Analysis of the American directors’ works in the context of the European theory of auteur cinema

Issue 55, 2024

Iryna Gavran, Serhii Honcharuk, Volodymyr Mykhalov, Halyna Kot, Artem Parokonnyi

Received 22.11.2023, Revised 18.01.2024, Accepted 14.02.2024

https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/55.2024.143ge9

Abstract

Relevance. The relevance of this study is determined by the trends in the development of New Hollywood, which have radically changed the essence of modern cinematograph.

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to identify the specifics of New Hollywood cinema, which resonated in the work of modern Hollywood directors as an influential and competitive area. Examples from films by American directors and authors were analysed.

Methodology. Methods of scientific analysis, comparison, and generalisation were used in the study of the topic. In addition, analytical and systematic methods were applied in their unity, which is necessary for studying the art history aspect of the problem, working on the historical and factual base and clarifying the terminology of research. Using the method of introspection, the paper investigated and systematised the problems of director's self-fulfilment, which contributed to the awareness of the specifics of the theory and practice of author's cinema parity.

Results. Based on the results of the study, conclusions were drawn about the specifics of creating author's models of modern cinema under the influence of the canons of New Hollywood author's independent cinematograph.

Conclusions. It was established that the determination of factors of professionalism creates psychological models of professional activity and professional self-consciousness of the individual. The practical significance of the study consists in expanding the arsenal of knowledge about the specifics of the author in cinema and, in particular, the author's cinema of New Hollywood and makes it possible to use them in training courses on the theory and history of cinema and directing.

Keywords: director-author; author's self-expression; independent cinema; American cinematic art; mass and elite audience; avant-garde

Suggested citation

Gavran I, Honcharuk S, Mykhalov V, Kot H, Parokonnyi A. Analysis of the American directors’ works in the context of the European theory of auteur cinema. Sci Herald Uzhhorod Univ Ser Phys. 2024;(55):1439-1448. DOI: 10.54919/physics/55.2024.143ge9

Download article

References

  1. Trinder S. Questions of space in contemporary Hollywood. Cinema Open Cult Stud. 2020;4(1):11–4. DOI: 10.1515/culture-2020-0001.
  2. Berliner T. Hollywood aesthetic: Pleasure in american cinema a reply to critics. Projections. 2020;14(2):90–101. DOI: 10:3167/proj.2020.140209.
  3. Curnutt K, editor. American Literature in Transition, 1970-1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2018. Cerasulo T. “Do the hustle”: Showmanship, publicity, and the changing landscape of literary authority, p. 237–240. DOI: 10.1017/9781316584484.
  4. Trotter D. Come-hither looks: the Hollywood vamp and the function of cinema. Crit Q. 2020;62(2):37–9. DOI: 10.1111/criq.12556.
  5. Riabov O. The red machine: The dehumanization of the communist enemy in American cold war cinema. Quaestio Rossica. 2020;8(2):536–50. DOI: 10.15826/qr.2020.2.479.
  6. Clogher P. Moving texts: A hermeneutics of the Gospel according to Hollywood. Harv Theol Rev. 2018;111(3):399–400. DOI: 10.1017/S0017816018000160.
  7. Ann Wells S. Media laboratories: Late modernist authorship in South America media laboratories. New York: Late Modernist Authorship in South America; 2018.
  8. Bartosiewicz A, Orankiewicz A. The impact of Hollywood majors on the local film industry. The case of Poland. Creat Ind J. 2020;13(3):289–90. DOI: 10.1080/17510694.2020.1736452.
  9. Berliner T. Hollywood aesthetic precis. Projections. 2020;14(2):48–51. DOI: 10:3167/proj.2020.140204.
  10. Bettinson G. Film theory. Year's Work Crit Cult Theory. 2019;27(1):160–2. DOI: 10.1093/ywcct/mbx001.
  11. Ghourchi M, Mosaviyan S. The role of hollywood cinema in geopolitical representation of the middle east. Geopolit Q. 2021;16(4):10–2.
  12. Kanjere A. You and we’re the same: Men and women outside the romance pact. Can J Film Stud. 2021;29(2):75–7. DOI: 10.3138/cjfs-2019-0020.
  13. Tronchin L, Scaroni N. Cinema sound: Characteristics and 3D acoustic measurements. J Phys Conf Ser. 2020;1655(1):012079. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1655/1/012079.
  14. Sarasola MD. Hollywood, an american factory of international soft law and social order. Int J Semiot Law. 2021;34(1), 28–31. DOI: 10.1007/s11196-020-09757-y.
  15. Yao J, Poague L. Defining the almost undefinable Susan Sontag: An interview with Leland Poague. Foreign Lit Stud. 2021;43(1):17–9.
  16. Mittal R, Sinha P. TVR cinemas: film prioritization and negotiation during crisis. Emerald Emerg Markets Case Stud. 2020;11(1):1–5. DOI: 10.1108/EEMCS-06-2020-0242.
  17. Rich PB. Hollywood and cinematic representations of far-right domestic terrorism in the U.S. Stud Conflict Terrorism. 2020;43(2):178–82. DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2018.1446295.
  18. Pérez JMG. On classical Hollywood cinema: Beyond the clash between style and canon. Atalante. 2019;27:119–21.
  19. Laugier S. Film as moral education. J Philos Educ. 2021;55(1):263–4. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9752.12551.
  20. Rossi J. French film music scoring in the thirties: a stylistic tripartition. French Screen Stud. 2020;20(3-4):193–6. DOI: 10.1080/14715880.2019.1697129.
  21. Chernozub A, Korobeynikov G, Mytskan B, Korobeinikova L, Cynarski WJ. Modelling mixed martial arts power training needs depending on the predominance of the strike or Wrestling fighting style. Ido Movem Cult. 2018;18(3):28–36. DOI: 10.14589/ido.18.3.5.
  22. Kongyratbay T, Kongyratbay K. Hermeneutical aspects of kazakh heroic epic study. Mid East J Sci Res. 2013;18(9):1330–4. DOI: 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.18.9.12373.
  23. Kadyraliyeva A, Zholdubaeva A, Mukhanbet A, Omirbekova A, Saparova Y, Daribaeva R. Multiculturalism in Kazakhstan. Utop Prax Latinoameric. 2019;24(Extra5):208–17.
  24. Kondratenko Y, Gerasin O, Topalov A. A simulation model for robot's slip displacement sensors. Int J Comp. 2016;15(4):224–36.
  25. Kondratenko YP, Kozlov OV, Gerasin OS, Zaporozhets YM. Synthesis and research of neuro-fuzzy observer of clamping force for mobile robot automatic control system. Proceed 2016 IEEE 1st Int Conf Data Stream Min Process DSMP 2016. 2016;1:90–5. DOI: 10.1109/DSMP.2016.7583514.
  26. Mykhailovych HI. The role of propaganda in the formation of personal semantic constructs. Insight. 2022;8:24–38. DOI: 10.32999/2663-970X/2022-8-3.
  27. Gryglewski P, Ivashko Y, Chernyshev D, Chang P, Dmytrenko A. Art as a message realized through various means of artistic expression. Art Inquiry. 2020;22:57-88. DOI: 10.26485/AI/2020/22/4.
  28. Najjar L, Baskaya FAT. Drone-based SVP utilization for revitalizing under-valued public open spaces: Case of Istanbul. Disegnarecon. 2022;15(29). DOI: 10.20365/disegnarecon.29.2022.17.
  29. Aizstrauta D, Ginters E. Integrated acceptance and sustainability assessment model transformations into executable system dynamics model. Proced Comp Sci. 2015;77:92-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.364.
  30. Gozhyj A, Kalinina I, Gozhyj V, Vysotska V. Web service interaction modeling with colored petri nets. Proceed 2019 10th IEEE Int Conf Intell Data Acquis Adv Comp Syst: Technol Appl IDAACS 2019. 2019;1:319–23. DOI: 10.1109/IDAACS.2019.8924400.
  31. Gomolka Z, Dudek-Dyduch E, Kondratenko YP. From homogeneous network to neural nets with fractional derivative mechanism. Lect Notes Comp Sci. 2017;10245 LNAI:52–63. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59063-9_5.
  32. Tabeikyna EK, Kamalova GT, Hasanov EL, Dzhumagaliyeva KV, Demeuova NK. The place of intelligentsia in socio-economic development of society: The creative perspective. Creat Stud. 2021;14(1):235–50. DOI: 10.3846/cs.2021.13639.
  33. Petryshyn OV, Hyliaka OS. Human rights in the digital age: Challenges, threats and prospects. J Nat Acad Leg Sci Ukraine. 2021;28(1):15-23.
  34. Borysova VI, Ivanova KY, Iurevych IV, Ovcharenko OM. Judicial protection of civil rights in Ukraine: National experience through the prism of European standards. J Adv Res Law Econ. 2019;10(1):66-84.
  35. Nazemi K, Burkhardt D, Ginters E, Kohlhammer J. Semantics visualization – definition, approaches and challenges. Proced Comp Sci. 2015;75:75-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.216.
  36. Privalko VP, Dinzhos RV, Privalko EG. Enthalpy relaxation in the cooling/heating cycles of polypropylene/ organosilica nanocomposites I: Non-isothermal crystallization. Thermochim Acta. 2005;432(1):76–82. DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2004.09.023.
  37. Naisbayeva AK, Massalimova AR, Zholdubayeva AK. Modern advertising practice: Gender images and stereotypes generation. Rupkatha J Interdisc Stud Human. 2018;10(2):118–28. DOI: 10.21659/rupkatha.v10n2.12.
  38. Najjar L, Baskaya FAT. Spatial Video Projection as a Digital DIY Paradigm for Under-valued Public Open Spaces Revitalization. Street Art Urban Creat. 2022;8(2):112–9.
  39. Najjar L, Baskaya FAT. Spatial video projection and public open spaces: a distinct bibliometric study approach. Spatium. 2023;49:30–41. DOI: 10.2298/SPAT230120007N.
Make a Submission

Indexing

info@physics.uz.ua