z. Wilimowska, L. Borzemski, J. Świątek (Eds.), Information Systems Architecture and Technology: Proceedings of 40th Anniversary International Conference on Information Systems Architecture and Technology – ISAT 2019. Cham: Springer; 2020. P. 254-61. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-30443-0_23.
  16. Silagadze A. Contemporary Global Economic Trends: Transitional Economies during Covid-Depression. Bull. Georgian Natl. Acad. Sci. 2022;16(3):130-135. http://science.org.ge/bnas/vol-16-3.html
  17. Bozzi A, Matthes M. A glance at Switzerland’s innovation ecosystem in food and nutrition. Chimia. 2020;74(10):761-4. DOI: 10.2533/CHIMIA.2020.761.
  18. Imran LB, Latif RMA, Farhan M, Aldabbas H. Smart city based autonomous water quality monitoring system using WSN. Wireless Person Communicat. 2020;115(2):1805-20. DOI: 10.1007/s11277-020-07655-x.
  19. Kerimkhulle S, Alimova Z, Slanbekova A, et al. The Use Leontief Input-Output Model to Estimate the Resource and Value Added. In SIST 2022 - 2022 International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies, Proceedings. Nur-Sultan: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2022. DOI: 10.1109/SIST54437.2022.9945746
  20. Gordon WJ, Mandl KD. The 21st century cures act: A competitive apps market and the risk of innovation blocking. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(12):e24824. DOI: 10.2196/24824.
  21. Trusova NV, Oleksenko RI, Kalchenko SV, et al. Managing the intellectual potential in the business-network of innovative digital technologies. Estud Econ Apl. 2021;39(5):1-15. DOI: 10.25115/eea.v39i5.4910
  22. Shaposhnykov K, Filyppova S, Lagodiienko V, Krylov D, Svinarova H. Universities innovative development under the globalization conditions. J Time Space Educ. 2022;15(34):e17608. DOI: 10.20952/revtee.v15i34.17608.
  23. Korzhik VN, Kunitskii YuA, Borisov YuS, et al. Structural transformations in Fe-B-C-Si alloys vitrified by the gasothermal coating process. Russ Metall. 1989;(2):165-168.
  24. Kotenko S, Kasianova V, Dondych L. Implementation of the institutional anti-crisis policy in the transport area. Econ Innovat. 2020;22(2(75)):40-8. DOI: 10.31520/ei.2020.22.2(75).40-48.
  25. Atanelishvili T, Silagadze A, Silagadze L. Some economic problems of the post-soviet states after the global financial crisis. Bull Georgian Natl Acad Sci. 2020;14(3)149-154. http://science.org.ge/bnas/vol-14-3.html
  26. Borisov YuS, Korzhik VN, Gritskiv YaP, et al. Structural transformations occurring in flame-sprayed Ni60Nb40 alloy coatings during heating in the presence of oxygen. Sov Powder Metall Metal Ceram. 1987;26(12):966-970.
  27. Kerimkhulle S, Aitkozha Z, Saliyeva A, et al. Using Technical and Structural Coefficients of Economic Statistics to Equalize Flows of Input-Output Table. Lect Notes Networks Syst. 2023;596:501-511. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-21435-6_44
  28. Borisov YuS, Kunitskii YuA, Korzhik VN, et al. Structure and some physical properties of plasma-sprayed coatings of the nickel boride Ni3B. Sov Powder Metall Metal Ceram. 1986;25(12):966-969.
  29. Renna P, Ambrico M. Design and optimization of production lines. Basel: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. DOI: 10.3390/books978-3-03943-962-1.
  30. Danchuk V, Shlikhta H, Usova I, et al. Integrated project management systems as a tool for implementing company strategies. Periodicals Eng Nat Sci. 2021;9(4):259-276. DOI: 10.21533/pen.v9i4.2308
  31. Kerimkhulle S, Saliyeva A, Makhazhanova U, et al. The input-output analysis for the wholesale and retail trade industry of the Kazakhstan statistics. E3S Web of Conf. 2023;376:05023. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202337605023
  32. Ismayilov V, Mammadov S, Abbasova N, et al. The current state and prospects for further development in the energy sector in Australia: reforms, foreign economic relations, investment climate. Polityka Energetyczna. 2023;26(2):105-120. DOI: 10.33223/epj/163451
  33. Zarim ZA, Mohamad O, Rahman MS, et al. The Role of Organisational Commitment, Leadership Style, Strategic Human Resources Practices and Job Satisfaction Towards Sustainable Tourism Industry: Comparative Study in the UAE and Malaysia. In Leadership, Innovation and Entrepreneurship as Driving Forces of the Global Economy. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Atlantis: Springer Science and Business Media; 2017. P. 255-268. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-43434-6_21
  34. Kunitskii YuA, Bespalov YuA, Korzhik VN. Structural heterogeneities in amorphous materials from a Ni-Nb alloy. Sov Powder Metall Metal Ceram. 1988;27(10):763-767.
  35. Mishchenko V, Naumenkova S, Grytsenko A, et al. Operational risk management of using electronic and mobile money. Banks Bank Syst. 2022;17(3):142-157. DOI: 10.21511/bbs.17(3).2022.12
  36. Marti L, Puertas R. Analysis of European competitiveness based on its innovative capacity and digitalization level. Techol Soc. 2023;72:102206. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102206.
  37. Dovgal E, Makhova L. Development of the theory of innovations in the context of the new industrial revolution. J V.N. Karazin Kharkiv Nat Univ S Int Relat Econ Country Srud Tour. 2020;11:62-8. DOI: 10.26565/2310-9513-2020-11-07.
  38. Miethlich B. Vocational Rehabilitation in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: An Integrated Management Perspective on Potentials and Business Impact. In Vocational Rehabilitation in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: An Integrated Management Perspective on Potentials and Business Impact; 2022. P. 1-414. DOI: 10.30819/5572
  39. Baikin A, Shalbolova U, Kazbekova L. Regional diversification of entrepreneurial activity in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Espacios. 2017;38(46):35.
  40. Omurzakova A, Shalbolova U, Mukhanova G. Risk assessment of social public-private partnership projects. Publ Policy Adm. 2022;21(2):140-150. DOI: 10.13165/VPA-22-21-2-11
  41. Shalbolova U, Chikibayeva Z, Kenzhegaliyeva Z. Efficiency of investment projects to modernize facilities housing and communal services (case of Kazakhstan). IOP Conf Series: Earth Environ Sci. 2021;650(1):012075. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/650/1/012075
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua