Cultural and artistic practices in the perspective of education institutionalisation

Issue 55, 2024

Olena Pavlova, Olena Afonina, Iryna Vilchynska, Olena Khlystun, Lesia Smyrna

Received 10.12.2023, Revised 01.02.2024, Accepted 15.02.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.145mr7

Abstract

Relevance. The relevance of this study is conditioned by the dual standards of institutionalisation of artistic and educational practices, must meet the principles of creating cultural objects as material products of high culture and aesthetic level, but, at the same time, must meet the requirements of the time, standards and educational tendencies of its time. Thus, a conflict of artistic vision and the standards of accumulated artistic experience is formed, which must be resolved in a process of dialogue and permanent collaboration of the two practices: educational and artistic.

Purpose. The purpose is to investigate the basic vectors of the institutionalisation of educational and artistic practices, identifying priority ways of institutionalising both practices and the space for their interaction in scientific research.

Methodology. The main scientific methods for researching the topic are the basic general scientific theoretical methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, comparative to deduce the main regularities and characteristic features in the processes of institutionalisation of artistic practices, as well as systematisation and classification methods to form the structure of the main educational artistic strategies based on common and unique features.

Results. As a result of this study, a generalised system of the main processes of institutionalisation in the cultural sphere was created, the characteristic features of these processes were identified, and a comparative analysis of the research achievements with the existing positions of researchers in historiography was carried out. The results of the research prove the ambiguity of the perception of institutionalisation processes for culture, demonstrating the polarity of the positions of representatives of different areas of activity: education and the art.

Conclusions. The focus on the main trends in cultural and artistic education strategies allows solving the problem of the antagonism between the current educational standards and the creativity of cultural and artistic figures.

Keywords: institutionalisation; modernism; cultural-artistic educational practices; structurisation; individualisation

Suggested citation

Pavlova O, Afonina O, Vilchynska I, Khlystun O, Smyrna L. Cultural and artistic practices in the perspective of education institutionalisation. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):1457-1465. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.145mr7

Download article

References

  1. McLennan D. Is the institutionalisation of our arts a dead end? [Internet]. Diacritical: Arts Journal; 2017 [updated 2017 Feb. 17; cited 2024 Jan. 09]. Available from: https://www.artsjournal.com/diacritical/2017/02/is-the-institutionalization-of-our-arts-a-dead-end.html
  2. Faragher M, Krzakowski KZ. Rainey’s Institutions: Twenty years later. Modernism/modernity. 2020;5(2). DOI: 10.26597/mod.0155.
  3. Esola L, Nelson K. Modernism of art education theory. Transdisciplinary inquiry, practice, and possibilities in art education. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Libraries Open Publishing; 2019.
  4. Dushniy AI, Dutchak VG. Culture and arts in the educational process of the modernity. Lviv-Toruń: Liha-Pres; 2019.
  5. Wheatley LB. The impact of postmodernism on 21st century higher education. Virginia: Hollins University; 2021.
  6. Ruiz-Rivas T. De-institutionalising the new institutionalism [Internet]. Wrong Wrong; 2017 [updated 2017 Jun. 14; cited 2024 Jan. 09]. Available from: https://wrongwrong.net/article/de-institutionalizing-the-new-institutionalism
  7. Gano GM. The little art colony and US modernism. Edinburgh: University Press; 2020.
  8. Giuntini P. Becoming modern [Internet]. Khan Academy; 2015 [cited 2024 Jan. 09]. Available from: https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/becoming-modern/introduction-becoming-modern/becoming-modern1/a/becoming-modern
  9. Signorelli MA, Salingaros NA. The tyranny of artistic modernism [Internet]. New English Review; 2013 [updated 2013 Dec. 08; cited 2024 Jan. 09]. Available from: https://patterns.architexturez.net/doc/az-cf-177039
  10. Wolfe EAG. The challenge of a global modernism. Art J. 2019;78(3):133–7.
  11. Rodner V, Kerrigan F. From modernism to populism – art as a discursive mirror of the nation brand. Eur J Mark. 2018;52(3/4):882–906. DOI: 10.1108/EJM-12-2016-0707.
  12. Kalin N. (de)Fending art education through the pedagogical turn. J Soc Theory Art Educ. 2012;32:42–55.
  13. Babii N. Aesthetics of modernity at the turn of the century: Modern, postmodern, hypermodern, metamodern. Cult Arts Mod World. 2020;21:23–33. DOI: 10.31866/2410-1915.21.2020.207866.
  14. Zhou Y. A history of contemporary Chinese art. Berlin: Springer; 2020.
  15. Garnet D. Art, culture, and pedagogy. Leiden: Brill; 2019.
  16. Beech D. Institutionalisation for all. Art Monthly. 2006;294:7-10.
  17. Trentini B. Institutionalisation and autonomy of art. Can socially engaged art be institutionalised? Labyrinth Int J Philos. 2020;22(2):25–39.
  18. Kirchberg V, Marontate J. Institutionalisation in the arts: Lessons from the twentieth century. J Arts Manag Law Soc. 2004;33(4):259–62. DOI: 10.3200/JAML.33.4.259-262
  19. Tunbridge L, Borio G, Franklin P, Chowrimootoo C, Williams A. Round table: Modernism and its others. J R Music Assoc. 2014;139:177–204.
  20. Tynybaeva M, Tanirbergenova A, Aktanova A, Imangaziev A, Torebekova A. Incentive structures and their impact on the economic viability of academic and research institutions: a case-based methodological investigation. Econ Annals-XXI. 2023;202(45019):61–72. DOI: 10.21003/ea.V202-06.
  21. Rakauskienė OG, Petkevičiūtė – Stručko M. Determinants of logistics’performance: a new approach towards analysis of economic corridors and institutional quality impact. Insights Reg Develop. 2022;4(3):11-33. DOI: 10.9770/IRD.2022.4.3(1).
  22. Karpan' A. The contribution of higher education institutions of Cherkasy region in the development of the regional local lore movement in the 1920-1930. Soc, Doc, Commun. 2023;18:78-101. DOI: 10.31470/2518-7600-2023-18-78-101.
  23. Koshoeva BB, Chynybaev MK, Bakalova AT, Abdyldaeva AR. Business Process Designing of the Institutional Ranking System of Higher Education of the Kyrgyz Republic. Commun Comp Inform Sci. 2023;1733 CCIS:168–82. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-23744-7_13.
  24. Shcherban T, Terletska Y, Resler M, Ostapiuk N, Morhun A. Empathic Features of Conducting Negotiations in an Entrepreneurial Environment. Rev Econ Fin. 2022;20(1):406–16. DOI: 10.55365/1923.x2022.20.48.
  25. Makaliuk I. Diagnostics of transaction costs flow quality influence on economic results. Econ Annals-XXI. 2016;156(1-2):74–7.
  26. Dziubenko O. Involvement of High School Students of General Secondary Education Institutions in Environmental Projects: Theoretical and Methodological Approaches and Practical Implementation. Prof Educ: Methodol, Theory Technol. 2023;17:93-107. DOI: 10.31470/2415-3729-2023-17-93-107.
  27. Shahini S, Shahini E, Koni B, Shahini Z, Shahini E, Bërxolli A. Enhanced Tomato Yield via Bumblebee Pollination: A Case Study in Durres, Albania. Int J Design Nature Ecodyn. 2023;18(4):905–14. DOI: 10.18280/ijdne.180417.
  28. Shahini E, Shebanina O, Kormyshkin I, Drobitko A, Chernyavskaya N. Environmental consequences for the world of Russia’s war against Ukraine. Int J Environ Stud. 2024. DOI: 10.1080/00207233.2024.2302745.
  29. Shahini E, Myalkovsky R, Nebaba K, Ivanyshyn O, Liubytska D. Economic and biological characteristics and productivity analysis of sunflower hybrids. Sci Hor. 2023;26(8):83–95.
  30. Saprun S, Korniyenko S, Kuz Y, Mashtaler I. Theoretical and organizational basics of the integration of the football section in secondary educational institutions. Theory Pract Phys Cult Sports. 2023;3:103-9. DOI: 10.31470/2786-6424-1/2023-103-109.
  31. Volovyk LM. Formation of environmental competence in students of general secondary education institutions in the school course of geography. Scient Societ. 2023;1(3):166-72. DOI: 10.31470/2786-6327/2023/3/166-172.
  32. Miethlich B, Belotserkovich D, Abasova S, Zatsarinnaya Е, Veselitsky O. Transformation of Digital Management in Enterprises Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic. Inst Econ. 2022;14(1):1–26.
  33. Khaletsʹka L. Strategic directions, key initiatives and activities of the international federation of library associations and institutions (2019–2022). Soc, Doc, Commun. 2023;19:213-54. DOI: 10.31470/2518-7600-2023-19-213-254.
  34. Canaj K, Nimani A, Canaj B, Spahija D. Management and internationalization of research strategies in higher education institutions as a basis of economic well-being. Corp Busin Strat Rev. 2022;3(2 special issue):221–9. DOI: 10.22495/cbsrv3i2siart3.
  35. Sinaj Z, Kasemi R, Cenolli S. Human Resource Management in Public Administration: Study on the Performance Measurement and Emotional Intelligence in the Workplace in Albanian Public Institutions. Rev Econ Fin. 2022;20:845–50. DOI: 10.55365/1923.X2022.20.95.
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua