Assessment of the university entrepreneurial potential (comparative analysis)

Issue 55, 2024

Dilnara Zakirova, Gulzhan Yerubayeva, Assel Sissenova, Dardana Dadabayeva, Akmaral Ualzhanova

Received 29.11.2023, Revised 26.02.2024, Accepted 18.03.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.113vt4

Abstract

Relevance. The relevance of the study is due to the need to conduct a comparative analysis of the Kazakhstan’s universities with entrepreneurial universities from the leading countries of the world in order to assess their entrepreneurial potential.

Purpose. This article is aimed at identifying the universal criteria that define the concept of entrepreneurial university, with the help of which it is possible to assess how a university corresponds to the definition of entrepreneurial university, as well as to make assessment of the universities’ entrepreneurial potential.

Methodology. The method of analyzing economic processes is the leading approach to the study of this problem, which allows considering in details the significant events and trends in the economic and social development of countries that has occurred as a result of implementation of the idea of entrepreneurial universities. In addition, the following research methods were used: online questioning of experts, comparative analysis, work with sources, system analysis, logical analysis, methods of synthesis and deduction.

Results. In this article, there are the results of the study: it has been identified the universal criteria that define the concept of entrepreneurial university, with the help of which it is possible to assess how a university meets this definition; it has been conducted an online survey of experts to assess the compliance of universities in Kazakhstan, the USA, Germany and India with the criteria of entrepreneurial university; it has been carried out a comparative analysis of entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial universities of these countries based on the data identified during the analysis; it has been given the general recommendations on the formation and development of entrepreneurial university.

Conclusions. The materials of this article are valuable for science, as they contain recommendations for the formation and development of entrepreneurial university, based on the experience of the leading countries in this field, and in addition, it has been described the universal criteria for entrepreneurial university that will help in determining its entrepreneurial potential.

Keywords: knowledge economy; triple helix; HEInnovate; questioning of experts; promotion and development of entrepreneurship

Suggested citation

Zakirova D, Yerubayeva G, Sissenova A, Dadabayeva D, Ualzhanova A. Assessment of the university entrepreneurial potential (comparative analysis). Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):1134-1143. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.113vt4

Download article

References

  1. Harris S. Building an entrepreneurial Caribbean university library: practice, possibilities, and lessons; 2022. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/09557490221103034.
  2. Etzkowitz H. Entrepreneurial university icon: Stanford and Silicon Valley as innovation and natural ecosystem. Indust High Educ. 2022;36(4):361-380.
  3. Metcalf L, Katona T, York J. University Startup Accelerators: Startup Launchpads or Vehicles for Entrepreneurial Learning? Entrep Educ Ped. 2021;4(4):666-701.
  4. Link A, Sarala R. Advancing conceptualisation of university entrepreneurial ecosystems: The role of knowledge-intensive entrepreneurial firms. Int Small Business J. 2019;37(3):289-310.
  5. Osmani M, El-Haddadeh R, Hindi NM, Weerakkody V. The influence of creativity on the entrepreneurial intention of university female graduates: An SEM approach. Indust High Educ. 2022;36(5):556-567.
  6. Gyr U, Oylumlu I, Kunday O. Critical assessment of entrepreneurial and innovative universities index of Turkey: Future directions. Techn Forecast Social Chang. 2017;123:161-168.
  7. Cheng Y, Liu Y, Fan W, Yan Z, Ye X. Triple helix on globalization: A case study of the China International Nanotech Innovation Cluster. Info Develop. 2019;35(2):272-289.
  8. Mascarenhas C, Marques C, Ferreira J. One for All and All for One: Collaboration and Cooperation in Triple Helix Knowledge Cocreation. Int Region Sci Rev. 2020;43(4):316-343.
  9. Ramos Salazar L, Zhang Y, Huntington H, Khandelwal P, Joshi P. Examining Online MBA Students’ Social Presence and Career Planning Self-Confidence. Business Prof Commun Quart. 2022;85(3):319-348.
  10. Dimitropoulou A. World’s Most Entrepreneurial Countries; 2021. https://ceoworld.biz/2021/01/03/worlds-most-entrepreneurial-countries-2021/.
  11. Frequently asked questions about small businesses. 2021.https://cdn.advocacy.sba.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/06095731/Small-Business-FAQ-Revised-December-2021.pdf.
  12. Study Entrepreneurship in Germany: 39 Universities with 58 English Degree Programs. 2022. https://www.mygermanuniversity.com/subjects/entrepreneurship.
  13. Germany Announces €2 Billion Startup “Booster” to Combat Coronavirus Impact. 2020. https://www.gtai.de/en/meta/press/germany-announces-2billion-startup-booster-to-combat-coronavirus-236004.
  14. Diessner S, Durazzi N, Hope D. Skill-Biased Liberalization: Germany’s Transition to the Knowledge Economy. Polit Societ. 2022;50(1):117-155.
  15. Srikanth M, Kumar GN, Reddy WR. Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Development: An Indian Experience. Small Enterp Develop, Manag Exten J. 2020;47(3):279-292.
  16. Satpayeva Z. State and Prospects of Development of Kazakhstan Innovative Infrastructure. Euro Res Stud J. 2017;20(2B):123-148.
  17. Satubaldina A. Share of SMEs in Kazakhstan’s GDP Reaches 32 Percent; 2021. https://goo.su/CPtLc.
  18. McMullen JS, Brownell KM, Adams J. What Makes an Entrepreneurship Study Entrepreneurial? Toward A Unified Theory of Entrepreneurial Agency. Entrep Theor Pract. 2021;45(5):1197-1238.
  19. Eesley C, Miller W. Impact: Stanford University’s Economic Impact via Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Found Trend Entrep. 2018;14(2):130-278.
  20. Lahikainen K, Kolhinen J, Ruskovaata E, Pihkala T. Challenges to the development of an entrepreneurial university ecosystem: The case of a Finnish university campus. Indust High Educ. 2019;33(2):96-107.
  21. Bazan C, Shaikh A, Gillespie K, Rushat T, Yap S, Finn C. Effect of the university’s entrepreneurial orientation on the academic’s entrepreneurial propensity; 2022. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/09504222221115954.
  22. Allahar H, Sookram R. Emergence of university-centred entrepreneurial ecosystems in the Caribbean. Indust High Educ. 2019;33(4):246-259.
  23. Sanadgol S, Dadfar M. Students’ evaluation of entrepreneurial university activities: A case from the Iran University of Medical Sciences. Indust High Educ. 2020;34(6):446-450.
  24. Biswas A, Verma RK. Attitude and Alertness in Personality Traits: A Pathway to Building Entrepreneurial Intentions among University Students. J Entrep. 2021;30(2):367-396.
  25. Brekke T. Challenges and opportunities of building an entrepreneurial discovery process through university-industry interaction: A Norwegian case study. Indust High Educ. 2021;35(6):667-678.
  26. Ismayilov V, Safarov G, Sadigova S, Asadov Z, Muradova S. Technology of production and primary processing of milk in farm conditions. Sci Hor. 2023;26(10):138–149.
  27. Kerimkhulle S, Saliyeva A, Makhazhanova U, Kerimkulov Z, Adalbek A, Taberkhan R. The estimate of innovative development of construction industry in the Kazakhstan. E3S Web Conf. 2023;389:06004.
  28. Kerimkhulle S, Mukhanova A, Kantureyeva M, Koishybaeva M, Azieva G. Applying a housing construction model to improve a small town demographic dynamics. AIP Conf Proceed. 2023;2700:040047.
  29. Salah J, Darus M. A note on generalized Mittag-Leffler function and applications. Far East J Math Sci. 2011;48(1):33–46.
  30. Salah JY. Properties of the modified caputo's derivative operator for certain analytic functions. Int J Pure Appl Math. 2016;109(3):665–671.
  31. Khodakivska O, Kobets S, Bachkir I, Martynova L, Klochan V, Klochan I, Hnatenko I. Sustainable development of regions: Modeling the management of economic security of innovative entrepreneurship. Int J Adv Appl Sci. 2022;9(3):31-38.
  32. Shtal TV, Staverska TO, Svitlichna VYU, Kravtsova SV, Kraynyuk LN, Pokolodna MM. Digitalization as a tool for ensuring innovative development of restaurant business. Estud Econ Aplic. 2021;39(5). https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i5.4898
  33. Kerimkhulle S, Koishybayeva M, Alimova Z, Baizakov N, Azieva G. Created and Realization of a Demographic Population Model for a Small City. Proceed Engin Sci. 2023;5(3). https://doi.org/10.24874/PES05.03.003.
  34. Salah J, Al Hashmi M, Rehman HU, Al Mashrafi K. Modified Mathematical Models in Biology by the Means of Caputo Derivative of a Function with Respect to Another Exponential Function. Math Statist. 2022;10(6):1194–1205.
  35. Rehman HU, Darus M, Salah J. Graphing examples of starlike and convex functions of order β. Appl Math Inform Sci. 2018;12(3):509–515.
  36. Abbasova Agamamed S, Asgarova Alinazim F, Aliyeva Shaban M, Hamidova Adil L, Qushkhani Nasir R, Rzayeva Yusif L. Problems and prospects in developing the auditing system in Azerbaijan. Univers Socied. 2023;15(2):550–561.
  37. Abbasova S, Aliyeva M, Huseynova L. Accounting information transparency and business performance: A case of G7 construction companies. Probl Perspect Manag. 2022;20(4):518–531.
  38. Makedon V, Dzeveluk A, Khaustova Y, Bieliakova O, Nazarenko I. Enterprise multi-level energy efficiency management system development. Int J Energy, Environ Econ. 2021;29(1):73–91.
  39. Kerimkhulle S, Azieva G, Saliyeva A, Mukhanova A. Estimation of the volume of production of turbine vapor of a fuel boiler with stochastic exogenous factors. E3S Web Conf. 2022;339:02006.
  40. Tkachenko A, Levchenko N, Pozhuieva T, Sevastyanov R, Levchenko S. Modified assessment methodology ESG competitiveness of enterprises to a new generation of investors. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 2023;1254(1):012126.
  41. Tkachenko A, Levchenko N, Shyshkanova G, Shvets V, Ivanova M. Evaluation of the efficiency of social investments of metallurgical enterprises according to the decoupling approach. Nauk Visn Nats Hirnych Univer. 2021;2021(5):147–153.
  42. Salah J, Rehman HU, Buwaiqi IA. Inclusion results of a generalized mittag-leffler-type poisson distribution in the k-uniformly janowski starlike and the k-janowski convex functions. Math Statist. 2023;11(1):22–27.
  43. Maraj A, Jakupi, G, Rogova E, Grajqevci X. Testing of network security systems through DoS attacks. In: 2017 6th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing, MECO 2017 - Including ECYPS 2017, Proceedings (article number 7977239). Bar: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2017.
  44. Niyazbekova S, Zverkova A, Sokolinskaya N, Kerimkhulle S. Features of the «Green» strategies for the development of banks. E3S Web Conf. 2023;402:08029.
  45. Ziberi B, Alili MZ. Economic Growth in the Western Balkans: A Panel Analysis. South East Eur J Econ Busin. 2021;16(2):68-81.
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua