Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

ISSN 2415-8038 e-ISSN 2786-6688
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series "Physics"

  • Submit an article
  • Home
  • Articles & Issues
    • Current
    • All Issues
  • About
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Sources of Financing
  • For Authors
    • Submission
    • Terms of Publication
    • Formatting Guidelines
    • Peer Review Process
    • Article Processing Charges
    • License Agreement
  • Ethics & Policies
    • Publication Ethics
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Subscription Policy
    • Archiving
    • Complaints Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Corrections and Retractions
    • Anti-plagiarism Policy
    • Generative AI Policy
  • Search
  • Contacts

Comparative study on curriculum design of art education between China and Kyrgyzstan

Issue 55, 2024

Chunhuan Liu, Nurbubu Asipova, Bin Lu, Wei Wu

Received 13.10.2023, Revised 04.01.2024, Accepted 19.02.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.296ks9

Abstract

Relevance. The comparative analysis of art education curricula in China and Kyrgyzstan offers valuable insights for enhancing educational programs in both countries.

Purpose. This study aims to identify commonalities and significant differences in the approaches to shaping art education systems in China and Kyrgyzstan.

Methodology. A comparative analysis, induction, and deduction were employed to comprehensively examine the art education curricula in both countries and identify notable differences and common principles.

Results. The study reveals significant differences in curriculum development strategies. China’s centralized system with a rigidly structured curriculum is contrasted with Kyrgyzstan’s more flexible approach, allowing for individualized choices in topics and teaching methods. Cultural and historical aspects significantly influence curriculum development, with Kyrgyzstan emphasizing national artistic traditions and China supporting both traditional and contemporary art movements.

Conclusions. The differences in curriculum development strategies highlight the substantial impact of cultural and historical factors on art education in various countries. The study provides a valuable foundation for exchanging experiences and improving the quality of educational programs in both China and Kyrgyzstan.

Keywords: curriculum development strategies; educational standards; teaching methods; cultural influence; artistic skills

Suggested citation

Liu C, Asipova N, Lu B, Wu W. Comparative study on curriculum design of art education between China and Kyrgyzstan. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):2969-2977. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.296ks9

Download article

References

  1. Ysmayilov MZ, Mamazairov ML, Mamaraimov KD. History of the development of fine arts in the Osh Region. Bull Osh State Uni. 2022;2:207-213.
  2. Ibiraiym kyzy A, Akmatov DA, Dyishenaliev DS. Terms and conditions of modernization the content of subjects informatics, art, and music. News Kyrgyz Academ Educ. 2020;3:22-28.
  3. Muratbek K. Modern trends in Kyrgyz folk musical performing art. News Nation Academ Sci Kyrgyz Repub. 2022;1:130-135.
  4. Alimbekov A. Integration of scientific and folk pedagogy in the educational and methodological works of B. Apyshev. Bull Osh State Uni. 2022;4:137-146.
  5. Оmurzakova GA. Criteria and level of upbringing of junior schoolchildren in the field of interethnic culture. Bull Osh State Uni. 2023;1:87-96.
  6. Musakanova M. Competence relations teachers in education and training students in higher education institutions. News Uni Kyrgyzstan. 2019;3:143-147.
  7. Hu A, Ødegaard EE. Play and/or learning: Comparative analysis of dominant concepts in national curriculum guidelines for early childhood education in Norway, Finland, China, and Hong Kong. In: Annual Review of Comparative and International Education 2018 (International Perspectives on Education and Society, Vol. 37) (pp. 207-224). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited; 2019.
  8. Awgichew S, Ademe E. History education for nation-building in Ethiopia, Germany, Rwanda, South Africa, Switzerland, and USA: A comparative analysis. Cogent Educ. 2022;9(1):2113210.
  9. Qing W. Teaching method of folk music appreciation in the music appreciation course for international students in China. Art Perform Letter. 2021;2(7):110-113.
  10. Zhang J. Research on the cultural and tourism cooperation between Gansu province and Russian-speaking countries along the belt and road. In: 2020 International Conference on Language, Communication and Culture Studies (ICLCCS 2020) (pp. 173-179). London: Atlantis Press; 2021.
  11. Gupta A, Zhao X. Teachers’ work under responsibilising policies: an analysis of educators’ views on China’s 2021 educational reforms. Journal of Education Policy. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2023.2236067
  12. Du W, Maimaitiyiming Y, Nijat M, Li L, Hamdulla A, Wang D. Automatic speech recognition for Uyghur, Kazakh, and Kyrgyz: An overview. Appl Sci. 2022;13(1):326.
  13. Jodoi K. The correlations between parliamentary debate participation, communication competence, communication apprehension, argumentativeness, and willingness to communicate in a Japanese context. Argument. 2023;37(1):91-118.
  14. Jiang Q, Horta H, Yuen M. International medical students’ perspectives on factors affecting their academic success in China: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):574.
  15. Long KA, O'Connell C. Public discourse and public policy on foreign interference in higher education. J Comp Int High Educ. 2022;14(5):15-42.
  16. Lee Y. Examining the impact of steam education reform on teachers’ perceptions about steam in Uzbekistan. Asia-Pacific Sci Educ. 2021;7(1):34-63.
  17. Longhurst K, Nitza-Makowska A, Skiert-Andrzejuk K. Re-thinking soft power: China, Russia and the European Union in Central Asia. Spraw Międzynarod. 2019;72(3):151-169.
  18. Benavot A, Lee WO, Takahashi K, Subbaswamy S, Gong Y, Massara G, Sedhai K, Kim Y. Feasibility study on monitoring global citizenship competence in the Asia-Pacific Region. Seoul: The Asia-Pacific Centre of Education for International Understanding under the auspices of UNESCO; 2022.
  19. Manoharan AP, Viswanath S, Sabharwal M. Public administration pedagogy in India. J Pub Affair Educ. 2020;26(3):291-312.
  20. Assanova S, Serikuly A, Abikenov A. A comparative analysis of the mediation in Kazakhstan and states of Victoria and New South Wales’. Austral Disput Resolut J Update. 2019;29(4):289-301.
Make a Submission

Indexing

  • Scopus logo
  • WorldCat logo
  • OpenAIRE logo
  • Crossref logo
  • VNLU logo
  • Professional publications of Ukraine logo
  • BASE logo
  • Google Scholar logo

info@physics.uz.ua